Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - _Anna_

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 115
1
TIAI ~ 2012 / Re: TIAI January 21
« on: January 21, 2012, 03:34:55 PM »
Jermaine doesn't know shit. He just knows about the hoax. And for sure he has no idea about anything else. If Michael is not here then no one from the family reads this forum.


I thought again, I will not further this to the family, as they ignore most of the things, and if they do TS will say "The family didn't speak against me so this means they support me and the message I spread".


But I will further this to the authorities.

2
TIAI ~ 2012 / Re: TIAI January 21
« on: January 21, 2012, 03:23:32 PM »
I will leave from this moment from this forum, but I will forward this forum to the family to read it and decide what they will do if they consider to do something. If I were from US I would denounce this and what it has turned into, going to this extent furthering this agenda using Michael.

I won't be part of it by ignoring it. I will further this to the family and to authorities if necessary. I will tell all the Jacksons first, and maybe they will do something. If not, then I will further this all to the authorities.

3
TIAI ~ 2012 / Re: TIAI January 21
« on: January 21, 2012, 03:04:27 PM »
I will not comment on TS' subjects from now, read them or check them. Because this was the proof of what is behind all this. Not what's behind Michael's hoax, but what's behind TS' character. For me this was the last proof. I will not be part of this. I don't understand who this character is, why he came here and why he chose Michael's subject to further this agenda. Enough. I will not be part of this.

4
TIAI ~ 2012 / Re: TIAI January 21
« on: January 21, 2012, 02:47:19 PM »
Quote
It should also be clearly stated at this point that the world will not end on 12-21-2012; but it will end shortly after 2012! How long is “shortly”? Nobody knows a specific date; but it will probably be within the next few years (nobody living on earth now is going to grow old, unless you’re nearly there already). How can we be sure that this is true? If you keep watching, you will learn how, soon enough.

I will not comment on this. But again, no mortal, no human being on this earth can, with all the possible calculations in his hands or bible analysis since the beginning of the world, say when it will be the  end of the world. No human being.

5
Randy posted today on twitter

My siblings & I were never informed the restitution bid against Murray was being dropped. We DO NOT support that action. NOT our decision.


From day 1 this family never seems to do anything together. As if Michael isn't brother of them all. They always always have to be split, in any situation.
If him and his siblings didn't drop the bid then WHO did it? Mrs. Katherine and Joseph? Who? And why would they do it as if they never consult the other members of the family, as if Michael is not son/brother of them all.

6
Back's old posts / Re: Nothing is by cooincidence-back post 11/5/2009
« on: January 20, 2012, 12:16:46 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I know it's been long. But damn, I'm even more curious now. I remember another photo of Michael where he is very amazed somehow, it's a closeup.
I'll see if I find it and post it here.

EDIT:

Found it


You mean, as you describe it, that it was photoshopped to make him look bad as in disrespect? Not in a funny prankish way?


Now, I remember seeing the pic put up. Thanks for finding it Anna.  I respectfully disagree with you Tink, I absolutely think that is him screwing his face up. He's squeezing his nostrils, plumping his lips, popping his eyes, and arching his eyebrows. He's made similar silly faces lots of places.  However he has used a strong overhead light to accentuate the shadows for dramatic effect.

I suppose there will be as many opinions as in the double thread. But anyway. I know Photoshop since I was 10 and in  this photo Michael is pulling out funny faces and the lens of the camera being very close to his face and  above his height a bit is  making him look a bit "unnatural"- i.e bigger eyes, short chin + himself pulling out a funny face. No woman there.

7
I went on that blog yesterday and my eyes fell on the comments. I literally choked with my coffee, in laughter.
I saw I was mentioned too, from what I got probably I'm also Souza undercover.

They are just sick in the head. But anyway, never cared and never will, about that blog. I just simply can't even get angry. It amuses me literally.

8
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Let's say Murray really killed Michael and he really was broke, then STILL you would do anything in your power as a family to make his life miserable by letting him hand over every penny he can each and every month for the rest of his life. But instead the famly decides to make a nice gesture and Murray doesn't have to pay a dime. LMAO!

I know. I know I would do this and more, and still I would feel like it's not enough for a life that was  taken.

9
@Tink

If I knew or had a friend who really saw Michael in flesh and bones, alive and well

1. I wouldn't even have an account here or anywhere else for that matter, because I wouldn't need to; 
2. just saying it and expecting people to not ask for proof and just believe, is pointless.

 If one can't or knows they can't show proof, why say it? It's like when people come and say "I know something but I can't tell you how I know it, and I can't show you proof. But I know something you don't". Is this respecting a privacy and caring about someone? This has been done here and anywhere on the web for over +2,5 years and usually done to get hype and fuss.

No offence.

10
Tink, you said it some time ago too, about your friend. But I can say that you said you don't believe that photo of Michael with big eyes/amazed face which was redirected to the old board is Michael himself, but a clone-photoshopped photo of him. I also work in photoshop and I am very certain that is Michael himself just pulling faces. Considering perception can differ from person to person (you say it's not him tottaly, I say it is him), then your friend could have seen any good look-alike and really believe it was Michael. Why didn't she take a photo? If you are friends you didn't ask her more?

I say because I even have relatives who saw E'casanova hown on TV and said "ooh, for someone who doesn't look at Michael very much can almost swear it's Michael himself.". While I see no resemblance.

11
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: January 19, 2012, 11:23:41 PM »
Before any of my words get twisted, I want to say that I always enjoyed BACK's angry posts and his so called "bad language" was never seen as bad for me, because he spoke the truth, he used it constructively, to express his anger towards those who bashed Katherine, towards many figures in media who were spitting shit allover about Michael. They were epic, grande, for an important issue. His ability to  use his words was always amazing and still now, reading again his posts, I get a good vibe from him.

From what I understood, there are people here on the forum and maybe not only here, who bash Souza for being an illuminati puppet or working for Sony. I first almost laughed at the accusations when I saw them here on the forum but I don't really think she was talking about the "doggy" from that pathetic blog. I wouldn't waste my time with such things, because ignorance is ignorance and they will never get on the right path no matter how much you feel the need to verbally duel them in order to prove us something. This is not  a proof of anything, on the contrary.

I know that, at least for me, the situation in life goes like: "little people - little problems, big people- big problems" - and it applies involuntarily.

I won't get into word analysis anymore with you. For me it's disappointing what I see. You made a big compilation of the "bad" words you used here over time + 2 or 3 of BACK's words and thought to press the enter button. While reading this post of you, I almost have the feeling of being tired, like reading a remake novel, like reading the same thing said over and over again with the same words put in other order. I almost had a deja-vu sensation. The same words of your old posts and a few from BACK mixed up in other order (even the 411 thing from BACK).I don't know if anyone understands my point. I don't bash, I am not here for that, but I cannot shut up at what I see here happening.

BACK was unexpected,  he had a huge vocabulary and every time I read his posts I get the feeling like he had so much to say that a bandwidth was too little for him to express himself. Like he had so much to say, that the words were always his best weapon.

These being said, I want to tell everyone that this was no bashing from my part, just genuine observations, thoughts. I don't know who Front is but I will now leave this topic by saying that BACK is BACK and I always said that he's one of those few people who cannot be imitated. No one can try copy BACK and go along with it a long time. This is something that I always said


You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
To the blog authors & their "anonymous" puppet commentators:

It's really a shame when fellow members of this forum and/or so-called "fans" crank out the mindless drivel and preposterous ASSumptions contained in a certain "blog"…much like tabloid trash ASSociates, they hide their intentions/names/sources behind "anonymous" smokescreens --- yet their little "facts" constantly spew from their mouths like diarrhea. I SUGGEST printing out your "precious" BLOG on paper----it can be put to better use, rather than taking up valuable bandwidth: toilet paper for wiping the cake-dried shit off your face. Try removing your head from your ass for once, Mr./Ms. FACT FINDER. Here's a 411 for you and your little circus freak show of "anonymous" groupie AZZ-CLOWNS----> be careful what you dish…..you might just find a big ol' plate of Karma staring you back in the face ---- with a side of eat shit, and choke-on-it dip.

If you get off in attempting to belittle yours truly, so be it. I've been called worse than your elementary insults, and your non-sensical babbling is BORING. However…..when it results in congregating a little circus bandwagon and provokes members to turn on EACH OTHER…that's quite another thing!

Ludicrous accusations & name-calling among members of this board --- furthermore, FROM members of this board --- when we reside in the same "house" as part of the same "family" is an outcry of hypocrisy! This is such a low blow below the belt to admin/mods/members of the the forum, who have worked so diligently and given their valuable time, passionate hearts, and incredible minds to make this place what it is today. MJ would be DEVASTATED at this cold-hearted hostility!!!

I would not--AT ALL!--be surprised if there was a certain name (or 3) in the tabloid arena behind the writers and/or comments of that blog. If I'm right--- and I'm 99.99999999999999% sure that I am--- your writing skills have diminished IMMENSELY. It's not even tabloid garbage--it's one notch BELOW it-----> wanna-be TABLOID TRASH. Aww, can't sell your tabloid fiction for toilet paper anymore…..now you've resorted to free "e-tabloids" in the form of a blog. P.A.T.H.E.T.I.C.

As for the "anonymous" puppet commentators and people who register on this forum with only one intention---- to stir up the shit and then wallow in your own pot squealing like a pig because you derive great orgasmic pleasure from basking in the mud-slinging………………………..

4 words----> GET. THE. FUQ. OUT.

12
Twitter ~ Not verified but (probably) real / Re: ALLJACK5ON twitter
« on: January 19, 2012, 12:23:54 PM »
Marlon makes tons of typos, or I don't know how to call them. Errors.
The last time he said something, he was talking about going to Forest Lawn and he said "grave sight" instead of "grave site". Now "X mast", and "here from me" instead of "hear from me".

13
TIAI & TS Discussions / Re: TS/T.I.A.I discussion
« on: January 18, 2012, 11:30:16 AM »
@Bec

My point is that the 999 numerology was never found in Michael's work as it's the case with 777. I'm not saying literally that numerology doesn't count  and that we can't base our belief on it. If Michael wants to use numerology, that's ok, you can plan to do some things considering the numbers you want, and arrange the things as you want. But 999 was brought up from nowhere. Around 999 there is the circle formed with another chain of connections. But 999 was never brought up by Michael himself. He never wore 999 on his clothes, never had a thing with 9 or 999 like it's the case with 7 or 777.

14
Back's old posts / Re: Nothing is by cooincidence-back post 11/5/2009
« on: January 18, 2012, 10:38:28 AM »
I know it's been long. But damn, I'm even more curious now. I remember another photo of Michael where he is very amazed somehow, it's a closeup.
I'll see if I find it and post it here.

EDIT:

Found it


You mean, as you describe it, that it was photoshopped to make him look bad as in disrespect? Not in a funny prankish way?

15
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: January 18, 2012, 10:17:49 AM »
Here is a little analysis of the poem which I read and liked. Maybe you will understand the poem better if you read this.

Quote
"What mystery pervades a well!” This line describes an interaction between speaker and nature, with an idea of eternal separation concluding the poem. The six four-line stanzas lack significant punctuation and employ an ABCB rhyme scheme of exact, vowel and suspended rhymes; each stanza offers an experiential snapshot of the speaker’s journey. In this poem, Dickinson uses multiple elements of nature in metaphorical ways to describe the positions of humans. Specifically, the poem begins with an idea of wonder and confinement, as presented through a device used by humans:

What mystery pervades a well!
That water lives so far—
A neighbor from another world
Residing in a jar
(1-4)

Based on this stanza, an unseen boundary exists between man and the water encased by the earth. In addition, Dickinson compares humans to vegetation when she personifies “grass.” The speaker states that “The grass does not appear afraid…” and ponders the physical position of the “grass:” “…Can stand so close and look so bold / At what is awe to me” (9, 11-12). These lines reveal a common human fear of the unknown, as well as show the aggressive manner of those who believe they master nature. This leads to a further interpretation that perhaps Dickinson is questioning whether or not the “grass” has the ability to understand. Dickinson also shows the close discernable link between humans and nature by contrasting “grass” with “sedge.” Sedge resembles grass but has solid stems. The “sedge” remains distinct in the poem and is placed specifically by “the sea.” The superficial likeness pointedly relays the interconnected nature of man and earth.
Dickinson switches to a human perspective to further explore the idea of fear. In the penultimate stanza, she relays the haunting and mysterious qualities of nature:

But nature is a stranger yet;
The ones that cite her most
Have never passed her haunted house,
Nor simplified her ghost.
(17-20)

In this excerpt, nature is used to symbolize both a “haunted house,” as well as the “ghost” that inhabits it. While nature might be portrayed as an inspirational harbor, it can also embody alarming qualities. The complexities of this quatrain are explored in Yuto Miyata’s article, “The Rejection of the Traditional Idea of Nature in Emily Dickinson’s Poems”: “The word ‘haunted,’ originally meaning to be visited by a strange form of a spirit, may imply that nature is haunted by an unidentified ghost. Perhaps this unidentified ghost is nature’s inner truth: it can never be revealed to man, though it has many outer aspects to be observed and to make man imagine what they stand for. Nature never permits simplification by Dickinson” (81). In addition, the notion of a home, where one resides, should be comforting. However, the home that nature provides is an unsettling rather than reassuring environment; in fact, this dwelling’s occupants are figures of death. Dickinson concludes the poem with an ironic statement that shows the knowledge of nature is actually lessened as one becomes more aware of its greatness: “That those who know her, know her less / The nearer her they get.” Even though the reader is given a succinct message at the end, it doesn’t dilute the speaker’s quest for understanding already presented. According to this poem, the mystery of nature will continue to evolve and increase as an individual becomes more intent on scrutinizing its mysteries. Consequently, the line the speaker seeks to cross in order to receive wisdom and a retreat seems to shift farther away with each step similar to the movement of a horizon.
Dickinson’s treatment of nature is various and contradicting because it sometimes renders
an incredible beauty, and other times exposes a relentless, unforgiving enigma. The poet once said that “The unknown is the largest need of the intellect,” and nature is clearly an entity she considered a mystery (“14” 83).

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 115
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal