This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - luvandmissumike
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8
16
« on: May 09, 2014, 01:29:36 AM »
TS/_comments has made no secret of being a fake. He's said it several times. He's said he would support false theories on at least two occasions. Once early on and again during the levels. He said if no Bam by 12/31/12, he's a fake. And he said it again on 5/5.
For all we know, the false theory he believes he is supporting is the hoax itself.
But I won't lie, I am entertained.
you are absolutely right, he did say if no mj by the end of 12/12 he's a fake. i guess the person i'm angry with is myself, for thinking he knew what he was talking about. now my question is why is he back here since he's proven himself to be a fake? i guess entertainment purposes only. in that case i agree with the person that said why waste your time?
17
« on: May 08, 2014, 11:02:36 AM »
can't wait to see what happens with the redirects of may 10 & 12. i hope it doesn't end up like the " mike will be back by the end of 2012 -- NO MIKE, NO EXPLANATION, NO NOTHING!! oh, but we did get a houdini (?) disappearing trick.  not that i want to jump too deep into your shit but, had u came back with SOMETHING at the end of 2012 it would have helped ur credibility. otherwise, u r just talking loud & saying nothing. to make claims that u don't/can't back up makes u a joke (for entertainment purposes only). if u say front is mj, than u must know mj, can u at least prove that u know him. if i'm coming off harsh it's because i've always been a no-nonsense person. i don't do games, beat around the bush, or have time for B.S. that being said, if u have something concrete SPEAK UP if not SHUT UP. yes, u did/do keep things lively around here & keep the brains working. but, if ur intentions are to play games with us & use our caring for mj as a weakness, when it's said and done it won't be our weakness that u will remember. soooo...ball is in ur court and again welcome back. sorry for the rant but my alter ego (THE BITCH) is surfacing. i don't feel like the up & down, going around in circles again. we've been there & done that.
18
« on: May 08, 2014, 08:45:53 AM »
from some posts as u can c we don't remember level #7 being completed in 2012....refresh our minds, what did u say?
Not wishing to speak for TS you understand, but after he presented all his DWD 'evidence', on 30th Nov 2012, he did post the TII pic with all the puzzle pieces in place, here:
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
I guess that means he considered Level 7 finished, even if some of us don't remember it that way!
thanks for the post. i'll read it when time permits
19
« on: May 06, 2014, 08:51:39 AM »
BAM!!!!!
The end comes SUDDENLY!
{You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login}
BAM!!!!!
Finally ... the time that we have all been waiting for!
:multiplespotting: :th_bravo: :woohoo2: :moonwalk_: :icon_cool:  :icon_geek: :icon_mrgreen: :penguin: :TongueOutSmiley:
:abouttime: :LolLolLolLol:
To everyone who is new to the hoax forum—welcome! And you have a lot of reading to do, if you want to get a good understanding of the reasons for the hoax, etc.
To everyone who has been on the forum previously, but didn’t stay here until the BAM—welcome back! And you may also want to do some reading, and catch up on things that you missed while you were away.
To everyone who stayed here, and never left—congratulations! You decided to: “keep the faith NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS!!!!!!!!!!!” {You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login}
TS Is a Fake Informer!
For those who thought that TS is a fake informer, because there was no BAM by then end of 2012—I will quote from sweetsunsetwithMJ:
“HOAX = FAKE (not real)
TS = INSIDER (person who is giving us first hand info to make us understand this hoax, maybe from MJ’s inner circle??)
SO.....
TS = FAKE INFORMER (informer of the fake)
It took me a time to understand it but I’ve finally understood it.”
{You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login}
TIAI Redirects for 10-27-13, & 5-5-14
{You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login}
Did anyone notice that the Dow Jones hit a new all-time high, for the first time in several years, on 3-5-13 {You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login}? And this was about three years after TS connected the market with the hoax, and specifically with the March 5 date: “God is fully capable of controlling world events. And in this case, the 666 low came on 3-6, which was only one day after the March 5 press conference in London. March 6 was a Friday, so the 7th and 8th were the weekend; but after the low on Friday, Monday March 9 was the start of the fastest six-month rally in US history.” {You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login}
Furthermore, believe it or not—as Adi noticed—the total days since June 25, 2009, is exactly 1776 (inclusive reckoning, as usual); this is the exact number that I used as the title and subtitle (see subsection 4-21), clear back in 2010, for that same Update #4.
{You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login}
And did anyone notice when the S&P 500 closed at 1776—for the first time ever {You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login}?? How’s that for some fancy insider trading, LOL!?! Again, 1776 is the number of the days since 6-25-09, and 1776 is also the exact number in the title/subtitle of that Update #4 (777 + 999 = 1776). TS redirected to the S&P specifically on 10-27-13, which was more than half of a year in advance!
While some might be trying to calculate the odds, that all of this is just coincidence: others might begin to realize The Source, of the information that I’ve posted over the years.
{You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login; You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login}
Level #7, Sign #7, Update #7
Level #7 was already finished, in 2012. For those who are interested in The Signs: the final one, Sign #7, will be the redirect for Saturday, May 10. And for those who have read the previous Updates: the final one, Update #7, will be the redirect for Monday, May 12. Update #7 will explain who I am, as well as The Source. For now, though, I will say that I’m not Front, and I’m not MJ (as I’ve said before); but Front is the real MJ
BAM!!!!!
Let’s do it one more time ...
BAM!!!!!
from some posts as u can c we don't remember level #7 being completed in 2012....refresh our minds, what did u say?
20
« on: May 06, 2014, 08:41:05 AM »
I dont mean anything specific with that, I just want to be ready in case it will get busy in the next few months. It's a precaution really.
oh  .... thanks anyway
21
« on: May 06, 2014, 08:14:16 AM »
Also, Level 7 was not finished in 2012. As with many things, TS/_comments, just because you say it, doesn't make it so, and you cannot rewrite history to suit your needs; some of us have better memories than that.
the same came to my mind. i don't remember 7 being done. i don't come here everyday but i do remember people asking about what happened to it. anyway welcome back TS, if nothing else u helped to keep things lively
22
« on: May 05, 2014, 11:08:15 AM »
Hi everyone,
With the upcoming events and new plans for this website in the future, I would like to ask you all if you are interested in becoming a moderator. I need moderators on here and on HoaxBook. I would like to have 10 moderators for the forum and 10 different ones for here unless you think you can handle both. I know it doesn't seem to be busy now, but that can change in a heartbeat as you will understand. To the ones that are already mods I would like to ask if they prefer to be a mod on the forum or on HoaxBook or maybe both.
I also need some people that are willing to moderate the chat, even though it is not very active now. So if you would like to do that, let me know. Just post in this thread if you want to become a mod and if so for which part (HoaxBook, forum or chat).
Souza
ok souza i've bit my tongue for as long as i can. you stated " i know it doesn't seem busy now, but that can change in a heartbeat as u will understand. :suspect: WHAT'S UP?? :confused: what do u know that we don't? i've noticed the number of guest have been over 400 plus daily. :woohoo2: i know patience is a virtue & u probably can't or won't say. but, u've peeked my curiosity and gotten me anxious and excited, :icon_bounce: so i thought i'd ask, wouldn't be me if i didn't. :icon_e_wink: :icon_ anyway, thanks for the heads up, i'll be sure not to let a lot of time go by without checking in :icon_bounce: :icon_bounce: :icon_bounce:
23
« on: May 05, 2014, 10:30:02 AM »
You know Blankie that i have the same problem,but i signed up also. :icon_e_wink:
Go for it.
And i hope that people forgive us for the mistakes we for sure wil make in writing.
They only need to know that it is never intended.
And after 5 years here i hope it wil get so busy,that they wil need al our help. :icon_cool:
Like i promised from the beginning: i'll be there! if i am needed. :icon_e_smile:
:beerchug:
24
« on: April 28, 2014, 09:57:57 PM »
curls - " I know numbers have got a place in the hoax, and if that early TMZ article highlighting all the 7's in MJ's life meant anything at all, I could be coaxed into saying he'll be back after 7 years! Did I really just say that? LOL!"
7 YEARS :Pulling_hair: GOD i hope not, but who knows, esp. when u think of elvis & tupac :errrr:
25
« on: April 19, 2014, 09:51:10 PM »
tigerbelieve vid - she/he makes good points. as long as mj is singing, i agree with her. You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
26
« on: April 15, 2014, 09:08:32 AM »
i don't agree on saying Debbie is bullshit, she still is Paris and Prince's mother, wich MJ has chosen!, what stands out to me is that she is in the news primarly now, it has to be about something and we don't have a clue what it is at this moment imo.
Paris is with her at times or more, so she is happy with her mother, Mj also said ones...Debbie was around for seeing and be with her kids, and they named her aunt or something....So he and she were happy the way they have aranged it. What i meant to say before is (i know i havent expressed myself properly) If we Judge on Debbie for not being there for her children (wich we arent sure off at all) , then automatically we have to Judge on MJ the same way. because they arange this and they are happy with that, imo. in whatever way it is, we don't known the inns and outs....ever!
We have to remember Debbie is the children's mother. And Mj never spoke one bad word about her, i remain to believe she did this out of great love for Michael.
i'm just seeing this post. i don't mean to be so hard on debbie but, i don't understand how u can carry a child and so easily give them up. it would be hard for me to give up a foster child...but that's just me. why would michael feel the need to raise the children on his own is he that selfish? or did he just see her as a surrogate & just married her because he's a public figure. did either one of them think about the children?
paris longed for a mommy figure that's why she sought debbie out. poor prince is devastated that's why he can't bring himself to bond with her now, out of fear of her ABANDONING him again, imo. no one thought about the children in this situation. and, MAYBE she did it out of "love" for michael and his longing to become a parent but would she had done the same if he was a regular joe with minimal funds? that's it, i'm done with debbie
27
« on: April 15, 2014, 07:20:04 AM »
Mattie, it's not a no go area. We've had several threads discussing the possibility of 2 MJs. I started one myself not long ago. Just because not everyone (me included) agrees doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't talk about it if you want to. It is a fascinating idea!
All I personally would disagree with in your comments above, is that I don't think 'more than one MJ' is the only possible explanation for the differences we've witnessed over the years.
And your English is just fine, so no worries there!
I dont say/mean it is the only possible explanation(thats my problem in expressing myself)but until now nobody came with a better/evidence explanation for me.
For me, all the difference can not be explaned away with high heels/make up and lightning..and that is the only answer you get and you have to be okay with..most members resist any idea of more than one MJ and dont want to dig deeper
But for me something else is going on..and if i could i would investigate this..But unfortunaly my English is not good enough!
Thats what i think is a missed change.
But i dont overreact/overcomplicate and can let go!
So be it.
if u are TRULY curious about something u owe it to urself to check it out ( self gratification). maybe u can find something in ur native tongue on it. afterwards should u care to share, just throw it out there. i agree ur english is fine.
Dont you think i tried that?? In my native tongue there is nothing of interest.
And wen i speak about it they make fun of me.
In the English laguage wen it gets difficult i have problems in understandig so i can not find my way further.
It is not that simpel for me,you dont know how much time it takes for me to write this.
A lot of words i have to looke up before writing..And translater is no option because i can not read my own words anymore wen i use that.
But it is okay..i keep on reading and maybe one day :icon_e_smile:
to say- don't u think i've tried that :icon_e_surprised: can be considered abrasive. which will put someone in a defensive mode, which is where i was about to go, with a reply of "excuse the hell out of me". but i remembered english isn't ur first language. it's best to say i've tried that. good luck on that which u seek
See!! here it comes In my language it is a normal thing to say.
That is why i never post much,because the problems of expressing myself.
Not everybody is understanding.
Maybe my Englisch is fine for basic things..but wen it goes deeper i get these problems.
This also keeps me from investigating.
Better i just keep reading like i did for lmost 5 years now :icon_e_surprised: Haha
But thank you for your understanding.
i don't want to make u feel bad & not express ur thoughts & opinions. true there are differences in languages and how what said is interpreted, but i also have to apologize. thru written communication u can't see a persons face or hear their tone in the voice, if wrong, sorry. hope u keep posting and find what u r looking for.
No hard feelings. :smiley_abuv:
But i is what i have to think about al the time.
Do i say this correct,does it come over different ?..It takes so much extra time :icon_redface:
And wen i want to respond to something,i think better leave it because of those reasons.
:icon_e_smile:
don't let this stop u. continue to express ur thoughts and opinions. if someone takes it the wrong way (as i did) u let them know what u meant and they can either accept or reject it. as i used to tell my children, as long as a person isn't putting food in ur mouth clothes on ur back and a roof over ur head what they think or feel really isn't that heavy ( i.e. :images:) KEEP POSTING
28
« on: April 15, 2014, 07:05:55 AM »
it's a shame this 80+ yr old women has to go thru all this stress
29
« on: April 15, 2014, 06:55:54 AM »
Of course she wants the children... including Blanket. Why wouldn't she? She would be getting $90,000.00 a month.
HELLO !! :icon_lol: for 90 grand A MONTH u can send them over here. hell, i'll take them for 90 grand a yr
30
« on: April 15, 2014, 06:52:29 AM »
I love how this is any of our business in the first place. Backseat parenting and judgement passing on people we don't even know--about kids that aren't ours. Gross. MYOB.
when u make ur business public u open urself up to peoples opinions and thoughts. u don't have to be in the drivers seat to know what should or shouldn't be done if experienced. judgement passing, well u know what they say about first impressions. no we don't know any of them. but since this is a discussion on her wanting custody of the kids we're entitled to express our opinion as are u. so to all that are reading they can just take it or leave it
|
Show Posts