This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - tiida11
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 15
1
« on: October 11, 2011, 10:19:44 PM »
I posted this in the TIAI thread, but I will post it here too:
Okay, so I did a little de-sqeezing and I think this is more accurate:
I think they sqeezed it horizontally to make him look skinnier (well I think more narrow defines it better, because he sure doesn't look skeletal). By de-sqeezing it, his body looks way more in proportion. I don't think mine is 100% accurate, but the shoulders are broader, the neck shorter and the body looks more in proportion, so I think it's at least a lot closer to accuracy than the original. And if this is really his body anno 2009, I must say he looks pretty damn fine for a anorexic junkie...
I posted this in the TIAI thread, but I will post it here too:
Okay, so I did a little de-sqeezing and I think this is more accurate:
I think they sqeezed it horizontally to make him look skinnier (well I think more narrow defines it better, because he sure doesn't look skeletal). By de-sqeezing it, his body looks way more in proportion. I don't think mine is 100% accurate, but the shoulders are broader, the neck shorter and the body looks more in proportion, so I think it's at least a lot closer to accuracy than the original. And if this is really his body anno 2009, I must say he looks pretty damn fine for a anorexic junkie...
He looks too young, the abdomen is too firm for a "skeletical " guy and we all know that , when lying on a plane surface the ribs are more visible; the eyebrows are not his and on the right shoulder there is something like a hidden tattoo...or a pigmentation spot? Look at his hand...the skin it's way to young. It looks to me like a dummy .
2
« on: September 28, 2011, 10:18:08 PM »
Same here and I'm so sorry I'm not able anymore to BELIEVE (in capitals), to be 100% sure Michael is still with us. I have more and more doubts now in spite of everything I know, read, hear or/and see after the last two years . I'm aware the 'evidence' we have is hard to be chewed but now, after yesterday... And there is something more that worries me .Since the first moment, I 've been convinced that Michael wouldn't have done anything bad to his children , that his Achilles' heel were his kids. Never he could have hurt them in any way! Therefore , if Prince or/and Paris testifies, I'll be devastated. Of course, they could do that but we have to admit that education and welfare of a child could be irrevocably affected , belive me, and MJ ... I love Michel Joe Jackson and I love you all, guys! bearhug
3
« on: September 27, 2011, 09:54:05 PM »
Totally fake. Not even a cellphone could take a pic with so low quality. His hair was curled back then but in the pic is straight.
I'm still trying to understand what is the white stripe around his face.
And check the distance from his upper lip to the nose. Not even the O2 guy was like that. This could be only possible if his mouth was wide open, and by this pic, it's not. Unless, of course, if he was attacked by Samara.
Oh, I don't like this ! Media published this photo saying that it's Michael's body immediately after he died, and that band on his face is a proof that they had tried hardly to resuscitate him. The pic seem to me a demonstrative fake but it makes me so sad !
4
« on: September 17, 2011, 02:59:12 AM »
For me, its' bad news... Don't like that the kids have to go to court... don't know if michael wanted them to do this. What do you think?
Same here. If Prince testifies I am almost sure I'll lose my faith because I don't think Michael would go so far .For any child on the planet being in a court could be disturbing. If Prince /children testify I'll know Michael left us for ever.
5
« on: September 13, 2011, 02:23:09 AM »
So how do you fit in the fact that Michael's marriage cert. to Lisa, and 3 kids BC are all "Joseph"? I know Souza (I think) suggested they were all fakes and the real ones kept secret from the public for the sake of the hoax.
i've always suspected their wedding was.....FAKE!!! probably,it was planned for the hoax?? is it possible?? don't forget we've found so many "similarities" between mikael's hoax and elvis' one (or elvis' life??)!! coincidence??? :roll:
*LUNA*
What if the hoax had been decided soon after that so-called marriage made in that scope and , because of any reasons, it had to be postponed ? Michael needed the right moment and that moment was June 26, 2009 even if he had been thinking about the hoax more years ago.
6
« on: January 29, 2011, 10:17:22 PM »
This video needs to reach 10,000 views! Let's make this happen !
[youtube:1w7rieqy]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrjjU1Wej98&feature=player_embedded[/youtube:1w7rieqy]
7
« on: January 29, 2011, 12:09:55 AM »
And this one : [youtube:oimmf1lp]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnUHWv5FQFA[/youtube:oimmf1lp]
8
« on: January 28, 2011, 11:47:26 PM »
[youtube:1okoqgfo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlrddoQZ530[/youtube:1okoqgfo]
A new interesting video from Flem18. I hope you'll enjoy watching it .
9
« on: January 24, 2011, 12:33:44 AM »
Have you ever seen this blog? You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login She is not a believer but she is a big fan and she has a lot to share.I think it would be interesting to read.
10
« on: December 12, 2010, 04:48:46 AM »
I think we'll all be very very old and we won't know the truth about Michael. We'll know it if he wants , when he wants and how he wants. He's a prankster, a wizzard, a player Sometimes I wonder if he really existed... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
11
« on: November 15, 2010, 04:39:44 AM »
I think it will be about Nibiru , a planet very alike to the Earth. It has an unusual orbit and this is the period whent it is in it's closest position to the Earth.
[youtube:ktfvm6br]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKn_2neBSyo[/youtube:ktfvm6br]
Anyway it will be very interesting to watch what it will happen.
12
« on: October 30, 2010, 02:24:35 AM »
Hmmm...I still do believe it wasn't Michael at O2 arena. The big sun glasses covered the place where the mole should have been. As for the mole...just look at its position on the cheek - the photo before the last one . I am sure there were two Michaels. A twin brother or just a very good double ...I don't know since with the Jacksons everything and I mean EVERYTHING was and is possible( no offence or disrespect). I am sure the MJ's photos we al know show (at least) two different men and with any day passing I am more and more convinced I am not wrong.
13
« on: October 27, 2010, 07:08:22 AM »
Maybe the day of 25th written in black on the calendar downside the page... ??
14
« on: October 20, 2010, 02:16:45 AM »
[youtube:2klr0yvv]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkcyn1JgdUw&feature=player_embedded[/youtube:2klr0yvv] Any thoughts?
If double posted please feel free to delete it.
15
« on: September 21, 2010, 05:36:05 AM »
Nobody could affirm that he/she knows the real MJ. Nobody but his family and very close friends. And they would never tell us the truth...loyalty or just their own interest. What we know is that , after the Pepsi accident , a lot of very visible changes occured in the MJ's appearance : his lighter and lighter skin, his different behaviour, different height and even different smile , and more others( MJ began to use playback in concerts!!!)...but you already know all these, don't you? May be that was the moment when Michael decided to live a new life, the beginning of the hoax we are trying to solve now. It's an interesting thought, particularly your closing statement. It does raise a few questions for me, though. If Michael wanted to live a new life after the Pepsi incident, I'm not sure he couldn't do just that without all the smoke and mirrors. Financially, he was well off and became even more so after buying the Sony/ATV catalog in 1985. He didn't have to tour; plenty of artists choose not to.
I remember the Thriller days and yes, Michael was absolutely the biggest thing out there. But I think much of his mega-superstar status was cemented in the public's mind in the years that followed. I'm not saying he wasn't successful before Thriller - he clearly was. He's always had enormous talent. I just think the 1980's catapulted him to a whole different level and things grew exponentially from there. But I think that if, in 1985 after the Pepsi accident, he decided he was done and wanted to live a new life, he probably could have. I think the general public's desire to see the Thriller superstar in concert would have waned as new music and new pop stars hit the scene. The fans would have always been there; this I know. But many others would have moved on. Many did, anyway, despite the fact that Michael did not leave the spotlight and continued to innovate the world of music, dance, and entertainment.
I hope you don't think I'm attacking your theory. I'm really not. It just got me thinking on some things and one of the thoughts I always seem to have is how difficult it is to imagine Michael Jackson NOT being "Michael Jackson," the mega-superstar. I watch the 1983 Motown 25 special where people in the audience are just sitting there, not clapping...or teenagers dancing on American Bandstand with Michael dancing to Shake Your Body only a few feet away. So I guess that's why I'd question if Michael really would have needed to create this hoax if he wanted to live a new life as early as back then. I tend to think the necessity for the hoax came because he stayed in the spotlight, grew ever more successful, and really became a threat to/target for the evil in this world. But who knows? As you so rightly say, none of us knows the real MJ, so this is all just speculation. I hope one day soon we both learn the truth. Peace.
It's ok. Thanks for your reaction to my post. Actually that's not my theory; it was just a thought...what if...Anyway, we have to admit that absolutely everything is possible when MJ is the main character of the story. Some time ago I read Mrs. Katherine's book 'The Jacksons -My Family' and she wrote that Michael ( as a child and later as a young man) was very similar to herself: the same inner structure, the same sensibility, the same shyness,the same willingness of having a close family relationship. That's why I do believe that, at a given moment in his career, Michael wanted to become just a husband and father of more children. But money can be a good reason for all kind of subterfuges and I'm sure the Jacksons would do everything for $$$$$, lots of money. No offend to anyone, it's just a fact and I'm sure you know that is the truth. So..what if ...
|