This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - misha86
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 33
16
« on: April 08, 2010, 10:52:14 PM »
First of all let me say thank you for all the time and effort you are putting into this.
Everything you have mentioned are all things I have also thought about and questioned. Unfortunately I don't have the time or the resources to research things as thoroughly as I would like to. So that is why I am grateful to someone like you who can bring this to the forefront so it can be investigated.
This should be very interesting. Maybe that is what was meant by the This Is It poster and DVD. "DISCOVER THE MAN YOU NEVER KNEW"
I can't believe my eyes.......
HAHAHHAHAAHHAAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAH i leave for a month or so and NOW everything thinks/knows/ see that there has been doubles for atleast 20years :roll: at this point if/when mj comes back, if he does, i wouldnt even be shocked it he was still black :lol: "meet the man you never knew" LMAO but seriously it would be easier to use doubles with lighter skin,glasses and wigs 
17
« on: March 26, 2010, 11:46:01 PM »
good clip, for some reason something popped into my head that I believe applies to this:
Being from Northern California I just want to point out that 2 of , if not the most violent citys in cali,and the whole USA are Richmond and Oakland. if I am not mistaken they are next to chemical sites. I beleive if you were born in richmond before a certain time than you got a check because of the chemicals and the harm it did/does. Also Hunters Point in San Fran i believe is near a chemical site and not only is that a very violent place but they have an abnormally high cancer rate. I think I am going to research this info and come back and post about it. If so that makes so much sense and its very very sad.
as usual Dick Gregory is great!
18
« on: March 10, 2010, 08:15:45 PM »
they had aaliyah on there is she is not hip hop and when i watched i didnt see tupac..they could have showed him earlier but from the hours i seen he wasnt shown
and honestly i would still except to see mike on a hip hop list if aaliyah was on there because he has influenced all of black entertainment
19
« on: March 10, 2010, 12:36:11 AM »
Im sitting here doing my homework and i have been watching/listening to Mtv in the backgroud and so far nothing on Mj..its been a couple of hours, maybe i missed it but so far i have seen:
aaliyah
easy e
big l
lost boys(freaky tah)
RUN DMC ( jam master jay)
biggie...he died on this date
dolla
i know he is not hip hop but his influence is there so he should be mentioned also and if i am wrong and someone sees/seen him my bad....lol
20
« on: March 09, 2010, 11:09:21 PM »
I hear what you're saying about him being a private person. However... that is the very reason why outsiders (remember we are in that group) never knew who he was really dating or involved with.
The publicists arranged for him to be seen with Tatum, Brooke, Madonna, Princess Stephanie etc. What about the other romantic female companions that were his choices? Naturally, I am not talking about those buddies of his like Liz or Liza...lol.
Remember male celebrities are advised to keep a low profile when it comes to their love life. They are advised to do this because of the negative feedback that could result from their female fans. There are females who will reject a male celebrity if it is perceived that he is not available. There are still female fans of celebrities who look at these guys and believe that they have a chance to be with them romantically. Publicists don't want to ruin the fantasy and cause the celebrity to lose female fans as a result. Female fans buy the cds, attend the concerts and support the celebrity. This is a business and they cannot afford to face that type of financial loss.
I stopped reading after this post! thank you so much for saying this because alot of people seem to forget that! the last thing they wanted was for people to know or think that michael jackson, the cutie from J5 OR MJ the biggest selling artist ever was taken! if the other brothers had to lie about having wifes what you expect from mike?? what you see on tv is exactly that! that does not mean he didnt date, have sex or anything like that pre 1993 LOL. The media only talks about relationships its some type of power couple that can help both parties careers i.e brad and angelina, bey and jay, brit and justin..you get the point A good example of that is stephanie mills said that her and mike dated for awhile and she thought they would marry. she said this way before mike died! the reason why they probably never talk about them dating is because 1( back then it wouldnt have been good for fans to know he had a girlfriend and 2( his PUB didnt set that relationship up for him :roll: lol Good Post!
21
« on: March 05, 2010, 10:11:28 PM »
during that time they were suppose to work together on they were going to be on each others albums
and like i said in the other topic jay z meantions him 3 times on his album which is kinda weird to me
and im still trying to figure out what he means by that line and the connect to oprah, who is talking about first and obama and mj..
Oprah interviewed him on her show a couple months ago. I watched that one, she went to the "hood" he grew up in, that's what he means by the line is his song. The MJ line in his song, refers to the summer jam concert that I am referring to, where Michael made an appearance. IDK about the Obama one though? He & Beyonce were just at the White House or something. Maybe he & Obama communicate or aree friends? IDK.
lol i know what he is saying literally but i dont understand is what is the purpose of saying that in the song? and why meantion them 3 together
22
« on: March 04, 2010, 08:04:21 PM »
during that time they were suppose to work together on they were going to be on each others albums
and like i said in the other topic jay z meantions him 3 times on his album which is kinda weird to me
and im still trying to figure out what he means by that line and the connect to oprah, who is talking about first and obama and mj..
23
« on: March 03, 2010, 11:32:27 PM »
the first thing i thought about was the electro shocked used in programming
24
« on: March 03, 2010, 11:30:02 PM »
Jay Z?? the devil worshiping freemason? :roll: probably mentioning some illimunati figure
:lol: I'm sorry but I think some people are running with this Illuminati stuff and going on the attack for no real reason. I know, I know. He has a lot of symbols in his videos. I get that. However, he could've did these symbols because he knew people were talking about him being a "devil worshipper" and figured, okay I'll give them something to talk about. That's a great way to get some buzz going. It's a business tactic. He is a businessman.
he has meantioned being in/with the illuminati since his first album that came on in 1996 so i dont think he is just using the symbols when he not only has been down since day one but his label is named after 1 of the 13 bloodlines as far as him mentioning mj as the king, i doubt it BUT i will point out that he meantions mike at at least 3 times on his album "black or white we both like mike"-venus vs mars "I thought shorty like mike, found out she likes prince"-venus vs mars "mj at the summer jam, obama on the text, yall should be scared of what im gonna do next.."-on to the next I also want to point out that mike has been mentioned in ALOT of songs in the past year, starting right before he "died" if i have time at work tomorrow i will make a list of them and post them here
25
« on: March 02, 2010, 10:30:36 PM »
Great topic!
If this was just for publicity i actually wouldnt be mad at all and i would say that it worked and here is why:
I, being honest, had not paid mike much attention since the 90s everything they ever said about him was bad so i just stopped listening, i did watch bashit and made sure he was found not guilty but for the most part i didnt really follow him like that. when he "died" i couldnt get over it and thats how i started to watch his interview more and more....and learned more about him that i ever would,heard songs i never heard,interviews i hadnt seen and read the conspiricy book and the j.randy guys book...that alone makes this hoax worth it..realizing that he wasnt the person i thought he had became but much more! i can go on and on about what i have learned but im not...lol
reason number 2 why i wouldnt be mad is that it taught me to question EVERYTHING in the media, just like how we seen the BS in his death story i can see the BS in most stories printed now and words can not express how much that has changed my life..again another big thank you to mike
reason number 3 is the NWO rather you believe in it or not or that mike was MK ultra or not it is still worth looking into and again a life changer for me, i hadnt read a book in so long b4 this and now im constantly at the library and ordering books so i can be more aware
reason number 4 the whole thing about the clues, how genuis is that! there are clues going back to the 80s! who else could have thought of that! even when i thought this was only about a movie i thought that was hella tight how he had people and sources basicly speaking to US!
reason number 5 is the introduction to his family, being a huge janet and mike fan i actually enjoyed the jackson show and seeing his brothers and mikes neices and nephews! to see a postive black family means alot to me!none of them in jail, they all seem to be good fathers, the neices and nephews seem to be doing good for them selfs, well spoken, attractive..lol i enjoyed all of them! especially Siggy :lol: . I think there great and im glad they got some shine!
and with that said there is really no way that this is SOLELY about publiclicy because alot of things were brung up and brought to our attention that if you used it you could have grown as a person like i feel i did....and if mike is watching thank you, thank you, thank you
26
« on: March 01, 2010, 03:55:21 PM »
You guys almost sound funny.
You're claiming that the doubles can look more like Michael, than Michael does himself :lol:
Oh give me a break! :lol:
The only thing that looks slightly different on Michael is the cleft, like that's enough to call him a double?
There is no such thing as doubles looking exactly like someone else. You want to have the proof? -> As long as I know we're still living on planet Earth in the year 2010 not a Si-Fi movie.
![]() Have u ever heard of prostetic make up? Like mike wore in the ghost video? That's how u can look like someone
27
« on: March 01, 2010, 12:56:56 AM »
Picture of MJ with no make up: look at his chin and nose on this picture and then compare this to the 3rd and 4th pictures that were posted in first comment..how can you say that all 3 of them are the same person??? :lol:
28
« on: March 01, 2010, 12:43:43 AM »
For me the proof is that I see Michael Jackson on those pics. Common sense doesn't lie.
It's not realistic at all to claim it's somebody else . its not realistic to ignore the physical differences in these people and just assume they are mike. Your only seeing mike in all the pictures because thats what you want to see, there is plenty of photographic evidence that these are all not the same people...
Do you have proof that those are doubles? :roll:
![]()
please explain how his ears are bigger in the first picture and not in the 2nd? again you are only seeing what you want to see
It really disturbs me when you guys don't have proof those are doubles
you keep saying this and yet there are PLENTY of pictures that show the difference in facial features in 3months...you have not supplied 1 thing to show that IT IS mike other than "you see mike"
and then make fun off his appearance by saying it can't be Michael because the cleft "looks like an ass" and call it investigating. That really disrespectful to Michael.
lmao no its not disrepectful, mikes chin doesnt look like an ass, thats other guys does therefore i am not making fun of him, mike has had a cleft since what 1987 and it has never extended that far! but again you seem to ignore that shit its must be mike :roll:
I don't think there were any doubles but if you want to examine wether there were doubles it can be done with respect for Michael. There's no need to make fun off HIS features
and for the last time THAT IS NOT MIKE! you can go to his website and look at ALL the pictures from the bad era and on , even at the annoucement, and he has never ever ever had a cleft like that!
29
« on: February 28, 2010, 12:35:59 PM »
. It is not about a different looking cleft or nose or whatever at some picture, it is the overall image.
.
so are you saying that as long as the person has the "overall" image then its mike?? as long as they have a cleft, reguardless of size, light skin, and a curly wig its mike???
No, many more things.
You're not making sense. What are you saying here, that it would be OK to base an identification on just one thing like nose or ear or cleft but not on the overall picture?
yes :lol: you do identify someone by there face dont you?the facial features of all 4 of the men in those pictures are different and yet no one has an explaintion why other than it must be him or the lighting ect. there is no way that doing the course of shooting that movie that his cleft, nose and eyes changed that much or his height for that matter
30
« on: February 28, 2010, 12:04:10 PM »
. It is not about a different looking cleft or nose or whatever at some picture, it is the overall image.
. so are you saying that as long as the person has the "overall" image then its mike?? as long as they have a cleft, reguardless of size, light skin, and a curly wig its mike???
|
Show Posts
