Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MichaelsAngel

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 15
31
TIAI & TS Discussions / Re: TS/T.I.A.I discussion
« on: January 17, 2012, 11:48:04 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Well, that
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Yet in some of the comments you can clearly see that if it were to suddenly be revealed concretely as coming from Michael...then presto-chango...it's all good.  What good is it really if you only accept the message because you like, love (or in some cases are obsessed with) the messenger?  Wouldn't that mean you have totally missed the point IN the message?  A healthy dose of skepticism is never a bad thing...any dose of cynicism is never good.

Hmmm...
 Imagine for one second that such "charismatic messenger" happens to be no other than Charles Manson, or another psychopath/ sociopath/ serial killer....let´s say...someone despicable in the eyes of society. Would you still "accept the message and it´s messenger?

It is VERY important to know the messenger now days.

I put it this way. I may accept the message in general terms but not the messenger.




Of course we'd all jump on if the ts bandwagon if we found him to be Michael!  That's why we are here.  But, there are in the know people coming and going all the time.  I WANT to be 100% for sure...about anything I read...isn't that what Michael told us to do?

That may be the point. People are only willing to follow the message if it comes from Michael. To me, that means that you (i'm talking in general terms, not necessarily you Ford) really don't care what the message is. Rather, you just care about pleasing Michael. Thus, the importance of the message itself is lost.
WOW...I'm certainly not here to please Michael.  To please ANYONE.  I'm here to satisfy my desire to be with others that believe Michael is alive.  I'm here to find friends all over the world who love Michael and his music, dance, words and love.  I'm here MAYBE, not necessarily to find out why Michael did the hoax, but if I don't whatever.  I just want to know I'm not crazy like the world feels I/we are in believing Michael lives. 
About the message, I don't even believe there is a message actually.  I don't have proof that it is about religion.  About saving the world.  About and ARG.  About a movie.  About getting crocked doctors or pharmacies.  About the court system.  Whatever we've guessed at.  And it don't matter to me.  It just matters that he's alive.  He'll let me/us know when it's time to do it.
About only believing a message if it comes from Michael...THAT IS why I'm here.  For Michael.  Anyone can tell me anything any place in my life, that don't mean crap.  Using what was said above about if a message of love came from Manson...EXACTLY!  What I feel about that is, NO.  Just because anyone is claiming LOVE and that it's what Michael wants them to be saying don't mean it's true.  It could be A "manson" a whoever.  Right, if it's a good message, then what does it matter, right?  NOT.  I do care who they come from.  On line we can be anyone.  Just because an angel is an angel don't tell whether it's a  good angel or a bad angel.  Just an angel.  Same with the message.  Just because it's a good message, don't make it a good person giving it.  OR from Michael.  Wish it did...AND MAYBE IT DOES.

I understand where you are coming from. I honestly didn't mean any disrespect...I'm sorry if it came across that way

32
TIAI & TS Discussions / Re: TS/T.I.A.I discussion
« on: January 17, 2012, 06:18:56 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Yet in some of the comments you can clearly see that if it were to suddenly be revealed concretely as coming from Michael...then presto-chango...it's all good.  What good is it really if you only accept the message because you like, love (or in some cases are obsessed with) the messenger?  Wouldn't that mean you have totally missed the point IN the message?  A healthy dose of skepticism is never a bad thing...any dose of cynicism is never good.

Hmmm...
 Imagine for one second that such "charismatic messenger" happens to be no other than Charles Manson, or another psychopath/ sociopath/ serial killer....let´s say...someone despicable in the eyes of society. Would you still "accept the message and it´s messenger?

It is VERY important to know the messenger now days.

I put it this way. I may accept the message in general terms but not the messenger.




Of course we'd all jump on if the ts bandwagon if we found him to be Michael!  That's why we are here.  But, there are in the know people coming and going all the time.  I WANT to be 100% for sure...about anything I read...isn't that what Michael told us to do?

That may be the point. People are only willing to follow the message if it comes from Michael. To me, that means that you (i'm talking in general terms, not necessarily you Ford) really don't care what the message is. Rather, you just care about pleasing Michael. Thus, the importance of the message itself is lost.

33
Thank you Applehead for brightening up my day!  bearhug  bearhug

34
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: January 15, 2012, 11:41:07 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Just when I thought the illuminati are controlling us with mind control and are fucking with our minds.

Nope, it's meeeeeeeeee. Mwahahaha. *bec rubs hands together and looks devious*

 lolol/

 :evil:

35
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: January 15, 2012, 11:40:24 AM »
Why does every thread have to turn into a cat fight  /pull hair/

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
@bec... OMG! does that mean we've been mag-funked???  afraid/

IF this site has some 'ties' to Sony...is it really that surprising when you consider WHO one of the major stakeholders of Sony is?

It's all about perspective and connecting the dots.  For those who have followed TS (and actually read ALL his posts instead of speaking out of ignorance)...the 'ties' between HIM and Sony were established a long time ago.

With L.O.V.E. always.

Excellent post!  bearhug

36
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: January 14, 2012, 12:29:51 AM »
I love our hoax music...we should play it at the Bam party  party/

37
The Coroner and Autopsy Report / Re: Michael Jackson Autopsy Photo
« on: January 12, 2012, 07:49:59 PM »
Interesting finfin...it does kind of look like it

38
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
But marijuana is a natural healer.... there hasn't been 1 person who has ever died from marijuna overdose....no lasting side affects........doesn't affect other organs......please read up on true natural state of marijuna b4 saying it's a junkie drug........BIG PHARMA......IS THE LEGAL DRUG DEALER........SAY YES, TO MARIJUANA.

I never said it was a junkie drug. I really don't believe it is a junkie drug...I just don't like the idea of smoking anything, not marijuana itself.

39
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Might I add that the cannaboids in marijuana have been shown to attack cancer cells while leaving healthy cells alone. Obviously, there's not enough research nor funding to conduct proper research for this, but it would make sense that that is exactly why marijuana has been given such a bad rep on purpose. If marijuana was legalized and regulated medically and recreationally, the big pharma industry would literally die a very quick death. People without medical insurance have already been "self medicating" for years and are some of the healthiest folks around. I'm not saying marijuana is the answer to all this, I'm just saying it's a great example of how we're lied to and how THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT US!

Marijuana is used for a lot of medicinal purposes and it has been given to cancer patients. Being legal for recreational use and being legal for medicinal use are two different things. People can get medical marijuana with a prescription (especially in California). The issue of legalization is more in terms of recreational use and lets face it, it will be used more for that than medical use. I don't think that marijuana is any worse for you than alcohol or cigarettes but I do not agree with people who say it is perfectly natural. The fact of the matter is that if you smoke anything, it will have an effect on your lungs and marijuana gives you a high.I really don't care if it is legalized or not. I just don't agree that it is as healthy as everyone tries and makes it out to be.

40
Back's old posts / Re: new life in vegas-back post 2/7/2007
« on: January 08, 2012, 01:56:31 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
and yes DL would be for something like the down low,, or for better words,, "keep it in the closet" ; )

haha I like this definition the best

41
TIAI ~ 2012 / Re: TIAI January 6
« on: January 08, 2012, 01:23:11 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
But the story goes even further, that GOD caused the death of the first born male in every household... children... GOD did this. Not just condoned but CAUSED.

Bah. Doesn't matter. Just sayin'.

That's why I don't believe in the biblical God. I believe in God, with all my heart, but not as he's described in parts of the bible.

I tend to agree with this. I believe in God with all my heart but I'm skeptical of the Bible because it was written by man and I just can't imagine God would condone some of the things that are said in the Bible. However, I really need to study more about the Bible to gain a better opinion. I just need something that will push my faith in one direction or the other.

42
Back's old posts / Re: on Kanye-back posts 2/27/06
« on: January 05, 2012, 11:25:52 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I think the meaning is that MJ has real talent in his camp....meaning Kanye is in the MJ camp....but Kanye is also arrogant.

So BACK is talking about MJ having Kanye in his camp and that  Kanye is talented although arrogant according to BACK.

Again - how would BACK know this? unless of course...........

Agreed

43
Back's old posts / Re: Katrina Song-back post 1/13/06
« on: January 05, 2012, 11:11:57 PM »
Thanks for all of your hard work Bec! These Back's threads are awesome

44
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: January 05, 2012, 11:10:34 PM »
Welcome to your new home Front!  bearhug

45
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: January 03, 2012, 11:51:08 PM »
Can't we all just get along and agree to disagree?


Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 15
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal