Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Suzi~Ses~Its~Right

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Info for new members / Re: List of questions about the past 4+ years
« on: September 23, 2013, 05:51:28 PM »
Souza, this is a brilliant idea i am supprised you didnt think of this years ago :0) ... ok i dont post much on here, and havnt in the 4 years i have been here even though i 'check in' every day .. i appolagize if my answers are quite long but i thought i could put my thoughts down for the first time in 4 years as i never get involved in board disscusions  ;D



1.   What is your username and has it always been the same?

I have always been susiesesitsright seemed the right username as my name is Suzie and ask freinds and family .. I am always right ;0)



2.   What made you look into the hoax and when?

25th June 2009, Jermain Jackson announced his brothers death ... what the hell?? since when??? I thought it was always an official body that announced a death ... the other niggling doubts set in the next day when absolutely nothing made any sense. The biggest thing that played on my mind was the length of time it took to 'bury' Michael.

3.   What do you think is his reason to hoax his death?

To this day i honestly cant answer that question ... my first thought was that he knew he could not complete the 'this is it' concerts and knew he would be finished if he cancelled ... but since reading lately those hand written notes, I think the TII concert was never meant to take place and that was the begining of Michael's new path in his life.

4.   Who do you think are 100% in on the hoax?

Jermain without any doubt, Kenny O, the cast and crew of TII and a VERY small group of chosen 'by Michael' friends, def Paris & Prince i have reservations about blanket .... i even have some doubt as to Katherine knowing.

5.   Do you think he will come back and if yes; why, when and how? If not, why do you think he will not return?

At first it was certainly no, as i could not see Michael going through all that to come back, I think he had his whole new future planned out and i honestly believe, the hoax death is so he can follow his dream of movie making, directing and producing, also you will never convince me that the Cirque Du Soleil Immortal world tour was not produced, mixed and directed by Michael, i think he has been working on that tour a very long time.

6.   Do you believe MJ reads the forum and do you think he posts. If yes, do you have a suspect?

LOL i would love to think he does, ermmm yes i think he does, this forum has had so much publicity his curiosity would have made him check it out, does he post?? maybe .. some posts i read although have no mannerisms of Michael at all, certainly have his way of thinking .... I wont allow myself to believe anyone here is Michael .. that way i dont get dragged in by any troll :0)

7.   How long do you think this hoax was in the planning? Please explain why.

Since the 2005 trial .. i honestly dont believe he even thought about it before then, i think once he was found innocent he decided on a new direction in his life and he had to vanish from view to achieve this and thats why he led a 'nomad' life ... he was laying the foundations for the hoax and his new life.

8.   Do you think we have overlooked something or haven’t examined enough and if so, what?

I think we need to go back and re-examine the days, weeks & months directly after Michael's 'death' with ALL the information we have now.

9.   Which part of the hoax do you like less?

the crazyness that led to every advert, every film, every song, everything in general being disected because it held clues to the 'hoax' Michael is a powerfull man ... but im sorry he is not so powerful that he can sway big companies to place clues in everything filmed, written etc since 2009

10.   What do you think is the best hoax video / YouTube channel?

I watch so many but take no notice of who made them ... sorry folks who make them .. but they are all equally well researched :0)

11.   Do you think O2 guy was MJ?

I want to say no .. but honestley i really am not sure.

12.   What old topic should be discussed again you think?

The early days just following the 'death'

13.   If you would have to make a non-believer reconsider and you could pick 3 things to make your point, which 3 things will that be?

1. Jermain's airport slip up, 2. the ambulance video (sorry i still think that was genuine and the 'how we did it video was damage controll') 3. The children and their reaction at the memorial and funeral, specially Paris's (i can cry on demand) speach at the memorial.

14.   Is there anything you believe about the hoax/MJ that you rather not say because you think people will think you are crazy? If yes, please share! Hahahaha.

That Michael is alive and well and living in Sevenoaks in kent and i will bump into him in Hamleys toy shop while shopping in London :0)

15.   What made you laugh the hardest the past 4 years?

Jason pfeiffer and his imagination ... that guy should write fan fiction ... look at fifty shades of grey :0) .... come on Jason think about it, you wouldnt need to leech of Michael's memory anymore you could earn an honest buck :0)

16.   Anything else you want to share or questions you think should be added?

ermmmm ... ok hands up who took the red pill and who took the blue pill?? :0)


2
Is it just me or does the note that says ' if i dont contribute film no imortalization' scream death hoax? .... i dont know much about these notes but it seems that a lot of what MJ has written has come to pass since his 'death' what grabbed my attention was the 'MJ soda can deal' .. ive been away from the sitefor a while so all that i have observed reading these notes has probably been discussed .... but these notes have certainly reinforced my belief in the hoax!!

3
TMZ Articles / Re: PARIS JACKSON PICS DEBBIE ROWE WILL SUE PIC SELLERS
« on: August 23, 2013, 03:26:42 PM »
hmmmm I cant get my head around all this .... as Katherine is the legal guardian wouldnt she have to place, legally, Paris into this 'boarding school'? and wouldnt TJ have to ok it too? and when did Debbie Rowe start playing the over protective mother? has she actually any rights over Paris? seeing as mummy dearest sold those when the kids were babies? .... dont get me wrong im all for the children getting to know their mother it is their right ... but she seems to all of a sudden have the freedom to throw around her weight and suddenly play the devoted, fiercely protected mother  :icon_e_confused:

4

Quote
I still think it is odd that "the cheese stands alone".....No one else is coming forward? :animal0017:

It would seem like someone, anyone would come forward since WR has cracked the door open...there should be a windfall of accusers coming out but there aren't.


.....things that make you go hmmmm.....

your so right ... hear me out .... there had been whispers for years, since i was a kid, about 'there being something not quite right' about Jimmy Saville and the way he was with children .... now all these years later, after he died hundreds of people have come forward, with NO monetary gain, to claim he abused them as children .... I am sorry but if MJ EVER laid a wrong finger on a child, they would be exposing him in their masses .... a huge wealthy company like the BBC could not silence the people abused by Jimmy Saville .... likewise there would be no one able to silence any one who was truley abused by Michael ..... which common sense should shout in peoples faces ... where are all these children, now there is nothing to stop them ALL comming forward ???? ..... maybe they are all just Sneddon's imaginary friends ???? :0)

5
While i agree with a lot of what the original poster says however i have to disagree about knowing the Bible, as the 'New World Translations of the Holy Scriptures' and the 'Holy Bible' (niv & king james) are not the same I have both the JW version and the Holy Bible, i have read them both for a piece i wrote for university and the scriptures differ quite a lot.... ok added my 2 pennies worth back to serious debate now lol  :)

6
I swore to myself never to get involved in any chat about the kids paternity ... but I got to say this ... I'm sorry but I have always believed that Paris is Michael's biological daughter .... she has the very same skin tone as my son, the same natural hair colour as my son .... I like Debbie Row, am very pale skinned, with blue eyes and blonde hair, my sons father, is the same skin tone as Michael, (before the vitaligo) maybe a little lighter, and he has jet black hair like Michael ... my son did not get his dad's brown eyes, he has pearcing green eyes!! ... so NO ONE can predict the skin tone of a mixed child or eye colour ... but what really convinced me she was Michael's daughter? .. look at her eyes and your looking right into papa joe's eyes!! ... and that's all im gonna say on the subject lol :0) apart from I believe this is just tabloid heroin ready to be pumped into all the tabloid junky believers !!

7
Michael Jackson News / Re: Here we go again, Oprah dissing Michel Jackson
« on: November 23, 2012, 06:29:39 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You guys didn't believe when I said that JB is in on the hoax, he is trying to keep MJ's name alive and trying to be sure nobody forget his name until he will come back and BAM!!
JB's concerts plays "MJ's Man in the mirror" before the singer appears on stage, besides his last album is called "Believe" and he appears with angel wings on the stage.
It could be that singers as JB or Rihanna or american rappers (Niki Minaj, etc...) were not aware of Michael's hoax but who are ruling Hollywood music industry know and they are just giving instructions to hint Michael's hoax in some of their songs or albums due to they are being the most influential artists at the "momment of now" and this way is easy to spread it.

I have to disagree i dont think JB has any idea nor is he in on the hoax ... he just has very very good PR agents, producers, etc and NOT because he is talented enough to warrent it ... it is because he sells and he sells big to a large audience, an audience whom they know will appeal to their parents to buy any merchandise going its a massive gold mine money making plan. Once JB's fans are old enough to have their own sustantial incomes, they will think twice about laying out huge amounts of Money for anything with JB on ..... We may get annoyed with them linking JB with MJ where ever they see an oppertunity .. ie his album Believe, the playing of man in the mirror etc .... but the faces behind the scenes holding the contracts, purse strings etc are laughing hysterically all the way to the bank while JB's main audience are gullable young girls. They will grow up soon and the gravy train that is JB'S sucess will also be deraild ... Just my opinion  :)

First of all: reread my post again please, I am saying he might be in on it or he might not be in on it however magnates who run the music industry might be in on it.
Second: let teens get crazy about whoever they want and their parents to spent money in whatever they want, I love Michael Jackson and I think he is "UNIQUE" but there is still a life out of him and JB doesn't deserve to be crucified and scrutinized the way he is being on this forum only because he "LOVES" Michael Jackson and "MEDIA" likes to always make a comparison between them. JB won't probably be the best singer nor the best dancer but he has a magnet undoubtedly to teens, he has a sweet face and a special charm (swag lol) that makes them become crazy, what's the problem here?. I can't really find it  :confused:

Well i am sorry if i offended you .. no i dont like Justin Bieber .. that is no reason for a hostile attitude just because i said i disagreed ... I have no problem i was just commenting on an opinion i had that was diffrent to yours .. and JB will never be crucified his fans will see to that, read them on twitter, for children some of them are dam right evil with their comments to non fans! .... I think in future i will follow Michael's advice and keep quiet ... like he says if you cant say anything nice about someone dont say anything ... so i thinks its best that its back to lurking i go .... :0)

8
Michael Jackson News / Re: Here we go again, Oprah dissing Michel Jackson
« on: November 22, 2012, 01:12:33 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You guys didn't believe when I said that JB is in on the hoax, he is trying to keep MJ's name alive and trying to be sure nobody forget his name until he will come back and BAM!!
JB's concerts plays "MJ's Man in the mirror" before the singer appears on stage, besides his last album is called "Believe" and he appears with angel wings on the stage.
It could be that singers as JB or Rihanna or american rappers (Niki Minaj, etc...) were not aware of Michael's hoax but who are ruling Hollywood music industry know and they are just giving instructions to hint Michael's hoax in some of their songs or albums due to they are being the most influential artists at the "momment of now" and this way is easy to spread it.

I have to disagree i dont think JB has any idea nor is he in on the hoax ... he just has very very good PR agents, producers, etc and NOT because he is talented enough to warrent it ... it is because he sells and he sells big to a large audience, an audience whom they know will appeal to their parents to buy any merchandise going its a massive gold mine money making plan. Once JB's fans are old enough to have their own sustantial incomes, they will think twice about laying out huge amounts of Money for anything with JB on ..... We may get annoyed with them linking JB with MJ where ever they see an oppertunity .. ie his album Believe, the playing of man in the mirror etc .... but the faces behind the scenes holding the contracts, purse strings etc are laughing hysterically all the way to the bank while JB's main audience are gullable young girls. They will grow up soon and the gravy train that is JB'S sucess will also be deraild ... Just my opinion  :)

9
Michael Jackson News / Re: Here we go again, Oprah dissing Michel Jackson
« on: November 20, 2012, 09:20:01 PM »
Dear Oprah .... Michael Jackson was is and will always be a massive star, Elvis was is and will always be a massive star, the Beatles were are and will always be massive stars .... all legends that have, are and will always stand up to the test of time ... in 10 years time the hordes of 12 - 14 year olds who are screaming now will be saying in their twenties ... yeah i remember Justin Bieber ... what ever happened to him??  while listening to a new idol they have discovered.  He may be able to sing be he certainly aint got the magic that flowed from Michael, Elvis and the Beatles .. no sireee he aint ever had nor will he ever have !! (sheeesh that patronising, condercending woman makes me sick!!)

10
Twitter ~ Verified Accounts / Re: Paris Jackson Twitter @ParisJackson
« on: November 17, 2012, 06:35:10 PM »
Paris Jacksoη @ParisJackson
oh , look what you've done , you've made a fool of everyone . oh well , it seems like such fun until you lose what you had won . #jet


Just my thoughts, but when i read this tweet, i honestly thought it was a refrence to Michael Bush and that the costumes he is going to auction which were proved to have fake MJ signatures (not oficially i might add) ..... i took it to mean he tried to make a fool of the fans by convincing them the sig was genuine, and he has lost what he would have won i.e. money from the sale of the auction .... i could be completley wrong but thats just how i read it from my opinion

11
Others / Re: could this be a TII double??
« on: October 13, 2012, 04:52:15 PM »
Thanks Andrea :0) ..... If anyone knows how to zoom in on photos that might help, im useless as images it took me nearly an hour to work out how to post the piccy lol ... its the guy to the right of the fella at the back in the hat :0)

12
Others / could this be a TII double??
« on: October 13, 2012, 04:40:34 PM »
ok, while browsing through a certain MJ impersonators, pics on face book i come across a comment that intrested me, so i clicked on the name to veiw the facebook pics, This one really struck me .... im sorry if i have posted in the wrong place i couldnt find a thread for the doubles or impersonators and i appologise if this piccy has been seen before .... anyway look at the impersonator standing next to 'William J Wagnor' the one in the white hat at the very back ... he looks to me like MJ in orange pants in TII .... (like i said i appologise if i have picked up on something that has already been looked at) .. this picture is titled 'MJ revival 2012 Berlin'


13
I have been a believer since day 1, infact i expect like most on here, i have had to endure the most awfull abuse and cruel comments when stating to people i believe, but it's easy to shrug it off when you think of what Michael suffered over the years, I have had freinds turn against me for defending Michael's innocence when he was accused of child abuse. ( to this day i can not write Michael's name the the 'p' word in the same sentence) i have been told im weird, im pathetic, wakko, eccentric to name a few .. but have always stood steadfast in my beliefe and trust in a man that i feel has the same very strong sense of rightfullness as i have, I think this is why i am so easily 'swayed' when i read something that makes me feel 'that is so wrong, we need to fight for what is fair and just'. My mother, a christian, says i have too much rightous anger inside me lol .... Reading the last few comments posted though, has brought me back to perspective, the behaviour of the family since 2009, the children, and other things you have mentioned ... Please exscuse my ramblings i find it easier to orally express my self and thoughts than i do to put 'pen to paper' lol .... but i still cant shake the feeling that John Branca nor the estate (even though it is Michael) is still not to be 100% trusted .... But thank you for your comments and grounding me once again  :bearhug:

14
Believers ... non believers ... i dont see what diffrence it makes .. arnt we all here for one thing and one thing only?? Michael ?? .... and to be honest, if it were true think of the money and power that Sony, AEG and the estate have ... Michael fought Sony long enough ... They would make sure they ruiend the family for good ... mud certainly sticks, we all know that ... I can remember while studying the JFK case for a paper way back in the stoneage when i was at school, reading a comment from a journalist of the time, he said 'You can kill 10 men with one gun, I can kill 10,000 men with one pen' I have never forgotten that !!!

15
In the last week i have read that web site cover to cover and i have to admit it's alarmingly frightening to the point of it makes too much sense ... just as a scenario ok .... say Michael actually did die ... say he was actually murdered in a coup d' etat by the music organisation as in sony, AEG etc and the wired things we witnessed that we assumed were mistakes/ clues to a hoax death were actually slip ups made by a badley organised 'hit' .... i dont know, these last few months the estate just does not sit easy with me one bit ... the fact is 'if' Michael truley were gone, then John Branca realy is a sycophant who truley believes he is now Michael Jackson ... as soon as he let Sony get their hands on the catalogue and Michael's unreleased music, alarm bells started ringing for me and i cant shake the feeling that what if i trust the estate, I could be getting into bed with the men who could have their hands covered in Michael's blood! I honestly wish i could loose this forboding feeling i have had for the last few months, but i just cant shake it :-\

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal