Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - chloead505

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 26
31
TMZ Articles / Re: MJ's Kids -- Murray Couldn't Have Killed Our Dad
« on: February 20, 2011, 07:31:12 AM »
Quote from: "Sinderella"
I can't even cope with this LMAO.

I need another cup of tea before I get stuck into a proper in-depth thought/reply session over this article/development.

Quote from: "chloead505"
Haha..they're spoon-feeding the hoax to the public.

First stage: Murray couldn't have killed our Dad.
Second stage: Nobody could have killed our Dad.
Third, and last stage: If nobody killed the Dad...the Dad is ALIVE.

Where's Dad? Dad...Daddy...MJ... :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

This made my day!

HAHAHAHAHAAHA You know it's true :P


Also,just like to say TMZ is not the gospel by any stretch of the imagination,however..as we know,the worlds media seem to believe that they have 100% reliable sources and copy and paste them on a regular basis,so this story will circulate like all those before it,therefore transmitting the idea to the general public that if the kids are saying he never killed him(when they were there and it was said in the prelim they saw Michael not breathing,naked,etc),there is a song in the charts called 'Michael Jackson is not dead',the lawyer is compromising the trial and there is a possible delay on the way etc etc, things will start adding up slowly.
I think now is a good time to believe more than ever.
This trial is slowly going down the drain one drip at a time.

right,brb my brain requires caffine.


May I have one as well please? Although the good laugh I've had over this actually woke me up LMAO

32
TMZ Articles / Re: MJ's Kids -- Murray Couldn't Have Killed Our Dad
« on: February 20, 2011, 07:28:19 AM »
Quote from: "Billie J"
I have got the feeling. Grace is not trustworthy.

Well if she really spoke to the LAPD investigators about this..you'd expect the interview to have been recorded or protocoled or whatever. This would also need to be brought up during the trial with Murray - based on Grace's testimony. Murray's legal team would certainly try to get Grace on their side cus this would help the defence MUCH more than the funny story about MJ being a druggie and injecting himself a shot of propofol and other fairy tales.

It's just so ridiculous how the defence always comes up with something so absurd!! Instead of actually focusing on things that could POSSIBLY help Murray. I mean why don't they try to obtain a professional feedback on Murray - from his colleagues, former professors, medical institution...anyone CREDIBLE, for chrissake!? Well cus they're busy looking for 1,5 year old syringes that were found on an unsealed crime scene. Gimme a break.

Oh, but the prosecution team isnt staying behind...their recent story about Murray's new lawyer having a personal conflict is a hoax in itself.

 :roll:  We shall see...

33
TMZ Articles / Re: MJ's Kids -- Murray Couldn't Have Killed Our Dad
« on: February 20, 2011, 07:04:51 AM »
Haha..they're spoon-feeding the hoax to the public.

First stage: Murray couldn't have killed our Dad.
Second stage: Nobody could have killed our Dad.
Third, and last stage: If nobody killed the Dad...the Dad is ALIVE.

Where's Dad? Dad...Daddy...MJ... :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

This made my day!

34
Dave Dave / Re: Dave Dave came back!
« on: February 19, 2011, 03:38:41 PM »
Oh, haha...indeed!

Well for me the LKL Dave Dave just SEALED IT.  :lol:

It's absolutely undeniable. Even a blind and deaf person must see and hear it!

35
Other Odd Things / Re: The Return of the Moonwalker
« on: February 19, 2011, 11:49:33 AM »
Very strange...

Did you notice the eye and the pyramid? It's too obvious to be a random image.

36
This is VERY FUNNY! How can he possibly have a conflict of interest?! If he has one, that's just his persnal issue or that of Murray, but NOT of the counterparty - they cant object to that, only way they could is if G. was gonna TRY/hear the case as a judge- THAT is a conflict. Either this is a scam or it's a funny strategy of the prosecution team, although I have no idea what they're tryin to achieve.I expect the judge to dismiss it within 10mins of filing.If not, I shall go back to law school LOL. If there's any US lawyer on here Id like to hear their opinion.

37
Random MJ Talk / Re: A united front against YouTube-New Mission,are you in?
« on: February 14, 2011, 05:26:25 PM »
Quote from: "Sinderella"
Only question that should be asked regarding that book-
Why have the family/estate not filed for it to be stopped legally?
Instead of flying off all over the world and have the media reporting him to be a bad father and husband,why doesn't Jermaine put time and effort into protecting Michael/his legacy and his children from this trash and lets be honest-blatent lies and slander.
KJ should be furious,as should ALL Jacksons.
I think they need to take some lessons from Michael's fans in how to unite and stand up for justice.

This infuriates me to the point of almost having no words....almost.

It's the same story as with the Discovery channel and its planned MJ autopsy. God knows if the Jacksons/Estate would of objected hadnt the fans protested on such massive scale. Makes you go hmmm.
Btw I hope nothing will ever make you lose words!! xox

38
General Hoax Talk / Re: Feb 7th Arguments for televised trial proceedings
« on: February 05, 2011, 07:28:21 PM »
@hesouttamylife
Great article. Id love to have a lawyer-to-lawyer discussion with this guy about the MJ case. I want to know what's his perception of the insanity thats been going on till now.

39
Random MJ Talk / Re: A united front against YouTube-New Mission,are you in?
« on: February 05, 2011, 07:14:55 PM »
Quote from: "whatyourheartsays"
Quote from: "chloead505"
HAHAHAHAHA!
And I thought I was gonna sleep now..haha.

Go to bed !  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

I am in bed :D
But this is too funny! I can see Sind and her spiked boots HAHAHA!

40
Random MJ Talk / Re: A united front against YouTube-New Mission,are you in?
« on: February 05, 2011, 07:03:36 PM »
HAHAHAHAHA!
And I thought I was gonna sleep now..haha.

41
Others / Re: Telegraph-"Usher's personality lost to MJ"
« on: February 05, 2011, 05:31:39 PM »
Quote from: "PeaceLoveHappiness"
Usher's "performance" at the Memorial really turned me off.  His performance seemed so fake to me; I couldn't wait for him to stop singing.  And then when he touched the coffin, I remember thinking 'Oh Please'!  I didn't think Michael was even in the coffin (I still thought he was really dead at this time, although the Memorial was the first thing that made me truly wonder).  Anyway, I don't mean to bash Usher and I do think he has talent (I also recently saw him in a movie and thought he acted well too), but I still can't shake that performance, even though it's been a year and a half.  He needs to stop trying to be Michael and be his own self already.  You would think these younger artists would have learned to be themselves from Michael, someone who truly was himself.

Touching the coffin was too much...a cliche in the worst imaginable form. But I didnt know he's SO lame...

42
The Coroner and Autopsy Report / Re: Question about Autopsy Report
« on: February 05, 2011, 05:28:39 PM »
Quote from: "~Souza~"
Quote from: "chloead505"
We're running in circles here. But all of these things have a common feature: ABSURDITY
That is the best word for it :lol:

 :lol: It's my favourite word in connection with the hoax. I think hoaxers should be called "the Messengers of Absurdity"  :lol:

Welcome to ABSURDISTAN  :lol:

43
The Coroner and Autopsy Report / Re: Question about Autopsy Report
« on: February 05, 2011, 05:19:41 PM »
Quote from: "MJhasSpoken"
I think when Murray was doing CPR it crushed MJ's ribs because he was doing CPR on the bed.

In fact THAT is weird because you usually crash the ribs when doing CRP on a hard surface. Doing it on bed (soft surface) is not effective, precisely because the force of the presses is weakend due to the soft surface which allows the body to sink and thus absorbs the force. It's not making much sense. Also if I remember correctly, the prelim revealed that at some stage MJ was lying naked on the floor with Murray kneeling beside him and moaning "does anyone know how to do CPR" - cardiologist doesnt know that, right.
We're running in circles here. But all of these things have a common feature: ABSURDITY

44
Others / Re: Telegraph-"Usher's personality lost to MJ"
« on: February 05, 2011, 04:58:24 PM »
This is just so sad, sick and sorry, but disgusting. I wanted to remember Usher singing Gone to soon at the memorial. Now I just cant help it but FAKE is the only word that comes to mind now...

Someone should do Usher the favor and tell him this is the beginning of an end....

45
Other Odd Things / Re: Michael Jackson's Inner Circle Addresses Rumors
« on: February 04, 2011, 06:52:08 PM »
Quote from: "Sinderella"
I just wrote a post on this....

Quote
Re: Teddy Riley - @TeddyRiley1

DancingTheDream wrote:Michael Bush also said he dressed Michael in his coffin... so its not just Karen Faye... :?

Sinderella wrote:There are many posts and threads on this topic already in existence on the forum.
It is not protocol for family/friends/personal assistants or make up artists to do make up on a body waiting for burial.
My cousin was killed a few weeks after June 25th,when I look at Michael's death from the start to now,I compare it with his death.Whether you are a multi millionaire super star or not,the autopsy,tests,prep for burial/funeral are the same.
The coroners have their own specialised make up artists who are trained to work on corpses.You have to have specialised training and in some cases a degree.
Working on a dead body is not the same as a live one,they are decomposing,if they have been in accidents they will have injuries,autopsy scars,parts missing...etc.
For those reasons and for mental health also,you have to be trained to work on them.
They use specialist make up and fillers-my cousin had to have some of his face filled in because of his injuries so my aunt could see him before the funeral.They worked on him for 24hours to get him to a decent looking state so she would see him looking like he was-kinda.
How could a grieving relative or friend work on someone they love dearly,when their lifeless,cold...it is NOT allowed.
In an article I read not long after it said they did tests in the autopsy on Michael's brain and it was removed and some taken for tests,then given back to the body before he was put in FL.....there is NO WAY IN HELL they would let LaToya his sister who is supposed to be mourning his death,Karen fucking Faye or Michael Bush in to do make upon Michael OR dress him and let them see him with half his head missing/sown back up and the usual Y cut from the autopsy.
No family member or friend of a dead human being is allowed to just waltz in and get their maybelline out.

It's just an absurd claim to make,and so as I said complete and utter BS.

I know, love. Confirming what I'd said before.

And fordtocar is backing it up :-)

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 26
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal