This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Coco
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
46
« on: October 17, 2011, 04:50:58 AM »
actually the thought of having a whine and cry thread is too funny to whine and cry in it <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: -->
LOL, this sfm.
47
« on: October 16, 2011, 06:02:50 AM »
This is amazing. If this is all a movie (or a movie is part of the hoax), oh my gosh, it will be beyond words...
You've gathered clues, I barely noticed. The connections with Britney, in her new music video, are great.
Like someone said earlier, I love seeing things visually, so thank you!
48
« on: October 15, 2011, 02:27:15 AM »
Another "moon" connection, if you look at the autopsy photo label: People v. Murray SA073164. Taking that as a date, July 31, 1964, there was an historical event. "Ranger 7 sends back the first close-up photographs of the moon, with images 1,000 times clearer than anything ever seen from earth-bound telescopes".
Wow, that's a great connection! The pre-autopsy image isn't very clear, though. :lol:
49
« on: October 15, 2011, 02:19:49 AM »
Ah, yes, I remember watching that Harry Potter special on CNN and my thoughts immediately going to Michael when he said that. I wonder what it is... It may or may not be hoax/Michael-related.
50
« on: October 13, 2011, 12:10:51 AM »
Oh my gosh. I absolutely adore ANTM.
MJ/Jackson-related ANTM? I think I have just died and gone to heaven.
I'm watching for sure. Maybe there's a clue or two... rr/
51
« on: October 01, 2011, 09:38:42 PM »
Let's take the version she addresses the large public (non-believers) what logic does this have? Read between the lines for what? If it's the truth, what RBTL she asks for? Or, if they say lies in court, again, why RBTL? If they are lies, you simply treat them as lies. There's no truth in a lie. It simply has no logic.
1. truth is truth, you don't have to RBTL when the truth is said.
2. lies are lies and there's nothing to RBTL in a lie. If for example the prosecution argues that Michael killed himself/drank propofol- what can you read between the lines as large public (non-believers)? That's a lie, and nothing to read between the lines.
I agree with you and don't see anything 'WOW' in La Toya's tweet.
Scorpionchick, I do find it strange. As I stated above, it makes no sense for the nonbelievers. No matter how I take it, from a nonbeliever point of view it makes no sense what she said.
Read btw the lines by Latoya was directed at US, believers. It's not about non-believers. There're so many lies hidden BTW the truths and there're so many truths hidden BTW the lies in this hoax. That is the reason why we are always told to read btw the lines by the family. Marlon wrote the same if you guys remember it. They are trying to say that, 'the truth is not what it seems. It looks like Michael is dead and even us are saying he is dead but that is not the truth, try to catch the hidden clues we're giving in the lines. That is the reason why we're asking you to read btw the lines.' This is what we are supposed to do and actually doing during the past 2 years. We're reading btw the lines and that is the reason why we found out about the hoax. We know a truth is not the truth and a lie is not a lie in this hoax and in life actually. And Latoya is the second family member who used the same line "read btw the lines" and some others used "connect the dots" which is all a WOW for me.
Marlon wrote that?! When? Why? How? :shock: /woohoo/ About reading between the lines - it's directed at everybody, I should think... We should all be careful and wary of what we're hearing and being told.
52
« on: October 01, 2011, 07:59:14 PM »
No, I don't think doing it at a real courthouse in a real courtroom constitutes entrapment so long as the proceedings are clearly not official in nature. The state seal makes everything official government business, from documents to letterheads to courtrooms. A fake seal renders these things invalid. There was another fake seal in the last 2 years as I recall, DC perhaps? Off the top of my head I don't remember which document but it was also something obviously inaccurate about the seal. It was CA also.
(edited to add: what I'm trying to say is that a state seal is like a government signature. A falsified signature renders a document, transaction, or agreement invalid. Forging a signature is done with the goal of being an exact replica, ie performed with the intent to deceive. In this case, the incorrect seal is not fraudulent because this replica is clearly and obviously not the same... visible by anyone who cares to notice.)
:shock: I've been thinking... Are other seals put up in courtrooms? (As well as the one of the state the courtroom is in.) Why was this seal filmed? Is it the only type (or one) in the courtroom? Was it filmed intentionally, or did it just so happen that it was? (Filmed to cause questioning, doubt, etc...) "A fake seal renders these things invalid." Does everyone in the courtroom/involved in the trial recognize or understand that the proceedings going on, are of a false nature? I think, that's about it... I'm going crazy with thoughts. :lol:
53
« on: September 30, 2011, 11:06:57 PM »
I think the image looks like this on purpose.
As in, we're meant to be having doubts and questioning its legitimacey...
But, why? What is the reason for it?
(Also, if the photo is found to be fake will there be trouble.
And couldn't Michael just have posed for the photo appearing to be dead.
Why does there have to be questionable editing? Hm.)
Probably not explaining myself too well, here. :?
54
« on: September 30, 2011, 07:01:29 PM »
I wonder, I wonder... /pull hair/
It would be interesting to see their "perspective".
Blanket looks like he could bite you if you got too close, in that photo.
55
« on: September 28, 2011, 12:33:23 AM »
Okay - so Anthony Jackson just tweeted about this video...
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login ANTHONY JACKSON I feel like I'm watching a soap opera. So many lies, innuendoes and I don't even believe that was his voice. 13 minutes ago
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
I thought this was quite interesting.
56
« on: September 28, 2011, 12:16:18 AM »
This morning gave me the perfect opening statement (although significantly less formal then you might expect). Thank you TMZ for this quote:
Sources close to Prince tell TMZ ... the 14-year-old is "nervous" and worried that if he's called to the stand he might get flustered and "mess up." You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
Although it's full of journalistic interpretation, it does include a quote from Prince; "mess up", which is a statement you'd expect a teenager to say regarding concerns about going on stage in a performance... not taking a witness stand in their father's accused doctor's manslaughter trial. If you take the witness stand, there's nothing to "mess up". You just tell the truth. You don't mess up the truth, you just tell it. Scripted lines in a live stage production, on the other hand, you might forget or misspeak, aka mess up.
I'll be laying out my reasons that I believe court is a scripted production directed by Michael himself, ie "Hoax Court".
Disclaimer: I do believe there will be aspects of court that are real; it's really happening live at the court house, for example. There are almost certainly real court employees who complete their day-to-day duties who are none the wiser in regards to the hoax. All attending members of LAPD may not be privy to all aspects of the production and may only have direct orders of how to proceed when things get unorthodox, for example, without direct knowledge of the hoax. There will be other aspects that we see that are very real. But the bottom line of my belief is that what we will be seeing on TV is a MJJ Production.
Anyone who feels as I feel, and believes as I believe... help me out and back me up and together we will ultimately prove that MJ is the master of illusion who created and launched the Greatest Show on Earth!
Game on! bounce/
Maybe he meant “mess up” as in he’ll say something he didn’t mean to, or get mixed up. Or the nerves will get to him and he'll make a mess of what he means to say. Then again… I suppose all he has to do is tell the truth. (How do you get mixed up with the truth?)
57
« on: September 27, 2011, 11:57:14 PM »
1. Yellow cab company outside with number 222-2222. I think the area code was 246. Yellow cab in the Wiz and toy cab on judge's desk in past.
2. V mask on back of someone's head outside.
3. Another odd photo on gurney.
4. Voice on tape sounds like a prank from a comedian. (That was funny). Nobody is mentioning how it sounds nothing like him.
5. Prosecutor mumbles I'm bad and Defense mentions 3D Thriller movie.
6. When they show MJ's dresser in his bedroom it has Sweet Baby banner on it w/lots of baby photos on plates, I think. lol.
7. Conrad support banner flying on an aircraft.
8. Some guy outside saying hugs not drugs with a he's bad sign.
9. A lawyer named Joey Jackson commenting on case.
10. Even one of the commercials seemed off to me.
11. Some guards have chevron on sleeve, some have a star instead.
About the voice on that tape, Anthony Jackson tweeted this - ATONCLASSIC ANTHONY JACKSON I feel like I'm watching a soap opera. So many lies, innuendoes and I don't even believe that was his voice. 12 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply The family is speaking out. I wonder what the lies and innuendoes are? And why a soap opera?
58
« on: September 27, 2011, 03:13:01 AM »
Thanks so much, Souza! I will be watching (and enjoying?) this trial closely. /judge/ ![]()
59
« on: September 27, 2011, 02:47:53 AM »
Oh, I just watched something similar on CNN. Something along the lines of Michael's conference being delayed for 90 minutes (I think?), because he had passed out (or something... ) and had difficulty getting off of a sofa (I remember this clearly), backstage. (I have to be more alert.) There's a lot more being said about the trial, in the news.
Hmmm, not sure about all of this. But, it is going to be really interesting to see how all this plays out. I hope the right decision is made.
/overreacting/
Sorry.
60
« on: September 23, 2011, 10:11:47 PM »
I'm shocked, I mean Paris retweeted a twitt from Illuminati account that promotes the Illuminati concept, not fighting against them.
The account was created on 17 Septhember 2011. You can verify here You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
Maybe the TheIIluminati account isn’t in support of the Illuminati at all... Perhaps, it’s against them. Like PureLove said “ The IIluminati TII = This Is It! This looked like she wanted to mean THIS IS IT ILLUMINATI”. Besides, their tweets could be considered positive… They seem relatable and not altogether sinister, with the exception of the O.T.I.S tweet… I think it’s a possibility, though I’m probably wrong. Also, I can’t see any tweets prior to the one Paris retweeted. I could have sworn there were more… Unless, I’m mistaken. Oh well, this is all very interesting.
|
Show Posts
