Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MJonmind

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 444
1
I've seen that pic before, and if they had cameras in the mirrors taking that one, why not show the pic's more explicit without some clothing or one of them touching private parts? It's because that's the worst they were doing, rough-housing, wrestling as ALL boys do, except they are in a hotel room which for traveling musicians is all they've got to wrestle in.

How this Maura and whatever theories she has, can be confident about anything is beyond me. All I see are a bunch of rehashed possibilities. Combination possibilities are mathematically infinite, as especially any who have followed the hoax from the beginning realize. For me the ONLY certain thing is that MJ is alive and enjoying a bit more freedom/privacy. Also, he has purpose in planning for decades and staging something so elaborate all the while dealing with the WORST human beings, and could not possibly be persuaded to forget about his desired goals. 7 is a number MJ liked, and we haven't yet reached 7 years of his 'Ghost' state, so why all the doubt, worry and lack of confidence in MJ's chess-playing ability? There's also the possibility Maura is a planted troll/disinformation agent, and she's done a very good job.

2
Some aspects seem suspicious but no one is actually saying it... yet.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

3
Other Odd Things / Re: My personal experiences with this hoax
« on: January 28, 2015, 03:29:01 AM »
Iamhere4mj, thank you so much for sharing your experiences! So wonderful and I'm happy for you! :icon_e_biggrin:

4
An interesting signature thing happened at the Jacksons 2014 MJ birthday event in Gary.
In the fan's book, Paris signed "Paris", Blanket signed "Blanket" (not their legal names), and Prince signed "Michael Jackson".
This is strange because when going to Cuba earlier he prints his name "Michael Joseph Jackson Jr."
For the belt signing a few years earlier and the Jackson's visit to Gary in 2013, Prince prints his signature as "Prince".
So it is unusual that he didn't add the middle name or the Jr., and he wrote it.
I think it was a shout-out that his Dad was INDEED there (Prince was signing on behalf of his Dad), but disguised/covered by a family member (female) dressed similarly to him, so those suspecting that it was Michael would be disappointed and thinking Nah it was just a family member that looked like him. Just as MJ's appearance on LKL was in disguise as a known living person, Dave Dave, leaving it uncertain & controversial to this day. I think it's likely that ALL of MJ's disguises since his 'death' have been as real and known people--very clever.


5
Other Odd Things / Re: Jermaine's B-day Dinner Photo - MJ in pic?
« on: January 15, 2015, 04:13:43 AM »
The chandelier reflection is several feet to the right in the window, so the photographer standing to the right of the chandelier, would also reflect even more to the right, which would be off the photo all together.
However, I love the sunflower theme, the hand, and the wink!

6
As per usual Michael has been completely underestimated. And in fact I believe MJ may be feeding into some of these myths, so that when the time comes for him to blow people minds once  AGAIN, it will be so much greater than anyone expected.

Quote
Michael Jackson @michaeljackson  ·  Jan 8 2015
“I love to create magic—to put something together that’s so unusual, so unexpected that it blows people’s heads off."


7
The Movie Theory / Re: Birdman movie
« on: January 08, 2015, 03:41:29 AM »
Its Her, thanks! So funny, and goes with the commercial mentioned here:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

And how could we forget "Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike, what day is today?" by VDJ MikeyMike lol
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

But of course there's Michael Jordan and Magic Mike movie and others so...

8
The Numbers Theory / Re: the 777 theory
« on: January 08, 2015, 12:53:13 AM »
And Back's 7DayTheory (if that is still considered valuable).

June 25, 2009 to December 6, 2012 = 1260 days or 3 1/2 years (significant Biblical prophetic number)
December 6, 2012 + 1260 days = May 19, 2016
7 years is 2520 days, and 2520 is an interesting (I guess perfect) number. All digits from 1-9 can be divided into it evenly.
This is far from over, but slowly following the clock of MJ's, IMO.

Reading back through these posts around this time you'll find it is literally full of all kinds of fascinating details everyone was digging up, way to many to mention here.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

9
Quote
Sweetsunset
100% certainty?? only Michael would know that? are you MJ? 

:)  :icon_lol: :icon_mrgreen::penguin::suspect:

10
Introduce yourself / Re: Hi, Again
« on: December 01, 2014, 06:14:43 PM »
Hi Des! WB! I was here from the beginning and here occasionally now to check in. Mostly on twitter.

11
The Movie Theory / Re: Birdman movie
« on: November 27, 2014, 10:07:16 PM »
Its Her, in the recent Interstellar movie (I saw a couple of days ago), it was said that the Apollo missions were all fake to bankrupt the Soviet Union! Are we sheeple given tidbits of truth mixed in fictional movies? IDK lol
Always enjoy reading your thoughts! But I can't find that Aspirin commercial. lol

12
Neverland / Re: Neverland Trademark companies
« on: October 12, 2014, 03:06:34 AM »
Wow, could this be it? You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Quote
Fracking in the West
Big reserves, big reservations

California tries to decide if it wants to join the shale revolution
Feb 16th 2013 | SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA | From the print edition
 Timekeeper
SHALE exploitation in North Dakota has lifted incomes and brought unemployment down to 3.2% of the workforce, the lowest level in the country. Californians are rarely found looking longingly towards the Midwest. But the revelation that their state, with unemployment at 9.8% and America’s highest poverty rate, may be sitting on the largest deposit of shale oil in the continental United States has led some to wonder if their salvation lies 10,000 feet (3,000 metres) beneath them.

[img]http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/290-width/images/print-edition/20130216_USM973.png[img]

California has been an oil state since 1865. Thanks largely to reserves that can still be tapped by conventional means, it remains the third-largest producer in the country. Output has lately been declining by 2-3% a year, according to the state’s Energy Commission. But in 2011 the federal Energy Information Administration declared that the Monterey shale formation, which spans 1,750 square miles (450,000 hectares) in southern and central California, held 15.42 billion barrels of recoverable oil, 64% of the total estimated to be in the 48 contiguous states.

That should be an attractive prospect for a state with a history of unemployment and fiscal woe. But environmental scruples have long been as characteristic of California as budgetary mismanagement, and a battle is brewing. Opponents of the hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) technique often used to extract oil and gas from shale rock in “unconventional” drilling say regulations proposed by the state in December do not adequately protect against groundwater contamination or air pollution. Some mutter about earthquakes. Such concerns find receptive ears in a seismically active state with a large farm sector.

The oilmen reply that fracking has been conducted in California for years without trouble. Moreover, they add, surely the environmentally concerned should want as much Californian oil as possible produced under the state’s tight regulations, rather than imported from places with looser regimes. Some see an emerging split between inland counties, which tend to have higher unemployment and more conservative politics, and the conservationists along the coast. The row will rumble on, with revised rules expected later this year.

For some, the complex geology of the Monterey shale opens up alternative means of extraction. Santa Maria Energy, a small producer in Santa Barbara County, about 150 miles (240 km) north-west of Los Angeles, extracts 200 barrels of crude a day from the shale at depths of around 2,500 feet by exploiting natural fractures in the rock. Although the firm has no plans to begin fracking, David Pratt, its president, likes to say that the Monterey is California’s way out of the “fiscal toilet”.

Some of the “Saudi America” talk is overdone. And even if California does begin exploiting the Monterey aggressively, an economic miracle is unlikely. California’s population is over 50 times bigger than North Dakota’s, and, as Kevin Klowden of the Milken Institute, a think-tank, points out, the opportunity costs of giving over land to drilling may be far higher in California than in some other states.

No producer has yet found a way to begin large-scale extraction from the Monterey. But despite the geological and regulatory uncertainties, several firms have placed large bets on its future. And other states in the region sitting on shale reserves are forging merrily ahead. At a Senate hearing on February 12th John Hickenlooper, Colorado’s Democratic governor, staked out his position by announcing that he had once drunk a glass of fracking fluid.

Meanwhile, the technology that kick-started the revolution marches on. Some speak excitedly of fracking that uses saline rather than fresh water, or no water at all. The industry has moved so quickly in recent years, says Dan Kirschner of the Northwest Gas Association, a trade body, that it is starting to seem odd to call shale resources “unconventional”.

Reminds me of SOTT, sitting on the toilet! I'm sure Michael knew he was sitting on a 'goldmine'! lol

13
The Illuminati Theory / Re: Surgical Masks, EBOLA and the KGB
« on: October 12, 2014, 02:38:26 AM »
I noticed that too Gwynned! You've noted some interesting links Liberia and Ebola (most deaths), and Liberian Girl, MJ funeral.  Who knows, we just got to Keep Watching.


14
Other Odd Things / Re: Is this Murray?
« on: September 25, 2014, 12:49:28 AM »
OTOH, many times when a clue is given out, once they (MJ &crew) realize we have it, the source is removed. So it is there as an easter egg waiting to be found. Going with the possible partial ARG purpose, that may be how slippery playing this, can be. We have the clues, but they are buried in mountains of archives like needles in haystacks, only retrievable by hoaxers in forum by searches, and personal files.

15
Other Odd Things / Re: Was this Michaels message to us? Creepy
« on: September 15, 2014, 01:30:43 AM »
Thanks for taking the time to write about MJ and video games, not a part of my life!
Just wondering, what were some of the taunts and lines of MJ you mentioned that were hilarious?

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 444
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal