Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - ~Souza~

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 57
MJDHI Live Streams / MJDHI Live October 28th, 2023 | Moonwalker 35
« on: October 28, 2023, 01:52:12 PM »

Live September 9 | T-Mez back to kick ass, Is Q J.F.K.?, 1, 2 Michael's coming for you & More!

Join the discussion live at: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

- Tom Mesereau back on board
- Michael's relationship w/Trump
- Is Q J.F.K.?
- How many Michaels?
- Trump being taken off ballots
- Questions & Statements
- Chit Chat

Sign up for a free trial with promo code MJLIVE You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

All our socials and channels can be found through this link: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

MJDHI Live Streams / Live September, 2023
« on: September 04, 2023, 10:07:59 AM »

Revisiting Old Stuff / A short recap
« on: September 02, 2023, 01:00:01 PM »
I was discussing on MJJC and felt the need to make a short list with hoax evidence because there is still so many people saying we're crazy, and I thought I'd copy it here too:

You know I always laugh when people claim that us hoaxers have no evidence. There is literally so much that I always struggle to begin to name them. But for the ones in this thread who can't seem to let it go, I will just name a bunch in this post. I do podcasts (I have one tomorrow actually) and anyone who wants to call in and have a civil discussion is always welcome to join. The thing with this is that you can't expect everything to be given on a silver platter. There is plenty of evidence but if you really want to know what happened you will have to put some blood, sweat and tears in it and investigate yourself, like I have done for 14+ years. There is just too much to put in a post, or a day or even week for that matter. I could write multiple books on it. Don't read one thing and write it off as a coincidence, read it all and realize that at a certain point, something just can't be a coincidence anymore. Here is a starting point:

1. “This is my Bible and I want it to be yours… I want my whole career to be the greatest show on earth,” Michael Jackson told his manager, Frank Dileo, and attorney, John Branca, as he handed them copies of a book on Phineas Taylor Barnum’s theories and philosophies. (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login)
Phineas Taylor Barnum was the MASTER of hoaxes and was celebrated for it. Read up on Barnum, Michael did. During the memorial on 07/07/2009, the Barnum circus was right there at the staples center: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

2. On the autopsy report Michael is listed as 69 inches long: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login. That is only 5'7 and a half. Michael is taller than that. Here is his booking for the child molestation allegations, he is listed as 5'11": You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login . Also during the Super Bowl, he is right next to Jennifer Batten and he is on his flat loafers and I believe she is wearing a small heel, he is taller. Jennifer is listed on her IMDB at 5'9" and I can confirm she is since I have met her and she was about an inch taller than me, I am 5'8". That makes Michael indeed about 5'11". In fact I asked both Jennifer Batten and Debbie Rowe about his height and they both confirmed he is 5'11". So whoever they measured at the coroner's office, it wasn't Michael. Also, his hair is listed as brown. Michael's hair is black. Here is a discussion on the report with a California doctor: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

3. The EMT's claimed they arrived at the house and saw a hospice patient who was bald and they didn't even recognize him as Michael Jackson:
"Richard Senneff, the first witness in the civil trial, testified that he was initially unaware that the person lying in pajamas on a bed in the rented Los Angeles mansion was the world famous pop singer.
“The patient appeared to be chronically ill to me,” Senneff testified, saying he could see Jackson’s ribs. “He was very pale and underweight. I thought perhaps this was a hospice patient.”"
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Yet we get three pictures: one in the ambulance, one in the hospital and one at the coroner's office. In all three pictures we see a fairly healthy and fit Michael Jackson, clearly recognizable as Michael Jackson and not bald at all. Now you can claim Michael wore wigs, but he supposedly arrived at the morgue with his wig on, so how would the EMT's describe him as bald? Did they put his wig on before taking him? Did they take it off to take a peek? How would they know, even if there was a wig, that he was bald under it? Strange assumption I would say.

4. Michael's legal name is NOT on the death certificate. His legal name from birth is Michael JOE Jackson, not Michael JOSEPH Jackson. And no, if Joe is your middle name, they won't just turn that into Joseph just because it's the 'longer version' of Joe. On a death certificate your LEGAL name must be stated. Aliases can be mentioned also, but your legal name as appears on your birth certificate must be stated. We know Michael's legal name is Joe because his passport and driver's license tell us. When you renew your passport they will take your name from your previous passport, but the first one is verified by your birth certificate. Also, we know his driver's license said 'Joe' instead of 'Joseph', yet the coroner who claimed to have identified him by his DL, puts Joseph on the report. Wherever he found his driver's license is a mystery, Michael was supposedly wheeled in butt naked wearing only a hospital gown. Maybe he kept it in his butt crack? His legal name is also found on the FBI files and on the child molestation indictment. Now sure, errors can be made and if you're dead poor and your death certificate has an error there is not really a big problem. But when your name is Michael Jackson and you have gazillions in assets, real estate and music, you can be sure the estate would have had to have that fixed to be able to handle his business. They never did. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

5. Michael's life insurance was NOT paid out. Most headlines said so, sure, but who would read the article would learn would see it was not 'paid out' but 'cashed in'. You do that when you're alive to get cash (hence why it's called CASHED in). The amount was only 3 million dollars. That might sound like a lot of money to most of us, but it's pocket change when you're Michael Jackson. I think J-Lo had her ass insured for more than that. The 3 million was just the premium he paid for the insurance and that was cashed in. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

6. Paris said Michael 'cussed like a sailor' (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login),
“He did have kind of a potty mouth. He cussed like a sailor.”
Now I don't know if you all remember how young those kids were in 2009, and I absolutely believe Paris when she says it, but I do not see him cuss like that around the kids when they're that small. As adults? Yeah sure, totally believe her.

7. The famous ambulance picture was not made as they claim it was made. If you are a photographer you would agree with me. I have expensive 'fast' lenses as they call it and modern mirrorless camera's and even with my gear I HIGHLY DOUBT I would be able to take that picture. The ambulance windows were tinted and reflective, the ambulance was moving, the photographer was moving. To even get a picture without motion blur you'd have to speed up your shutter speed significantly which means you get even LESS light onto your camera's sensor. You can crank up your ISO, but camera's in 2009 were not as good as they are today and your picture would be extremely noisy. The software back then was not good enough to clean it up like that. The EXIF data of the picture reveals even more, like camera model and aperture of the lens (Nikon D200 and a lens aperture of f/4.5). I owned a D200, was a great camera in its time, but terrible in low light performance as they call it, so it got noisy quick. Also, an aperture of f/4.5 is DARK for a shot like this and that combined with a shutter speed of 1/250, the picture would never come out like that. On the hoax forum you can find an old thread with more EXIF data from the actual photo that was around back then:

Camera: Nikon D200
Lens: 24 mm
(Max aperture f/3.5)
Exposure: Auto exposure, Shutter priority AE, 1/250 sec, f/4.5, ISO 400
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

This here says it all. The camera was in auto exposure on AE (which means it was set at 1/250 shutter speed and the camera then makes sure all the other settings are automatically adjusted to get the right amount of light in. But even the lens makes no sense at all. If it was a native Nikon lens it must have been the Nikon 24mm f/3.5D PC-E (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login ) because that is the only Nikon lens with a max aperture of f/3.5 at 24mm. When you look at the picture that was made of the photographer taking the shot, that lens seems to be the one used indeed. This is not a paparazzi lens AT ALL.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

In fact, this lens is terrible for paparazzi pictures, it's a lens you use for stuff with as little motion as possible. Paparazzi lenses are fast lenses, preferably with image stabilization to be able to make those quick shots. This lens was not even fully compatible with the D200, the aperture would have to be set manually. Makes absolutely no sense at all. As anyone even remotely knowledgeable of photography would know.

So even though the windows were dark, the aperture stuck at f/4.5 and the shutter speed quite high, the camera only set the ISO to only 400. Now the photographer might have set that as his max ISO (I would with that D200 probably) but then there is no way the camera would even focus unless it was on a contrasted and light frame outside and in that case, everything inside would be much more blurry and dark.

Nope. It's not just a lucky shot, it's an impossible shot. Yet no one besides Brian Oxman seems to question it.

Messages to Michael / Happy Birthday Mah-Coh!
« on: August 29, 2023, 08:02:34 AM »

Just so you know.... from now on you will be closer to 80 than to 50. 
Have a great one, don't break a hip!

And give a freakin' sign of life FFS >:(


You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Sorry had to postpone a day!

Join the discussion live at: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


Neverland Shenanigans
Dangerous album cover vs Michael album cover
Dangerous signature
Donald Trump Jr. on Q
Trump Subpoena Power and EO 13848 - USA is a Bankrupt corporation
Questions & Statements

Sign up for a free trial for MJ Live on Locals with promo code MJLIVE: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

All our socials and channels can be found through this link: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Join the discussion here: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


Invincible Album
Sound of Freedom update
Michael Jackson the Humbug
HIStory tour Manila
Living with Michael Jackson
TMZ Grassy Knoll 01/28/2010
& More

Next live: Saturday August 5 @ 4pm EST / 1pm PST!

See you all then!

All our socials and channels can be found through this link: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


07/22/2023 4PM EST


Streaming in about 30 minutes on Rumble:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

« on: July 08, 2023, 10:26:13 PM »

Posting this here again because I want to rewatch this, we discussed it in the live on Darryl's channel. If I remember right this was somewhere in November of 2009.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Messages to Michael / Dude...
« on: July 06, 2023, 07:01:15 PM »

For realz though  ::)




6/26/2023 4:23 PM PT

UPDATE11:27 AM PT -- In a joint statement, Wade Robson and James Safechuck tell us, "A sexual abuser’s passing does not deprive his victims of their day in court and, in turn, justice and healing. Michael Jackson is not sued personally in this case-his company is, and his company will have every opportunity to defend itself in the trial."
They continue, "We are pleased that the Court of Appeal has taken its time and considered all of the facts and applicable law in these cases. We look forward to oral arguments next month and the eventual decision of the Court of Appeal.”
Michael Jackson will effectively be tried for allegedly molesting choreographer Wade Robson when he was a child ... TMZ has learned.

The California Court of Appeal just cleared the way for Robson to make his case -- alleging MJ molested him at the Neverland Ranch when Robson was between the ages of 7 and 14.

The issue -- Robson is suing Michael Jackson's corporation -- MJJ Productions, Inc. Jackson's company lawyers argued the company had no legal duty to protect Robson or anyone else from MJ because it had no ability to control him.

The trial court bought the Estate's argument, but the Court of Appeal begged to differ, and according to a tentative ruling -- which almost always becomes final -- the case will be sent back down for trial.

Robson claims when he came to the U.S. from Australia as a young boy, Jackson befriended him and sexually abused him.

In 2005, when Jackson was on trial for molesting another boy, Robson testified that he slept in MJ's bed with the singer but nothing happened.  He changed his story in 2013, filing a lawsuit against the company. He said he had testified falsely on behalf of Jackson due to "complete manipulation and brainwashing."

Another man, James Safechuck, filed a similar lawsuit against MJJ Productions and it too is before the Court of Appeal. Given today's tentative ruling, it appears Safechuck will also have his day in court.

Sources close to the MJJ Productions legal team tell TMZ ... the ruling has nothing to do with the merits of the case and they fully expect to prevail at trial.

Yours For $75,000

10/17/2021 12:50 AM PT

A rare piece of Michael Jackson history that highlights his globetrotting status as the King of Pop is hitting the open market, and could be an incredible conversation piece in your home ... if ya got deep pockets.

Here's the deal ... MJ lost his passport in the early 1990s and had to fill out an application for a replacement -- and now that document is going up for sale at Moments In Time.

As you can see, Michael included 4 passport photos in his application, which is filled out with all of his information ... and it's even got his John Hancock.
The pics are pretty cool ... they're Polaroids -- that alone is a blast from the past -- and even though Michael's not cracking a smile, his hair is looking great.

Also note how he put his occupation as "entertainer" and check out his huge, sweeping signature.

The documents and pictures look to be in excellent condition ... which is part of the reason why this Michael artifact has a $75,000 price tag.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 57
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal