This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - suspicious mind
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 366
31
« on: January 03, 2015, 04:44:21 PM »
yes i feel fairly confident that it is makeup. but the person under it doesn't look to very made up to me. i kind of looks more like someone with some very white, loose and or heavy makeup handled it getting it off and then this other person put it on .
32
« on: January 03, 2015, 04:17:49 PM »
i am sorry to be off topic here but i am just now noticing how umm dusty(?) that hat a scarf are . what's the deal with that?
33
« on: December 29, 2014, 11:31:04 AM »
only thing it makes me think of is the dirty diana bed.
34
« on: December 29, 2014, 11:11:02 AM »
is there a link for this interview with jermaine i have never heard of this before. :icon_e_confused:
35
« on: December 18, 2014, 09:53:08 AM »
wonder if there could be any reason why it was made after marlon's jacket? i have also considered that his initials are also mj
36
« on: December 15, 2014, 04:53:22 PM »
He really does look sad, doesn't he?
I see something in the trees too but I would say it is some type of reflection from the room. I used to analyze pics all the time and would see pics of people everywhere on shirts, jackets and even faces (Marilyn Monroe is on Michael's forehead in TII) - it finally made me wear a straight jacket for awhile, so I don't do that anymore. :Pulling_hair:
I do see the hand on the right but can't really tell anything by it. I enlarged it but that didn't help any.
I saw the video you are talking about suspicious and I thought the same thing when I was watching it, I thought this was supposed to be his first Christmas but he seemed like nothing was new to him. It is a possibility maybe he celebrated twice, once with the Cascios and one with Liz.
We know so much, but yet we know so little.
Love you Michael!
hummm so when was he supposed to have started hanging out with the Cascios ? was it before or after 93? it is kind of hard to imagine that as a family with children they would not have gotten around to sharing that with him before that long if he was around them.
37
« on: December 14, 2014, 10:25:51 AM »
humm now that ya point it out i do see something. like layers in the picture. reminds me of the ambulance photo. (or there are spooks hangin' round germ :LolLolLolLol:). wasn't there another photo or something not that long ago with the same flavor? also did anyone see the video that showed up on the other site? was supposed to be for auction. showed michael having Christmas with Casio's . oddly enough the same year that liz was supposed to have given him his first Christmas. he had given frank a camera and was in the mirror messin' with it. it got pulled , of course :icon_e_wink:
38
« on: December 13, 2014, 02:20:29 PM »
looks sad and alone to me
39
« on: November 20, 2014, 04:39:55 PM »
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Loginok in this video they give him this list , the one he goes on to say is about things he wants to discuss in an interview. the one that has always jumped out at me is the inauguration of bill clinton. does anyone know anything about this and where the rumor came from. i have to say i have always found the pics with clinton and mikes kids made cringe.
40
« on: November 18, 2014, 11:40:15 AM »
i think if there would be any truth to this than someone would not be doing a very good job of keeping thing under wraps.
41
« on: November 18, 2014, 11:37:28 AM »
i feel like those moments of the sillies usually come in the wee hours when it is just family sitting around talking about old times ect. what i think stood out to me is that the times of ummm emotional breakdown on the part of family did not feel authenticate. only one who seemed truly sad was kate and i swear it was a sadness that something was up and not one of the devastation of the loss of your child. is all just my opinion though of course. 
42
« on: November 18, 2014, 09:59:52 AM »
interestingly michael and sneddon both have connections to the D.A.R.E. program
43
« on: November 16, 2014, 01:58:26 PM »
Yes, Suspicious, I thought they'd just made it up until I saw the video and I have to say I was surprised to see Murray 'in the flesh'.
He seems to be contradicting himself here with the Demerol story. He claimed in that powerpoint presentation thing he did, that unbeknownst to Murray, MJ was in withdrawal from Demerol on 25/6 ... here he says Demerol caused his death. Maybe he's referring to the lack of Demerol, and the fact that he knew nothing about MJ's supposed Demerol use, that meant he didn't treat MJ appropriately. Whatever!
Putting aside the absurdity of ET asking Murray about the correct use of Propofol, does anyone else feel somewhat uncomfortable/confused about why Murray, as a 'character' in MJ's story, would put himself out there commenting on someone's else's situation? Seems wrong somehow. Disrespectful.
I wish I could get to the bottom of Murray. He's the only reason I'm still here! And when he comes out with stuff like I wasn't there, I don't know what happened, I don't know what MJ did, I just found a lifeless man - it makes me question even more: could there be areas in which he is in the dark, just like the rest of us?
there is a video? do you have a link?edit: i see it now.  i had overlooked the video reading the article interesting about that title didn't have to die. wasn't that said about mike also , and is that not part of lyrics to one of his songs?
44
« on: November 16, 2014, 01:49:23 PM »
yeah i think at some point a bit of laughter will sneak into the situation almost as some sort of relief mechanism .
45
« on: November 15, 2014, 10:28:16 PM »
come to think of it , i have been to many a funeral in my day (  ) and i don't ever recall there being ushers.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 366
|
Show Posts