This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - son
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 12
31
« on: February 03, 2012, 08:25:58 AM »
Bump
32
« on: February 03, 2012, 08:23:31 AM »
What do you mean son? I know the whole history, so what am I missing from your point of view? bangbang
The minister who wrapped him in the Torah said that they weren't literally crowning him as king. They were just trying to restore him spiritually in light of the accusations.
33
« on: February 03, 2012, 08:17:43 AM »
What are your thoughts? Can anyone help me? Does anyone know of any SOLID clues in the last year to six months? Maybe Paris's "cry on the spot" statement on Ellen...
34
« on: February 03, 2012, 08:15:25 AM »
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
If this isn't proof enough of the coming of the anti-christ, then I don't know what is. /cook/ People please be careful who you worship. This man is as close to the devil as anyone can be.
Michael Jackson gets taunted and persecuted for seriously loving children and this man sleeps with boys in the church that he is supposedly mentoring and is crowned king. WTF?? is wrong with that picture?
I'm guessing you didn't read the whole post...
35
« on: February 03, 2012, 08:06:10 AM »
AKHTONI, I’ve never seen anyone use so many  . I found that :lol: ! It's a shame some of the smilies are rarely used!!
Mrbigshot and Son, I'm so glad we are such a mix, assorted, of so many genres! Big boys or "big girls", fans or not, as Front would say "Nappy or non-nappy", beLIEvers or doubters, and deists or atheists. beerchug
![]()
Bec, I'm so glad you're digging in to Sign #1. I'm looking forward to your thoughts when you're ready!
I don't know why, but I have this lurking hunch that there is something of an entertainment level about TS's Sign #1 post as well. But IDK.
Not really much of a difference between Deists and Atheists. I'd say the continuum works like this: Theists (believe in God actively) --> Deists (passively believe in a creator, existence of God is more or less irrelevant outside of this) --> Atheists (no belief)
36
« on: February 02, 2012, 10:27:40 AM »
Sorry, but it's not us who are in denial. Thank you for your concern, but we are all big girls. If Michael is dead than I am the easter bunny.
Not all of us are "girls". lol If Michael is dead I'll accept it. Right now, it's a matter of logic and objectivity that favors the hoax death theory
37
« on: February 01, 2012, 01:07:24 PM »
I think that if the interview is fake, then all the police and political discussions (presented in the 2nd hour of the film) are just deductions that anyone can make based on the real info presented in the 1st hour and which was not new, at least not to me.
But we discuss here in hypothetical "IF"-s...so no one can be sure of anything.
But based on what I know and compared to what I heard in this film, I managed to form my opinion: it was not Elvis behind this film, just some very well informed people , professionals in making movies.
But hey I might be wrong, but that's what I think right now.
About the CD ... it can be a CD like any other CD made by voice impersonators. It won't be the first nor the last.
When I say "if" I'm not saying I definitely think it's valid or fake but either way I don't know. What he said about Barack Obama (assuming the interview is fake) is definitely shameless, I don't think that's necessary for a fake interview "mockumentary" to go off topic into recent political commentary unless they can sincerely back up their source. This is probably my biggest issue with the film. And the CD is presented as "validation" of Elvis being alive (rather than just another impersonator). It wouldn't be such a problem if they would have posted a disclaimer or something at the end. I'm sure they'll eventually come out and say the interview was fake (if the DVD gets enough attention). The heavy use of fake edited pictures of the Elvis from the 80s and 90s talking to Reagan and Clinton as well as the "picture" on the CD and DVD cover imply that the interview was fake as well. In the film's defense, however, I think the wet ink and 10 day receiving of the documents doesn't sound too farfetched. Depending on how new the Freedom of information act website is. Elvis never really had a youthful voice (to me), I could see him in his seventies still sounding about the same as he did in his 30s.
38
« on: February 01, 2012, 12:22:53 PM »
I don't know what to think...
For a beginner in Elvis-hoax, it is a very good documentary! the best so far!
But on the other hand , for someone like me, it didn't come up with anything new besides a possible theory about how he did it that day and what he did for the FBI as a secret agent.
There are things that doesn't add up or maybe they can't say more for the moment .
The guy is clearly an Elvis-voice impersonator, I doubt Elvis himself would do such a thing unless he wanted to come out. I don't know if this movie is done with Elvis approval or this movie-company just did it on their own...It's possible both ways. About 80% of everything the "Shadow-Elvis" says is taken word by word from known interviews that Elvis gave during his life. If you search on Google the words: "Elvis quotes" you would recognize them all as the "Elvis from this film" basically reads them word by word. So the "script" was pretty easy...loll
Anyway it was an interesting idea to correlate Elvis's story to social and historical movements of America till the present day. Overall it is a good film to watch! and the best way for beginners to start learning the truth about Elvis!
I find rather ignorant and disrespectful the comments about Priscilla and Michael. Lisa Marie was pretty much left out , too. The Numerology was completely ignored! - kind of odd!!
So these things ^^ made me think that the true Elvis is not really behind this doco!
The main information was taken from already known documentaries about Elvis' life or about Elvis being alive, such as this one for example: Cover Up - Elvis Presley Is Still Alive - You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
But unlike other documentaries, "Elvis Found Alive" has the merit of combining almost everything in just one.
I think if the interview was fake then the CD and Political commentary are definitely in bad taste.
39
« on: January 31, 2012, 08:00:57 PM »
Bump....
40
« on: January 31, 2012, 04:19:25 PM »
Ignore, this post....
41
« on: January 31, 2012, 04:04:49 PM »
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginOne of the songs from the tracklist is Michael Jackson's "Wanna be startin somthin".... maybe it's a clue to his connection.
42
« on: January 31, 2012, 01:01:51 PM »
in linda hood sigmon web, linda said that jesse(elvis) told her that he is no more interested in what elvis was interested in like jewelery but in this movie i see his fingers full of jewelry geek/ WTF??
Maybe one (or both) of the "Elvis" people are lying. I'm hoping more people watched the documentary, I don't have enough Elvis knowledge to scrutinize it fully.
43
« on: January 31, 2012, 10:49:32 AM »
I watched the whole film, but it just got removed from Youtube. The "picture" looks fake but in it's defence the voice doesn't sound that young to me.
/pull hair/ it is removed from youtube and i just watch 1hour. but why it's removed?
Maybe too many people watched it. Someone needs to order the DVD from the website so it can be analyzed more deeply.
44
« on: January 31, 2012, 10:42:11 AM »
I watched the whole film, but it just got removed from Youtube. The "picture" looks fake but in it's defence the voice doesn't sound that young to me.
Edit: He said he doesn't want to come out publically while Obama is in office.
45
« on: January 31, 2012, 10:12:34 AM »
Didn't seem to be a big MJ fan....
The CD he was working on... You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 12
|
Show Posts
