This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - pikachu
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8
16
« on: May 05, 2012, 05:42:20 PM »
So maybe you should tell us all how this hoax works and how to connect the dots. We are all too selfish to understand.
'The obvious' is called obvious because it was said/printed/shown many times. All important things were said by MJ himself. the irony is that NO ONE LISTENS TO YOU, until you set up a little scandal, mess or provocation ; ) But when there is a mess, it's too late to try to be heard.) So, this is the method, and MJ knows it and uses sometimes, but many words, said in the midst of crowd, quietly, remain unheard. How on earth to make us paying attention, without resorting to a scandal, if we don't pay attention? Plus, everybody sees what they want to see, not what really is. (for instance, Gina sees me as 'a guy' and doesn't miss an opportunity to flirt ; ) :icon_lol: So the question is not how it works, but how to make people see? I don't know. How can you assume PEOPLE care only about themselves? If we cared only about ourselves why were we here for 3 years instead of going on with our own lives?
Gina, relax, I didn't expect you would understand the difference. it's possible 'to be here' without true presence. As well as to see without real 'seeing', I guess needless to explain such platitudes...
17
« on: May 05, 2012, 04:49:22 PM »
So who DO you mean? Or are you just being provocative?
I know, I get on your nerves, Souza, but actually, no, I'm not being provocative. yet.) I just told, people are blind because they care about nothing, but themselves. this postulate is especially actual here, in the hoax. this is the main reason that doesn't allow them to connect the dots and to see the obvious facts about that case, including the man. (* did I express myself non-ambiguously enough this time?) @Gina You said this.) (* yes, let's say this is the off-topic and stop here. Maybe let's talk about mmm how to quit smoking or to lose weight? as to me, I quit 26 months ago and lost 24 Ibs. Another off-topic? well, sorry guys, don't even know what subject to offer then... @Veronicafall Veronica, fall if you want to, but no need to fall such low.
18
« on: May 05, 2012, 03:52:58 PM »
I hate this kind of judgement. I am NOT an angel, I am NOT a demon. The sooner people understand this, the better. It's just human nature.
ps: maybe you should adjust your expectation from "girls" ...or your prejudgements about "girls". I am too old now to pay attention to what OTHERS want ME to do, not you, but people in general...
me, me, me, me, me.... i, i, i, mine, mine, mine... that is what prevents people of seeing the simplest and the most obvious things about the others. A big ego overshadows a view, you know? sure, I mean not you, Gina, but people in general ; )
19
« on: May 05, 2012, 01:52:02 PM »
@Souza, @Ginafelicia
you know, I really am an apologist of a 'woman's nature' here, but sometimes girls behave so mmm funny... it wasn't sarcasm, rather an irony -- by this I just tried to hint, that some moves are hardly appropriate, but, well, probably it's just me, so forget it.
my motivation, Gina? hehe, I just keep watching. ; )
Anastasia, a beautiful name, by the way.
20
« on: May 05, 2012, 10:11:47 AM »
@Souza maybe it's different but still you made me think about my "Bob" lol, obviously another user here. Different personality, maybe, but definitely a Virgo.It just stroke me the "old guy" thing. Could be a coincidence though.
wow. comparing notes is the most amusing part of any girlish party. it may sound as a bad joke, but every gal in the hoax has her own 'Bob', lol. (statistic observation.) well, let's all start writing here our hidden messages to 'Bob'. lol Mmm, although, I've got a feeling, that 'Bob' may dislike it.. Or, au contraire, he may be in awe (haven't decided yet) -- it's a funniest show after all. lol :icon_lol: ....................... * Bob, son of the bitch, call me!!! :thjajaja121:
21
« on: April 27, 2012, 11:45:36 AM »
That said, you HAVE to know that I care...by now. You HAVE to know that I understand frustration. Stay strong! Strong? my teacher (he is a man) says, that if a man could have been within a woman's conscious at least a day, he would have gone mad. in fact. for the world of woman's emotions, the amount of channels of comprehending reality is so huge, the information she gets an every minute is so complex and subtle, the range of emotional fluctuations is so wide, that a man's psyche would have never coped with it. so, a woman's daily reality is a man's insanity. well, try to imagine what's going on within a mindfunked woman's mind, when she actually feels like she is going mad... welcome to hell and neverending bad trip, boy. no offense, but I don't think the man can really 'understand' frustration of predominantly female audience of the hoax. though, sure, we 'bought' our tickets to that funny ride ourselves... ...by now. the devil is in the details...
22
« on: April 26, 2012, 03:38:26 AM »
destination: beginning----> end destination: end----> beginning Sometimes one must venture into the opposite direction in order to come full circle and acquire NEW realizations from the SAME window-seat scenery.
Wow dear Mr. Fro_t!! THAT particular quotes of Your just openned full Phandora Box , isn’t ? ha-ha - to more and more interfiere with TS religious posts and all the deep meaning we are (succesefully?) digging behind the Mega-Global Matrix of your Hoax. Shall we beginns? - from Present to Past and and Back to nowa-days.
Murder in the Cathedral
is directly linking to Burnt Norton and also amizingly fit with Michael"s feat. )) :bowdown:
Its a verse drama by T. S. Eliot that portrays the assassination of Archbishop Thomas Becket in Canterbury Cathedral in 1170, first performed in 1935. Eliot drew heavily on the writing of Edward Grim, a clerk who was an eyewitness to the event.
those are great quotes, of course, I love Eliot too, but with the same success you may start quoting here the whole world literature and entire Wikipedia. for this tale is as old as time. no need to dig sooo deep, the meaning of Front's words is on the surface... all is simple. as zen ; )
23
« on: April 26, 2012, 03:19:00 AM »
Ps. @Front, wtf does this mean:[/b]
destination: beginning----> end destination: end----> beginning Sometimes one must venture into the opposite direction in order to come full circle and acquire NEW realizations from the SAME window-seat scenery.
I don't see a group who's starting at Bamsday and working backwards toward death.
An end is always a beginning of something new. (New beginning) Sometimes one must venture into the opposite direction in order to come full circle and acquire NEW realizations from the SAME window-seat scenery. to leave to get back again. to lose to find (to appreciate), again. to go down to the very bottom to find an impuls to rise high, again.. to die to live, again. = full circle
24
« on: April 26, 2012, 03:17:24 AM »
I know that, that wasn't what I meant. It's the fear of disappointment, that somewhere down the road we misunderstood some crucial stuff, you know? It's been three years and there are times now that you start to doubt your own sanity. Just try to explain this all to a total stranger and imagine his/her face. Then you have the people around you, who did give you the benefit of the doubt at start, but start calling each other behind your back now because it has been 3 years and they are worried about your mental health.
Anyway, I need sleep. Maybe I'm more positive tomorrow. I'll think about this whole thing here.
look, he does his best to give us a sort of calm -- everything is gonna be okay. he offers the only help available at this time -- his words. sure, at some point, words are not enough for us, words are helpless, so he gives even a sort of confirmation that his words are worth of credibility. but seems it doesn't work again. for if you have no knowledge and confidence in your heart and mind, no source is convincing and credible enough for you... take a look inside yourself, I'm sure, you already know the truth.
25
« on: April 25, 2012, 05:57:01 PM »
I'm having a difficult time envisioning how this will come to be. The stronger the resistance the stronger the unified bond?? I guess I will just have to remain patient as always because you've lost me completely this time, Front.
Like on a rubber band, Bec. 'Faraway, so close.'
26
« on: April 23, 2012, 06:43:41 PM »
sure, it's not Tupac. He's wearing a white shirt and no bandana. AND - if he really was Tupac, don't you think everyone in the bar would notice, and be looking at him?
No. If it really was Tupac, he was an exact metaphor of truth. So he was safe. )
27
« on: April 18, 2012, 04:42:47 PM »
Move Over, Tupac—Michael Jackson Hologram Could "Absolutely" Go On Tour With His Brothers
Read more: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
28
« on: April 18, 2012, 04:33:10 PM »
oh, must say, the hoax insiders became soooo bold lately! love it ; )
29
« on: April 18, 2012, 01:13:50 PM »
probably the off-topic, sorry if so. BREAKING NEWS: EC APPROVES SONY/ATV-EMP DEALYou are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login"Sony and its investment partners have been given the green light from the European Commission for their $2.2 billion purchase of EMI Music Publishing a day ahead of its scheduled ruling, the Financial Times reports. And the Commission’s stipulations will cause minimal pain to the principals. The decision will be announced tomorrow."(btw, congrats, Mr. J! ; ) ........... Front happened to use the spelling like 'tIME', sometimes it was in the same line with a 'takeover', one day this made me wonder -- wasn't it linked to EMI?
30
« on: April 18, 2012, 11:59:48 AM »
Maybe he had doubles, and used himself, and also dressed himself as one of the doubles. That's totally GENIUS. No one can figure anything out. He can also walk around dressed like a double or come back and no one would be sure who it is.
Masks, glasses,hats and gloves are just perfect also. There are soooo many who try to copy it. Smart, Smart, Smart !!!!
And maybe Jim Carey played a double for Michael. Maybe announcing the concerts ? I don't know because I didn't think he was that thin ? Maybe it was Michael acting like a double. Maybe it was just another double ? Maybe it was him but it didn't seem like him
This is "The Greatest Show on Earth".
He consciously made himself a myth, a symbol, and after that symbol was copied and replicated so many times by so many people, it has lost its original meaning and exclusivity. now, having passed this symbol into the possession of others, he may use any other one to identify himself or remain unidentified at all, what has a lot of benefits in his nowaday situation. as to using body-doubles, a quite interesting travesty also takes place here. he may use and probably uses the disguise of his own double/mimicker, as well anyone even remotely resembling him, can be mistaken for him. for the symbol (a hat, a glove, white socks, a mask and so on ) now goes freely without being tightly connected to its original. that's a totally postmodernistic move, full of humor, and I admire MJ's wit here, though i hope this is not 'the greatest show on earth' yet.) as to those endless appearances of some officially non-doubles who behave in the worst traditions of reverse psychology and, trying to convince us they are not MJ, convince us in the opposite -- it's just a monotonous, non-creative and boring circus. and I sincere hope this is not MJ is having such a desperate genre crisis and lack of taste, but just some obsessed and non-original people, whose own life in not bright enough. (Sure, I don't mean sweet guys like Pablo, 7 Leachims, TMA, Mjviva, PeterPanPYT and so on, lol.)
|