This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Topics - mrbigshot
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
1
« on: October 01, 2013, 09:53:16 PM »
Yeah 
2
« on: September 24, 2013, 10:22:27 AM »
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Loginarticle here. LOS ANGELES — If Michael Jackson were still alive today, he would have just celebrated his 55th birthday and the world would know the outcome of his comeback efforts. He might be embarking on a new career in filmmaking and probably would be nudging his eldest son in the same direction.
As a trial pursued by the singer's mother against the promoters of Jackson's planned comeback concerts draws to a close, jurors may soon be considering intriguing what-ifs had the King of Pop lived.
Throughout the trial, which has spanned 21 weeks and more than 50 witnesses, the panel of six men and six women has heard evidence about Jackson's ambitions and his undisputed devotion for his three children and mother. If jurors determine that AEG Live LLC is liable for Jackson's death, the group will then have to decide how much to compensate the singer's three children and his mother for the loss of a loving father and an entertainer potentially capable of earning tens of millions of dollars a year.
In order to award Jackson's family any money, the panel would have to determine that AEG Live hired the doctor convicted of administering an overdose of the anesthetic propofol in June 2009. AEG denies it hired former cardiologist Conrad Murray or bears any responsibility for Jackson's death. The company's lawyers point to evidence that Murray treated Jackson for years before preparations for the "This Is It" shows began and testimony that the singer was secretive about his medical care.
Yet whether or not the jury will need to determine compensation for Jackson's family, the trial has revealed new details about the superstar's post-tour plans.
Witnesses have described the entertainer's interest in another career as a filmmaker after wrapping up his "This Is It" shows, which were slated to begin in July 2009. The singer's contract included provisions for a worldwide tour after the singer completed a run of 50 shows planned at London's O2 Arena, but AEG executives say the global shows weren't a certainty.
Experts hired by Jackson's mother have testified Jackson could have earned a billion dollars or more on a worldwide tour, a figure that defense experts have attacked as speculative and far in excess of earnings from the singer's previous tours.
Jackson's success or failure during the "This Is It" shows would have determined his future course. By many witnesses' accounts, including his son Prince and a trusted nephew, Jackson was eyeing a second career as a filmmaker. He considered his long-form music videos such as "Thriller" and "Remember the Time" as films, but was eyeing even bigger projects on Egypt's King Tut and a Chicago gangster film
Prince Jackson, 16, recalled during the trial that his father would often show him films twice – the first time with the sound off so that they could analyze shots together. The teenager still has aspirations in show business and told jurors he is considering film school, a decision his father might have steered him toward if he was alive.
The singer suggested to his nephew Taj that he study filmmaking as well, urging him to focus on 3-D technologies that hadn't yet become mainstream in 2009. "He just loved the technology and he wanted to do something groundbreaking with it," Taj said. He said his uncle talked about working with famous directors and about doing movies based on some of his hits, including "Smooth Criminal."
Jackson's devotion to his three children has been a major focus of the trial. The entertainer closely guarded their privacy and often had them wear masks while in public. Since their father's death, Prince, Paris and Blanket have become household names and their faces are now well-known.
The children now live with Katherine Jackson and are supported by their father's estate, which has successfully erased the singer's sizable debts and have kept interest for his music high. But their father's death has taken away the children's primary caregiver and a father who by all accounts during the trial sought to bring his children happiness and instill in them a sense that they should help others.
The family's attorneys haven't told the jury how much they're asking for the loss of Michael Jackson, yet they could reveal a suggested amount during closing arguments, set to begin Tuesday.
Attorneys and experts hired by AEG Live have presented a different version of Jackson's long-term prospects throughout the trial, showing evidence that the singer was deep in debt and sought out the anesthetic that eventually killed him in the months before his death.
Jackson was on the brink of losing his signature asset, his stake in the Sony-ATV music catalog that includes songs by The Beatles and other top acts, the company's experts told the jury. The singer's medical care has also been thoroughly detailed throughout the trial and it has revealed new information about Jackson's relationship with Murray.
The former cardiologist accompanied Jackson to a 2007 medical appointment in Las Vegas and paid for the cosmetic procedure, a doctor who treated Jackson recalled in testimony. AEG's attorneys have argued that Murray was Jackson's personal doctor and the company was merely advancing the physician's $150,000 a month fee to work on the "This Is It" shows.
It will take at least nine jurors to agree that AEG indeed hired Murray if the panel is to then consider the what-ifs of Michael Jackson's ambitions.
3
« on: June 25, 2013, 01:12:02 PM »
Well, evidently we have officially reached four years since the death (re-birth) of Michael Jackson. As the climactic events unfolded since that time, How have your thoughts, perceptions on the matter significantly impacted YOUR world since the announcement? For many of us, it came as a complete and utter shock. Now that we have reached the point in time in which we have four years to get this circus correct, as michael loosely put it, do you still believe we are going coming to our conclusion? or something of the sort. This is just a thread essentially expressing our thoughts and opinions regarding michael jackson's alleged death in general, how it has impacted your lives..(if at all) etc. Let us set aside all the investigative clues and take us back to that moment on this day (I think it was announced at 2pm actually) that michael had passed away, as only the media announced it followed by Jermaine.
4
« on: March 22, 2013, 12:02:39 AM »
I have been quite busy and unable to successfully post and I feel absolutely awful about this. But I would just like to state (with such emphatic conviction) that Michael is still with us and has always been....this is the conclusion that I have arrived at years ago and yet I still believe it to be legitimate. Of course, it's a statement that has been verbalized extensively but I still find it necessary to reiterate. Not only to keep reminding myself, but to allow us to grasp this knowledge so it can resonate within our subconscious. It is factual and it will remain that way even if michael were to never resurface again. (Which is improbable, because we know michael will show up, and it's a matter of time in essence.ing He maybe even reading this post with a slight smirk on his face! :icon_razz:) And as as the saying goes..all great things must come to an end. This is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated upon the media and the world, and I think a celebratory moment is on the horizon. So before Michael returns, let us not get too worked up on his estimated arrival. because, once he comes back, There is no turning back. (uttering such a cliche feels so sour to me by the way...ugh, it's the only way to express myself though!) We have this coveted knowledge, knowledge that we know and once the world knows of this revelation...it will be over. a declaration so momentous once it reaches public insight...we can no longer be in the minority which leaves us to being believers. The minority will transition into the majority...and it will be yesterdays news. although it will forever remain a subject of spectacularity and marvel. What I'm trying to get at is this is something indelibly special. It is a rarity...and before we wait for the astounding news that will reverberate across the world...just remember...live in the moment as it is. for nothing can be as spectacular as knowing what they (the public) does not know but we (the minority....the believers...the knowers) do know.
IF someone believes in the seed of insight..
cultivate it...breed it...
let it blossom into something incredibly
magnificent...
although it may be innocuous...
and somewhat benign...
like a fading memory in your heart...
the dyed t-shirt that seeks revival and rejuvenation.
must be soaked in liquidated dye once again...
for it to sparkle and shine.
glisten...for years to come...
to bring back to LIFE.
remember.
it's all for love.
and THIS hoax is our love.
all lame poetic gesturing aside...
remember to enjoy this hoax for the duration that it is lasting for.
because it is truly something special to know something that others do not know. :bearhug:
5
« on: December 24, 2011, 01:45:49 PM »
Very sad day today as we mourn the loss of the oldest musical entertainer. I'm sure Michael admired this guy's showmanship and charisma! Hope you enjoyed your very long life, Heesters! Now you rewarded with the gift of virtuous serenity in heaven! he was performing on stage right up until his death today at age 108. You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginBERLIN (AP) - Dutch-born entertainer Johannes Heesters, who made his name performing in Adolf Hitler’s Germany and was dogged later in his long career by controversy over his Nazi-era past, died Saturday, his agent said. He was 108.
The tenor Heesters made his debut on the big stage at the Volksoper in Vienna, Austria in 1934. His career took off in Berlin where, starting in 1935 _ two years after the Nazis took power _ he became a crowd favorite at the Komische Oper and Admiralspalast.
He gained fame by appearing in films such as “Die Leuchter des Kaisers” (“The Emperor’s Candlesticks”) and “Das Hofkonzert” (“The Court Concert”).
Despite his popularity in the Third Reich, Heesters was never accused of being a propagandist or anything other than an artist willing to perform for the Nazis, and the Allies allowed him to continue his career after the war, when he took Austrian citizenship.
