Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - anewfan

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 67
31
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: January 15, 2012, 08:56:50 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Oh ps. since the topic of Twitter n Jackson Fam came up, I thought I'd copy/paste this from LaToya's Facebook on Friday:

Quote
La Toya Jackson
latoyajackson: Happy Birthday@HiDzzJackson @michaellover73 Happy 39th Birthday!!! Please By All Means Girls Do Enjoy Your Day!!!
Published: 2012-01-12 07:39:57 GMT

We were just talking about mean girls... lol.

I'm pretty sure that's not a clue from LaToya...that's just stretching it.  She meant, "By all means, girls, do enjoy your day."

32
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: January 14, 2012, 03:37:42 PM »
Don't you think asking the family is a positive thing? Since so many are 100% convinced that Front is the man himself, why would it be a negative thing to ask the family what they thought of it? Is it only a "secret gift" for this forum only?

I am asking serious questions, and I'd rather not be bashed. I really want to know why this has to remain a secret, because I'm not getting it. Everyone here is so beyond excited about these snippets, why not share them and see what others have to say about them?

33
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: January 14, 2012, 01:30:40 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Maybe we could send the links to the snippets to some of MJ's family on Twitter and see what they have to say about them. It would be interesting to see if and how they would respond to them.

I personally think it's worth a try...even if there is no reaction.

They would have no reaction.
If Front is Michael he's making fun of us with this snippets. Just my opinion.

34
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: January 14, 2012, 01:12:04 PM »
Maybe we could send the links to the snippets to some of MJ's family on Twitter and see what they have to say about them. It would be interesting to see if and how they would respond to them.

35
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: January 13, 2012, 04:48:43 PM »
Another product of GarageBand loops, but I know you all say that's irrelevant......

I wonder what MJ would think of people trying to pass GarageBand loops off as his original work......smh....

36
TIAI ~ 2012 / Re: TIAI January 11
« on: January 11, 2012, 10:21:41 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Maybe it's just the natural course of this hoax as we have had moments where we've been left in the wilderness wandering around (or so it feels like). We've had the chance to reflect, learn, and grow. For anyone who's been here long enough, even if you don't believe everything, there has been something new to learn. For me, I've learned a lot that i didn't know before. A lot about Michael, about this world and life, and about myself, and I've met some amazing people all from all over the world.

Anyway, I'm still thinking about the BACK thread where he spoke of there being no co(o)incidences.  As amazing as the blog is I can't help but notice the timing. Really? Did TS just pop up and say "AMAZING JOB - I AM GOING TO REDIRECT TO SOUZA'S POST". If he/she has done that than doesn't it say that TS does not plan out his/her posts or redirects? It just confuses me, is all.
Blessings

One of the best things in this whole journey for me is meeting you, voice. I mean it. I appreciate how kind you are, how real you are, and how smart you are. You have always treated people with respect...even when you may not agree with them.

The timing of the redirect got me thinking as well.

37
Cirque du Soleil - The Immortal Tour / Re: Cirque observations Sacramento
« on: January 11, 2012, 06:25:26 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It's down, then up, then down, in the trailer. so you can see the back screen, from what I see.

Thanks for the info! I figured the reason was because it was too big for the stage in Vegas. I'm glad they didn't cover up the screen...I enjoyed watching that during the show.

38
Cirque du Soleil - The Immortal Tour / Re: Cirque observations Sacramento
« on: January 11, 2012, 05:37:14 PM »
Hi Tink! Which video shows it moving? Is it in the trailer video? Thanks for posting the link.

39
Cirque du Soleil - The Immortal Tour / Re: Cirque observations Sacramento
« on: January 11, 2012, 04:49:40 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Just came back from Immortal show in Sacramento. Fantastic show and wanted to share a few observations:

Smooth Criminal had lots of clues including things about the media on the back projection screen in newspaper headlines;the whole production used things that
Michael seemed to be working on in the DOME project; the band/singers/dancers were from TII; the plural "pains" was used etc etc etc. GREAT PRODUCTION!

I know people were talking about the giving tree and the changing form of the tree in CIRQUE.  Well, in tonights performance it was a nuclear reactor--not a tree..........
 OMG!

Hy Loveunited and welcome  :) bearhug !!!!
Thank you very much for this information ,very intresting,cause I talked before about that TREE form Immortal tour.Wow so now there is no TREE  :shock: ,just a nuclear reactor. I wonder why  :idea:  :?  ????
Here is a part from an article about Immortal tour from 5 november 2011,that "talks" about the GIVING TREE:


"The problem was compounded on Friday night by the unexplained absence of the giant Giving Tree, the on-stage centrepiece which director Jamie King, interviewed in the Straight last week, called IMMORTAL’s “energy source”  :? . (Confusingly, what’s left of the tree, which served as both a sturdy oak and a sprawling, tentacular alien life form when the show made its debut in Montreal, now resembles a scale model of a nuclear reactor’s cooling tower.) "



Hi guys! I went to the show in Las Vegas, and I remember thinking it looked like a can. It's like only the trunk of the tree was there. There were no branches or anything. I don't know if they wanted it to look like a nuclear reactor or if the tree display was too big and they could only have the trunk (which then ended up looking like a can or nuclear reactor)? I found this very weird, though. Especially since the tree was supposed to be the centerpiece of the whole show. 

I wonder if anyone was at a show where the entire tree was present? Anyone?

40
Back's old posts / Re: Nothing is by cooincidence-back post 11/5/2009
« on: January 11, 2012, 12:26:59 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Diaper fetish.

And there was a diaper on the "death bed".

And all this talk of condom catheters and urine bags.

mmhmm.

He kicked my ass off the forum for not dropping the subject that mjhd.com was part of the hoax. Well, "he". I wouldn't let it go for weeks at a time, as per my usual, but I couldn't get 3 words out about it in chat before they kicked me and my posts were removed of the forum. There was a zero tolerance policy on "questioning" "AMY", even though I was just questioning there was an Amy at all.That really pissed me off, lol.

I couldn't figure out why this SHOULDN'T be a topic of convo, it was so obvious something was up and that website almost had to be in on it, considering the timing and the content of the original blog and all, we SHOULD be talking about this. Not taking no for an answer on that one made me a target for the NEW mod crew backed by their shadowy, suspicious identity "ADMIN"...

mmhmm.

Maybe just crazy talk. We may never find out for sure.

It's really frustrating when you want to discuss a topic that you feel has value and you aren't allowed to. It really makes one wonder, "Why?".

Yeah you can you imaginary martyr. Just start a post<----for the thousandth time.

??? whatever that means......

41
Back's old posts / Re: Nothing is by cooincidence-back post 11/5/2009
« on: January 11, 2012, 08:39:43 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Diaper fetish.

And there was a diaper on the "death bed".

And all this talk of condom catheters and urine bags.

mmhmm.

He kicked my ass off the forum for not dropping the subject that mjhd.com was part of the hoax. Well, "he". I wouldn't let it go for weeks at a time, as per my usual, but I couldn't get 3 words out about it in chat before they kicked me and my posts were removed of the forum. There was a zero tolerance policy on "questioning" "AMY", even though I was just questioning there was an Amy at all.That really pissed me off, lol.

I couldn't figure out why this SHOULDN'T be a topic of convo, it was so obvious something was up and that website almost had to be in on it, considering the timing and the content of the original blog and all, we SHOULD be talking about this. Not taking no for an answer on that one made me a target for the NEW mod crew backed by their shadowy, suspicious identity "ADMIN"...

mmhmm.

Maybe just crazy talk. We may never find out for sure.

It's really frustrating when you want to discuss a topic that you feel has value and you aren't allowed to. It really makes one wonder, "Why?".

42
Back's old posts / Re: Nothing is by cooincidence-back post 11/5/2009
« on: January 10, 2012, 09:43:13 PM »
I just wonder how MJ would feel having his name associated with people who do those kind of shady things and treating his fans poorly.
I would hope he would NEVER want his name attached to people like.

43
TIAI ~ 2012 / Re: TIAI January 7
« on: January 10, 2012, 08:59:30 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Ever heard of GTFO? I am sick and tired of the same 'debunkers' coming back time and time again with a lot of mumble jumble, and none of them has any proof, only ridicule and attacks, ASSumptions and false allegations. I will boot every single 'new' user that pops up with the same nonsense. Go bore someone else please.

Souza...that part made me LOL for real.  :lol:  Thanks...it was much needed. 

To me it becomes more apparent over time that what these instigators REALLY must be is closeted, frightened and/or frustrated beLIEvers.  Would any self-respecting and sane individual really spend so much time devoted to a subject that they claim to have no use for or despise?  So which is it...hmm?  No self-respect?...Not totally sane?...Closet beLIEver?...Or the most likely scenario...they crave attention that must not be afforded to them in their daily lives and are stumped to think of a more original way of getting it.  How sad for them under any of those circumstances.  :cry: 

Note to future pot-stirrers (because unfortunately they will come):  Better bring your A game with some FACTS if you want to sling your brand of "knowledge" here.  Halfa$$ed innuendo, empty accusations and your broadly generalized negative BS ain't gonna get you anything here but the door!!!

Say Hello to Souza's Boot... 8-)
   


Are you the forum bodyguard? It seems like you mainly show up to back up the posse. I guess everyone has a role to play.

44
Introduce yourself / Re: just for the record
« on: January 10, 2012, 08:51:26 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
i see that the name is typed slightly different from mine. suspicious_mind. guess i got a little  /overreacting/  but the idea of someone putting words in my mouth always make me get  /scream/

Anything is possible in this hoax....it's better to cover all bases.

45
Back's old posts / Re: Nothing is by cooincidence-back post 11/5/2009
« on: January 10, 2012, 07:38:31 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
MJonmind - I agree, a lot of people were upset when the forum went down. It makes me wonder if our TS is someone from the media/tabloid world. Someone who might have information regarding Chandler before anyone else? But then, they'd have no control over the date (November 5th). I admit that I am thoroughly confused. What is the significance of MJHD going down? Is TS responsible for that? What's the purpose of this? And if so then he/she is collaborating with the admin, right? Or TS is possibly one of the admin...

 ;)

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 67
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal