This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - trustno1
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 39
1
« on: August 31, 2012, 05:25:21 PM »
Very true my friend, there should be so much more to commemorate and celebrate MJ's achievements thus far, considering the official story that he died in 2009 is still believed by so many. One has to ask why there isn't more of an outcry for a memorial site (other than the house in Gary), and whether we'd even know about it if there was one. Who represses those voices, makes it almost trite to ask for such a thing, and why do so many still believe the lies spun by those who tried to destroy him? Just this evening someone on a forum in response to an article on Spike Lee's BAD25 asked why people "still idolize this child abuser?", a sight I see regularly as I'm sure we all do. I recommended that the poster educate themselves by reading the trial transcripts first and to stop believing what the corrupt media force-feeds them. It's true that if those transcripts were splashed all over the papers tomorrow people would finally (I hope) realise just what was going on. Of course it's not going to happen as it would expose them as the lying leeches that they are. As for the previously discussed green-screened funeral, I have to disagree with Bec, I thought the funeral was so obviously green-screened as soon as I started watching it. Same goes for the Oprah/Lisa-Marie interview. And for that to be the case everyone who was there would in my book have to know they were sitting in a studio.
2
« on: April 14, 2012, 03:50:47 PM »
A warm welcome to you, I agree with some here that members shouldn't jump to conclusions about every new enigmatic recruit, whether they could be MJ or a troll, but in this case I don't think you did anything to justify that kind of response, it wasn't your fault that some people made assumptions based on nothing. I hope it hasn't put you off being here and joining in the discussions. None of us know for sure who is behind the screen, so I just try and treat everyone equally, and that's with respect and tolerance. It's difficult not to regard every new member with suspicion but their true agenda will come to light through time, I for one just let them prove themselves one way or the other, if they're trolling then karma will come back around to them one day. (See I just used the words "back" and "time" in the same sentence, not that unusual in itself as Souza pointed out). Anyway, welcome TheGame/Sebastian, look forward to hearing more from you. :icon_razz:
3
« on: April 14, 2012, 02:43:53 PM »
Jeez I have been out of the loop for SO long and have missed so much (computer issues), I've no idea where to start, I'm just getting the hang of navigating the site again! I gather we were hacked again recently, I'm glad I missed that this time round. I also gather I'd probably better start by reading up on Back/Front, obviously I've done plenty of reading about Back in the past but this whole thing sounds too complicated to just skim over without going back (pardon the pun) to basics and doing my homework. Last time I was on a few months back I think it was I heard the name Front for the first time, it seems like a lot has gone on since then. Nice to see the same old "faces" and to find that they all still hold true to their beliefs and attitudes. Nice to be back. Now to go do some reading BBL :icon_razz:
4
« on: July 07, 2011, 03:06:19 PM »
Agreed. There are a number of things that I think were planted as clues long before 2009 which might not have made sense at the time (for example why he sounded so different on 3000 Watts, later we'd be using that as an example when debating whether he was actually singing on the Michael album). The seeds of the drug addict story were planted years before to make it all the more believable that he would become even more dependant as time went on.
5
« on: July 07, 2011, 02:59:33 PM »
Or maybe it was never going to. It has been asked a few times if the trial would just be delayed constantly and never happen, I suppose we wait till September if nothing happens before then. Still mighty strange though that this has gone, why isn't the media questioning all this weird stuff? Do they even pay attention anymore?
6
« on: July 07, 2011, 02:54:41 PM »
Agreed. I think most of us have come a long way since the days of discussing skipping the concerts as a possible reason. Bit extreme, no?! He had other assets and unreleased songs as well as his music catalogue if he seriously didn't want to do the concerts, he didn't have to kill himself doing 50 shows if he didn't want to. Which isn't to say he wasn't fit and healthy. He passed a medical remember? And even a super-fit young artist would find a 50 show run gruelling to say the least. All part of the plan.
7
« on: July 07, 2011, 02:47:36 PM »
Today was a good day for all. With the demise of the News of The World, and serious questions being asked in the UK House of Commons about how much sway the likes of News International has over our lives, are we witnessing the beginning of a long-overdue slow death for the tabloid publications and shows that have blighted our lives for so long? I couldn't help but think of MJ with his "Burn All Tabloids" sign when the NOTW got the axe today, and it felt like he'd be smiling somewhere, thinking "one down...". It might be wishful thinking that more will follow suit, but as long as two more don't rear up to replace it then that's okay with me. It feels like some people are slowly awakening to the reality of the hold the media and the press has over our consciousness. We need way more to wake up though, the masses are SO unaware. The question is, how to capitalise while people are beginning to distrust the media? When all this blows over (assuming a further scandal doesn't cause a domino effect) the opportunity has been lost. Any ideas guys?
8
« on: July 07, 2011, 10:11:10 AM »
Oh boy, I knew something would happen while my internet service was down! Good to have you back TS, though I'm sure you never actually left, just kept an eye on things. This is a great level, the murder theory. The whole "did they make it look like a hoax" aspect reminds me of a plot from Columbo (RIP Peter Falk).
It does mean that the memorial with all its Liberian Girl images, the "pains" line, the "I'm alive and I'm here forever" etc, was devised to encourage the notion of a hoax, and as the family and AEG planned and staged the memorial they would have to be all in on it, or at least have someone influencing their decisions as to which pictures to use. So there could theoretically be someone "on the inside" close to the family/AEG but actually working for the Illuminati, helping to create the illusion of a hoax. But then, this same person or persons unknown would also have to have influenced everything the family did and said ever since the "death". They wouldn't be aware that they were contradicting themselves and each other? Come on. They have repeatedly said that they suspect someone was out to kill MJ and they know who but can't say at the present time. We get the all-too-familiar "all will become clear". Now if someone had murdered my brother, I knew who it was, and they had gotten away with it (assuming Murray's trial collapses) I'd be shouting their name from the rooftops, regardless of my own personal safety. What about Dave Dave?!
The Jacksons have already stated their belief that he was in danger and that they know who from, therefore this person or group is aware they are known to them. An organisation like the Illuminati for example might seem all-powerful to many but when you're dealing with a large, world-famous family like the Jacksons, you can't just quietly dispose of any pesky whistle-blowers without fuss. Everyone would know. The Jacksons themselves don't seem to be too worried for their safety or the safety of the children, they seem to be going about their business pretty much as normal. What does this tell us? That they are either feeling confident that nobody would dare try and harm any of them with the world watching, or that they don't have anything to worry about because they haven't blown the whistle on anyone at all, they have no-one to blow the whistle on because there was no murder. It does also beg the question again of whether there is a sting operation underway to snare Hollywood Dr Feelgoods. By continually implying MJ was in danger from someone who wanted him dead for whatever reason, the real target may be lulled into a false sense of security. Whatever the outcome of this level, I just can't see how the murder theory holds up. EVERYONE would have to be in on it. It makes more sense to me that the shadowy figure influencing AEG and the Jacksons was in fact MJ himself. If I'm wrong then I'll hold my hands up but instinct and common sense haven't failed me yet.
9
« on: June 22, 2011, 09:01:49 AM »
As someone who's taken a short break from the forum (though I did still check in regularly) and coming at this completely fresh, I thought to myself "Who the heck is this Front person they're all talking about now?!". Another mysterious poster steps up to the plate. And with a username like Front too. How clever to choose a name that, despite being the opposite of our famous and much-missed Back, immediately causes members to suspect he'd returned just by the obvious connection "Back to Front". Something MJ would do? Quite possibly, but maybe deceptively clever. In hindsight it wouldn't be too difficult for someone to figure out that in posting in a similar style and with such a name, they could have the undivided attention of the majority of the forum members.
I've spoken before about MJ's acting ability and his knack for the subtle. It's been discussed whether it's possible to imitate someone else's writing style or actually alter your personality online. I believe it's very possible. Someone who has English as their native language and who has writing as their vocation (speaking from experience here) could do so quite easily. (Not to say I've pretended to be someone else online, I haven't). It's about adopting a character and STAYING IN CHARACTER. We all know unfortunately how easy it is for people to masquerade as whoever they choose to be online, there are many predators who take advantage of this and many trolls on many sites who do the same. So even though the posts I've read which were written by Front don't immediately strike me as overly similar to Back or TS - what difference does that make if the poster is deliberately adopting a persona - a character - for each username? They may all be one and the same, all different, all MJ or none of them MJ. The man's acting talents are far too under-rated, even here I feel. Credit where it's due. So I will stay neutral as to whether I think this latest mysterious person is here to create interest in a time of relative quiet, to troll or genuinely engage with us. Because with Michael you wouldn't know either way. The man's an acting genius as well as a musical one. Just ask Miko.
10
« on: April 07, 2011, 04:11:47 AM »
True Anna, going on those things alone could result in nothing but confusion and a whole lot of trouble. I think people forget that the internet may be a very useful tool but in some ways good old-fashioned detective work is still required, it's not a case of simply hitting a few keys and viola you've found someone you were researching. So many fake accounts, so many possible inaccuracies. Definitely not the way to go. Movies and TV have taught people that anyone can be tracked down with a few clicks or keystrokes. Thankfully it's not usually that easy. And that's as it should be.
11
« on: April 07, 2011, 04:02:10 AM »
Something is afoot methinks, with these 2 controversial MJ statues/sculptures going up in England within days of each other, back in the news again Mr Jackson - not that you were ever out of it! Dodo is in London too isn't he at the moment, wonder if he'll go check out these "pieces". I'm also wondering if more likenesses will pop up around London of MJ in the near future, if so then there's definitely a method to this madness.
12
« on: April 04, 2011, 03:09:20 AM »
Al Fayed does it again, getting on the football fans nerves and getting himself in the news at the same time! It's hilarious how aggrieved many of the football fans are about this (I say this as someone who cannot understand the fascination/obsession with all things football at all). The fact that he's told the ones who don't like it to go to hell just makes it even funnier. As for the statue, it's not the worst one I've seen but surely with all his money he could have gotten a more realistic likeness? This was supposed to cost £100,000? One of the tabloids had an art critic give his opinion and he was going on about it being the wrong colour, he said Al Fayed probably wanted MJ to look Egyptian, and how it had no artistic merit whatsoever. I don't think it's meant to be a piece of art, just a tribute. I think it's brilliant that MJ is creating controversy everywhere still without actually doing anything personally. He no doubt has had a giggle about this. Maybe when MJ comes back it can be redressed as Jermaine?
13
« on: April 04, 2011, 02:59:34 AM »
Okay I've just read the entire thread and to get back to the topic, thanks Souza for the blog repost, though from what I've read in this thread some of the doubters still don't see what we do, it's hard for people who have a strong idea in their head of how something happened to be disuaded from that. Aside from the fact that I don't even think Michael doing "this" to his children is even a valid argument as none of us know him personally, that's an opinion not a fact, so how it's used as the main argument I don't know...and the kids are totally in on it. The questions that I would ask non-believers are about the many, many, many contradictions from various family members/team MJ, the huge delays and the constant drip-drip of zany, crazy tabloid stories, some of which could probably only have come from Team MJ. Everything was exaggerated on a grand scale, reflecting the madness that surrounded him when he was officially alive. Hopefully providing a nice little video montage (and at the same time holding up a mirror) when he comes back.
14
« on: April 03, 2011, 06:44:37 AM »
HAPPY BIRTHDAY GORGEOUS GIRL!!!Hope you have a fantastic day!
15
« on: March 31, 2011, 09:59:13 AM »
Being in the UK we read the date as 21/3/11,so I'm off to see what happened ten days ago that might have been significant just in case! If indeed it is a date of course. 
|
Show Posts