Heesters died early Saturday at the hospital in the southern city of Starnberg, where he had been cared for while being in critical condition for several days, his agent Juergen Ross said.
In Heesters‘ native Netherlands _ which was occupied by Germany for most of the war _ some viewed him as irredeemable given his appearances under the Nazi regime.
In February 2008, he braved protests to perform in the Netherlands for the first time in 44 years at a theater in his native Amersfoort.
In his previous attempt, in 1964, he was booed off the stage in Amsterdam when he tried to appear as the Nazi-hating Captain Von Trapp in “The Sound of Music.”
Heesters said it gave him a “heavy heart” to know he was “not wanted in my homeland.”
“What did I do wrong? Sure, I acted in films in the Third Reich, entertainment films, which distracted countless people inside and outside Germany from daily life during war,” he wrote later about the reception he received.
“Sure, I wanted to make my career and I remember well at the time how many people in the Netherlands were proud that I made a career in the huge neighboring country,” he added. “But apart from my career _ and the fact that, through no fault of my own, Adolf Hitler was one of the fans of my art _ what have I done?”
Critics focused on a visit Heesters made to the Dachau concentration camp in 1941.
In December 2008, Heesters lost a court attempt to force a German author to retract allegations that he sang for SS troops there.
Heesters maintained he had been ordered to go to Dachau by the Nazis in an attempt to deceive the public about what was really going on there, but said the alleged performance “never happened.”
But Berlin author Volker Kuehn cited an interview with former Dachau inmate Viktor Matejka where the prisoner recalled “I pulled the curtain for him, I was there, I saw him singing.”
Story Continues →
6
« on: July 15, 2011, 08:51:45 PM »
I noticed this while I was talking in the chatroom of this site.
what the hell is this?
[thumbnail:2kkdhbxx]http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/594/facegu.png[/thumbnail:2kkdhbxx]
7
« on: June 21, 2011, 09:28:42 AM »
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginThis was a comedian america who was widely known for his appearances in the Jackass movies. Ryan Dunn was driving drunk beyond the wheel and also killed another passenger which prompted some hostility and negative remarks from roger ebert saying, "friends don't let jackasses drive." As horrible a decision as it was, we can't judge the guy. a life was lost and it can never be brought back. strangely enough, however, people at first thought it was a hoax and there was much confusion as to whether he died or not in the beginning. (remind you of anyone? suspicious// ) and this occurred almost two years after Michael's death? articles hinting this was a jackass hoax for their next movie: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginMy conclusion: I hope he seriously wouldn't fake his death this way. this is such a horrific tragedy and nobody should be acting out such dire circumstances. I think this is just sensationalism at it's finest. but I do think regardless of your thoughts of Ryan Dunn, he needs to RIP. people make mistakes and it cost him his life and the passenger in the car as well, but we are all human beings and his life was taken too soon. 34 years.
8
« on: May 29, 2011, 09:44:50 PM »
I was just watching this youtube video about the this is it tickets and noticed a couple things that I thought were interesting:
[youtube:2e3ftth7]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMXZJIM5X6I&feature=related[/youtube:2e3ftth7]
1. the commemoration tickets that are supposed to be in his memory do not say REST IN PEACE or in memoriam the king of pop michael jackson. It is just a ticket which has his name on it.
2. the michael jackson ticket in commemoration is a "hologram" as referred to in the youtube video. As soon as i heard that word i thought of all the michael jackson tributes at the VMA's and other musical performances in dedication to him. (suggesting michael appeared as a hologram)
3. the interviewer asks at 1:04 if the fan of michael jackson would go for a refund for the tickets being purchased (after michael's death) or if she would like to commemorative ticket instead. her response is, " of I want to have the memory...because HE Designed it himself." How would michael have designed it if the commemorative ticket if he died? a commemoration is for someone who passed away! to me it sounds like she was referring to the ticket and nothing else. because thats what the anchor asked. or maybe im not getting this ahah.
anyway, just thought i'd share. I don't know if you guys already noticed this before but if not theres more clues to add for you.
9
« on: May 04, 2011, 10:22:56 AM »
I don't think she deserves enough praise for the amount of acting she's put fourth in this entire hoax. She really deserves your recognition to be able to repeatedly go on the air for television interviews and improvise. If this turns out to be a hox along, I really think she needs some kind of Oscar. I don't know ANYBODY ELSE who I could watch in an interview and actually think michael is gone. She is perhaps the only person who has that kind of ability to be able to do such a thing. anybody else agree? You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login^ she was interviewed once again stated that the molestations were THE BIGGEST LIE.
10
« on: April 27, 2011, 12:01:10 PM »
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginDr. Conrad Murray Could Testify At Michael Jackson Death Trial Dr. Conrad Murray Could Testify At Michael Jackson Death Trial
By Jen Heger
Radar Legal Editor
Dr. Conrad Murray's jury selection for his involuntary manslaughter trial stemming from the shocking death of pop superstar Michael Jackson is expected to begin on Wednesday, May 4th, and RadarOnline has exclusively learned that Dr. Murray wants to be put on the stand to testify.
It's anticipated that jury selection could take one week. The District Attorney will present evidence to the jury that backs up their claims that Dr. Murray is responsible for Jackson's death on June 25, 2009. Dr. Conrad Murray "will be playing an active role in his defense. Dr. Murray has made sure that his medical practice and patients are taken care of during the trial," a friend of Murray's tells RadarOnline.
PHOTOS: Stage Shots of Michael Jackson Performing
The source also says: "Dr. Murray wants to tell his version of events the day that Michael Jackson tragically died. Dr. Murray has maintained his innocence since he was formally charged. Dr. Murray's lawyers will make the tactical decision when it's their turn to present their witnesses at the trial about whether or not to put him on the stand. Dr. Murray truly has nothing to hide, and wants the jurors to hear what he has to say."
If Dr. Murray doesn't testify at the trial, his pal tells us: "Dr. Murray would probably do an interview after the trial, if his advisors approve it, to explain his story. There is so much that the public doesn't know. Dr. Murray is hopeful that at an appropriate time, he can elaborate on misconceptions about him and his care of Michael."
PHOTOS: Stars Who Died In Bizarre Ways
If convicted of the involuntary manslaughter charge, Dr. Murray could serve up to four years in state prison.
Calls seeking comment from Dr. Murray's spokesperson weren't immediately returned.
PHOTOS: Michael Jackson Through The Years
11
« on: April 24, 2011, 12:51:24 PM »
Conrad Murray: Michael Jackson Might As Well Be Alive
4/21/2011 7:07 AM PDT by TMZ Staff
Conrad Murray has reportedly stated in his defense that the King Of Pop, who tragically passed away on June 25th, 2009, had been administered the deadly anesthetic propfol. TMZ learned that Murray stated He (Jackson) "might as well be alive" after claiming the pop singer injected himself with the drug that took him from his loved ones in June of 2009. According to an unknown source, Murray was simply distraught and dumbfounded by the accusations and simply "will not rest" until justice is served. Conrad Murray is on trial for involuntary manslaughter and a verdict is scheduled for July 2011. WOW. :shock: I hope this story is true. O_O I can't find this on any other site though. did it get deleted? I swear it was on TMZ a second ago.
12
« on: April 15, 2011, 08:04:23 AM »
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Loginwow this is pretty interesting. O_o
13
« on: April 15, 2011, 08:03:28 AM »
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginBoxee Box Giveaway
PROFESSOR: Sarah Palin Probably Staged A Gigantic Hoax About Being Trig's Mother
Henry Blodget | Apr. 13, 2011, 6:29 PM | 272,127 | comment 534
*
A A A
*
x
Email Article
From
To
Email Sent!
You have successfully emailed the post.
*
*
* inShare79
*
*
Sarah Palin
Sarah Palin
An interesting footnote has emerged to a theory that raged around the Internet during Sarah Palin's candidacy for Vice President:
The theory is that Sarah Palin is actually the grandmother of her purported son Trig, not the mother, and that she staged a gigantic hoax during the campaign to cover up this fact.
Professor Bradford Scharlott of Northern Kentucky University has looked into this story in detail and written a long academic article about it. He concludes two things:
* First, that the "conspiracy theory" is likely true--Sarah Palin staged a huge hoax, and, second,
* The American media is pathetic for not pursuing the story more aggressively
Scharlott's article walks through all the evidence supporting the theory, including the photos of Palin in what is said to have been a late-stage pregnancy, the leisurely 20-hour trip home that Palin took after she supposedly went into labor in Texas, the refusal of the hospital where Trig was supposedly born to even confirm that he was born there (let alone who was the mother), strange statements from Palin's doctor and the McCain campaign, and so on.
bristol palin
Bristol Palin
And Scharlott concludes that, given that this hoax would be a massive fraud perpetrated on the entire country by a vice-presidential candidate, the media absolutely should have pursued the story more aggressively.
Because the mainstream media did not--and has not--pursued the story at all (let alone aggressively), Professor Scharlott has done some of the work himself. He has also attempted to explain why the media was so wimpy and gullible during the campaign.
One of Professor Scharlott's theories, interestingly, is that conservatives have been extraordinarily effective at shaming anyone who has even brought up the matter, let alone investigated it. He notes how different this is than the Democrats ability to quell the other conspiracy theory that has obsessed the nation in recent years--the theory that President Obama was born in Kenya.
Given the amount of publicity (and support) presidential candidate Donald Trump has gotten in recent weeks by picking up the Obama-wasn't-born-here mantra, the silence on this other question is indeed startling. The evidence Scharlott's cites about about Palin's possible hoax is by no means conclusive, but it certainly raises as many questions as the logic about Obama's birthplace.
In light of Scharlott's evidence that Palin staged a hoax, as well as the ongoing absence of any proof that Palin is actually Trig's mother, one wonders if the media will now, finally, seek to determine the truth--especially because Palin is considered a candidate for president.
The suspicions started with the story the Palins told about how Sarah Palin and her husband behaved after she went into labor while on a trip to Texas. Namely, they took a 20-hour trip home.
The suspicions started with the story the Palins told about how Sarah Palin and her husband behaved after she went into labor while on a trip to Texas. Namely, they took a 20-hour trip home.
The press release Palin put out announcing Trig's birth did not say where the birth took place. The hospital where Trig was supposedly born did not list him as being among the babies born that day.
The press release Palin put out announcing Trig's birth did not say where the birth took place. The hospital where Trig was supposedly born did not list him as being among the babies born that day.
After Palin supposedly went into labor in Texas, her husband Todd did not mention this to her aides. Flight attendants on the way home did not notice that Palin seemed pregnant.
After Palin supposedly went into labor in Texas, her husband Todd did not mention this to her aides. Flight attendants on the way home did not notice that Palin seemed pregnant.
When Palin returned to work three days later, she seemed unsure about the timing of her water breaking. In her later book, she implied she went into labor at 4AM in the morning--and then stayed in Texas long enough to give her speech before beginning her 20-hour trip home
When Palin returned to work three days later, she seemed unsure about the timing of her water breaking. In her later book, she implied she went into labor at 4AM in the morning--and then stayed in Texas long enough to give her speech before beginning her 20-hour trip home
The hospital where Trig was supposedly born lacks pre-natal intensive care, which made it a "less-than-ideal" place to deliver a child with Down syndrome. Palin was close to several hospitals in Texas and Anchorage that did have these facilities.
The hospital where Trig was supposedly born lacks pre-natal intensive care, which made it a "less-than-ideal" place to deliver a child with Down syndrome. Palin was close to several hospitals in Texas and Anchorage that did have these facilities.
Two months earlier, when Palin announced her pregnancy to her staff (at 7 months), her staff was shocked: No one thought she looked pregnant.
Two months earlier, when Palin announced her pregnancy to her staff (at 7 months), her staff was shocked: No one thought she looked pregnant.
Photos of Palin in the weeks before she gave birth gave no indication that she was pregnant
Photos of Palin in the weeks before she gave birth gave no indication that she was pregnant
(Another photo, from four weeks before the birth)
(Another photo, from four weeks before the birth)
After Trig's birth, the McCain campaign issued a bizarre statement
After Trig's birth, the McCain campaign issued a bizarre statement
During the campaign, Palin had promised the press that she would release her medical records. The night before the election, she did. The section from her personal physician about Trig's birth was worded in a way that it barely said anything
During the campaign, Palin had promised the press that she would release her medical records. The night before the election, she did. The section from her personal physician about Trig's birth was worded in a way that it barely said anything
Nothing in the doctor's statement suggested that the doctor was present for the birth, and the doctor declined to answer any questions.
Nothing in the doctor's statement suggested that the doctor was present for the birth, and the doctor declined to answer any questions.
Finally, one traditional media tried to figure out the truth... and ran into a brick wall.
Finally, one traditional media tried to figure out the truth... and ran into a brick wall.
The editor of the Anchorage paper tried to explain to Palin why he wanted to investigate the issue: To determine once and for all that it wasn't a hoax. Palin never responded.
The editor of the Anchorage paper tried to explain to Palin why he wanted to investigate the issue: To determine once and for all that it wasn't a hoax. Palin never responded.
All Palin would have had to do--then and now--to prove that she was Trig's mother was, ironically, produce a birth certificate
All Palin would have had to do--then and now--to prove that she was Trig's mother was, ironically, produce a birth certificate
One of the only American journalists who looked into the story, Andrew Sullivan, suggests that we may have witnessed one of the greatest frauds in history
One of the only American journalists who looked into the story, Andrew Sullivan, suggests that we may have witnessed one of the greatest frauds in history
Did Palin stage a hoax? Should the media have investigated more aggressively? Let us know what you think...
Read more: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
14
« on: April 15, 2011, 08:01:09 AM »
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginBoxee Box Giveaway
PROFESSOR: Sarah Palin Probably Staged A Gigantic Hoax About Being Trig's Mother
Henry Blodget | Apr. 13, 2011, 6:29 PM | 272,127 | comment 534
*
A A A
*
x
Email Article
From
To
Email Sent!
You have successfully emailed the post.
*
*
* inShare79
*
*
Sarah Palin
Sarah Palin
An interesting footnote has emerged to a theory that raged around the Internet during Sarah Palin's candidacy for Vice President:
The theory is that Sarah Palin is actually the grandmother of her purported son Trig, not the mother, and that she staged a gigantic hoax during the campaign to cover up this fact.
Professor Bradford Scharlott of Northern Kentucky University has looked into this story in detail and written a long academic article about it. He concludes two things:
* First, that the "conspiracy theory" is likely true--Sarah Palin staged a huge hoax, and, second,
* The American media is pathetic for not pursuing the story more aggressively
Scharlott's article walks through all the evidence supporting the theory, including the photos of Palin in what is said to have been a late-stage pregnancy, the leisurely 20-hour trip home that Palin took after she supposedly went into labor in Texas, the refusal of the hospital where Trig was supposedly born to even confirm that he was born there (let alone who was the mother), strange statements from Palin's doctor and the McCain campaign, and so on.
bristol palin
Bristol Palin
And Scharlott concludes that, given that this hoax would be a massive fraud perpetrated on the entire country by a vice-presidential candidate, the media absolutely should have pursued the story more aggressively.
Because the mainstream media did not--and has not--pursued the story at all (let alone aggressively), Professor Scharlott has done some of the work himself. He has also attempted to explain why the media was so wimpy and gullible during the campaign.
One of Professor Scharlott's theories, interestingly, is that conservatives have been extraordinarily effective at shaming anyone who has even brought up the matter, let alone investigated it. He notes how different this is than the Democrats ability to quell the other conspiracy theory that has obsessed the nation in recent years--the theory that President Obama was born in Kenya.
Given the amount of publicity (and support) presidential candidate Donald Trump has gotten in recent weeks by picking up the Obama-wasn't-born-here mantra, the silence on this other question is indeed startling. The evidence Scharlott's cites about about Palin's possible hoax is by no means conclusive, but it certainly raises as many questions as the logic about Obama's birthplace.
In light of Scharlott's evidence that Palin staged a hoax, as well as the ongoing absence of any proof that Palin is actually Trig's mother, one wonders if the media will now, finally, seek to determine the truth--especially because Palin is considered a candidate for president.
The suspicions started with the story the Palins told about how Sarah Palin and her husband behaved after she went into labor while on a trip to Texas. Namely, they took a 20-hour trip home.
The suspicions started with the story the Palins told about how Sarah Palin and her husband behaved after she went into labor while on a trip to Texas. Namely, they took a 20-hour trip home.
The press release Palin put out announcing Trig's birth did not say where the birth took place. The hospital where Trig was supposedly born did not list him as being among the babies born that day.
The press release Palin put out announcing Trig's birth did not say where the birth took place. The hospital where Trig was supposedly born did not list him as being among the babies born that day.
After Palin supposedly went into labor in Texas, her husband Todd did not mention this to her aides. Flight attendants on the way home did not notice that Palin seemed pregnant.
After Palin supposedly went into labor in Texas, her husband Todd did not mention this to her aides. Flight attendants on the way home did not notice that Palin seemed pregnant.
When Palin returned to work three days later, she seemed unsure about the timing of her water breaking. In her later book, she implied she went into labor at 4AM in the morning--and then stayed in Texas long enough to give her speech before beginning her 20-hour trip home
When Palin returned to work three days later, she seemed unsure about the timing of her water breaking. In her later book, she implied she went into labor at 4AM in the morning--and then stayed in Texas long enough to give her speech before beginning her 20-hour trip home
The hospital where Trig was supposedly born lacks pre-natal intensive care, which made it a "less-than-ideal" place to deliver a child with Down syndrome. Palin was close to several hospitals in Texas and Anchorage that did have these facilities.
The hospital where Trig was supposedly born lacks pre-natal intensive care, which made it a "less-than-ideal" place to deliver a child with Down syndrome. Palin was close to several hospitals in Texas and Anchorage that did have these facilities.
Two months earlier, when Palin announced her pregnancy to her staff (at 7 months), her staff was shocked: No one thought she looked pregnant.
Two months earlier, when Palin announced her pregnancy to her staff (at 7 months), her staff was shocked: No one thought she looked pregnant.
Photos of Palin in the weeks before she gave birth gave no indication that she was pregnant
Photos of Palin in the weeks before she gave birth gave no indication that she was pregnant
(Another photo, from four weeks before the birth)
(Another photo, from four weeks before the birth)
After Trig's birth, the McCain campaign issued a bizarre statement
After Trig's birth, the McCain campaign issued a bizarre statement
During the campaign, Palin had promised the press that she would release her medical records. The night before the election, she did. The section from her personal physician about Trig's birth was worded in a way that it barely said anything
During the campaign, Palin had promised the press that she would release her medical records. The night before the election, she did. The section from her personal physician about Trig's birth was worded in a way that it barely said anything
Nothing in the doctor's statement suggested that the doctor was present for the birth, and the doctor declined to answer any questions.
Nothing in the doctor's statement suggested that the doctor was present for the birth, and the doctor declined to answer any questions.
Finally, one traditional media tried to figure out the truth... and ran into a brick wall.
Finally, one traditional media tried to figure out the truth... and ran into a brick wall.
The editor of the Anchorage paper tried to explain to Palin why he wanted to investigate the issue: To determine once and for all that it wasn't a hoax. Palin never responded.
The editor of the Anchorage paper tried to explain to Palin why he wanted to investigate the issue: To determine once and for all that it wasn't a hoax. Palin never responded.
All Palin would have had to do--then and now--to prove that she was Trig's mother was, ironically, produce a birth certificate
All Palin would have had to do--then and now--to prove that she was Trig's mother was, ironically, produce a birth certificate
One of the only American journalists who looked into the story, Andrew Sullivan, suggests that we may have witnessed one of the greatest frauds in history
One of the only American journalists who looked into the story, Andrew Sullivan, suggests that we may have witnessed one of the greatest frauds in history
Did Palin stage a hoax? Should the media have investigated more aggressively? Let us know what you think...
Read more: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login[/quote
15
« on: April 02, 2011, 06:58:14 PM »
I apologize if this has been posted before, seeing as this was a video from 2009, but if not, in the video Chopra discusses Diprivan and the effects it has on the individual administered. Chopra goes on to mention that in a phone call with Michael Jackson, he asks Depaak Chopra if he has ever heard of this thing that takes you to the valley of death...then brings you right backI hope you guys didn't notice this at all because then it makes it easier for me to say i spotted my own clue, but if it wasn't discussed before, heres a new clue for you!  [youtube:mke33hky]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qo4fStIpY6M&feature=related[/youtube:mke33hky]
|
Show Posts
