This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Topics - bec
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
« on: August 25, 2014, 11:57:35 PM »
The Xcape album cover is MJ turning into a hologram by passing through a black hole. Or... MJ becoming 2D by falling into a black hole. Or... MJ becoming 3D when emerging from the 2D black hole environment. If you look into the holographic universe theory it explains everything about this album cover perfectly. Advances in quantum physics have revealed a startling new theory that the universe is a hologram. Black holes suck in information and reduce everything they swallow to 2D information which gets spread along the surface (or horizon) of a black hole. Because of the laws of physics that no matter (or information) can ever "go away"; matter simply becomes transformed but never gets lost, this means that the entire universe, and everything in it is actually a hologram. Or a simulation. Much like how we play sim games with characters, this is likely all we really are. A character in someone's sim game. It's more complicated then that, and I don't have time to go over the whole thing, but it stacks up interestingly well. This is not some wacky far out theory. It's a theory like gravity is a theory. And relativity. Which basically means it may well be the truth regarding ourselves and our world and the entire universe and everything in it. It's all an illusion of 3D; much like a hologram. Check out this series which explains in detail the holographic universe theory and you will find that the album cover chosen for Xcape--as well as the advent of the MJ hologram, are both perfectly explained by this concept of quantum physics and the laws of the universe. It really could change everything that we thought we knew about the meaning of life and "god". Here is the link to part 1 of 5. I am currently on part 4. Each part is approx. 1.5hrs long. Again, this isn't wacky stuff. Rather it is a good science documentary series. Enjoy. You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
2
« on: January 09, 2014, 09:14:20 AM »
What keeps you here? Aka, what makes you keep watching?
Approaching 5 years, arguably the hoax has hit an impasse, the radio silence is deafening, and it's tempting to give up and throw in the towel and yet... there are many still here, lurking, waiting, watching. Why? What are you waiting for?
I don't know what happened, I don't know if we made it all up, but the amount of time that has passed combined with this complete and utter silence from hoax HQ, makes me seriously doubt that this project has an ending even remotely like what we used to speculate and even expect to come to fruition.
I do now wonder if this is how MJ chose to exit his public life, and this is the legacy he chose for his persona; the perpetual hoax, to lay the foundation for permanent expectations to top Elvis, to keep an underground facet of faithful, ever waiting for his hoax to be revealed--and leave it that way forever. The ultimate man of mystery, left a mystery for the ages. Our generation's Elvis, and maybe that was good enough for him.
So tell me what you think. Why are you still here? What keeps you hanging on?
3
« on: November 04, 2013, 09:31:00 AM »
This is an extremely interesting article out today, with things I don't believe he said in the taped interview airing over the weekend. Check it out. You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginCorey Feldman Raises Doubts on Michael Jackson's Death
By ABC News | ABC News Blogs – 1 hour 35 minutes ago
Just as Conrad Murray was released from prison Monday after serving two years for involuntary manslaughter in the death of Michael Jackson, a child star who knew Jackson well says the King of Pop may have been behind his own death.
"I think that he was much more involved with it himself than people would like to know," Corey Feldman told ABC News' Bianna Golodryga. "And I don't mean an accidental drug overdose. I mean I think this whole thing was done with a message."
"This is it, this is it, this is it," Feldman said, referring to Jackson's "This Is It" concert tour, which the star was in final rehearsals for at the time of his death in 2009 at the age of 50.
Feldman, the former child star known for his roles in such '80s films as "Stand by Me," "The Goonies" and "License to Drive," said that Jackson used to heap praise on him, calling him "the next Marlon Brando."
"That was the most amazing feeling in the world, you know, having the person that you idolize, that you respect for their talent, tell you that you're right up there with him," Feldman said. "What an honor."
Corey Feldman Says Pedophilia No. 1 Problem for Child Stars
Feldman, 42, who has written a new memoir, "Coreyography," said his relationship with Jackson, a father of three, was an escape from the alcohol and drug abuse that riddled his life starting at the age of 14.
"I was afraid he'd be mad at me when he found out," Feldman said of Jackson. "He never cursed, did drugs."
Feldman's own struggles began, he said, in childhood when his parents separated and left him, a 7-year-old, as the family's sole breadwinner.
"There was nobody else to bring in the family income as far as I knew," he said. "Here's the bottom line, children should not be part of the work force."
The Two Coreys: America's Original Child Stars
"The thing that I think is wrong is putting children on a pedestal, making them stars, treating them like they are some powerful force," said Feldman. "That is where it gets very iffy. "
Even though Feldman had a 20-year heroin addiction that he eventually conquered after several stints in rehab, he said it was not drugs or alcohol that were the biggest threat to Hollywood's youngest stars.
The actor, and father to a 9-year-old son, said the biggest threat for child stars is pedophilia. He said the trauma of pedophilia contributed to the 2010 death of his closest friend and "The Lost Boys" co-star Corey Haim.
"People wanted to make sure that our reputations were flawed," Feldman said of himself and Haim. "That way, when we were old enough, wise enough, mature enough, we would be silenced before the truth came out."
"Corey and I, since the age of 16 years old, when the people in Hollywood who were responsible for the things that were happening realized that we were becoming very popular, and very successful, made sure to squash that popularity by elaborating on our downsides," he said. "[They were] exuding our flaws as opposed to quieting them, as most of Hollywood does." First off he's clearly a believer, no doubt about that anymore, but what he goes on to say about pedophilia in Hollywood is interesting too.
4
« on: October 27, 2013, 06:09:46 PM »
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginYesterday (10/26/13) was: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
5
« on: September 07, 2013, 11:40:55 PM »
Consider: this is Sony's hoax, MJ is dead, and the family & friends are playing along out of obligation.
Starting at the beginning, the whole story is true regarding the death; Propofol and all that, Murray is a sleazy, incompetent doctor, and really is serving time. Aeg really did push MJ to the brink and instructed Murray to do whatever it took to keep MJ alive and performing. Once the events of 6/25/09 occurred, Aeg was in a panic. Facing the prospect of losing all that money in ticket sales they went into damage control. The first attempt at recuperation was hasty and only mildly effective; refunds OR commemorative tickets collector's pieces. Also selling tickets to the memorial (lottery system). But it wasn't enough, so the idea for TII was born. They pieced together a movie of sorts with Kenny Ortega's help, and set out to sell it. Once Sony got wind of what they had, and negotiations began, an idea began to take shape there at Sony headquarters, a diabolical, shady idea, one they borrowed from a previous dead King, and the death hoax was born.
So, in a top secret project, cinematographers and editors at Sony pieced together any clips they had of the TII rehearsals that looked "hoaxy" and strung them together in a "hoaxy" order and TII the rough cut was born. But this wasn't enough. Data miners at Sony discovered the hoax site mjhd.com and planted moles. The moles observed the community and quickly infiltrated it. Sony approached Amy and purchased the site and 40 days and 40 nights later, Amy became "AMY" and the [Sony] Death Hoax was launched.
Sony also planted other hoax personalities in various media sprinkled through the web. Twitter, Facebook, forums, blogs, they infiltrated everything and began to "suggest" certain likly outcomes to the "hoax". For example, remember the alleged 33 clues in TII? Widely circulated speculation swirled prior to TII's release of such to the point that some hoaxers attended opening night with pencil and paper in hand to record all 33. Another example, TS/_comments and the FBI theory, also the notion of "bamsday", the idea that MJ will return, perpetually.
Meanwhile, all members of MJ's immediate and close extended family/friends are approached with a proposal. Participate and be handsomely rewarded in the form of a multi-year contract and salary, possibly even commission. Decline and miss out. Speak out and be ridiculed mercilessly in the media and your "career" is over. Most, realizing the stakes were incredibly high, and knowing MJ is resting peacefully anyway, agreed. Some declined (Randy? Rebbie? Jackie?). Others were given auditions, and effectively "tried out" for different roles, after which being assigned to their respective character for the duration of the hoax (5 year plan?). They periodically receive instructions akin to a job order on what move to make next.
The purpose of this is to keep alive continued interest in MJ and the MJ brand, to make the brand more relevant today, and to launch his iconic status (Elvis) going forward. Sony knew the drugs and old chi-mo allegations buzz would take center stage and sought to counter attack by launching the hoax. We always speculated MJ had little to lose reputation-wise going into this, thus why not do something this massively risky and edgy? Exactly the same reason Sony settled on the idea of a hoaxed death hoax. They own the MJ brand, which at TOD was distressed. They threw a hail mary and low n behold it was completed.
The fact that the death hoax theory is so underground adds to the sense of mystery and perceived legitimacy. It doesn't feel like marketing. It feels real, as if the user truly stumbled upon something big just below the consciousness of society. Whoever put this together at Sony was indeed a genius, but it wasn't MJ. There's a reason Sony is a multi billion dollar conglomerate mega-brand in entertainment, they employ the best of the best. As any good marketer knows the in's n out's of human nature, this Sony hoax master mind, using what pop culture learned from Elvis and what we knew of MJ, and created the perfect urban legend death hoax for today's generation and effectively elevated their private MJ brand to immortality status.
Now, prove me wrong.
6
« on: August 20, 2013, 11:18:25 PM »
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginMichael Jackson estate fights U.S. IRS in Tax Court
Reuters
Patrick Temple-West 4 hours ago Internal Revenue Service
By Patrick Temple-West
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The estate of pop music legend Michael Jackson is fighting the Internal Revenue Service over taxes and penalties levied on a wide range of the star's assets, including the Neverland Ranch, his "image and likeness" and some recording properties, according to court documents.
The estate's challenge, filed in U.S. Tax Court, does not disclose any dollar amounts, suggesting the differences in estate taxes paid and allegedly owed could be significant, said tax lawyers who reviewed the court filings on Tuesday.
The dispute centers on the value of estate assets at the time of Jackson's death on June 25, 2009. Some assets, such as the star's image and likeness, are extremely difficult to value for tax purposes.
Under tax law, the penalties associated with the IRS's allegations could be as high as 40 percent of the difference between the taxes paid and those allegedly owed for some of the items.
Though dollar amounts in the documents are redacted, the IRS's deficiency notice said the tax agency levied penalties on the value of Sycamore Valley Ranch Company LLC, which includes the Neverland Ranch, according to the court filings.
The IRS issued to the estate a tax deficiency notice in May and the estate filed its challenge in Tax Court on July 26. The IRS has 60 days to respond to the Tax Court challenge.
Negotiators for the IRS and the estate have held meetings for more than a year to try to resolve the valuation differences, said Charles Rettig, one of the lawyers representing the Jackson estate. He declined to say how much in taxes and penalties are in dispute.
"The government believes estates of celebrities likely have a significant audit potential," Rettig said on Tuesday. "The estate believes the estate tax return properly reflected the interests of Mr. Jackson as of the date of his death."
An IRS spokesman declined to comment.
Under Tax Court rules, the Jackson estate will not need to pay any taxes or penalties unless the court rules for the IRS.
Jackson died at age 50 from an overdose of the surgical anesthetic propofol while rehearsing for a series of comeback concerts in London.
"The Michael Jackson estate was on a clear collision course with the Tax Court," said Bridget Crawford, a tax professor at Pace Law School, who reviewed the Tax Court filings.
(Reporting By Patrick Temple-West; Additional reporting by Eric Kelsey; Editing by Howard Goller and Ken Wills) Uh? I'm perplexed by this.
7
« on: August 14, 2012, 09:45:15 AM »
This topic has been moved to You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login. You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
8
« on: July 17, 2012, 11:17:18 AM »
Sign 4 is up: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
9
« on: April 02, 2012, 11:02:03 AM »
I remember Forbes printing celebrity gossip-style articles recently and us posing the query, why is Forbes carrying "news" like this? They are supposedly a "respected" business and finance publication. Anyway, it caught my eye. Here's the article: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginGoogle News Fooled by April Fools' Day Prank MashableBy Zoe Fox | Mashable – Sun, Apr 1, 2012 Who doesn't love a little April Fool's Day fun? Apparently, not Google News. The algorithmic aggregator of the web's top breaking headlines confused a spoof story for a serious one on Sunday morning, slating it in the page-view-driving top spot. Business magazine Forbes published a fictional dispatch from the Republican campaign trail, "Romney Drops Out of Race, Endorses Santorum." The media company must have rethought its prank, once the story landed in Google News's coveted number one spot, and removed the story. "In a surprise move, Mitt Romney announced today that he is ending his presidential campaign and throwing his support behind Rick Santorum. The move shocked observers, including Senator Santorum, as Governor Romney seemed poised for a decisive victory in Wisconsin.
The governor, however, said he concluded that he has 'no chance' to win the general election in December and that a Santorum candidacy in 2012 would be in the 'best interest of the party.'" You can read the full text of the removed story on Short Form Blog. Forbes didn't beat buzz-blog Gawker, which captured a screenshot while the story was trending on Google News. What do you think of news sites engaging in April Fools' Day pranks? Have any others caught your eyes today?
10
« on: January 09, 2012, 01:54:15 AM »
I need everyone's help.
All of the back posts are up, but this is certainly not all 608 that were, at least most recently known, in existence. There are at least 400 more back posts floating around out there in cyberspace. If you have any one of those >400 back posts I did not post, or a link to where the pic is posted online, please PM me and I will keep adding to the library.
Thank you!
11
« on: January 09, 2012, 01:32:47 AM »
12
« on: January 09, 2012, 01:15:05 AM »
13
« on: January 09, 2012, 01:12:18 AM »
14
« on: January 09, 2012, 01:08:02 AM »
15
« on: January 09, 2012, 01:04:10 AM »
|
Show Posts
