Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Ninanina

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: [1] 2
1
Updates & Posts by TS / S.T.U.D.Y.'s old posts on MJHD.com
« on: October 02, 2010, 01:25:56 PM »
I just found S.T.U.D.Y.'s /TS's old posts on MJHD.net - "verylittlesusie" saved them last year.  :)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course this is just a theory, but it is rather simple and also quite convincing. If it is true, we may hear about it on 9-9-09, or it might not be publicized until the Thriller 2 (TII) movie at Halloween (This Is It). There are at least five different ways to verify the date 9-9-09.


First:
When MJ signed the 1998, he also had three additional digits—usually "0", but sometimes "X" or "6"; (for pictures, see "Michael Jackson 1998" on Google images, and/or go to this thread: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login…..-code-mean).


So if you divide 1998 by three, you come up with a three digit number: 666; and if you turn 666 upside down, you have 999. The 666 could also refer to the "beast" in the Thriller, since 666 is "the number of the beast" (Revelation 13:18). And from the Thriller lyrics: "And no one’s gonna save you from the beast about strike … unless you change that number [666] on your dial" (change from 666 to 999?).


This change from 666 to 999 could be what is coded into the "Dangerous" autograph (see above thread). Some have wondered whether the middle digit is a six or a zero; but it clearly has a hook, just a smaller hook than the hook on the top digit. In fact, if you look very close, there is a small hook even on the bottom digit; so all three digits are sixes—just progressively smaller hooks to help hide the code. Take 1998, and decrease it (down arrow, or subtract) by the 666: and you get 1332 (1998 – 666 = 1332); then insert that answer 1332 (caret means insert) and divide it by 4, which is 333 (1332 / 4 = 333). 333 is the difference between 666 and 999. The down arrow could also represent "death" / "burial", and the up arrow (caret) the "resurrection".


Second:
If you take 1998 and add the first digit (1) to the other digits (998): you have 999 (1 + 998 = 999).


Third:
9-9-09 is a catchy date, and easy to remember (like 6-6-06, and 7-7-07, etc); so this is a date that everyone would know was planned, and not a coincidence.


Fourth:
9-9-09 is exactly 77 days from the "death" on 6-25-09 (note: you must use "inclusive reckoning", see below for details). We already know about the many "sevens" related to MJ: memorial on 7-7-09 (full moon), which was 7 years after MJ signed his will on 7-7-02; funeral at 7pm, and the family was 70 minutes late, and the 7 chairs wide, and many other examples (see this thread: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login…..-symbolism).


Fifth:
9-9-09 is exactly 7 days from the funeral/"burial" on 9-3-09; again, you must use "inclusive reckoning" (this may explain why it was not on the full moon of 9-4-09). The funeral was also 71 days (inclusive) from the "death"—does anyone remember the number "71" related to his "death" (ambulance)? This should show that MJ is indeed using inclusive reckoning!


INCLUSIVE RECKONING:

This is the term which refers to the system of counting, where you "include" (inclusive) both the first and the last in counting the total number; basically, you start counting with "one" instead of "zero". Michael Jackson did read the Bible a lot, and this inclusive reckoning system is found repeatedly in the Bible—in fact, it is most well known in reference to the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ!


1 Corinthians 15:3,4, "Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:" (see also Matthew 20:19; Mark 9:31; 10:34; Luke 18:33; 24:7,6; etc). Jesus died and was buried on Friday (day #1), rested on the Sabbath (day #2), and rose on Sunday (day #3).


Here is another example of inclusive reckoning: "… I do cures today [day #1] and tomorrow [day #2], and the third day I shall be perfected." (Luke 13:32). Notice that the "third day" is the day after "tomorrow". There are many other Biblical examples of inclusive reckoning (read carefully Acts 10:3,9,23,24,30); but I will not take up more space for now.


Apparently, Michael has had this up his sleeve for a couple of decades! Please let me know what you think about all this. Thanks, S.T.U.D.Y. (no, I’m not MJ)


S T U D Y

To

Understand

Doctrines

Yourself


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


This song was sung at the memorial, as they brought in the casket (see You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login…..Hux4W7sIv0). So let’s ask several questions here.



What "King" were they singing about—King Jesus? No, because the memorial was not a memorial for Jesus. And also because they brought the casket in during this song—was it a casket with Jesus inside? No, it was MJ inside (supposedly); and everyone knows that MJ is the "King of Pop". So they were singing about MJ! Soon and very soon, we are going to see the King of Pop!



Did they mean that soon we were going to see the dead body of MJ, is that what they were singing about?? No! Because the casket was closed both at the memorial, and also the funeral/burial. In fact, not one single picture of the body has yet been shown by the media!?! Unless of course you count the phony photo (ambulance). But even that picture was prior to the memorial; and they were singing about seeing the King in the future: "Soon and very soon …"—that is future, so it can’t be the ambulance shot that they were singing about. Last but not least: MJ is not dead! So it’s not the dead body, that we are going to see "soon and very soon".



Well then, how soon are we going to see the living body? Many think that MJ went into hiding, never to appear again. But this does not fit the evidence. If that’s what he wanted, then there would not be so many clues left behind that he is still alive; these are not blundering mistakes, but intentional clues—such as this song (and many other clues). If he was planning to hide forever: then no point in singing soon and very soon, we are going to see the King!



Others say that if he comes back, it won’t be for years. But that would hardly qualify as "soon and very soon". Furthermore, if he did not go into permanent hiding, then he has a reason for coming back; and that would be publicity and/or to show that you can’t trust the media. So when would be a good time to do this? After a few years, when the media and the public aren’t thinking much about MJ anymore?? No, the best time to do this is NOW—while the news is still hot!



Some say that he will return this December, around the holidays. But does Christmas or New Years fit the Thriller theme? Don’t you think Halloween would fit better—which is when the movie is coming out. This would also be "soon and very soon".



In fact, wouldn’t tomorrow be "soon and very soon"—and also fit very nicely with the "1998" and "7" codes (see my topic posted yesterday: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login…..ber-9-2009). BTW: did any of you detectives notice the date and time when I posted that topic??


Stayed tuned tomorrow, for my third topic in the series.


S.T.U.D.Y.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Soon and very soon, we are going to see the King (3 times) Hallelujah! Hallelujah! We're going to see the King.

2. No more crying there, we are going to see the King (3 times)Hallelujah! Hallelujah! We're going to see the King.

3. No more dying there, we are going to see the King (3 times)Hallelujah! Hallelujah! We're going to see the King.


Some concern has been expressed that if the song did apply to MJ, then that would be blasphemy. Do we have any diligent Bible students here? The word is used about 50 times in the Bible, and in no case does it refer to applying the title "King" to a mere human being. Blasphemy is when a mere human takes titles and/or prerogatives which belong exclusively to God (and also when people defy or ridicule God, etc); if you were to say "I am God Almighty"—that would be blasphemy, it is a title exclusively for God. But the word "King" is used many times in the Bible in reference to humans. And none of the other words in the song apply exclusively to Jesus or God.


Sure, in the normal usage of the song "King" refers to King Jesus; but is it possible for a song to have a dual meaning? There are actually many things in the Bible with dual meanings (see 1 Corinthians 15:45; 5:7; Exodus 12:21; John 1:29; Genesis 22:7,8,13; etc). Remember the "lamb" in the sacrifices: the word referred to an animal, but it also represented Jesus! Yes, God Himself used the same word for Jesus—the King of Kings, and also for an animal; and it was not blasphemy.


For those who think that the song was not a clue about MJ: why was the casket brought in during that song? Even if that song had to be first (and it did not), they could have brought the casket in during another song–so there would be no possible misapplication. Do you suppose that the producers of the memorial did not even realize that MJ is very well known as the "King" of Pop?? Or do you suppose that even though they knew "King" is an established title for MJ—yet they thought that nobody in the whole wide watching world would remember that MJ is a "King" during that song??? If that sounds ridiculous, it’s probably because it is! Surely the producers knew that at least some people would think of MJ being a "King" during that song—especially when they brought the casket in during the song! And if the producers knew this, and did it anyway: then it had to be intentional, it had to be a clue.

2
Michael Jackson & Elvis Presley Similarities / Delay in Eliza's case
« on: September 13, 2010, 04:00:14 PM »
Eliza posted this on her Facebook:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Eliza Presley case is delayed

Eliza Presley's lawsuit to prove that she is the daughter of the late Vernon Presley, father of Elvis Presley, based on DNA evidence (which also would show that Elvis is alive) was supposed to take a big step forward a couple days ago.  Here's my prior article about the case that explains it.

There has been a delay. Elvis-presley

The same lawyer who tried to oppose Eliza's initial lawsuit (which successfully caused the Estate of Vernon Presley to be re-opened) is now attempting to intervene in this lawsuit.  He filed a motion asking the judge to dismiss Eliza's lawsuit on legal grounds, such as the "statute of limitations" (meaning that too many years have passed, he argued, since Vernon died) as well as that Eliza was adopted by another family (he argued the adoption means she can't become a legal heir of Vernon).

He does not provide any evidence to dispute the facts behind Eliza's claims.  He doesn’t even try to contradict the DNA evidence she’s presented to the court.

The attorney raised these same legal arguments during Eliza's first case, and they didn't work then.  Eliza's attorney will be filing her response soon, challenging these legal grounds and asking for the lawsuit to continue.

But, in the meantime, this new filing has delayed the case and prevented Eliza from obtaining a default judgment ... at least for now.

After Eliza's response is filed with the court, I'll have a more detailed analysis.

But here's a preview:  this lawyer filed his response on behalf of "the named defendant."

Normally, a lawyer who represents someone in a case states explicitly whom he or she is acting on behalf of.  There normally is no doubt who exactly hired the attorney.

In this filing, however, throughout the 20-pages submitted, Lisa Marie-Presley Lockwood is never mentioned, even once, by this lawyer.  He never even refers to her by name.


It's odd.  And it may lead to a very interesting twist to this case.  Stay tuned.

Posted by:  Author and probate attorney Andrew W. Mayoras, co-author of Trial & Heirs: Famous Fortune Fights!  and co-founder and shareholder of The Center for Probate Litigation and The Center for Elder Law in metro-Detroit, Michigan, which concentrate in probate litigation, estate planning, and elder law.

Posted by Andrew & Danielle Mayoras on September 12, 2010 at 09:01 PM

3
The Ambulance / Did he open his eyes? Look at this animation
« on: April 13, 2010, 05:02:07 AM »
I don't feel completely comfortable posting this, because it's different to look at a still pic, than looking at an animation.
However, I have to discuss this:
There are at least three ambulance pics - not one. Some know it, others don't.
But these three pics were shot in a row, they all are shot from different angles, so the distances between 'objects' and shadows are different.

In one of the shots, it looks like he opened his eyes! But not on the others. (The one without a logo on it)
It could be, that this is only caused by motion blur and due to the different angles!
But I'd like to know, what you see - pay close attention to his eyes.

At least this is a proof, that it was not the stage pic, that was used to photoshop this.
I am sure, these are real pictures, but they still can be a fake (double, from earlier years, or it IS him on June 25th and he just didn't die).
But they are certainly not photoshopped in the way Brian Oxman said.

[attachment=0:l2637y7b]ambulance_ani.gif[/attachment:l2637y7b]

4
TIAI & TS Discussions / AllJack5ons - again a reference to TIAI?
« on: March 13, 2010, 06:17:14 AM »
AllJack5ons tweeted yesterday:

Jackson Fans are an army of L.O.V.E. The media should take notice. Always, Jermaine J   8:06 PM Mar 11th   via TweetDeck  

A reference to TIAI? Right after Update 4? Very possible, I think.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Sorry, if it was posted before.

5
Other Odd Things / FYI: Murray judge is Keith L. Schwartz
« on: February 17, 2010, 07:52:41 PM »
Conrad Murray's judge is
Keith L. Schwartz
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

The discussion forum about him is pretty sad (empty):
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

There are some articles on the net not regarding CM. So, this might be a real judge at least.

6
TIAI & TS Discussions / 2 Timothy 2:26 - time of death
« on: February 02, 2010, 05:00:25 AM »
I just lookedup bible verses for the numbers of the time of death and one stood out to me.
I am not religious myself, but Michael is - so I give this some credit.

2 Timothy 2:25 - "Those who oppose him he must gently instruct, in the hope that God will grant them repentance leading them to a knowledge of the truth,"
2 Timothy 2:26 - "and that they will come to their senses and escape from the trap of the devil, who has taken them captive to do his will."


@TS - you have a special connection to the book of Timothy, right?

7
Pictures & Videos of Michael / Bodyguard carrying Michael - sweet!
« on: January 07, 2010, 07:47:18 PM »
I just came across those pics - they are so sweet. He looks really comfortable, that's why I decided to post them  :D



8
Other Odd Things / Do the Freemasons HELP Michael?
« on: January 05, 2010, 08:27:10 PM »
This is a thought I had months ago and also posted on MJHD and I am NOT talking about the Illuminati here.

For a member of the Freemasons the group means a circle, he can trust. They'd ALWAY help each other and are able to keep secrets.
That's, what I learned from my ex-boyfriend, who's father is a FM. My best friend also has a friend, who's father is FM and she said the same thing.

Now it looks like the three most important people in this case (besides Michael) are Freemasons:
William Bratton (ex chief of LAPD, who resigned on Oct. 30th), Chief Coroner Craig Harvey and Conrad Murray!

Since "Dangerous" there were always discussions, whether Michael was a Freemason or not.
He used a lot of their symbols in his cover artwork and also wore amulettes with FM symbols.
I think, it may very well be possible, as I don't believe in the theories, that the Freemasons are "worshipping Satan" etc.

I can't imagine this hoax would be possible without William Bratton and Craig Harvey being involved. How could it?
So if Michael was a fellow traveller, this would be an explanation, why he was able to get them to help him in this hoax.

Other Freemasons around Michael:
Jesse Jackson
Rev. Al Sharpton
Who else?

btw.
Roosevelt was FM, too; "...but if Roosevelt was livin', he wouldn't let this be, no nooo!"
Same is speculated about MLK.

Well, may be a naive thought, but I like it a lot better than the illuminati murder theory...
But this or that way - the list of Freemasons surrounding Michael is suspicious.

9
Other Odd Things / Michael isn't in debt...
« on: January 04, 2010, 08:56:18 AM »
This TMZ article about the creditor's claims is IMO a proof, that Michael isn'T in debt!
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

"the grand total will exceed $ 20 mil."

$ 20 mil. ????
 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

He's paying that from his petty cash!

Maybe they exclude the deals with SONY, but that would sort itself out, if there are actually any debts existing...

The article has it's own topic in the TMZ.com subforum, but it didn'T get a lot of attention and nobody there seemed to think the same way.
I think, this article is a great thing - just as the FBI release.

1. FBI didn't have ANYTHING against Michael
2. He doesn't have debts
3. What's next? :)

10
Other Odd Things / Craig Harvey statement about hoax!
« on: January 01, 2010, 05:25:36 AM »
He posted on his Facebook:

"NB: If you believe the death of MJ was a hoax, I am not sure what your problem is, but I'll bet it is hard to pronounce."

11
The Memorial / Jehovah's witness memorials focus on ressurrection?
« on: December 30, 2009, 09:24:55 PM »
I just found this on WikiAnswers:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

"Jehovah's Witnesses mourn for loved ones who have died, and have memorial services as well.

However, the funerals and memorial services of Witnesses often focus on the promise of a resurrection to life here on earth. (John 5:28,29 and Acts 24:15)

Any talk of how the soul survives death and lives on in a spirit world, surely pained her, only because such teaching are not based on the Bible. (Ecc 9:5)

No doubt she and her family are relying on God to get them through this difficult time."


Is that good or bad?
They're talking about Rebbie btw...

12
Other Odd Things / VMA again - slowmotion of MJ "hologram"
« on: December 29, 2009, 11:15:12 AM »
Hi!

This MJ hologram at the VMAs was already discussed, but I don't know, if you saw that video:
[youtube:jsaoqplr]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxR5oAtidsw[/youtube:jsaoqplr]

You can see him very good here and also see moves, that would escape the eye in real tempo.

What do you think?

EDIT: sorry, I just saw, that Michael is far too tall to be the real Michael - compared to the dancers...
How to delete a post?  :lol:

13
Other Odd Things / Sade "Soldier of Love"
« on: December 26, 2009, 08:18:04 PM »
Sade's new album (Sony - release Feb 8th, 2010) is called SOLDIER OF LOVE.

And she has the Mayan pyramids on the cover, if I'm not mistaken:


Just thought it's a nice one to share :-)
I LOVE Sade!

14
Other Odd Things / twisted press & another believer
« on: December 25, 2009, 03:40:04 PM »
This is a blog post, released on July 11th, which shows, how the media twist stories/interviews and doesn't get a thing straight.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

The article was tweeted by DeathHag, who runs the site You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

1. Michael is NOT listed on his site.
2. He's one of the two people Craig Harvey follows on Twitter (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login)
3. He's sort of a believer

He tweeted:

Let the rumors begin. I think he faked it. The ONLY way to get out of that family concert and the UK concerts with lawsuits aplenty.    11:54 PM Jun 25th   from web  

"I would like some way to disappear where people don't see me anymore at some point" - Michael Jackson.  
7:33 PM Sep 25th   from web

15
TMZ Articles / Reality documentary with Dr. Murray
« on: December 23, 2009, 06:31:58 AM »
Dr. Conrad Murray -- Lights, Camera, TV Show

Posted Dec 23rd 2009 12:30AM by TMZ Staff

Only in Hollywood, could a doctor who's being investigated in the death of Michael Jackson score a gig to star in a international TV special.

TMZ has learned Dr. Conrad Murray struck a deal with a British documentary crew to shoot footage of the Doc during his first day back on the job in Houston on November 23, 2009. We're told the footage was shot for an upcoming one-episode TV special.

A spokesman for Dr. Murray tells us the production company was "interested in the reaction of patients to his return." We're told the crew followed Murray around for the entire day, as he rolled by his office and his church.

The spokesman tells us Dr. Murray hasn't received a dime for his work -- yet ... but he will get paid an unspecified amount once the special airs.

One problem -- Dr. Murray is refusing to allow the company to air the project until the Michael Jackson investigation is complete. The spokesman tells us the wait could last "a couple of years."

And just to be safe, Murray's camp claims they're holding all of the footage.

The spokesman adds, "Dr. Murray is currently working 12 hour days ... to pay off his [child support] debt."

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Pages: [1] 2
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal