Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - LieBecomesTheTruth

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: [1] 2
Michael Jackson News / Re: Hold My Hand (Official Video!)
« on: December 10, 2010, 07:36:18 PM »
I wonder what the significance is of all the kids wearing Halloween costumes? It starts at 1:01

...What on earth? Lol.

Other Odd Things / Re: WANNA C Michaels DOUBLE ??? R U READY ???
« on: May 29, 2010, 06:54:30 PM »

The Ambulance / Re: Info for the newbies part 1 - PLEASE CHECK
« on: May 20, 2010, 02:39:03 AM »
Quote from: "scorpionchik"
Question to Souza & everybody:

My questions is about 911 display.It shows 911 original call made from 9641 Sunset Boulevard by verizon phone # 909-273-4846, which is disconnected when I called.
How the address can be related to phone #? If somebody calls 911 from cell phone, it can show phone # on caller ID, but not the address of particular location. it is different if call made home or hotel itself since the address also registered and can display. I don't understand this part.
If, for example, I am Glendale resident, go to anywhere in Beverly Hills and call 911, besides my #, it will not show the address I am at, unless I give them one.
What is your version people? How you expain this?

It shows the address of the nearest cell phone tower.  :)

The Ambulance / Re: Info for the newbies part 1 - PLEASE CHECK
« on: May 19, 2010, 09:33:04 PM »
Quote from: "moonwalkontoes"
Wasn't it agreed on that the phone tower is at Beverly Hills Hotel?  Which is why the call is registered there...

I thought so too.

And TMZ reported he was dead at 2:20 PM not AM  :) Just a little typo

Quote from: "suspicious mind"
seriously though if we ourselves want to retain any crediblilty to the original intent of the forum we CAN NOT go down every path that leads in some strange direction. if we give credence to every off beat thought as a possiblility then we might as well just say we accept micheal having someone hooking him up to an iv of propofol every night to go to far as the mj - lmp marriage. if there was motive other than genuine affection it was probably for the most part just to get some people goat.


Although I didn't watch the videos, I read the original post as well as most of the replies. I wanted to reply to this thread and say that I'm a biologist and I'd just like to share with you all that a "cure for cancer" is simply not that easy. No one case of cancer is the same, and that is why cancer is so hard to treat. The cells multiply and mutate in a different way each time. Cancer is always changing, which means, although there are treatments for certain types, finding a cure for cancer as a whole is extremely difficult.

Michael Jackson News / Re: Now taking questions.......
« on: May 01, 2010, 10:50:50 PM »

The Double Theory / Re: Mikes mug shot
« on: April 14, 2010, 12:08:21 AM »
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
Have you ever considered that the awful mugshot was DELIBERATE??

They used the worst and most harsh lighting in the room and captured MJ in a bad pose, full on with a startled expression.. in order for Mike to look as "wierd" and "abnormal" as possible??

The LAPD did it on purpose.. they wanted him to look like this so the public could look at the pic and say "yeah, he looks really wierd.  He must be a paedo"

Get it??  Its called PR.

DancingTheDream, I absolutely agree with you. The police department did do this on purpose in order to make him look as "weird" as possible. I'm sure many of us here have seen the video where MJ talks about how he was treated by those people, and what he says he was subjected to is absolutely despicable. And what I also think is despicable is analyzing this particular picture of him at an almost microscopic level. This was one of the hardest things MJ had to go through, and I really think it's disrespectful to be doing this. But of course, thats just my opinion.

On another note... as someone previously stated, when someone is booked in a county jail, fingerprints are taken.

The Double Theory / Re: The real least that's what we think
« on: April 12, 2010, 06:56:56 PM »
Quote from: "Raven"
Quote from: "~Souza~"
Quote from: "Raven"
Quote from: "~Souza~"
Quote from: "Raven"
Quote from: "~Souza~"
Quote from: "Raven"
@Souza I think it's all a double with a prosthetic mask on.

You are seriously starting to annoy me Raven, I ask a serious question here. You can either answer in a normal way, or stay away from the double threads.
This is not a double thread.

Why is it I'm doing the same you did.

When I said it was Michael himself you also replied it was a double with a mask on, and I also noted along the lines it started to become annoying. What's the difference?

The difference is that I compare pics and you just say "It's Michael Jackson". O2 dude can't be compared, we have no eyes. If try to compare O2 dude's mouth is already too wide. A good comparison is impossible with the glasses on.

I am done with people like you just 'stating their opinion', ridiculing others without any arguments. I had the discussion with mykidsmum as well, but she at least posts her own comparisons. You are only stirring the threads up. If you don't think there were doubles and you will not contribute to the thread proving us wrong, just stay away from these threads.

'Nuff said...
Ow I've given enough arguments, it's not true what you say. I've mentioned the scar near his lower lip. I've mentioned scars on his chin. I've mentioned the scar on his cheek. I've reposted a picture of yours that you used for comparison in black and white you couldn't get to match because it was in mirror-image. But you've all done away with them as 'that can be artificially added' or 'it's a prosthetic mask'.

Yes, because it's POSSIBLE nowadays, but you just ignored that and went on with sarcastic remarks. That's the last thing I will say about it, since this discussion is not the issue here. I am awaiting your comparisons...
I don't need to proof anything here. If you claim someone is not Michael, the burden of evidence is yours. I've also explained in the very beginning that IMO it's disrespectful towards Michael publically examining his face to the microscopic level the way you are doing, he would have HATED it, so that is another reason I won't do any comparisons. I've mentioned that plastic surgery is good nowadays (as is prosthetic make-up), but NOT to the detailed extent some people in here suggest.

Other contributions you've ignored:  I've explained that if the jaw moves with the lips closed the chin appears longer. I've explained that if the head is tilted forward the length of the chin visually appears shorter and the forehead appears longer on photo due to the 3D effect. So that whole remark of yours "I am done with people like you just 'stating their opinion', ridiculing others without any arguments." is just totally untrue.

I totally agree with you about it being disrespectful towards MJ.

Being a singer, dancer, and all around brilliant entertainer was MJ's job. And he worked very hard at his job. Yes, I'm sure he, like many other entertainers, had look a-likes to deter fans and allow him to safely exit various venues when the crowds were too large and stunt doubles to perform stunts that were too dangerous for him to do on his own (like flying over a concert crowd with a jet pack). But to suggest that it was not him performing at his own concerts is absolutely disrespectful. He worked hard to create the biggest selling album of all time. He worked hard to create music that actually had meaning. And he worked exceptionally hard to make sure that his concerts were perfect so that his fans would have the greatest experience possible. Don't try to take that away from him.

Michael Jackson News / Re: Los Angeles hit by a 6.9
« on: April 04, 2010, 06:21:23 PM »
Felt it here in San Diego. It was a pretty big/long one!! Everything's alright though. Haven't heard of any damage or injuries so far...

Other Odd Things / Re: Murray has a double...
« on: April 04, 2010, 04:44:00 PM »
He's also jogging in this picture, so his face flab is bouncing around... :lol:

Other Odd Things / Re: Murray has a double...
« on: April 02, 2010, 08:21:34 PM »
LOL. Is this for real?

Hoax Pictures / Re: Proof it was Michael at the 02
« on: March 26, 2010, 10:50:49 PM »
LOL! mykidsmum you are awesome. Souza and Mo... ya'll are nuts!!! IT'S MJ! Admit it, mykidsmum's comparisons clearly show that it's him.  :lol:  :lol:

The Double Theory / Re: Marks on MJ's hands
« on: March 23, 2010, 11:51:25 PM »
mykidsmum you did such an awesome job! If people can look at those match-ups and still think that they are not the same person, then you will never be able to change their minds. In my opinion, they've spent so much time trying to prove that it was not MJ at the O2 arena that, at this point, they would be too embarrassed to admit they've been wrong along.   ;)

Pages: [1] 2
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal