This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - m8ighty
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
16
« on: January 05, 2011, 04:39:11 PM »
Here you go: Michael Jackson Wanted to Clone Himself ![]() Michael Jackson wanted to build a clone of himself. The ‘Thriller’ star, who died of acute Propofol intoxication aged 50 in June, underwent several three dimensional scans in 1996 so a virtual reality ‘robotic’ twin could be produced. It is thought the scans could now be used to bring the singer back in pop videos, computer games or even films. The anonymous US businessman who owned the images and has reportedly been trying to sell them for $1 million told Britain’s Daily Star newspaper, “The data has been in our archives since he had the scans. The thing about this data is it immortalized him at the age of 37, before his nose was disfigured and when he was in the prime of his life.” Meanwhile, it has been revealed Michael’s funeral was nearly canceled at the last minute in a row over its cost. Around $1 million was estimated to have been spent on the funeral, which took place on September 3. Court papers have revealed just three days before the funeral was scheduled to take place, lawyers acting for the ‘Billie Jean’ star’s mother Katherine had filed a request to the administrators of his estate to pay for the funeral bills. The lawyers stated that if the funeral home and local police department’s bills were not paid by the next day, the burial would not go ahead as planned. Administrators were luckily able to pay the bills in time, preventing any delays to the ceremony. Katherine’s lawyers admitted the cost of the funeral was high, but added it was, “Entirely commensurate with the decedent’s worldwide status as an entertainer and the world’s grief over his death.”
17
« on: January 05, 2011, 12:12:05 PM »
Is it normal for a court of law to draw from a lottery so that fans can sit in on the performance, uhh... i mean court hearing. Idk that just seems out of the ordinary to me... it all just seems so set up to me. Like when they where doing a lottery for tickets for the memorial....?....
18
« on: January 04, 2011, 09:37:40 PM »
Today during the tmz live stream, while i was recording i notice an ambulance pass by with its sirens on. I thought wouldnt it be exciting if it happened to be the same ambulance that came and got MJ. Well.....It wasnt, but it got me thinking. So i decided to look up the Numbers from the ambulances to find their meaning or the numerology behind them:
The ambulance from MJ's House had the number 71:
1) Bible verse Ecclesiastes 7:1
Wisdom 7 1
A good name is better than fine perfume, and the day of death better than the day of birth.
2) It is at the age of 71 years old that the Greek philosopher Socrates died.
3)71 also stands for "approved absence" in the United States Office of Personnel Management. (Thanks for the info ignisaeternus)
and for the live stream ambulance the number was 804
1) verse 80:4
O Lord God of hosts, How long will You be angry Against the prayer of Your people?
2)Definition of Double Patenting
and thats all i found for 804
Just thought id share, thank you
19
« on: January 04, 2011, 05:26:55 PM »
wow after looking for the ambulance number in the live stream and comparing it to the ambulance from MJ's House i decided to look them up as bible verses
The ambulance from MJ's House had the number 71
Ecclesiastes 7:1
Wisdom 7 1
A good name is better than fine perfume, and the day of death better than the day of birth.
and for the live stream ambulance the number was 804
verse 80:4
O Lord God of hosts, How long will You be angry Against the prayer of Your people?
20
« on: January 04, 2011, 04:05:44 PM »
This chick on MJ4JUSTICE is getting on my nerves... :x lol shes annoying me to! Shes acting like she Miss's know it all. And shes acting like everything she says is a fact not just her opinion.
21
« on: January 04, 2011, 03:46:21 PM »
Did anyone catch that ambulance, Was that THE ambulance?? Something we should look into. Yeah I saw it ....but I don't think it was important (?)
yeah, maybe your right
ill still check when im done recording
I couldn't see anything it passed too fast and the quality isn't that good 
I Looked back on my recording, the ambulance # is 804 if anyone knows if theirs some type of reference please share. i look up bible verse 8:04 and all i got was : O Lord God of hosts, How long will You be angry Against the prayer of Your people?
22
« on: January 04, 2011, 03:24:17 PM »
Did anyone catch that ambulance, Was that THE ambulance?? Something we should look into. Yeah I saw it ....but I don't think it was important (?)
yeah, maybe your right ill still check when im done recording
23
« on: January 04, 2011, 03:18:53 PM »
Did anyone catch that ambulance, Was that THE ambulance?? Something we should look into.
24
« on: January 04, 2011, 02:56:06 PM »
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
If anyone Can record the live stream, plz do because i know there is going to be clues, maybe even in the most boring parts of the stream. This whole thing is very odd..... Live Streaming a preliminary hearing?.... doesnt seem like a normal thing to do to me, if i wrong just let me know. But theirs a cause and reason for everything thats happening and im sure we will catch on to it.
And it's even odder that TMZ is sticking with it( they KNOW there is nothing going on outside...or is there?) - So, I agree.
Also, I thought it was remarkable that they kept that ONE camera in that ONE position all that time.
I have to run out to find lunch- will catch back up later!
Im Recording on my other laptop, Hopefully its not hours long. Ill cut it into 10 minute segments and upload to youtube when im done
25
« on: January 04, 2011, 01:58:46 PM »
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
If anyone Can record the live stream, plz do because i know there is going to be clues, maybe even in the most boring parts of the stream. This whole thing is very odd..... Live Streaming a preliminary hearing?.... doesnt seem like a normal thing to do to me, if i wrong just let me know. But theirs a cause and reason for everything thats happening and im sure we will catch on to it.
26
« on: January 03, 2011, 07:31:18 PM »
Souza, I understand your point but my opinion, as strong as yours, is that it is Michael 100% in This Is It and that those specific "doubles" were used for another purpose and that is not to replace Michael or impersonate him to deceive people. For me, it's totally another thing behind all this stuff with the "doubles" What puzzles me is how you can think it is all Mike in TII. How do you explain the differences in height, bodies, faces and most of all: the movements that are off. It's a genuine question because I really do not understand.I see at least 3 different persons. Mike himself (or else a hell of a double), a short one that is very feminine and small with small shoulders, and a tall one. One moves like MJ and is IMO MJ himself or the best double ever, one is tall and dances great, and one is short and well uhmm...dances not that well. Billie Jean was not Billie Jean at all. I don't think he would change his moves like that. To improve it: yes. But this? No way. The orange pants in The Way You Make Me Feel? No way. I am sure he is very talented and can do a lot, but he can't change his body structure back and forth like that. Even if he would have lost 10 or 20 pounds in a few days, there is no way the width of his shoulders would change that much, simply because you bones don't schrink when you loose weight.
And how do you explain this? No matter how hard I try, I really don't see the same person in these pics.
![]()
![]()
Michael gave an interview once where he mentioned something about wanting to change up Billie Jean. He said the fans expected, almost demanded that he do the moonwalk at the particular point where he originally did it, so he kept it that way. I would be inclined to believe he would change the Billie Jean routine.
(If I can locate that interview I will for reference).
Also, the second row of pics show a man in two distinctly different positions. In one position, he is standing erect. In the other, he is in a semi squat dance position (classical Michael moves, IMO) thus making him appear shorter than what he is.
As for his moves, Michael was always evolving in his dance. I wouldn't be surprised to see him do things differently, even a little strangely as the newer moves were just that; new and less practiced. Also, consider that he was suffering from back and feet pain (well documented throughout the years) and that may have hindered his movements. He was, after all, 50 years old, too, and he'd not seen a stage (formally) in many, many years. He's definitely not going to move like the Michael of old.
I am just inclined to believe TII was all Michael.
I disagree on every point you make. As I said, IF he would change his Billie Jean choreography, he would improve it, not do something like this. It's not MJ, it's not fresh and new, it's not innovating, so my conclusion is: not MJ.
Well, I'll agree to disagree with you. Just because it's not fresh or invigorating to you, doesn't mean it's not Michael Jackson.
I am not talking about the length of the legs, but the shape. Straight thighs againdt round ones. The faces simply are not the same either. Ears, eyes, shape of head and mouth all differ. Angles do can make you look a little different, but not like this.
Like someone has famously said before...location, location, location...as well as lighting, clothing, etc. It's not rocket science at all.
As for the back and feet pains... Why don't we see him struggle with some other dances? Why does that look smooth?
Souza, I know you're not daft. Just as some with arthritis often do, it's possible he felt better at some points than he did at others. He's a human being for Christ's sake, and as such, he's prone to ills and ailments men his age often experience as a natural course of aging.
And please, 50 is not old. I have friends and colleagues that age and some are fitter than I am. Michael is a born dancer and not being on stage does not mean not dancing. Not competing with my horse does not mean I don't ride. We also have the rehearsal with Travis, were he is sharp as a razor. I have a slow internet connection, so I can't check the YouTube now, but maybe someone else can post it.
