This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - michangelo
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 16
1
« on: February 27, 2012, 12:54:28 AM »
ADELE = HAD HELL - Worships the Devil /overreacting/ ![]() You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login...It's very clear to me sorry! 
2
« on: October 02, 2011, 12:13:08 AM »
I do not know if anyone has noticed this, but the double Album Promotional of They Don't Care About Us, the first three digits of the serial number is 777 I have this jewelry, and when I did play at the plate the other day, the 777 appeared to me! Go to this link and note the serial number at the top of the page! You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
3
« on: December 27, 2010, 01:52:37 AM »
DOUBLE POST!...The TOPIC is already out in november !You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
4
« on: November 07, 2010, 12:57:33 PM »
 Warning! Movie Spoiler ! Not much to say but at the end of the film during the credits, the song (BAD) is sung by everyone and it dances! And Michael is singing! How much is the copyright of an original song in a movie? ...Oh! and this guy super hero with the big M on his costume, he pretended to be dead (HOAX)! :mrgreen: ![]() ![]()
5
« on: October 30, 2010, 01:15:20 PM »
Hi! everyone,
I live near Montreal and I can tell you it shows that according to 2011,
and it is possible to book your tickets!You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login...good luck CYA! 8-)
6
« on: August 28, 2010, 09:51:56 AM »
OK thank you all for your investigation ! 
8
« on: August 10, 2010, 10:02:10 PM »
Conference August 4, 2010 3:25 PMEric Schmidt spoke at the Techonomy conference in Lake Tahoe today and dropped some serious rhetorical bombs. "There was 5 exabytes of information created between the dawn of civilization through 2003," Schmidt said, "but that much information is now created every 2 days, and the pace is increasing...People aren't ready for the technology revolution that's going to happen to them." The Techonomy conference is a gathering of people from around the globe seeking to use technology to solve the world's big problems. Schmidt spoke there today and said that people need to get ready for major technology disruption, fast. The bulk of what's contributing to this explosion of data, Schmidt says, is user generated content. From that content, far more prediction than we've seen today is possible and will be a factor in the future. "If I look at enough of your messaging and your location, and use Artificial Intelligence," Schmidt said, "we can predict where you are going to go." "Show us 14 photos of yourself and we can identify who you are. You think you don't have 14 photos of yourself on the internet? You've got Facebook photos! People will find it's very useful to have devices that remember what you want to do, because you forgot...But society isn't ready for questions that will be raised as result of user-generated content." In addition to predicting personal behavior, diseases and other crises will become predictable as well, Schmidt said. On the misuse of information for criminal or anti-social purposes: "The only way to manage this is true transparency and no anonymity. In a world of asynchronous threats, it is too dangerous for there not to be some way to identify you. We need a [verified] name service for people. Governments will demand it." How's that all sound to you? Realistic? Frightening? A combination of both? The upside? "In our lifetimes," Schmidt says, "we'll go from a small number of people having access to information, to 5 billion people having all the world's knowledge in their native language." That is truly incredible. But in a loss of privacy, in the hyper-proliferation of predictive technologies, is there a cost in terms of free will? Maybe not, but it certainly seems an appropriate subject of debate. You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
9
« on: August 08, 2010, 01:13:52 AM »
Hello, firstly if this post already exists I apologize
because I seek and I find anything on the subject!![]() When I watch the last DEMON (oops sorry DEMO) of Iphone4 Matt Demon (oops! Damon), I was dizzy when I saw satanic sign not once but two times at the end of the pub! EYEPHONE (Iphone excuse me again) is entirely Illuminati. Not only for the PUB, but many more things. Look at yourself and tell me what you think? ![]() ![]() But what is troubling is that the sign of Satan, for the deaf and dumb It also means I love you! But what is most troubling here was that the mother is pregnant. She shows her baby to her husband military, by the function Osirix (osiris) Mac and the iPhone has and which are represented by the eye of Horus! ![]() ![]() You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginGo see the video is very touching but what is the truth? I confess to being very septic especially with what comes, follow me please! [youtube:ev8x9ga5]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Cu-3r5gHyA[/youtube:ev8x9ga5] ... and here two manipulation that create doubt about the Mac logo ![]() ![]() ...and what do you see? And to finish in style ... going into the year 1976 when the first Apple (1) was create!![]() Introduced: 1976 Original Price : System, $666.66You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginAnd it was given to it to give breath to the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should also speak, and should cause that as many as should not do homage to the image of the beast should be killed.Revelation 13:15-18![]() For me it settle, no Apple product that comes in my house! lol
I'm not saying I believe everything. But one thing is sure we control
but why? What do you think? and thank you for reading
10
« on: August 05, 2010, 07:41:46 PM »
![]() The man makes a very good point! As we all know, a posthumous Michael Jackson is set to be released in November, and there's been a lot of discussion about whether or not the late singer's estate is taking things a little too far! One such opponent is Black Eyed Peas frontman will.i.am, who collaborated with the King of Pop, and he explains: "I don't think that should ever come out. That's bad. He was a perfectionist and he wouldn't have wanted it that way. How you gonna release Michael Jackson when Michael Jackson ain't here to bless it? Now that he is not part of the process, what are they doing? Why would you put a record out like that? Because he was a friend of mine, I just think that's disrespectful. What's wrong with what he already contributed to the world? You don't disrespect someone when they're gone. … How much can you suck from his energy? … Freaking parasites!" We definitely understand where he's coming from! There is certainly a lot of demand for any music that Michael may have been working on, but we're not sure we're comfortable with it coming out without his blessing, either! What do U think?? Is it wrong to release new Michael Jackson music without him being around to give his approval?
11
« on: July 23, 2010, 10:27:18 PM »
Like Elvis, JM is the first imitator of MJ with some talent.
Many others will come in the future! Of course nobody will replace MJ.
Singing in the studio and on stage,
are two different things and we see at once that he sings bad live.
Now we know why it is not yet known internationally
JM has the voice that is false, it needs a voice teacher,
after that may be, it could well imitate MJ a little better! 8-)
[youtube:qz3ng0wr]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJAUbc0VLHs&feature=related[/youtube:qz3ng0wr]
12
« on: July 05, 2010, 04:01:03 PM »
Double topic!
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login arf! sorry for this !
13
« on: July 05, 2010, 03:28:08 PM »
The media are controlled by governments, TV and Radio are lying
like what happens with the imminent war and the stock market crash is coming soon!
The New World Order is just next door. But there is that the internet gives accurate information and OBAMA wants us disconnected four months!
Why? If our eyes do not see what happens?![]() A new bill rocketing through Congress would give the president sweeping powers to police the Web for national-security reasons. Could this be a way to block WikiLeaks?Is cyberspace about to get censored? Confronting threats ranging from Chinese superhackers to the release of secret documents on WikiLeaks and other whistleblowing websites, the Obama administration may be on the verge of assuming broad new powers to regulate the Internet on national-security grounds. The powers are granted to the White House under a bipartisan bill that was introduced in the Senate only last week but is already moving quickly through Congress toward passage. The legislation has generated considerable buzz on tech blogs—but drawn little notice so far by major news organizations. “The way it seems to be worded, the bill could easily represent a threat to free speech,” said Wayne Crews of the Competitive Enterprise Institute.The bill would grant President Obama the power to declare a “national cyber-emergency” at his discretion and force private companies tied to the Web, including Internet service providers and search engines, to take action in response—moves that could include limiting or even cutting off their connections to the World Wide Web for up to 30 days. While the bill’s sponsors say it is intended to create a shield to defend the United States and its largest companies from the growing threat of cyberattacks, civil-liberties activists tell The Daily Beast they fear the bill could give the White House the ability to effectively shut down portions of the Internet for reasons that could prove to be politically inspired. “We have seen through recent history that in an emergency, the Executive Branch will interpret grants of power very broadly,” said Gregory Nojeim of the Center for Democracy and Technology, a group that promotes Internet freedom. He said the bill, which he described as moving “at lightning speed in congressional terms,” was too loosely worded in its definition of which companies would be regulated and what they would be required to do in an emergency. Wayne Crews, vice president of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a free-enterprise think tank, said he believed the bill was so broadly worded that it might even allow the White House to take aim at whistleblowing websites that were believed to pose a national-security threat, such as WikiLeaks, in the guise of a “cyber-emergency.” “That would be a concern of mine,” Crews tells The Daily Beast. “The way it seems to be worded, the bill could easily represent a threat to free speech.” WikiLeaks, which is nominally based in Sweden and promotes itself as a global resource for whistleblowers, announced this week that it is preparing to post a classified Pentagon video depicting an American airstrike in Afghanistan last year that left as many as 140 people dead, most of them children and teenagers. The Protecting Cyberspace Act was introduced last week by Senator Joseph Lieberman, the Connecticut independent who is chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, and Senator Susan Collins of Maine, the panel’s ranking Republican. Counterparts in the House Homeland Security Committee have endorsed identical legislation, meaning that a final bill could be adopted by the full Congress within weeks. The White House has not taken a stand on the legislation so far. Lieberman said the bill was intended to prevent a “cyber 9/11” in which “cyberwarriors, cyberspies, cyberterrorists and cybercriminals” take aim at the United States and try to shut down infrastructure that is dependent on the Internet—a list of targets that include everything from nuclear power plants to banks to Pentagon computer networks. You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
14
« on: April 20, 2010, 02:46:28 PM »
hm..I'm Excited...Maybe they'll really working together...
Maybe thye're serious...
You know like now the most people think Michael is dead and they will just do money makin show....
But I have a feeling that Michael will com back this year and this will be one of his big shows next year Oh c'mon guy! MJ IS DEAD, Cirque du Soleil will mount a SHOW and nothing else!
15
« on: April 20, 2010, 02:35:57 PM »
Ohhh, they want to make money on his death. :twisted: Guy Laliberte did not need money, it is one of the richest men in the world 2.5 bilions,
and I am proud is a Quebecer like me! :mrgreen: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
|
Show Posts
