Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Raven

#2

I agree, as I've mentioned before it appears as if on one picture his eyes are closed and on the other they appear to be slightly opened.

As it seems from your animation: one closed, one slightly opened focussing straight ahead, one slightly opened looking to the left

#3
Quote from: "~Souza~"

Quote from: "Raven"

Quote from: "~Souza~"

Quote from: "Raven"

Quote from: "~Souza~"

Quote from: "Raven"

@Souza I think it's all a double with a prosthetic mask on.

You are seriously starting to annoy me Raven, I ask a serious question here. You can either answer in a normal way, or stay away from the double threads.

This is not a double thread.

Why is it annoying...as I'm doing the same you did.

When I said it was Michael himself you also replied it was a double with a mask on, and I also noted along the lines it started to become annoying. What's the difference?

The difference is that I compare pics and you just say "It's Michael Jackson". O2 dude can't be compared, we have no eyes. If try to compare O2 dude's mouth is already too wide. A good comparison is impossible with the glasses on.

I am done with people like you just 'stating their opinion', ridiculing others without any arguments. I had the discussion with mykidsmum as well, but she at least posts her own comparisons. You are only stirring the threads up. If you don't think there were doubles and you will not contribute to the thread proving us wrong, just stay away from these threads.

'Nuff said...

Ow I've given enough arguments, it's not true what you say. I've mentioned the scar near his lower lip. I've mentioned scars on his chin. I've mentioned the scar on his cheek. I've reposted a picture of yours that you used for comparison in black and white you couldn't get to match because it was in mirror-image. But you've all done away with them as 'that can be artificially added' or 'it's a prosthetic mask'.

Yes, because it's POSSIBLE nowadays, but you just ignored that and went on with sarcastic remarks. That's the last thing I will say about it, since this discussion is not the issue here. I am awaiting your comparisons...

I don't need to proof anything here. If you claim someone is not Michael, the burden of evidence is yours. I've also explained in the very beginning that IMO it's disrespectful towards Michael publically examining his face to the microscopic level the way you are doing, he would have HATED it, so that is another reason I won't do any comparisons. I've mentioned that plastic surgery is good nowadays (as is prosthetic make-up), but NOT to the detailed extent some people in here suggest.

Other contributions you've ignored:  I've explained that if the jaw moves with the lips closed the chin appears longer. I've explained that if the head is tilted forward the length of the chin visually appears shorter and the forehead appears longer on photo due to the 3D effect. So that whole remark of yours "I am done with people like you just 'stating their opinion', ridiculing others without any arguments." is just totally untrue.

#4
Quote from: "~Souza~"

Quote from: "Raven"

Quote from: "~Souza~"

Quote from: "Raven"

@Souza I think it's all a double with a prosthetic mask on.

You are seriously starting to annoy me Raven, I ask a serious question here. You can either answer in a normal way, or stay away from the double threads.

This is not a double thread.

Why is it annoying...as I'm doing the same you did.

When I said it was Michael himself you also replied it was a double with a mask on, and I also noted along the lines it started to become annoying. What's the difference?

The difference is that I compare pics and you just say "It's Michael Jackson". O2 dude can't be compared, we have no eyes. If try to compare O2 dude's mouth is already too wide. A good comparison is impossible with the glasses on.

I am done with people like you just 'stating their opinion', ridiculing others without any arguments. I had the discussion with mykidsmum as well, but she at least posts her own comparisons. You are only stirring the threads up. If you don't think there were doubles and you will not contribute to the thread proving us wrong, just stay away from these threads.

'Nuff said...

Ow I've given enough arguments, it's not true what you say. I've mentioned the scar near his lower lip. I've mentioned scars on his chin. I've mentioned the scar on his cheek. I've reposted a picture of yours that you used for comparison in black and white you couldn't get to match because it was in mirror-image. But you've all done away with them as 'that can be artificially added' or 'it's a prosthetic mask'.

#5
Quote from: "~Souza~"

Quote from: "Raven"

@Souza I think it's all a double with a prosthetic mask on.

You are seriously starting to annoy me Raven, I ask a serious question here. You can either answer in a normal way, or stay away from the double threads.

This is not a doubles thread.

Why is it annoying...as I'm doing the same you did.

When I said it was Michael himself you also replied it was a double with a mask on, and I also noted along the lines it started to become annoying. What's the difference?

#6

@Souza I think it's all a double with a prosthetic mask on.

#7

AllJack5ons have not tweeted for over 8 days...radio silence since April 5th 2010 (latest Murray courtday)

#8
General Hoax Talk / Re: Do you have a deadline?
April 12, 2010, 04:18:25 PM

I'd rather have a lifeline then a deadline

#9

And so it appears celebrities have a lot more privacy then believed...most isn't true what is written about their private lives

#10
Other Odd Things / Re: HEISMYPETERPAN AGAIN!
April 12, 2010, 03:51:00 PM

Anyone interested in my Twitter?

:D

#11

This same topic has been discussed in another thread as well:

viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1950

#12
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"

Quote from: "Raven"

Michael was extremely thin, to the point of looking sickly. He especially did not appear to have the weight required to do 50 concerts.

It amazes me that some keep saying he was not too thin. One might wonder how thin he needed to be for them to call him too thin.

To prevent videos from being lost, such as the one where he supposedly said he did not want to do the 50 shows, it would be a good idea to download such videos and store them on your harddrive. Videos from Youtube can be easily downloaded with this website by copying and pasting the youtube url in it:

http://www.savevid.com

Where is that video of him saying that he didnt want to do 50 show?  You have it?

No, I do not have this video but there has been much talk of it suddenly disappearing from the internet at some point. So as soon as anyone sees such an important video, download it because it can be removed again at any time.

#13

Michael was extremely thin, to the point of looking sickly. He especially did not appear to have the weight required to do 50 concerts.

It amazes me that some keep saying he was not too thin. One might wonder how thin he needed to be for them to call him too thin.

To prevent videos from being lost, such as the one where he supposedly said he did not want to do the 50 shows, it would be a good idea to download such videos and store them on your harddrive. Videos from Youtube can be easily downloaded with this website by copying and pasting the youtube url in it:

www.savevid.com

#14

21st april 2004..anyone recall what happened then

#15
The Double Theory / Re: The Official Double Thread
April 11, 2010, 04:34:53 PM

@Souza since you and Mo believe that it's all prosthetic make-up, this whole doubles discussion is pointless since you're labelling everything as "prosthetic mask".