I've posted that very video here on this forum, so I am familiar with its contents. Michael is a born man who happened to be a talented dancer. Just like any other talent, one must practice and work with it to perfect it. Do you know that he did so daily in his latter years? It has been my professional experience that rehearsals are sometimes as equally demanding as a show itself. If he was not conditioning himself rigorously, daily, then it is perfectly understandable that he'd be a little 'off' in some segments. That's the point of rehearsing; to get it right.
I do believe Michael would come up with new moves, but I am sure they would be new and great. This definitely wasn't. And those shades are ridiculous. You can see it even bothers him because he keeps touching them. Why would Michael Jackson need shades on a rehearsal? Where has he ever worn shades on stage, besides some intros?
Again, practice makes perfect, and what you're seeing in TII is just that; practice...
Michael being 50 doesn't mean old and cripple. Why do so many people rather believe he was old and unable to move his body, instead of him being in control. And I think he still got his moves, why wouldn't he?
No one said he lost it, least of all me. I believe he was in great shape, but I can also understand his need to polish his act, so to speak, after years of not performing.
encino_girl, you seem to get very offensive, while we are only discussing opinions here. You have yours, I have mine and as I said in my previous post, I disagree with your points. To me these are all excuses to make it MJ, while IN MY OPINION it is not all MJ. That is just my opinion and I have the right to have that opinion, just as you can have yours. If you don't like people disagreeing with you, you should start a blog and disable the comments. On a discussion board people discuss.
If you think it's all MJ, that's fine by me. I wouldn't loose a minute of sleep over it. But as I said before, this is the gazillionth discussion about this and I was already done with it months ago, since it's a useless discussion. Maybe we will hear one day from Mike himself. Until then, I rest my case.
I thought the double from TII was already explained in this video [youtube:9exm5l21]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkcyn1JgdUw[/youtube:9exm5l21] and about the TII pictures above, One of those pics was a promotional pic for the movie so it was spruced all up to look awesome, it even appears they removed the clef in his chin slightly. the other pic appears that they caught him mid blink and while he was singing. Now for "orange pants TII MJ" Hes wearing the skinny jeans that the kids are wearing these days that accentuate and sometime exaggerate the appearance of how skinny your legs are, trust me ive tried a pair of these ridiculous pants on before, and as for his broad shoulders, that shinny over sized blazer gives off the appearance of very broad shoulders.
27
« on: January 02, 2011, 01:57:33 PM »
OK, there is Hidden Beach Recordings site and Mike Phillips is on it. 2010 album called M.P.3
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login Ok. Thanks for the homework, and trying to pop my balloon. I still like Bill for the sax... :lol: :lol:
To m8ighty: TPTB= the powers that be, losers :evil: who aim to run the world, much to Freedom's detriment...
Thank you "Its her"
28
« on: January 02, 2011, 12:44:08 PM »
I am going to take this opportunity to mention a pet peeve of mine about all hoax videos.....POOR SPELLING! POOR GRAMMAR! I swear, I have yet to see one single hoax video that doesn't have either a spelling or grammar mistake or both....and I'm not referring to videos made by non-English speaking people...are people in such a hurry to get them up that they don't run a spell check first? This has always confounded me! And every time I see a spelling or grammar mistake, I feel it lessens the impact/legitimacy of the hoax video....I'll be watching along, totally getting into the message of the video and then BAM! There it is! A blatant spelling error or grammatical error....I shake my head once again in disbelief...
I realize that this will probably not change, but I still wanted to mention it as it has bugged me for a long, long time.
Despite this, I do appreciate the effort made by folks to make their hoax videos....just want to suggest that more time is taken to be sure mistakes are corrected before posting. LOL yup! It kinda ruins their credibility. I tried showing my friend ( a non believer ) a video, and of course we came across incorrect grammar, and immediately he said "I cant take this video seriously, they cant even spell correctly" and immediately i was deflated because this person had to complete this video and upload it in warp speed that they didn't have time to run it past a colleague or review it themselves.
29
« on: January 02, 2011, 09:57:13 AM »
LOl i feel your pain. i have watched some ridiculous videos with over the top claims or very insignificant claims. Im a believer, but some believers, if they know something closely related Like Lisa Marie or far from related like Justin Bieber, is about to have an interview or something, they will fight tooth and nail to find something, anything. And no offense, but sometimes it disgust me because the believers are no longer coming off ass investigators or researchers, but heart broken fans that wont let go. We cant have people thinking that we have some delusional infatuation.
30
« on: December 31, 2010, 08:15:43 PM »
excuse me for my ignorance, but what does TPTB stand for?
|
Show Posts
