2
« on: February 09, 2010, 09:25:05 PM »
Hi all. I've been a reader for awhile, and agree with things I read here. I dont' have much to add usually but I just wanted to say that I read the report that is circulating online, and much of it I had a feeling that it was just 'not right' somehow... one thing stood out to me though. It said that the subject was 69" ... SIXTY NINE inches is only 5 foot 7 and 1/2 inches tall. Now I know that in the general community there has been great debate over the actual height of Michael, but I don't think anyone has ever thought he was quite that short. I have always lent myself to the belief that he was closer to 6 feet... about 5'10, or 5'11. I wouldn't have been shocked at finding out he was 5'9". Maaaaaaaaaaaaybe 5'8""... but 5'7??? no, I don't think so. I've seen him next to Katherine in pics, and Janet, neither are tall ladies, but they aren't midgets either, and if he was only 5'7 they'd have to be under 5 feet, his mom would have to be 4'8 or less tall. That's insane.
Show Posts
