This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - tabloidburn
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 107
61
« on: July 11, 2010, 11:22:27 AM »
that's def one state to have no business in, obviously... 'the statue is 7 feet tall', eh?  :mrgreen:
62
« on: July 09, 2010, 01:55:39 PM »
i strongly believe that everything mike-related on the net (information, redirects, tweets) is somehow orchestrated. and i don't think anyone knows when 'bam' is but mike himself and he won't tell anyone until then. he'd be crazy to give that information to anyone, as close or in on the hoax as that person may be.
and everybody giving out information seems to have a certain role in this, i also think that the reactions are monitored somehow or by the same person giving out the information. that way, you can keep track of the supporters' base as well.
it might also be that 'bam' is subject to certain developments like the court proceedings. you can't influence everything...
:mrgreen:
63
« on: July 09, 2010, 11:09:11 AM »
welcome eliza and thank you very much for your post! this is some very valuable information you are sharing with us on this forum, hope to read more from you or some comments of yours. enjoy this 'looney-bin'. we're all crazy the same way here! :mrgreen:
64
« on: July 08, 2010, 03:37:06 PM »
i think there are a lot of 'mike-isms' in this. the m-jacket, the fun stuff coming out of the machine (balloon animal, flowers. the blinking gadget...). actually also the fact that the machine is giving stuff away. it's also interesting in connection with the moonwalking dodo-bird ad ('i'm alive') and makes this ad an even stronger reference, imo.
i'm not so sure yet if it's supposed to be a clue ('where will happiness strike next?') or a real clever marketing strategy...
:mrgreen:
65
« on: July 08, 2010, 10:54:16 AM »
i'm not so sure if the tweets regarding #elvisandmjdotcom prove anything in terms of 'thisisalmostit' not knowing anything. does he need to? and then knowing what exactly? did anyone actually expect some 'insider knowledge' from this tweeter? as if anyone would publish any details that way? i don't think so. even if anyone on the net knows anything, nobody would jeopardize this adventure and give it away in any fashion. nobody else but mike says 'go', if this whole thing should be working as planned.
fact remains that some of the links were very unusual and also very insightful, much more like others.
fact also remains that none of us knows who this is, if this person has any relation to mike, the hoax or not. even if it's 'just one of us' i don't see anything wrong or bad with it. still an interesting follow.
i'm pretty sure 'thisisalmostit' at least knows about this forum, which only shows that this is a serious place to be, hoaxwise. keep michaeling...
:mrgreen:
Sorry - but most of us aren't here for games. And I think you being a mod would need to say what you just did. However, just because someone is unusual and insightful doesn't mean they should be followed or even believed. And, yes, in my opinion, if he's going to play cat and mouse with us he sure as heck had better know something of value. I highly doubt this person is anyone other than someone connected to this site. Like I said before - please prove me wrong if you must and I don't fault anyone for wanting to continue to read the words he/she writes. For me I have more important things to do. Maybe I'll spend my time researching what good causes I can support. I think Michael would be more about that. Yes, I'll still be around. Blessings to you all.
i'm not saying that this is a game or should be regarded as one. 'being a mod' has nothing to do with my opinion. we don't know who this person is and as long as we don't, we shouldn't speculate too much on that but rather look at the info given, which is interesting, entertaining and also very useful. i don't think it's a waste of time but also that there shouldn't be so much emphasis on it being someone who plays around. if one feels that way, it's up to them to ignore that tweeter. peace... :mrgreen:
66
« on: July 07, 2010, 12:55:34 PM »
lol...like the 'female attention/ promoting hats'-note!
he also likes cruisin down p c h with the top down, btw...like i said: he's the fun guy outta the jacksons. the one everybody wants to hang with and paint the town red.
re: bad time...: i also think that it's not really important to look at punctutation in a tweet to decypher its meaning. if he had to go somewhere, he just tweeted that quickly and ran. i wouldn't read too much into that one.
:mrgreen:
67
« on: July 07, 2010, 11:20:24 AM »
well said TB. I agree with all you said. *hi-five* :mrgreen:
68
« on: July 07, 2010, 11:09:21 AM »
honestly, i don't think it's important if this is 'just another believer'. i find the tweets interesting and if that person decides not to answer anyone, that's his decision. we are also part of creating the mystery around 'thisisalmostit' by discussing the tweets. there wouldn't be no mystery if there wasn't an audience for it as well.
some of the tweets lead to info that wasn't discussed here before, so i don't think that this forum is the source of information. i'd rather think that #elvisandmjdotcom did create some attention in the right places, so i look at it in a positive manner.
i wouldn't take it all too serious, really. i look at these tweets as interesting and informative entertainment.
:mrgreen:
69
« on: July 07, 2010, 10:28:59 AM »
i'm not so sure if the tweets regarding #elvisandmjdotcom prove anything in terms of 'thisisalmostit' not knowing anything. does he need to? and then knowing what exactly? did anyone actually expect some 'insider knowledge' from this tweeter? as if anyone would publish any details that way? i don't think so. even if anyone on the net knows anything, nobody would jeopardize this adventure and give it away in any fashion. nobody else but mike says 'go', if this whole thing should be working as planned.
fact remains that some of the links were very unusual and also very insightful, much more like others.
fact also remains that none of us knows who this is, if this person has any relation to mike, the hoax or not. even if it's 'just one of us' i don't see anything wrong or bad with it. still an interesting follow.
i'm pretty sure 'thisisalmostit' at least knows about this forum, which only shows that this is a serious place to be, hoaxwise. keep michaeling...
:mrgreen:
70
« on: July 05, 2010, 07:00:26 AM »
they have left the building, or have they? #elvisandmjdotcom
when we were kings: #elvisandjdotcom
do the right thing: #elvisandmjdotcom
parallel universes: #elvisandmjdotcom
behind the final curtain: #elvisandmjdotcom
it don't matter if you're black or white: #elvisandmjdotcom
is seeing still believing? #elvisandmjdotcom
very important HIStory lesson: #elvisandmjdotcom
don't step on their blue suede shoes: #elvisandmjdotcom
kings' things: #elvisandmjdotcom
:mrgreen:
@mo: love the tmz-style! :lol:
71
« on: July 04, 2010, 05:54:12 PM »
this also came up as a result when googling 'revelation 2010'. interesting when considering that mike insisted on having organic food prepared by his chef and also in light of the degeneration of the foods we are consuming (processed and convenience foods, sweeteners etc.) You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Loginthere was also a french vid in the results about that but i couldn't do anything with it. my french is more than rusty...that made me look for 'codex alimentarius' and resulted in the above link. You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Logini think 'this is it'... :mrgreen:
72
« on: July 04, 2010, 05:42:01 PM »
@2muchmjluv:
i deleted your other post with tatiana's link because it was the same thing twice. but the link doesn't seem to work. could you please edit and provide a working link?
:mrgreen:
73
« on: July 04, 2010, 04:54:36 PM »
welcome. please use the 'newbie info' (summary of events since june 25, 2009) if you haven't already. it answers many questions and helps prevent double-posting...
:mrgreen:
74
« on: July 04, 2010, 09:53:33 AM »
i think a combination of several factors is the key here:
frank dileo is strictly business. he fired tatiana cuz he didn't want mike to be in a relationship that might have gotten public and it kinda did with that kiss. that's one more reason to cut it out, too. make ppl forget it happened. it was prob very obvious that this wasn't just a stage kiss but true romance going on. that would've prob did some 'damage' to mike's fame since so many female fans also meant a lot of money power. they didn't need that kinda outrage or possible money loss at the time and no risk for the tour to be jeopardized in any way. maybe frank also thought it would be 'inappropriate' for mike to be in a relationship with one of his dancers, presswise and all. just imagine the hype if they had made that public...frank was strictly into prevention of anything distracting the tour's success. businesswise it was prob the only thing to do, although terrible on the human side.
i also think it was mutual and they got carried away on stage. both of them. it's all visible in the shortfilm 'the way you make me feel' and tatiana also talks about the shooting and how mike was 'playing around' with her. chemistry galore, imo. everytime i watch that shortfilm, i can't help to think that they seem to be the perfect couple.
:mrgreen:
75
« on: July 04, 2010, 07:54:58 AM »
ian halperin is the classic example of a media whore who writes about anything promising him the most money. he acts like nobody else covered mike and revealed anything before him when aphrodite jones revealed it all years before halperin and lost her job over it. halperin waited with his 'revelations' until he was sure it got sold well. what a journalist... :roll: this interview was obviously before the book was published, cuz they wish him 'luck' at the end.
i had an interesting exchange with the german pro7 network about the 'gone too soon' film halperin made. i was complaining big time why they even considered that film in their program and that they obviously don't know about halperin. just the fact that they showed this flick on 'michael jackson day' (june 24th) is like letting the arch enemy hold the laudatio. you just don't do that cuz it's unethical. they recommended i watch the film and i 'would be surprised how positively halperin speaks about mj'... :roll: i did, just so i could see my criticism confirmed and tell them again what a scumbag halperin is.
this interview shows very well how messed up halperin really is. he changes his opinions with the wind, contradicts himself by first saying he talked to michael jackson, later in the interview it was 'handlers' of jackson...watch the other clips with opee and anthony tearing halperin another hole...i sent all that to pro7 as well...
:mrgreen:
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 107
|
Show Posts