Messages

1

TMZ Articles / Re: Dr. Conrad Murray -- Propofol Still An Option

« on: January 01, 2010, 05:42:10 AM »

Mmmm, this doesn't surprise me that much. Propofol is used for short procedures, for example colonoscopy, so i'm sure it has uses in other fields too. Not sure what the law is for practising while under investigation though. Murray would have been trained to use short acting anaesthetics, like gastroenterologists do, but not in keeping someone sedated for hours.

The State Board of Medicine where Murray is licensed COULD pull his license under an emergency order. Murray would have the right to a hearing to show cause why his license should not be pulled. I believe that the information regarding this case was never given to the Nevada licensing board. If someone were to make a complaint and attach the now public Affadivit in Support of the Search Warrant in the murder investigation, I would expect them to have a hearing.

The affadivit that I read, which was not a certified true copy, stated that Murray admitted to administering 25 mgs of Diprovan  (Propofol) around 11 AM. after numerous other sedatives were administered all night. According to some doctors, this additive effect could have caused cardiac arrest. Also, people stop breathing under Propofol and it is dealt with in the hospital. He didn't have the right equipment.

This is not MY opinion, but what is contained in the affidavit from the police and filed in court.

Now, apart from the affidavit, 25 mgs was not a massive overdose, so there had to be something else discovered afterwards or they are counting the other drugs in calling it an overdose. Remember, they were going for probably cause to search the doctor's and MJ's place.

The point here is that you would THINK the licensing authority would have the info, but I don't think the DEA sent it to them. I think a member of the public should and should ask why the man is not considered a risk to the public safety.  The DEA revokes DEA numbers on docs every day on the SPOT when they think a doctor is over prescribing narcotics--so why didn't they do something to this guy?

To me, that is one of the more powerful pieces of evidence right there. They DO NOT have to have a conviction yet. If they say they do, then ask the DEA why they didn't revoke his license or if they have done so on any of the docs who wrote RXs under aliases (IF THIS IS TRUE).

I find it disturbing that they are saying that he overdosed a patient yet he is still free to practice. It makes no sense.

2

Michael Jackson News / Re: Bonnie Vent has "contact" with MJ!!!

« on: January 01, 2010, 05:23:19 AM »

I don't know if mediums are legit or not, but I do know this: she doesn't say anything about MJ that shouldn't couldn't read anywhere on the Internet. And the rest is B.S. she makes up. If a dead MJ talks to ME, I will believe it. But anyone else? No.

In researching this issue I have found that Ms. Vent has withheld information because it is part of an ongoing investigation. She has also tried to get the immediate family to verify some information. Anyone who has a contact with the immediate family should write to her and maybe you could be part of resolving this one way or another. She asked a major network on which she was going to be a guest to help her get in contact with his family, and was unsuccessful.

I would be delighted if MJ was alive, and always hold out hope.  I also look at the other side of the coin. So, if people want to actually move this investigation along, help her get in touch with his family if you can. Again, I have absolutely no relationship to her, I am just trying to investigate all angles of this situation.

Finally, please don't hate on one person or a group of people (her OR psychics). I ask that you agree to disagree if that is the case, but above all, respect others opinions. I feel like we should have a saying
"WWMD?" but it would be against Christian beliefs to hold a man at the same level as Jesus (in my religion anyway).

3

The LAPD (Los Angeles Police Department) / Re: Is it MURDER now?

« on: January 01, 2010, 12:52:48 AM »

Sorry what is this document?
Do you have the full link or pic?

This person copied part of the affidavit that was used to procure the search warrant of Michael's home as well as his physician's offices.  The affidavit has been made public.

Also, murder in this document was used loosely, it was used to describe the investigation.  Since a decision has not been made (or was not made at that time) as to whether to bring a MURDER or MANSLAUGHTER charge, the term MURDER was used. For more details, read the affidavit online.

4

Michael Jackson News / Re: Bonnie Vent has "contact" with MJ!!!

« on: January 01, 2010, 12:45:42 AM »

Anything, Anything, Anything for money, they'll lie to u, die for u, even sell stories that they speak to mj!! whooohoooooo!! oooowwwwwwww!!    
Garbage!!

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I would like to respectfully point out some things here on your forum:

1) You all claim to respect Michael and some of you are soldiers in his army of love.

2) Yet, despite this, some of you have taken to ridiculing this woman, Bonnie Vent, with unkind words about her.

3) To set the record straight, I am not Bonnie Vent and have never met her. I can say that she was just named Medium of the Year by the International Psychic Association.  She has not made ONE DIME from the videos she posted on YOUTUBE.

4) There is another woman, Cherokee Billie who is selling the same type of sessions allegedly from Michael for the cost of 20.00.  She also has told every individual that she CAN AND WILL hook them up with Michael via a session, at the cost of 1.50 a minute.  Bonnie Vent refuses to do this. So,  perhaps you all have the two confused.

5) Despite your feelings about psychics, why call people names?  It is, in fact, a violation of the terms of service of this site.  Just because you don't agree with what she says does not make it OK. Just as importantly, Michael was subjected to so much hate and ridicule,  why do it to someone else?

6) I have been quietly watching this board and my main concern here is the attack on another person who has been sincere in trying to help Michael in her own way while NOT making money on this.  I find it odd that no one mentioned the other person.  

I BELIEVE IT WAS MICHAEL WHO SAID DON'T JUDGE A PERSON UNTIL YOU HAVE MET THEM FACE TO FACE (This was in the video tape of his deposition on YouTube).