This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - bluegurl201
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 11
16
« on: March 10, 2010, 02:55:40 PM »
Thanks TS, much appericated . Can't wait for your next update 
17
« on: March 04, 2010, 01:48:08 PM »
:lol: :lol: Thank you, actually I didn't even know you and Mo were being questioned.
18
« on: March 03, 2010, 07:54:52 PM »
Maybe she's just a fan, hmm :|
19
« on: March 02, 2010, 07:01:38 PM »
That was the first thing I thought back in late June/July. As much as I don't believe that is the (only) reason today, I wouldn't care if it was. Whatever his reasons are, this hoax is brilliant and I will take off my hat for him and make a deep bow... :lol: :lol: Opps sorry but that's true. L.O.V.E
20
« on: March 02, 2010, 06:54:44 PM »
*Mo* » Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:29 am
I am totally blown away by some statements I came across while catching up on this thread.
Let me explain something. I'd say that the majority of people on this board have no experience whatsoever with the music industry. Now I'm not saying I know it all because I don't, but at least I have been around in the business long enough to know what things are going on behind the scenes.
The entertainment industry is one big illusion. Artists, producers, managers and agencies will show you want they want you to see, and will let you listen to what they want you to hear. Publicity campaigns are put together to target audiences in different age groups, and an enormous strategy is involved in order to accomplish this. It's like one big movie script.
Have you ever been to a recording studio? Have you ever been present at a set where they record music videos? Have you ever been present at an artist's photo shoot for a promotional campaign? Do you have any idea what is done to create that big illusion you see and hear? If the answer to all these questions is NO, I'd really like you to think twice before you make comments which are not based on any knowledge nor experience...
Huge amounts of money are involved and invested in the entertainment industry, and money can buy ANYTHING. Google ProTools, harmonizers, compressors, equalizers and other related recording studio equipment, listen to samples. A song is not "ready to go" after simply recording the voice and the instruments. If that was the case, all these major label producers would be out of a job today. Go on youtube and watch "the making of" just anything in order to see what can and is done to manipulate any sort of film and video footage.
Now as for the use of doubles and I'd rather call them doppelgangers - the use of doppelgangers among the high profile celebrities, royalties, presidents etcetera is common knowledge to those surrounding them. People are paid big bucks to provide a service of being the double for the person they're being employed by. It's done for security reasons and diversion. There's nothing new about that.
If there shouldn't have been doubt about the use of doubles in This Is It, there would have been perfect doubles in the movie, looking and moving exactly like Mike. Since (in my opinion, as I see many differences) that wasn't done, to me it shows that we are to investigate these doubles and find out as to WHY they were used.
This has nothing to do with discrediting Mike, were here to investigate a hoax, and every single stone should be turned in order to get to the bottom of this.
I totally agree with you Mo, well said (:
21
« on: February 28, 2010, 03:34:27 PM »
I know the last pic is the real one cause I heard him speak in the movie and he was so cute bubbling his gum!
Without teeth?! Deffa cool moof....
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
22
« on: February 28, 2010, 03:19:38 PM »
by iMJacksonfaN » Sun Feb 28, 2010 7:01 pm
~Souza~ wrote:
iMJacksonfaN wrote:One picture is bended, one is straight in the legs.
And these pictures are from YouTube, the quality is not the same. A blind man could even see that.
No ToM, a even a blind man can see that those are not the same persons!
That's what YOU THINK AND SEE BECAUSE YOU THINK SO
I agree with Tom here, if you are wearing saggy jeans and ur knees are bended, then of course the jeans will appear tighter from the front, perhaps a view from the back will show that the jeans are still a tad bigger? Also of course someone will appear shorter if they are bending.
Dancing_Machine wrote:
misha86 wrote:
Dancing_Machine wrote:]
Do you have rock solid proof it's isn't Michael?
Unless you have that, you can't assume what appears to be Michael doesn't know how to dance.
do you have proof it is him? there are mulitple pictures of him with different facials structures and yet the only "reason" for this is lighting
For me the proof is that I see Michael Jackson on those pics. Common sense doesn't lie.
It's not realistic at all to claim it's somebody else.
Do you have proof that those are doubles?
It really disturbs me when you guys don't have proof those are doubles and then make fun off his appearance by saying it can't be Michael because the cleft "looks like an ass" and call it investigating. That really disrespectful to Michael.
I don't think there were any doubles but if you want to examine wether there were doubles it can be done with respect for Michael. There's no need to make fun off HIS features!
by ilprincipe » Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:06 pm
KeepTheFaith wrote:Wait a minute! where is this 3. picture from? it is not in TII as i remember, so it could be edited.
and all Michael btw
you are all confusing me...
I already agreed that no. 3 is NOT MJ..
I think this person needs a name. I will call him "froggy" because of this special eyes...
no. 3 is the same double like in the Smooth Criminal scene of TII....
same eyes....
but what's the conclusion...
there may be a lot of doubles...what does this mean for the hoax?
I agree with DM here, whether or not these men are doubles, I don't think it is appropriate for anyone to make comments such as "looks like ass" or name calling such as "froggy" simply because one is of the impression that it is not Mike. Remember, that to show disrespect for anyone is to show disrespect for yourself.
I am not of the impression that Mike used doubles in the film, I think that many of the differences can be explained by lighting, angles, and weight fluctuations as well as make-up and hair style...as a person who experiences frequent fluctuations in weight, I have experienced these differences (apparent change in the shape of my face- yes I kno it sounds strange, but it is true. I generally have a heart- shaped face, but I have seen pictures where I appear to have an oval or EVEN an elongated shaped face!) Because of this, I have a fear of taking pictures because I think I never look like myself or even look the same from picture to picture. Another example is my nose, if my head is tilted down and to the left I appear to have a str8 nose, however, if I turn a little to the right with head tilted back...much broader...I say all of that to say that we should be careful in our "analysis", because you never know...those "doubles"/humans with feelings could be reading as well...and after all they would only have been doing their job...
Totally agree, pyt777
23
« on: February 27, 2010, 01:03:27 PM »
I live in Canada so unfortunally I can't watch this or have VH1. Anyone have a link to the episode?
Much appericated.
24
« on: February 26, 2010, 06:56:12 PM »
my[KING]"]amen to that. Yup
25
« on: February 24, 2010, 08:00:57 PM »
Isn't it amazing how this poster can type a complete transcript of the call while claiming in the previous paragraph "I would have recorded it but I know its illegal to record someone without their knowledge".  I know, that is suspicous :|
26
« on: February 22, 2010, 05:37:20 PM »
Ya I know, I wonder what this clue means :|
27
« on: February 21, 2010, 06:49:21 PM »
hahaha :lol: :lol:
28
« on: February 18, 2010, 07:29:56 PM »
The new redirect is here: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login :|
29
« on: February 17, 2010, 08:15:44 PM »
Their is actually a person under that "green hat"? :|
30
« on: February 17, 2010, 08:10:46 PM »
TWO AMBULANCES AT MICHAEL HOUSE THE ONE THAT PULLED OUT WAS MJ DUMMY AND THE GUY WHO IS BEING SEEN COMING OUT OF THE AMBULANCE IS JERMAINE HE HAS THE SAME EXACT SHIRT ON WHEN HE MADE HIS STATMENT TO THE WORLD THAT HIS BROTHER HAD JUST PASS NOW FOLLOW ME ON THIS WHILE THE MEDIA WAS ALL OVER THIS. MJ GOT INTO THE SECOND AMBULANCE AND WENT TO A SECLUDED PLACE UNTILL IT WAS CLEAR PLEASE CHECK THIS OUT I BELIVE THATS HOW IT HAPPENED SO FROM THE VERY START IT WAS PLANNED. FOR MJ TO FAKE HIS DEATH THAT IS WHO IS BEHIND THE JACKET IS JERMAINE SAME WHITE SHIRT SEE FOR YOURSELF. JERMAINE WAS RIDING IN THE FIRST A MBULANCE THATS WHY THIS GUY COULD NOT SHOW HIS FACE GETTING OUT OF THE AMBULANCE. PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHAT YOU THINK I BELIVE THIS IS HOW IT HAPPEN. STARLIGHT777 LOVES MJ You got a link with that statement, hehe :lol: :lol:
|
Show Posts
