Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - julia142

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 13
1
Kenny Ortega / Re: Your thoughts?
« on: March 27, 2019, 05:42:09 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
This might not be a popular belief, but I think what is going on now is part of the hoax.
Some might agree with me, some might not agree with me. Many don’t  think Michael Jackson is alive either.

1993; MJ interview with Oprah.
2003; MJ interview with Bashir.
2013; WR lawsuit.
Robson waited the needed 7 years for the Statue of Limitations with regards to their 2005 testimony to end, and so filed the new civil lawsuits when the Statue of Limitations ended. Wade, this way could not be held accountable for perjury. Safechuck didn’t testify in 2005, but signed a declaration in the early '90's that he had not been "sexually abused" by MJ.

Wade allegedly "abused" from the age of 7-14.
Taj Jackson asking for $777 000 in donations for his documentary; There probably won’t be one because what is going on now is probably part of "it". But I might be wrong.
I believe, what is going on now is part of a set up trap for the media to walk straight into and they surely have. Media surely have broken the law in my country by airing this film.  I have a feeling Oprah is set up as well, although I thought her to be smarter than this.
And all the other contradictions and inconsistencies colliding with facts/evidence: It feels like the same thing over again, history repeating itself in another setting, like when the hoax began in 2009.
People closest to MJ, with a genuine relationship, are silent, except for those who (family included) haven’t previously been part of the hoax (vocally,) they now seem to be playing their part as it is relevant for the scenario. It sure seems like it.
And I have my thoughts on 2023 as well. I'm just going to keep watching.

I think the same thing than you. Since 2 weeks, it popped up in my head, and I really do think also, that probably everything goes out right according to Michael's plan.

2
AEG ~ Sony / Re: Katherine Jackson versus AEG set for trial 9-10-2012
« on: July 14, 2013, 01:04:40 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Thanks Sweet, should I know who Sharon Sidney is?!

we watched her videos curls. she is in you tube and likes getting attention. What Charissa says makes sense.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Scorpion she doesn't like to get the attention she is just telling her truth, she seems to be very close to Jackson family due to she was an assiduous fan of which were in front of Michael's house in a daily basis.

Btw Scorpion sorry I didn't PM because I couldn't log into the forum while being in L.A, although the house I stayed was in front of Forest Lawn (Glendale) I didn't visit it, it gave me bad vibes, lol.

No problem sweet. I would suggest you not to believe everything people say. Pearl keeps saying she is insider but she met a few times with couple of Jacksons in the past that's all.That doesn't make her insider.Same with this persona.   I met Katherine and La TOya in the court during Murray trial, Katherine looked exactly in my eyes when I said hello to her and replied, so should I make big deal  out of this ?

I happened the same with Mrs Jackson I even talked to her and took her hand and that doesn't make us insiders, so if I don't believe what Sharon says then why do you believe Michael is alive? we all know June 25 was a weird day because nothing added right? so Sharon shared her story with us through those interviews of what she witnessed that day, she doesn't have blogs or twitter or Facebook NOTHING she doesn't wanna be famous she just LOVES Michael in an unconditional way because she is following the trial in an almost daily basis, she even told me that she didn't know if Michael is coming back she only knows Michael is alive somewhere and the only thing she wants is JUSTICE for Michael, why I am not gonna believe her if she is saying what we all are saying from 4 years ago that the person or dummy on that stretcher wasn't Michael?

And talking about Pearl and this will be my last time because I respect Souza and she doesn't want us to talk about her is that when I met her I met the sweetest person (although you can't believe it) one person that is going almost everyday to the court because she is not sure about that trial, she thinks very ugly issues are going on behind scenes so she does believe the trial is real and having a coffee with her she told me almost crying that she can't sleep at night due to the trial, she said nothing makes sense and even thinks if Mrs Jackson wins that means Michael is dead and you know what? I had to comfort her telling her don't worry Michael is alive, with this I am trying to convey you the kind of person she is, she is much more humble than what she looks like in her vids or twitter, I think she has created a persona with a strong character that has nothing to do with her real life, she is very kind and loving person,she is very respected by everybody at the court and when I say everybody is EVERYBODY including Jackson's family and body guards, guys I don't wanna brainwash you but I think people is far from Pearl's reality which is just love and support to Michael and one of us "a beLIEver".

Absolutely agree with you, I also met Pearl with European reporters in 2010, and this is also the same person you talk about I met. And his husband also is very lovely.

3
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I think Gavin is a lost cause. But I expect we will hear from Jordy somehow and at some point.

Well, not so sure, because Gavin's family would do anything for money (just like Michael's song! lol), and if they are offered big money to tell the truth, I think they would...   :icon_lol:

4
TMZ Articles / Re: NEW CHILD MOLESTATION CLAIM By Wade Robson
« on: June 02, 2013, 01:10:09 AM »


 





For my part, I do think that Wade Robson is part of this hoax, without any doubt. 2 always come with 3. So it is the third allegations separated from 10 years each exactly, surely not a coincidence again guys. And I just saw the hoax video by another user, in which the tweet of Paris (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login) about Shakespeare, and Neda MJ makes the link that the character has to clear his name before coming back to life.

Here is my thought; what if Jordie and Galvin comes back in this trial as defense witnesses, saying they lied all along ? And taking as in mind, that we all know that Wade went in the trial of them both to say that he was never abused by Michael. The lie would become the TRUTH ! And that would clear the name of Michael once and for all ! Because all of the witness will have said for once that they were never been abused by Michael.

Remember that Back said 4 years ago that TM was the key that would clear the name of Michael! If we take in mind that TM is not in the AEG trial, that would mean that this Wade Robson's allegations will be the key to unveil the truth ! This is all we have been waiting for since so many years, the victim coming forward to tell the real truth. And Michael said we have 4 years to get it right, and Wade Robson's appear to happen in this 4 years that Michael said.

So for me, nooooooo doubt it is in this hoax ! If this vision of mine comes true, well let's say it is in the Pocket guys!!!!

5
For my part, I do think that Wade Robson is part of this hoax, without any doubt. 2 always come with 3. So it is the third allegations separated from 10 years each exactly, surely not a coincidence again guys. And I just saw the hoax video by another user, in which the tweet of Paris (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login) about Shakespeare, and Neda MJ makes the link that the character has to clear his name before coming back to life.

Here is my thought; what if Jordie and Galvin comes back in this trial as defense witnesses, saying they lied all along ? And taking as in mind, that we all know that Wade went in the trial of them both to say that he was never abused by Michael. The lie would become the TRUTH ! And that would clear the name of Michael once and for all ! Because all of the witness will have said for once that they were never been abused by Michael.

Remember that Back said 4 years ago that TM was the key that would clear the name of Michael! If we take in mind that TM is not in the AEG trial, that would mean that this Wade Robson's allegations will be the key to unveil the truth ! This is all we have been waiting for since so many years, the victim coming forward to tell the real truth. And Michael said we have 4 years to get it right, and Wade Robson's appear to happen in this 4 years that Michael said.

So for me, nooooooo doubt it is in this hoax ! If this vision of mine comes true, well let's say it is in the Pocket guys!!!!

6
TMZ Articles / Re: NEW CHILD MOLESTATION CLAIM By Wade Robson
« on: May 23, 2013, 08:52:42 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Adi
Quote
6. As someone pointed out, every 10 years a new allegation: 1993, 2003 and 2013
There's seems to be something very purposeful about this, 3,3,3.
I noticed in the article above that Robson is 30 and, "The claims come 10 days after top Hollywood choreographer Wade Robson..."
Plus plenty of 7's.
Seems Tom Mesereau is going to be in big demand again, like twitter Front predicted.
And where's Susan Yu; it would be nice to hear from her too? You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I agree...the 333 seems purposeful to me too. Also it made me remember reading somewhere that the date of hearing is 6/6/2013 and it is ----> here on the documents filed: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

so 6-6-2013 =  666 (where 2013=6)

The numbers 333 and 666 of course made me think back to all the numerology posts made by TS and the Dangerous autograph code etc - 333 needed to turn 666 into 999 - turning the pyramid upside down.

Also the every 10 years (10, 10, 10) also again reminds me of TS's numerology and 111 is  another hoaxy number (when zeros' are removed)

Very curious to me and yes I think purposeful.

Yes - Front on Twitter predicted it...and if this next round of BS allegations, which has been reported today, eventuates then I think Tom Mesereau will definitely be:
Quote
....back into the picture...very soon & very BIG

And the 333 pages from the FBI related to the molestation charges... 1993-2003-2013

7
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
not being one of the "everyone who's dissapointed" i just consider that MJ , aware person that he is, may have simply been pointing towards the climate change topic . He certainly did not say four years to get it right or i'm not coming back. The words came from his own mouth no doubt there , just doubt he was talking about a future come back schedule.

Just my opinion, but I feel that TII is full of colloquialisms. I dont beleive MJ here was talking about the environment or global warming. I honestly don't. It may appear that he is, but I believe he is talking about return. Just like BAM scene / reference, at the end of the movie. The scene is based on rehersal and figuring out the sequence of his act and then light go out and BAM. Is he talking about the LITERAL stage, and lights and bam illumination regarding turning to the audience in the concert? Or is that scene figurative for bam return / resurrection? Another example of this is FIST in ear, I don't believe he is talking about a literal fist in his ear, futhermore, I dont think he is actually referring to the audio equipment. I believe fist in ear (and I know others believe the same) to be a reference to something Michael doesnt agree with or like to hear or activity he is aware of that doesn't sit well for him. You know, Don't like it, don't like hearing it, makes me sick... "its like a fist in my ear" But on the surface it appears that MJ is talking about audio equipment, but is he really?

TII is full of scenes where MJ appears to be talking about one thing on the surface, but post knowledge of the hoax you see that he is really talking about something else. I think that the prayer 4 year scene fits into this category. Again, this is JMO, and I respect your opinion, but to me 4 year reference isn't about environment at all, its about bam.

Besides, who says, which aithority exactly, and based on what evidence, shows that the environmental damage actually IS irreversable in 4 years time???

Meanwhile, another 4 year reference.... Was cruising in my car listening to Bad 25, Bad remix. In specific the latino rap at the end, where artist raps "In FOUR YEARS catch me with a billion doing that moonwalk" - yeah it just made me smile! As much as I love the song, and love the remix and it made me smile, really, if you stop and think about it, it was said and put into the audio for a reason.

To me, 4 years is a clear bam indication from MJ himself. For me (again JMO) the question is not WHAT he is referring to with the 4 yr reference, its WHEN he is referring to?

Four years from filming that scene? Four years from DOD? Four years from release of TII? Four years after CM is convicted? and so forth...

Bring it on!

Good catch!  :th_bravo:

And don't forget also another 4 years, Michael always release an album every four years, so he always come back every 4 years! Maybe we should look at the exact amount of time between his album, like for instance, number of days between Off the wall and Thriller, Thriller to Bad, Bad to Dangerous... etc... ????

8
TMZ Articles / Re: MICHAEL JACKSON'S DRIVER'S LICENSE Stone-Faced Stare
« on: December 30, 2012, 04:03:14 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
For the record, I believe O2 guy=MJ. The dentition matches perfectly. Years ago I sought to prove O2 did not =MJ and ended up realizing he was in fact actually MJ by the end of the project. I see a match in the hand pics as well.

I think MJ played the part of his own impersonator.

In addition: why would an MJ impersonator not impersonate MJ in his body language as well as his appearance?

I think MJ played the part of his own BAD impersonator at the O2. (In other words, he played a person doing a poor job of impersonating himself). Because a genuine impersonator would do a better job of trying to ACT like MJ... since that's the point of an impersonator.... and O2 guy didn't even seem to TRY to act like MJ... rather, he acted like ELVIS (hint hint).

Absolutely agree with you, since the beginning, I always thought that Michael just wanted to make us think it was not him, while it was really him. And I have a seen a picture in the past, where we see the he seems to have prosthetic make up on his hands, so that would explain why the hands are not the same as usual. I think he also changed his voice and changed the accent to make us doubt. You know, everytime I have doubts in my mind, there's always that moment that comes to my mind, that last moment of Michael televised that comes to my mind, and his strangest appearances ever, then I say to myself, ''yes, it got to be a hoax for sure'' !

9
Twitter ~ Verified Accounts / Re: Paris Jackson Twitter @ParisJackson
« on: December 29, 2012, 12:22:17 AM »
New tweet from Paris:

Paris Jacksoη‏@ParisJackson

“…and then he greeted Death as an old friend and went with him gladly , and , as equals , they departed this life .” #TaleOfTheThreeBrothers
 
See the tale of the three brothers there:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

The last brother ask for the cape of invisibility, and he was able to hide from death all his life until he was old enough to die.

Very interesting tweet from Paris!  :icon_e_surprised:

10
TMZ Articles / Re: MICHAEL JACKSON'S DRIVER'S LICENSE Stone-Faced Stare
« on: December 24, 2012, 09:32:47 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
MICHAEL JACKSON'S
DRIVER'S LICENSE
Stone-Faced Stare


12/24/2012 1:00 AM PST BY TMZ STAFF



TMZ has obtained the last driver's license photo Michael Jackson ever took--
a big change from the singer's cheery license photo from the 1980s.

The latest photo was taken in 2005 -- four years before the King of Pop's
untimely death -- and you can tell from the harrowing image ... MJ had become
a tortured soul.



An image of MJ's 1980s driver's license was released by the FBI shortly after
Michael died  -- as part of the agency's massive file on the singer. The Bureau
compiled the dossier during its investigation into child sex allegations involving
the singer back in the 90s.



As you can see, Michael was a much different person back then -- smiling
brightly for his photo at the DMV.

Of course, it's not like MJ ever put the license to much use -- he was pretty
much exclusively chauffeured around, especially in the later years of his life.

Read more: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

OH MY GOD!!!!  :omg:

11
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: December 20, 2012, 11:11:12 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


Julia142, lovely video, and yes, "Happy Hoaxmas" to everyone here!  Love that greeting!

Thank you darling, I am happy you saw my post that was lost from a couple of pages ago, lol!

And hope so much, it will be HOAXMAS for real this time!!!!

12
Back/Front discussions / Re: Official back & Front thread
« on: December 20, 2012, 08:47:38 AM »
Happy Hoaxmas to all the beLIEvers!!! Here's a gift for you all and Mr. Front (even though, he never gave me a nickname, loool).

A video I made in 2010: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

(sorry I don't know how to do so that we see the video into my post, so I could only put the link)


13
TMZ Articles / Re: CONRAD MURRAY I Want Out of Jail STAT!!!
« on: December 18, 2012, 10:01:34 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Info re proceedings in Murray Court: (haven't verified yet):  Best read from bottom up....
From retweets :

"Michael McParland‏@MMcParland

#conradmurray The Court then phoned Deputy Attorney General, Victoria Wilson: any objection to the bail motion to be filed by 31.12. 2012.


3hMichael McParland‏@MMcParland

#conradmurray Alternatively if letting him out because he promised to be a good boy wouldn't work, he asked for reasonable bail.



3hMichael McParland‏@MMcParland

#conradmurray In this motion, Murray asked that he be released on his "own recognisance" pending appeal, ie he'll be good and show up. Yes!


3hMichael McParland‏@MMcParland

#conradmurray The First thing Murray's lawyers did was file a bail motion. Careful: a bail motion can be confused with a bowel motion.


3hMichael McParland‏@MMcParland

#conradmurray But instead of filing the Appeal Brief as the Court ordered Murray's lawyers did two things today.


3hMichael McParland‏@MMcParland

#conradmurray So given that the final date for the brief was also the same day as the End of the World, you might think he'd file on time.


3hMichael McParland‏@MMcParland

#conradmurray Without the Appeal Brief being filed in time, Murray's appeal would be dismissed. No brief: no appeal.

3hMichael McParland‏@MMcParland

#conradmurray The Appeal Brief is the written document that sets out the grounds on which Murray will claim is conviction was wrong.


3hMichael McParland‏@MMcParland

#conradmurray The Court made it clear in October that no further extensions of time for filing that Appeal brief would be granted.


3hMichael McParland‏@MMcParland

#conradmurray In October, the Appeals Court granted Murray's lawyer a final extension until Friday 21 December to file his appeal brief.


3hMichael McParland‏@MMcParland

 It's been a very busy day for #conradmurray at the California Appeals Court. #michaeljackson

Wow!!! Thanks a lot for these precious infos!  :)

14
TMZ Articles / Re: CONRAD MURRAY I Want Out of Jail STAT!!!
« on: December 18, 2012, 06:17:51 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Dr. Conrad Murray wants out of the pokey immediately while he appeals his conviction ... this according to court docs obtained by TMZ.

Murray -- who was found guilty of killing Michael Jackson -- has been in jail since he was convicted 13 months ago.

The Doc claims in the docs that he's not a flight risk ... partly because he has a small child who lives in L.A.  Murray also says he doesn't pose a danger to the community, and believes he was wrongly convicted.

Dr. Murray has tried this before and was shut down, but he's entitled to make his case for freedom once again.

Interesting wording - case for freedom.   Seems like a clue (and a HOPEFUL one at that!!!) to me!  I particularly like the IMMEDIATELY!

Will he go out on time for Christmas?????!!!!!!!!  ;D

15
Ok, since, I have researched a lot about 2012 prophecy and I wanted to know what was the origin of it...

By searching, I learned that this prophecy was made by only one man, not a bunch of scientists from the past, but one man, that wrote a book in the 80's. ''The mayan factor'' is the name of the book. I was telling to myself, that if Michael was signing ''Another part of me'' and that he says in it ''the planets are linin' up'' waiting for you'', is because he knew then about the prophecy. Guess what! This song and the book of Jose Arguelles about 2012, was released in the same year.

And by the way, the prophecy of Jose Arguelles was NOT the END of the World, but a change and a new day. That's it, and then, people started making their own theories based on his book, but changed it to end of the world instead.

Now, tonight, I was just telling myself, why If I could find a connection between Jose Arguelles and Michael, because Michael surely knew about the prophecy of Arguelles. And maybe he met him in the past and knew more. So I googled Jose Arguelles and Michael Jackson. And GUESS WHAT?

Jose Arguelles died on the same day than Elizabeth Taylor!!!! COINCIDENTAL isn't it:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Jose Arguelles
January 24th 1939- March 23rd 2011



Elizabeth Taylor
February 7th 1932- March 23rd 2011

Yesterday saw the death of two very famous NonConformist heroes, Jose Arguelles and Elizabeth Taylor. Jose was the man who first brought the idea of 2012 and the Mayan Calendar to public attention through his 1987 book The Mayan Factor. Without his input it’s possible we may never have understood what was really going on with this ancient knowledge, or at least we might be struck into a cold funk by unchallenged propaganda from the Hollywood nonsense of Roland Emmerich, see: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login Elizabeth Taylor was one of the world’s greatest actresses with a career that spanned over 60 years. She was plagued by ill health and relationship problems her whole life, but remained surprisingly down-to-Earth. Her most recent husband was her dustman! How many Hollywood and Broadway starlets would breach such a taboo!? Along with her marriages she also had a completely platonic but highly intimate friendship with Michael Jackson. Wherever she is now; I hope she and Michael are back together. Rest in peace, Elizabeth and Jose.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 13
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal