Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - diggyon

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 82
16
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I'm wondering if he was referring to the Obama administration.  Because Obama was inaugurated earlier in 2009.  Maybe Michael wanted to see the administration make changes (possibly environmental changes) within the 4 years he would be in office, otherwise the state the environment is in now would be irreversible.  I'm wondering if that segment started with him discussing Earth song which led him to say this statement.
Collaborating with the devil to expose the devil??? I thought the American Administration is involved in the Ebola circus and in other crimes as well, wich is exactly what the hoax is exposing!!!!!  →PARADOX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

17
Others / Re: Is artist B. Howard a Jackson?
« on: September 28, 2014, 04:17:25 AM »
Sorry to say this, but am i the only one here who thinks that anyone's private life should be respected???? Why is it so important to know if BH or even Obee is a Jackson or not???? Geee!!!!!! 9 pages already about this subject!!!!!!! Anyway, sometimes i think that BH is nothing but a bait for hungry sharks who need stories like this. If that is the case, then i guess MJ has succeeded and the media has gone crazy about the story.

18
References & Similarities / Re: Crazy NOI Connections to MJ
« on: September 26, 2014, 01:58:46 AM »
I checked the biography of Paris Jackson on IMDb. Since she is Prince's sibling, she must have the same cousins. But in her bio Ghaddafi is not mentioned. I don't thinks those kids have anything to do with him.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

19
Other Odd Things / Re: Is this Murray?
« on: September 25, 2014, 03:35:31 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
OTOH, many times when a clue is given out, once they (MJ &crew) realize we have it, the source is removed. So it is there as an easter egg waiting to be found. Going with the possible partial ARG purpose, that may be how slippery playing this, can be. We have the clues, but they are buried in mountains of archives like needles in haystacks, only retrievable by hoaxers in forum by searches, and personal files.

I wonder how many clues are still hidden in haystacks!! I hope we didn't miss any of them!

20
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't wish to rain on the party, but i truly think that grown up adults in a family that has so many issues and argues and trials and contracts and God knows whatelse including money, DO HAVE words about each others. I believe Jermaine could say so about MJ, and i believe MJ could say so about his family. I don't say i'm right or wrong, i just see what this people "do", the way the act, and sometime, i don't see any LOVE. So how could this be part of the Hoax... I don't mean they hate each other. I just say everything is not black or white (lol)

We don't know who may be in the know, and in what way. Anyway, being in the know surely may not change what people think deep inside. Maybe Jermaine knows MJ is alive, yet he thinks MJ would have been nothing without the J5. He may be part of the hoax as a character, under a contract signed with MJ.

Such deal wouldn't include the lines "Jermaine must kiss my *** in every words he says about me"

Jackson family love and support each other, Michael is playing with the media, don't believe anything they say, Jackson family are playing a role in Michael's hoax, they like controversy to be under the spotlight, all Jackson family members know MJ is alive, time will tell.

I totally agree with you sweetsunset. I still remember the fight Janet had with Paris. And of course that was not a real fight. Then we saw a picture of Janet holding a gun lool I think we should be used to this by now. None of what the Jacksons say about each other is true. They don't fight because hey hate each other or because they are jealous of their brother. They are playing their roles in the greatest show on earth lol. All we have to do is sit back, relax and order some pop corn because knowing that those fights are not real is fun in itself. Somehow I believe that they are paid for what they do. If MJ has hired some actors, he would have paid them too. But being paid for helping a family member is a little bit disturbing for me. But may be others would see nothing wrong about it... 

21
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Odd pic... In my opinion that girl is not Paris.. She is so different!

I agree. It's a totally different Paris. Now I wonder where the other Paris is!!!

22
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
@Diggyon

What difference does it make if the kids are with Katherine or Debbie?

@Do, Exactly.

All I can say is that moving the kids from Mrs. Katherine's house to Debbie's house is something we must stop at (if Debbie gets the kids). It's just my opinion, that's all.

23
Because of all the reasons mentioned in the article Debbie will definitely get those kids, which means that we're heading towards the next hoax chapter.  :icon_e_ugeek: :icon_eek: :ghsdf: :animal0017:   

24
Hoax Pictures / Re: The mystery of MJ's height
« on: April 10, 2014, 07:01:49 PM »
Actually i don't believe that there are 2 MJ's but I'm open to any new theory because I'm a beLIEver since 2009. But in order to convince people with such a theory there must be good evidence. May be we should start a new thread where we can post all the pro's and contra's and see what we will discover at the end. May be it's time to put our investigation glasse on again!  8)

25
Are we supposed to beLIEve TMZ's stories??? Seriously.... :icon_e_ugeek:

26
Prince, Paris & Blanket / Re: Paris appears in Prince's new Vine :)
« on: March 06, 2014, 03:17:43 PM »
I totally agree with Souza. When I saw the vid I thought that this is Paris. But when I saw the photo I changed my opinion. The girl in the pic looks different. And since those kids are only actors who can be replaced any time........  :icon_eek:

27
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Well it's a FEDERAL tax, it's called an estate tax that deal with the value/inheritance of a dead person.  If MJ was alive, he'd not have to pay estate tax. 

So the government could be flushing him out of hiding with the threat to take $702 million, IMHO.

Well, just like Curls, I'm not into taxes, nor do I feel like this has to do with the hoax, so I'm not going into that, just wondering why TMZ comes up with old news?

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

The article states that first the court has to rule in favor of the IRS before they can go further. When will this be happening or is this in court already?

Quote
When I talk about government I ONLY talk about Obama that we all once agreed he was for sure helping him due to MJ began the hoax shortly after rising to the presidency.

I don't remember in what way Obama helped Michael with his hoax? Do you have examples to refresh my memory? I only remember Obama giving a little tribute to Michael after he died, by saying he has his music on his I-pod, and that we lost an incredible musician, that's about it. And 'the four years to get it right' speech maybe could refer to Obama, but I'm certainly not sure this was done in a good sense.

Do I'm with you on this.
Do you really want to know why T.M.Z. (Thirty Mile Zone ) has brought this allegedly OLD news back?? Well,it is..... becasue it is not at all ,a OLD news,in fact it is a very Actually one  :icon_mad: .What people need to understand it is that the rabbit-hole it goes way deeper that people think it's very complicated......even for me .....after more than 4 years of investigations.
First of all, we need to rethink what was "told to us" about WHO Michael really is and WHAT he really owns......for real......becasue this CONfusion is everywere you look !!!!!!! During M.J. ( Michael Jackson ) history ,at one point it was told that he was in fact poor and had nothing.....just the Beatles catalog.....and the rights to HIS own music lol .Just when you think he is rich enough to live another 100 hundred years,the newspapers and media comes back and tell us,that he is in fact very rich lol :icon_eek: .This kind of CONfusion applies even to another things we were told about Michael.So let's see some example:he was poor/he was not poor,he was black/he was white
(or became white) ,he was short/he was tall(more taller than people think lol),he was ill/he was in fact not ill at all( ex: after 2009),he was childish/he was very mature (even very clever businessman) etc....... .In another word,all this were simple DETAILS, (that can be noticed if you really pay attention lol ) which were applicable in a certain period of history, according to the needs of certain persons/ groups of persons/corporations .I know this sound very strange,and in fact it really is lol.....but it was done DELIBERATELY to create CONfusion,about the person Michael Jackson and about his life.To create CONfusion about what all this begun,about who he reallly is,about his supposed business deals,about what he really OWNS.
In conclusion (and this is my oppinion only ) Michael Jackson does not own a damn thing,and as a person he is worthLESS!!!! But if we talk about a CORPoration like for example S.O.N.Y. ,that's something else .Branca always had double role in this,he was working for SONY/M.J.
Now the question is who Branca really is and for who is he working really,because as we know SONY is a CORPoration and it "front" of a CORPoration can be mANYone lol.For the people who are doing this,......this is a GAME,which in fact, for us is not......because people are dying every day because of them.This people/group of people does not care about us and never will.....because of the M.O.N.E.Y.  :woohoo2:!!!!




applehead I don't get your point! For me this is very simple because this is what I understood so far: if MJ doesn't come back he will have to pay all that money. But but if he comes back he won't pay those taxes. Now what did you say about MJ being wothless???

28
Oprah Winfrey / Re: Michael Jackson - Oprah Interview Outtakes (1 & 3)
« on: February 17, 2014, 12:04:56 PM »
Is this little baby really Prince? OMG! This means that he is not 17 years old! !

29
Oprah Winfrey / Re: Michael Jackson - Oprah Interview Outtakes (1 & 3)
« on: February 12, 2014, 12:53:52 PM »
It's true that we don't know Michael Jackson. But he seems to be very funny and nice. Shame on all the haters out there.

30
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
What if MJ pops up at the WMA's next May 27 2014 in Montecarlo??

5 + 2 + 7 + 2 + 1 + 4 = 21!!  YAYAYAYAYAYAY!!!  ;D


Interesting date  :D I just can't imagine him pop up in front of so many people telling them he is still alive. I can't imagine how a come back would be like!

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 82
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal