This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - fordtocarr
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 94
31
« on: February 16, 2012, 09:57:22 AM »
What I'd LOVE... A post from TS/Front...that isn't cryptic, or up for interpretation. One where we don't have to guess or decide who's post is the one we are going with. One where it's just out there point blank. 
32
« on: February 14, 2012, 09:40:14 PM »
Love to you all 
33
« on: February 14, 2012, 06:12:22 PM »
LONG article...more comparisons to Michael... You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
34
« on: February 14, 2012, 04:11:15 PM »
I guess that statement TMZ printed about Michael not wanting to be buried in NJ, was suppose to say NEVERLAND. Michael didn't want to be buried in Neverland. TMZ live is comparing Whitney's funeral plans, will etc, with Michael's. Of course...
They also said Sony jacked up the price of Whitney's music 50% right after death. Then said it was a mistake, that "someone" accidentally jacked it up and it was not suppose to be done.
Harvey said it was a fictitious person.
OH, also, I'm wondering, while making comparisons, why Paul McCartney, went to the hotel where Whitney died, and paid respects, and yet, there was no reporting of him doing so for Michael, or going to the memorial or funeral, even though Paul claims to not be mad/peturbed with Michael over the Beatles catalog.
36
« on: February 13, 2012, 01:21:31 PM »
Sony/ATV is NOT "THE" only publisher, nor the largest, I think the second though. YET, they hold publishing rights to the largest artists.
As in ones who have "died". Things that make you go hummmm
"Michael Jackson"
Whitney Houston
John Lennon (The Beatles anyhow)
Elvis Presley
James Brown
Jimi Hendrix
James Morrison
This cant be a coincedence fordtocarr,this is very shady to say the least.All of those celebs died very mysteriously.Well i dont know whether theyre all dead,but this makes u wonder what the hell is going on.
Seems to me, that these performers 'WE'RE" top performers at one time. The music that SONY will make off them with every song played is...ching ching.....
What seems like it consistent, is that these performers we're all trying to make come backs, but have been slow on the comebacks. With these artists comes royalties on the songs Sont already has.
I feel if the artist retires on his own & isn't plagued by negative press, Sony will continue to make money, off the artists prevous music, because he left on a positive note.
When the artists gets bad "press", added in the artists using drugs, some fans are turned off by that, & could deter from buying again if the artist tries to make a come back & is still battling negative "press".
I'm going to give you a GREAT EXAMPLE.....
Brett Favre
I"m from Wisconsin, bout 30 miles from Green Bay. When Brett retired as a Green Bay Packer, fans rushed out to buy his jersey, his books, magazines, etc....He retired as a Packer......so we thought.......then he decides to come out and say he wants to play football, but plays mind games with his fans & NFL league as a whole. He comes out of retirement. Plays for the Jets......( mind you, his #4 wasn't a big hit on NFL gear, etc) then he decides to he's going to play for the Vikings. (same #4) with now the fans from not only Greenbay feeling dejected, now he's got Jet fans feeling betrayed, & Viking fans feeling the same way.
When Brett retired as a Packer, I bought his retirement books, newspapers, etc......everyone felt great he was retiring as a Green Bay Packer.....money is rolling in because he started with Green Bay, he retired a Packer......well......
The companies that make thier most money off a artist/athelete is when they come into the business. They are "fresh", not enough of the private struggles don't come in till later in their career.
So you have Brett, who "retired", as a Packer, then he decides to come back, but now the true colors of Brett have surfaced, (arrogant, selfish, drug addiction (which came out when he was still playing for Green Bay, but he was young enough to redeem himself) & then WANTS to play for another team in our same division?
Packer Fans we're buying his #4 in record sales, when Brett retired as a Green Bay Packer. He left a postive words of encouragement upon leaving the fans.
When he decided to "un-retire", & then his arrogance of his selfishness surfaced, (which he kept masked pretty damn good in Green Bay) the sales of #4 just plummetted.
I won't buy anything of Brett Favre's of any #4 again. (Green Bay, Jets, or Vikings)
To me, Brett isn't "marketable" anymore in his younger Green Bay image.
NFL apparrel doesn't product his numbers like they did before, they cut their losses, & continuing to keep up the image of his younger days, just makes him look stupid.
So when an athlete/artist is in the prime of stages, the (record labels/NFL, ) have to keep that image going as long as they continue to make money.
Once that athlete/artist retires, then wants to make a come back, & their imaged has been tarnished by use of drugs, bad press. or just bad choices, they might have a chance.
But in the final stages of making the record labels/NFL apparrel money, the fans have to have a POSITIVE image of their athlete/artists LEAVING the industry. So welcoming them back can be POSITIVE.
If during the "off time" the athelete/artists is plagued with drugs, police, selfishness, arrogance, etc....the $$$$ that can be made off that person has just vanished.
By looking at the list of names on the SONY list of "unexpected disappearances/death" are artists that we're in the prime with the songs that SONY already owns. Any new songs, that are made after a "come back" won't bring them the royalties that we're there before the artists had his/her personal woes.
So athletes/artists can become .....disposable!
Very interesting. I can't help my mind from thinking that it's quite ironic. In the long run, we know Michael is alive, and scooping up the chaching from royalties on these other dead artists, but it does again make one wonder about Sony or "the catalog" being part of the reasons for the hoax.
37
« on: February 12, 2012, 03:19:50 PM »
I like this one...looks like Neverland, hopefully it's not here already
38
« on: February 12, 2012, 01:14:39 PM »
Sony/ATV is NOT "THE" only publisher, nor the largest, I think the second though. YET, they hold publishing rights to the largest artists.
As in ones who have "died". Things that make you go hummmm
"Michael Jackson"
Whitney Houston
John Lennon (The Beatles anyhow)
Elvis Presley
James Brown
Jimi Hendrix
James Morrison
39
« on: February 12, 2012, 12:32:10 PM »
I don't know what you are seeing. I just see a string bracelet...
40
« on: February 12, 2012, 11:12:21 AM »
Joe Jackson on twitter:
"If we are really going to make a change for the better & achieve a massive transformation then I'm gonna need all of you to spread the word!
If you always think you are more than you are, you will always have space to learn and grow.
If someone dreams of it someone can believe it, if someone believes in it someone can create it, if someone creates it, everyone can use it!
If it is to be, it is up to me!
If during your time in this existence you help to change the direction & improve the life of one other, you have lived a life more than most
I will persevere, never waning, never stopping, never giving up until this existence which I have been born into is back how its meant to be"
Joe Jackson has a twiter account?
RIGHT Gina. And from what I've heard of Joe speaking, these words sure don't sound like him do they?? I wonder if these are someone else's words...? I honestly will not believe Joe would say this or feel as these words.
41
« on: February 12, 2012, 08:37:46 AM »
Well, what's weird is that article says that Whitney was shockingly thin, even skeletal, but when you look at her timeline of pics, she looked like that years ago, not recently. Also, she'd just finished a movie due to be released this summer, so I'd say she was prob. looking pretty good and feeling better to have done that. JMO
But, in the awful pic TMZ is showing, she just looks drunk, not skeletal.
Also, look at the stretcher pic they have of her...it's NOT flat at the end, whether it's head or foot, like Michael's was.!!
42
« on: February 12, 2012, 07:56:01 AM »
Guess who has the publishing rights to Whitney's music!
Sony/ATV...MICHAEL
43
« on: February 11, 2012, 06:57:07 PM »
Creepy Sim.....
Here I thought he was leaving me some special message...like..stick to what I believe...etc, but that was written before I responded. So perhaps, it didn't matter WHO posted, just that the numbers worked out. Or perhaps, it was my referring to what I did that he was emphasizing. But, then there is TWO coincidences. So, I think that this was simply a repost to match the numbers no matter what the message was.
44
« on: February 11, 2012, 06:42:30 PM »
Sittin' back on this one......watchin' from the sidelines......
TS could have redirected only to the original post by Front.....but that wasn't the case.....so the reply by fordtocarr was what we must be focussed on, in combination with the uplifting post by Front.
HEY, I agree That makes sense... but I really didn't say anything, but point out further what he said..about the forest analogy and the POEM! soooooo.....
45
« on: February 11, 2012, 05:50:49 PM »
TS likes numbers, that much we know. fordtocarr's post is a nice, short note of a gracious nature. That could well be the whole of it or......that along with these numbers from her post:
post # 669
6+6+9=21 (7+7+7)
date 2/9/2012
2+9+2+1+2=16=1+6=7
or her post number right now: 1497
1+4+9+7=21 (7+7+7)
Whole lotta 7's going on......BTC, can you please do me a favor and check my math :lol:
Blessings Always
DANG!!!! Magic I didn't make that happen, neither did Front, so tell me, can you take anyone's posts, add their numbers and come up with 7's??
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 94
|
Show Posts
