Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Xsy

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
31
Dave Dave / Re: Repost: Official Dave Dave thread
« on: January 09, 2010, 05:28:15 PM »
Take a look at that picture again and compare it to the two pictures Mo posted. It´s really strange...

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

32
Michael Jackson News / Re: Ian Halperin ?
« on: December 30, 2009, 08:39:33 AM »
didn´t he wrote something about MJ is wearing womens clothes? i know, the way he told it must be bu****it! but maybe he saw something and put it in the wrong context!
maybe MJ just tried it on for the memorial... ;)

just an idea...

33
Hoax Videos / Re: This video has been published
« on: December 21, 2009, 08:54:22 AM »
It reminds me of michael´s waving when he was watching TII rehearsal. 0:37

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

34
Hoax Pictures / Re: What's the Big Friggin' Difference?! - O2 Dude
« on: December 15, 2009, 03:41:36 PM »
But what i don´t get is there are the same wrinkles in his clothes, same posture, just a littlelittle bit different angle. Maybe from another photographer. Different exposure und maybe that´s why he looks different, a bit lighter, less shadow.

I don´t know...it´s definitely he in the same posture. you can´t do the same picture with someone else again! So same Michael, same announcement!  8-)

35
Quote from: "jill"
Quote from: "DontBelieveTheHype"
I remember this. It first said it was published on June 24th and later  changed to July 24th. You know what, even if Amazon say its a typo, that was a BIG typo... The author knew something.

I just checked out the listing on Amazon and read the reviews.  There is one review that was posted on June 26th so apparently the 24th of June could be correct.  I would post the link but I don't know how.

yep right! I remember too. the first review was on 26th june, so if it were a typo, how can this gir,l i think it was, have read the book on 25th oder 26th to make that review on 26th. next post was on 1st july and so on. there were many post before 24th july.
So it must be published before! and even 24th, 25th or 26th june is quit quick to write AND release a book about MJ´s death if he died two or three days before...
strange!!!

36
But what i don´t get is there are the same wrinkles in his clothes, same posture, just a littlelittle bit different angle. Maybe from another photographer. Different exposure und maybe that´s why he looks different, a bit lighter, less shadow.

I don´t know...it´s definitely he in the same posture, so you can´t do the the same picture with someone else again!
 :?

37
Dave Dave / Re: Repost: Official Dave Dave thread
« on: December 13, 2009, 05:15:48 PM »
There´s a third one with Miko in the car.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

38
Hoax Pictures / Re: Question about the ambulance picture
« on: December 13, 2009, 04:31:23 PM »
sorry guys, i don´t see faces! left one looks like patterns oder something, right with much imagination like a cat face.  :D  but tell me why should there be faces, especially MJs? like the clouds on the car where you can see his face? or in some shadows?
Let´s go back to the point why we can´t see the photographer or the camera.

39
Another thing I remember is that Conrad Murray said "He was at the wrong place at the wrong time" or something like that.
What does that mean?

I mean, you only say that when you witness something you weren´t supposed to see, or whatever, but not when you (like the guy on the 991 call said) are the only person in that situation and you´re the one that act, the one who gave the prescriptions, the one who handle the whole situation. when you know what i mean.

That´s another thing that screams hoax or coverup!

(Sometimes the whole thing reminds me of the movie "The life of David Gale" just in another way..)

40
Dave Dave / Re: I found some interesting Dave Dave news
« on: December 11, 2009, 03:48:24 PM »
just have a look at that blog. scroll down a bit to dave dave. i don´t understand a word, but very interesting pictures!

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

41
Dave Dave / Re: I found some interesting Dave Dave news
« on: December 11, 2009, 02:40:34 PM »
On LKL Dave Dave said he changed his name to be his 'own person'. It makes me wonder WHEN he allegedly changed his name, or did he just start CALLING himself 'Dave Dave' and did he change it LEGALLY... I was just thinking, that if the 'real' Dave Dave didn't announce that he wanted to drop his surname UNTIL he appeared on Larry King...
Does anyone know? Or did i miss that topic we actually had?

42
TMZ Articles / Re: Jackson Kids Had a Baller Thanksgiving
« on: December 10, 2009, 04:43:56 PM »
Quote from: "Xsy"
Could be Hardwood Suite in Las Vegas..

Yes! I have to quote myself. It´s definitely Hardwood Suite!!!
You can see it on the ground of the basketball court! There´s the same sign!

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

43
TMZ Articles / Re: Jackson Kids Had a Baller Thanksgiving
« on: December 10, 2009, 04:05:18 PM »
Could be Hardwood Suite in Las Vegas..

44
Dave Dave / Re: DAVE DAVE IS THE CLUE!!
« on: December 09, 2009, 04:08:21 PM »
I am wondering why this topic has never been discussed in the media before, i mean this lovely story about DD and MJ, when MJ helped him when he was little and was like a father to him.. yeah, i know, because it´s GOOD news... you always heard bad news... that´s so sad! now that he´s gone the world realizes step by step the good soul of MJ, i hope he is with us to hear and see this.
If only those persons like DD had the possibility to talk about him earlier...
Same with what Al Sharpenton said at the memorial: "I want his children to know there was nothing strange about your daddy, it was strange what your daddy had to deal with." I hope MJ heard his words! (yeah i know we all believe he is alive and he heard it, but i´m sure you know what i mean..I just pray he does)

okay, back to the discussion:
i thought about "hatman" and i think it could be makeup artist Rick Baker. He´s the one who created the "werecat"  Michael transforms into in Thriller and was also the makeup effect artist in "Ghost". So he must be a really good makeup artist by the way ;)

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

45
Michael Jackson News / Re: The Jacksons are on LKL!!
« on: December 09, 2009, 11:23:47 AM »
Quote from: "Smelly"
Quote from: "Xsy"
Quote from: "Smelly"
Haha, this line was classic:

Tito: You guys sound like The Supremes in there
Jermaine: Shut up

 :lol:


Hang on! Did they say it in the interview at LKL??? I haven´t seen it.
It´s exactly the scene some fans have seen on 25th november in this is it movie!!
so if it was really a dialoge from the jacksons on LKL, these fans must have really seen it!
It was a clip of the reality show shown in the interview, it was in the second or third link of the posted videos. Did they include this scene in the movie?! Strange...

Someone posted this on the official michaeljackson channel:

This is it movie on 25th november: Ok, I have returned from the movie. I sat there in total darkness until the very end. The Columbia Pictures sign came on, the screen showed nothing and then 3 seconds of what played last night came on. No pictures, only words. The Jacksons are in the recording studio and they are told that they sound like the Supremes. These are the words that were spoken tonight: you guys sound like the Supremes, you guys sound like the Supremes. And then nothing. ??????? Why was the rest cut out? If you have a movie, how can the movie be missing parts from each showing to showing??????????????????????????????????? Especially in the same theater and the same frickin auditorium!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's bad enough that extra words are put in sometimes and a scene is inserted a few more times than others or if a scene isn't there at all, but why remove something at the end of the movie when the movie is over????? And why did they leave those words in? I believe this scene was in the middle of the segment that I saw last night, so why the editing job? Is this a reference to Diana Ross? Are we now being given clues bit by bit at the end, the extreme end?

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal