Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Kuki72

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: [1] 2 3
Jermaine Jackson / Re: Ahhhhhhh Jermaine LOL
« on: March 02, 2010, 04:30:22 AM »
Oh Dear God...

By any chance could the title of this post be re-worded as it give me the creeps :shock:

Introduce yourself / Re: hi to you "crazy" people..
« on: February 23, 2010, 04:58:05 PM »
Non-believers to the left, "crazies" to the right! HEE HEE
You'll catch on quick to this!

Michael Jackson News / Re: Michael Jackson+Wig??...I think not
« on: February 23, 2010, 04:52:00 PM »
How in the name of all thats Holy (say that a lot here in Ireland) can you make out that's Mickey Mouses Nose??? At first I thought you were talking about Mikey's nose and that Paris had given him something - sorry must use my favourite phrase again in respect of my sillines - TWIT!!  :lol:

Michael Jackson News / Re: Michael Jackson+Wig??...I think not
« on: February 23, 2010, 04:26:03 PM »
Jermaine Jackson - The All New Action Man  (add the theme tune to The A-Team) and Bobs your uncle :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  Sorry. . . couldn't resist ;)

Ok can someone fill me in on this Samantha person? Sorry, but we get NO information about ANYTHING to do with Mr. Jackson etc in my part of the world. Is she seriously saying that Mr. Jackson actually brought a lorry load of fans somewhere and poured his heart out to (complete strangers) about how he was bullied into 50 concerts? Sorry, don't mean to offend anyone but if its explained to me I will have a better understanding :roll:

Michael Jackson News / Re: 02 Shows in 2010?
« on: February 22, 2010, 08:02:57 AM »
Bon Jovi are playing June 19th -25th in O2 Areana so I guess MJ et al will not be on stage that week :cry:

Other Odd Things / Re: drivers license
« on: February 10, 2010, 02:06:37 PM »
Are we all not getting confused here?

Is it not logical to assume that when the body was handed over for the autopsy, is it not reasonable to assume that whatever medics had been working on him before he "died", that they would prepare the body for examination for autopsy, i.e., have it unclothed and laid out on a table with a sheet or towel etc over it? When my dad passed 2 years ago very suddenly (massive heart attack), the doctors etc didn't just hand his body over - they "prepared" it so to speak. Am I making sense? So therefore, it doesn't really matter what he was or not wearing at the time of death, because the autopsy isn't really interested in what he was actually wearing and wouldn't document it as such. Clear as mud to everyone?? :|

"A surrender -- in which a defendant turns himself at a police station for booking -- would allow the doctor to avoid being seen in public handcuffed and escorted by police."

Gee, the authorities in LA didn't afford poor Michael this opportunity did they. No, he was handcuffed and escorted by police into the police station for booking, remember, in full view of waiting cameras, and he was innocent. Now Murray, who may have killed Michael, not saying he did or didn't,  is allowed to run about the country un-checked for the past 7 months  - SO WRONG.

And I thought the legal system in Ireland was bad! :roll:

For whats its worth... i hear
 "What about baby boys"
"What about the days"
"What if I live again"
"Would you give a damn"

And at 3.01 its not so much he is clearing his throat, but more the like grunt he does before singing. God did I just describe the GENIOUS as "grunting" his lyrics... sorry MJ. :lol:

I got this for Christmas na na na na naaaaa :lol:
It is a lovely book to have in ones collection. Has lots of reproductions of various concert tickets, flyers etc. Even has details of a private high school that MJ and his brothers attended for a while - cute photo of Mike sharing a swing with a blond girl. Go out and buy it, well worth it.

Ok, seems like I have started something here. Sorry.

At the beginning of the award for MJ, just as a piece of film/video montage/whatever, was starting to play, the whole thing was interupted by these two "presenters" I guess you could call them. The quality was bad (on my side of the water anyway) so I could hardly hear what they were saying. In my frustration and tiredness I called them "twits" (meaning they are a little stupid (sorry no offense intended) or maybe just that it was a stupid thing to do putting them right smack bang in the middle of the piece, therefore preventing us from seeing the film piece.

Well I could have called them a lot worse! Sorry MO!! :?

We don't know what we missed because of the  bloody.. . TWITS! . . .   :evil:  :evil: :lol:  :lol:

Seriously, scroll up a few posts and you will understand.

I think Mr. Dileo was quite upset to be honest, he wasn't able to speak at the end and seemed like he just wanted to get off that stage.

Frank Dileo. NO kids.

Pages: [1] 2 3
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal