31
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 32
Michael Jackson News / Re: Ian Halperin ?« on: December 30, 2009, 08:39:33 AM »
didn´t he wrote something about MJ is wearing womens clothes? i know, the way he told it must be bu****it! but maybe he saw something and put it in the wrong context!
maybe MJ just tried it on for the memorial... just an idea... 34
Hoax Pictures / Re: What's the Big Friggin' Difference?! - O2 Dude« on: December 15, 2009, 03:41:36 PM »
But what i don´t get is there are the same wrinkles in his clothes, same posture, just a littlelittle bit different angle. Maybe from another photographer. Different exposure und maybe that´s why he looks different, a bit lighter, less shadow.
I don´t know...it´s definitely he in the same posture. you can´t do the same picture with someone else again! So same Michael, same announcement! 8-) 35
Other Odd Things / Re: A Book About His "Mysterious Death" Published 24th June???« on: December 15, 2009, 03:18:55 PM »Quote from: "jill"
yep right! I remember too. the first review was on 26th june, so if it were a typo, how can this gir,l i think it was, have read the book on 25th oder 26th to make that review on 26th. next post was on 1st july and so on. there were many post before 24th july. So it must be published before! and even 24th, 25th or 26th june is quit quick to write AND release a book about MJ´s death if he died two or three days before... strange!!! 36
The O2 Press Conference / Re: What's the Big Friggin' Difference?! - O2 Dude« on: December 15, 2009, 12:08:07 PM »
But what i don´t get is there are the same wrinkles in his clothes, same posture, just a littlelittle bit different angle. Maybe from another photographer. Different exposure und maybe that´s why he looks different, a bit lighter, less shadow.
I don´t know...it´s definitely he in the same posture, so you can´t do the the same picture with someone else again! :? 38
Hoax Pictures / Re: Question about the ambulance picture« on: December 13, 2009, 04:31:23 PM »
sorry guys, i don´t see faces! left one looks like patterns oder something, right with much imagination like a cat face. but tell me why should there be faces, especially MJs? like the clouds on the car where you can see his face? or in some shadows?
Let´s go back to the point why we can´t see the photographer or the camera. 39
Contradictions and all stuff that doesn't add up / Re: The timeline of death – the inconsistency and the lies« on: December 13, 2009, 02:03:05 PM »
Another thing I remember is that Conrad Murray said "He was at the wrong place at the wrong time" or something like that.
What does that mean? I mean, you only say that when you witness something you weren´t supposed to see, or whatever, but not when you (like the guy on the 991 call said) are the only person in that situation and you´re the one that act, the one who gave the prescriptions, the one who handle the whole situation. when you know what i mean. That´s another thing that screams hoax or coverup! (Sometimes the whole thing reminds me of the movie "The life of David Gale" just in another way..) 41
Dave Dave / Re: I found some interesting Dave Dave news« on: December 11, 2009, 02:40:34 PM »
On LKL Dave Dave said he changed his name to be his 'own person'. It makes me wonder WHEN he allegedly changed his name, or did he just start CALLING himself 'Dave Dave' and did he change it LEGALLY... I was just thinking, that if the 'real' Dave Dave didn't announce that he wanted to drop his surname UNTIL he appeared on Larry King...
Does anyone know? Or did i miss that topic we actually had? 43
TMZ Articles / Re: Jackson Kids Had a Baller Thanksgiving« on: December 10, 2009, 04:05:18 PM »
Could be Hardwood Suite in Las Vegas..
44
Dave Dave / Re: DAVE DAVE IS THE CLUE!!« on: December 09, 2009, 04:08:21 PM »
I am wondering why this topic has never been discussed in the media before, i mean this lovely story about DD and MJ, when MJ helped him when he was little and was like a father to him.. yeah, i know, because it´s GOOD news... you always heard bad news... that´s so sad! now that he´s gone the world realizes step by step the good soul of MJ, i hope he is with us to hear and see this.
If only those persons like DD had the possibility to talk about him earlier... Same with what Al Sharpenton said at the memorial: "I want his children to know there was nothing strange about your daddy, it was strange what your daddy had to deal with." I hope MJ heard his words! (yeah i know we all believe he is alive and he heard it, but i´m sure you know what i mean..I just pray he does) okay, back to the discussion: i thought about "hatman" and i think it could be makeup artist Rick Baker. He´s the one who created the "werecat" Michael transforms into in Thriller and was also the makeup effect artist in "Ghost". So he must be a really good makeup artist by the way You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login 45
Michael Jackson News / Re: The Jacksons are on LKL!!« on: December 09, 2009, 11:23:47 AM »Quote from: "Smelly"
Someone posted this on the official michaeljackson channel: This is it movie on 25th november: Ok, I have returned from the movie. I sat there in total darkness until the very end. The Columbia Pictures sign came on, the screen showed nothing and then 3 seconds of what played last night came on. No pictures, only words. The Jacksons are in the recording studio and they are told that they sound like the Supremes. These are the words that were spoken tonight: you guys sound like the Supremes, you guys sound like the Supremes. And then nothing. ? Why was the rest cut out? If you have a movie, how can the movie be missing parts from each showing to showing?? Especially in the same theater and the same frickin auditorium!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's bad enough that extra words are put in sometimes and a scene is inserted a few more times than others or if a scene isn't there at all, but why remove something at the end of the movie when the movie is over?? And why did they leave those words in? I believe this scene was in the middle of the segment that I saw last night, so why the editing job? Is this a reference to Diana Ross? Are we now being given clues bit by bit at the end, the extreme end? |