This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - QuirkyDiana
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 26
1
« on: August 20, 2010, 12:49:31 PM »
August 17, 2010 – Michael Jackson Know about Transitional?
The biggest Loan Michael’s estate has yet to deal with is the Barclay Loan for over $300 million. The estate has to pay this or get it refinanced by this fall or the Jackson Estate loses it’s share of the Sony/ATV and the Mijack Catalog. The deal with Sony for Michael’s unreleased songs for $250 million alone should be able to cover most of this. But the estate executors have no incentive to pay off this loan.
This is why:
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
I highly recommend you to read the blogs of Bonnie Cox, the comments and the archives because there is lots and lots of very valuable and thoroughly recheared information about Michael's business, about Sony, Branca, Dileo, Baschir, Sneddon, you name them. I'm reading the blogs for a few weeks now (I guess) and I'm so angry about the snake pit Michael was trapped in. Please, take time to read because then you will know WHAT WAS/IS REALLY GOING ON Thanks for that post - however fear not, the information you have been supplied with from that blog appears to be false. See this blog entry: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
2
« on: August 15, 2010, 01:08:21 PM »
Im gonna start searching for it and see if I can find it. Thanks, it will be greatly appreciated if you do locate it - that's if it is there.
3
« on: August 14, 2010, 07:17:46 PM »
Hey, I thought Geraldo also did a segment shortly after with a couple of guys that worked for the security company that MJ used? :? How sure are you about that? Did you see it, do you know anyone who has seen that on geraldo?
4
« on: August 12, 2010, 12:14:39 PM »
Remember the 2 guys that were interviewed by TMZ, who were from the security firm that MJ used for his surveillance inside/outside his house? Does anyone have a screen grab of these 2 guys being interviewed? I'm sure i've seen a screen grab in a video someone did on youtube......has anyone seen this?
If anyone can help, i need it.
5
« on: July 18, 2010, 07:50:53 AM »
imo, Michael has the tapes...the tapes have at lwast the beginning of the hoax and proof that MJ never died that day...and if there's a BAM (which I believe there will be) he would use these tapes as proof that he is Michael and not a double...which is what imo many will think...but really who knows? :? Well Michael Bush did say that he put MJ in his coffin with his own hands. That broadcast went everywhere. Did you see it? It's proof imo......and look what they said about AEG. Wow. It takes guts to say that on tv.
6
« on: July 17, 2010, 05:15:26 PM »
Murray wanted to return to the house using his own car......he made various excuses as to why he needed to go. The bodyguards were having none of it and they said they locked the house down. Murray got a cab. There's been no word on whether he tried to access the house. He wanted to retrieve the bag in the closet.
7
« on: July 17, 2010, 05:10:24 PM »
OK, there were cameras....but no tapes. This was on tmz some time ago. Presumably they are referring to cameras on the inside here, because we already know that Murray was seen entering the house on the outside camera - they have that tape. Also, a very good while back some guys from the security firm that fitted the cameras into the home apparently gave an interview on tmz. That video on tmz is currently missing according to those who have looked and had seen the interview previously and knew it was there.
The answers are all out there, you just have to ask the right people.....and i'm now of the opinion that whatever Brian Oxman says, you need to double check it.
8
« on: June 14, 2010, 07:52:03 AM »
If Murray was guilty of nothing.....why would you allow snippets of information to come out that make him look guilty of something?
Surely if this was a hoax (which it is not) Murray would have just made a medical judgement error and owned up to it, rather than 'saving his behind' as Katherine says.....look at what's going on carefully. Imagine the scenario of a hoax, would it really look like this? Nope.
The hoax always did have a shelf life, and now it's starting to smell a bit.
9
« on: June 13, 2010, 01:55:42 PM »
If you want to know what the general consensus is on this book read the comments here You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginNot saying that general opinion is always correct, but there is a recurring theme here... Did Pearl say how many books she sold yet? What a nice little earner, but aren't the fans paying for their own work?
10
« on: June 09, 2010, 04:33:14 PM »
So what's this ending in the book that Pearl keeps going on about? She says don't jump to the end and spoil it - so what's the ending anyone? Spoil it for me.....
11
« on: June 01, 2010, 06:55:06 PM »
Panic over. Found.
12
« on: June 01, 2010, 06:34:29 PM »
Does anyone have a copy of the trust document? Many are saying it has disappeared off the net. Did anyone get a copy?
13
« on: May 31, 2010, 04:59:53 PM »
Oh, and i do think that if Pearl pockets the money generated from this then that's vulturistic opportunism. Maybe we can get a comment from the family, Katherine?
14
« on: May 31, 2010, 04:53:03 PM »
OK first of all, I did not say that Twiggy/Hasil WERE Pearl Jr. I know exactly who Pearl is and i know who twiggy is - i have seen them both. If you look at what i wrote i said that it was my GUT FEELING that Twiggy/Hasil were involved in Pearl's book. That's my opinion and i'm entitled to think and say it. Aside from my own 'thoughts', everything else i wrote is accurate - i actually asked Pearl some questions about herself and the Jackson family and she answered.
I never actually wrote 'i know this to be true' - that is why i said 'If what i wrote is true.....'
You can't castigate people for having opinions. I have always said what i think about Pearl's book. I think it's distasteful, i think she may be playing on her 'closeness' to the family to lend credibility to the book and i am not alone in these thoughts - at all.
Is it really controversial to muse the idea that other people may have collaborated in writing the book?
So, illusionist, i will overlook the fact that you misread what i wrote. Again, if you want to see misinformation and lack of research masquerading as truth - buy Pseudocide.
15
« on: May 30, 2010, 06:23:31 PM »
I do reckon some evidence may be shown in court involving his body.
|