Blog

Yes,  Starchild This blog is a real gem.
The facts are indeed facts, always underlined with documents (links) so that anyone can verify for themselfs.

It truly was my pleasure to add it here, and hope from the bottom of my heart that people would take the time to invest time in reading all there is about these new allegations and also the old court documents.

It's beyond cruel how they have treaten MJ and even continue with the same old story's over and over again, with everytime a new name searching for their pot of gold, without to many labour.

Here is some interesting expiriment:

https://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/2015/01/08/asch-solomons-experiment-a-word-of-encouragement-for-truthseekers/

http://jjb.yuku.com/topic/527676/t/Accuser-admits-he-lied-Michael-Jackson-never-touched-him.html#.VO2D_yy8rYg

So the estate still ownes Neverland? or ownes percentages of the property? i lost the facts  because so much things has been written about Neverland, and imo nothing is clear and can be verified.

can't find the new topic button , so i add the link here, it's my opinion that the Child.M case regarding W.R. is very important, and i would like that articles written about the case( wich have value to inform people with facts instead of lies) , to add them here and  get a clear story for people who don't know the inns and outs.

https://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/2015/02/23/wade-robsons-fake-story-of-home-alone-at-neverland

i hope you are right, and that we see the interview back again.

Thank you for the link!

There has got to be some hoax video that has this info in it, I guess I should have been watching them all this time.  :icon_e_biggrin:

Love you Michael!

Hello again everyone, it's been quite a long time since my last post.

I searched for the interview, and remember it if it was only yesterday , because the voice was so simular to MJ's voice,Unfortunately, the interview isn't on the net anyore.
It says the vid doesn't exist, and that people thought  it was Michaels voice , but that they were wrong.
Although imo it was a strange thing and i am still convinced it was his voice.

I will never forget that interview. especially the Voice.
RTL was claiming in the intro that the interview was done by their own repoter. So they own the rights too tho?

here's the link: http://www.rtlnieuws.nl/boulevard/entertainment/%C2%91michael-jackson-bij-interview-rtl-boulevard%C2%92

btw, isnt it odd  that i can find every interview done by RTL Boulevard anyone of the Jacksons, even back to 2009, except  for that one interview.

the way i understand this is that the judge has given Wade's team time to change the papers, so that he can go on with this BS. lawsuit.
Maybe it's even for the better the dirt is already on the streets again, time for the estate (this time) to set the record straight ,.....again....!
I believe the more comes out the more Wade its  true colors come to light for general public to see...$$$$$$

i don't understand what Latoya's underwear and Janets bras has to do with the estate :icon_eek: there is even a adult S.. toy between them, btw the auction  doesn't state that it is Latoya's toy.. i think it's quiet humiliating for the family to ad this kind of stuff. this bothers me,... a lot of the things are private items . And i can not imagine the Jackson Family are happy with this auction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLMab-o0h7I#t=119

The Estate should have contacted Tom Messereau, he has won the case in 2005, it's odd imo.

the you tube button is not working. sorry can't post the vid here, only the link.

From my personal interaction with people just this weekend, brought on by talk of Cliff Richard, I'd say the public is getting wise to the dubious actions of both the media and money hungry opportunists. These people I was with aren't particularly fans of MJ, but they don't believe he was ever guilty of anything, they didn't know about Robson and Safechuck but dismissed their claims as money grabbing, when I told them.

MJ fans tend, I think, to view the few vocal 'haters' as a reflection of the general public, but increasingly I don't think that's true.

The danger of course, in a swing from believing every allegation reported by the media, to believing nothing, is that genuine victims will not be believed, and real abusers will get away with their actions.

Yes you are right, and i have to recall   " lots of people" i had to be saying " some people.
But i still don't see how the WR allegation would help MJ. we know in the past there wasent so much of a media circus when MJ was aquitted of all charges, it wasent in the media's needs to set the record straight. They wanted him to be guilty,....

I find it hard to swallow that WR is part of the hoax, i don't think it will help MJ to further dirt his name. because there are lots of people who only hear what the media tells them. So the allegations will hang in their minds for ever, even while he was aquitted from it in 2005,there are still lots of people who believe the line "if there is smoke, there must be fire".

Strangely enough it's MJ who had to proof he is innocent for all these years, It's the law who says" innocent untill proven quilty".,and thats how it should be, but the world just doesn't seem to work that way,.... doesn't?

@ShyBleuEyes, what are you trying to say regarding Robsons body language? Please enlighten me here. thanks

I always and still think MJ is innocent, and i like to add proof that he is innocent, also for people who come and visit the forum, but who doesn't have the knowledge or haven't dig into this story, i like to add proof and facts that will underline the truth, wich is that MJ never did something wrong to any child.
This vid was imo an interesting one, also because it's giving me a better view of how the mind and body works.
There is clearly a huge difference between Sandunsky's answers and MJ's way back, MJ said in de past, ï will slit my wrist if i ever did something wrong to any child, ( not an excact quote). When the interviewer asked Sandunsky the question if he is sexual attracted to boy's he is avoiding the question big time.
I hope i have answered your question Michaelslady, if not please say so..

I also just want to point out that Wade talks about his truth! so NOT the truth but his.

Hello It's Her,

first, i want to thank you for your reply. i try to reply to you but it will be later, i have difficultys to explain what i want to say. due to language. and it will cost mtime wich i havent right now.

i will add a link about wade robsons body languages, wich is imo interesting:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHdGRrkesfY

You are right @Suspicious.....quoted from an interview here. Seems this story has changed a few times .

'This is not a case of repressed memory. I have never forgotten one moment of what Michael did to me, but I was psychologically and emotionally completely unable and unwilling to understand that it was sexual abuse.'

I had the facts wrong about getting married at Neverland....Wade and Amanda got married in 2005 in Hawaii upon further digging. But he is on record saying that both families got together for BBQ's.

but i wonder about the legal aspect of all of these. as long as these things are out there does that keep the estate from being settled and still needing branca and weisman to execute it?

Yes that BBQ took place in July 2008!