This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - StrangerInCalifornia
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 31
46
« on: November 29, 2012, 10:23:00 PM »
I'm expecting a post at 11:30....just like the clock that was posted so long ago. "It's close to midnight...."
47
« on: November 29, 2012, 07:19:06 PM »
The anticipation is maddening! :over-react-smiley:
48
« on: November 29, 2012, 12:22:20 PM »
I'm so excited! Thank you bec and everyone else for all your hard work!
49
« on: November 28, 2012, 10:54:33 PM »
According to these records he was a vegetarian, but what about all that KFC??
50
« on: November 25, 2012, 03:19:05 AM »
I had another thought; what if we can't figure out whether it was a corpse or dummy because it was both?? You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginI'm not sure how the Institute for Plastination's Body Donation Program works or if a body can be plastinated with the skin intact (I don't have the time to look it up right now), but if a body was donated and then plastinated, would it then be both a corpse and a dummy, since some dummies are made out of plastic? Would this be considered a very life-like dummy? Sorry for all my random rambling ideas tonight, I'm just trying to make sense out of this.
51
« on: November 25, 2012, 01:21:11 AM »
My understanding of what TS said is the following: Everyone (or mostly everyone) who came into contact with the body that day was 'in on it' so a corpse was not needed to fool anyone (with the exception of possibly the targets of the sting which I'm not quite clear on yet). HOWEVER, a corpse was used instead of a dummy as a sort of plan b in case anything unexpected occurred. What if for instance, the ambulance broke down on the way to the hospital or there were a number of real emergencies and the paramedics or doctors had to be called away to attend to those? Any number of unforeseen circumstances could have happened that day and after 20 plus years of planning, it would be a shame if the hoax was compromised because someone discovered it was actually a dummy or something. If I were planning a hoax of this magnitude I'd make damn certain I had several safeguards in place just in case. A kind of a 'better safe than sorry' approach, if you will.
As for the autopsy report, death certificate, etc., why would the documents have to be real if there was a real corpse? If there really was a DWD patient there might not be a need for an autopsy. Even so, who's to say there aren't real documents somewhere filed with the proper institutions? For example, the will we saw was clearly fake, but that doesn't mean that Michael doesn't have a real will somewhere. I believe TS stated long ago that the coroner was definitely in on it, so either way (dummy or corpse) there would be fake documents for hoax purposes.
52
« on: November 25, 2012, 12:58:39 AM »
What if the patient self-administered the drug in Oregon that morning and the body was frozen to delay rigor mortis/decomposition? Then the body could have been flown via private jet to LA (about a 2:30 hour flight) and that's why Michael went to the airport? Maybe the room was especially warm that day to speed up the thawing process? I'm just trying to think of every possibility regarding the corpse issue. :Pulling_hair:
53
« on: November 24, 2012, 06:10:08 PM »
Bec:
No we don't really because under California law, anyone who was with the patient at the time the patient took the medication would be subject to arrest and prosecution for murder.
No Bec because nobody administered him the lethal med, remember CM was hanging with a telephone call so in that very moment the terminally ill person could have taken the pill, that's why CM during the trial was insinuating that Michael self administered the propofol lethal dose.
I agree, especially because of all the emphasis put on Murray being out of the room when Michael died (in the bathroom, on the phone with his girlfriends). The official story is that Michael was still alive when Murray left the room, Michael self-administered the drug to himself (according to Murray, who is probably the only one there that day who we can all agree is 'in on it'), and then Murray came back and found him not breathing. This would fit with the DWD theory in that the patient self-administered the fatal dose alone. Therefore this would not qualify as assisted suicide because there was nobody in the room to assist.
54
« on: November 23, 2012, 02:13:37 AM »
that "crying" part just now was kinda awkward.......
I agree - the silence. I guess to show how everyone is still in disbelief, speechless, then the cry without tears, and Branca wiping away a tear that wasn't there. :suspect:
Interesting sequence... Leave me alone, to Jermaine's announcement, to the silence, followed by Danyel Smith saying about his death 'we should all be ashamed'
Everyone looked genuinely upset...except Branca who didn't look the least bit upset. I laughed so hard at that pitiful tear he tried to pretend into existence.
55
« on: November 23, 2012, 02:07:01 AM »
Did they show the dummy, mindseye?
They actually showed two dummies while talking about CPR being done on them.
56
« on: November 21, 2012, 06:09:40 PM »
What a 'coincidence' :icon_e_wink: smells like the pi is almost done!
57
« on: November 21, 2012, 06:06:39 PM »
Happy birthday Miss Meep!! I hope your day is filled with love, fun, and lots and lots of food!! 
58
« on: November 20, 2012, 01:58:05 PM »
Is it possible that BOTH a dummy and a corpse were used that day? After all, we spent a whole level trying to figure out whether the court was a hoax court or a sting court and it turned out to be both. I do remember a post by TS saying that more than one option could have been used, but I don't have the time to search for it now. Do you guys remember something about there being two "bodies" in the helicopter? One with straps and one without? One could be a corpse and one could be a dummy (used for the autopsy photos?). Although I'm not sure what the reasoning behind that would be, I'm just thinking out loud.
59
« on: November 13, 2012, 05:03:59 PM »
I thought Michael Amir Williams was just Michael's personal assistant. I didn't know he was an employee connected with This Is It. There's something hoaxy here, but I can't quite seem to put my finger on it. I've always wondered why the This Is It dancers and employees renewed their confidentiality contracts months after Michael "died."
60
« on: November 13, 2012, 04:54:52 PM »
:icon_pale: :WTF: found this all kind of strangely strange considering the pbs stuff during election and front's use of cookie monster for the letter n . surely it is all coincidental right? :computer-losy-smiley:
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
There are no coincidences. Apparently the young man just recanted his story. A sign of things to come? :animal0017: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login The man who accused Kevin Clash, the voice and puppeteer of the “Sesame Street” character Elmo, of an underage sexual relationship has recanted that claim, his lawyer said on Tuesday. The reversal came a day after the claim was first published by the gossip Web site TMZ.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 31
|
Show Posts
