This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Diana Jean
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
1
« on: June 04, 2010, 10:56:03 PM »
May I ask as polietly as possible what this has to do with Michael hoaxing his death?
May I also ask what makes this UK tabloid paper credable?
2
« on: April 07, 2010, 11:44:03 PM »
El foro sobre la firma de nadialorens
3
« on: April 06, 2010, 07:04:39 PM »
Hola cómo están???
Gracias a ROFL y somekindofsign, he encontrado que tenemos este apartado en Español!!!
Les cuento que mi idea ahora aquí es compartir la mucha o poca información que tenga EN NUESTRO IDIOMA.
Así mismo, los invito a todos a participar o ver mi Web y Foro, en mi firma está la dirección.
Un beso grande a todos!!!! Traté de registrarme en el foro de ustedes, pero no me dejaron Se me dijo que contactar con la administración, ¿por qué es eso?
4
« on: March 06, 2010, 09:33:09 PM »
The fire alarm was not the buliding Michael was in. A paparazzi pulled it to create confusion so he/she could sneak into the hospital.
5
« on: February 15, 2010, 08:51:58 PM »
I FOLLOW him .
he makes some since , but i havent been here long enough to understand anythinq. i agree with some points but i ignore . alot of fake people on here . i stick with it thoo . :roll:
Have you seen the sick Hitler related shit this blogger posted about Souza and me? I have reported the blogger to the police. He can talk about freedom of speech and first amendment as much as he likes, but with what he blogged he most certainly broke the law. The police are after him for stalking, defamation of character and copyright infringement.
If you agree with the blogger on the things I mentioned above, I rather see you leave.
Mo, does he peep into your window wile you're asleep? I don't think "stalking" is an appropriate word, would you not agree? Why is it okay for you to call him a "Piece of shit" but get all angry when he critisizes you? ( piece of shit isn't all you've called him) Assuming the blogger is a "He", I'm not quite sure if that has been established or just assumed. But hey, That's just my opinion.
6
« on: February 09, 2010, 09:38:48 PM »
Can you please provide a link for the website of the first picture posted? Thankyou.
7
« on: February 08, 2010, 07:33:32 PM »
Souza, send me the book.
It's not my fault you posted an article you found without investigating it first.
It's not my fault you posted something expecting all your followers to read it and praise you.
It's not my fault the article you posted is crap.
I have givin you more than enough chances to prove me wrong, and tell me off with evidence.
But suprise, nothing.
Mo, you got me. Nothing gets passed you.
The OP is what it is, no matter what I say or you say, it's not going to change.
Would you rather believe something that's not true, or do you want to know it's crap to save yourself the trouble?
I have investigated it and I do NOT expect everyone to believe, it's for your information. If you are not interested, then fine with me, skip the topic.
I will e-mail you the book, read it first and then come back and ridicule this kind of stuff, you might hurt people by calling it crap.
I wasn't calling the Illuminati crap. All I was pointing out was that the OP can not be supported with the evidence stated. When I asked for supporting evidence, you gave me nothing. This isn't about the Illuminati being real or not, it's about the OP being a reasult of Poorly investigated copying and pasting. I look foward to your email.
8
« on: February 08, 2010, 06:41:11 PM »
Souza, send me the book.
It's not my fault you posted an article you found without investigating it first.
It's not my fault you posted something expecting all your followers to read it and praise you.
It's not my fault the article you posted is crap.
I have givin you more than enough chances to prove me wrong, and tell me off with evidence.
But suprise, nothing.
Mo, you got me. Nothing gets passed you.
The OP is what it is, no matter what I say or you say, it's not going to change.
Would you rather believe something that's not true, or do you want to know it's crap to save yourself the trouble?
9
« on: February 08, 2010, 04:10:02 PM »
And Souza, I just found this on youtube. You said that Britney is/may be one of these victims also right? What do you think of this?
Britney Spears "Sweet Dreams" Live in Anahiem
[youtube:3f716ffm]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpJ5Ku5gGn4[/youtube:3f716ffm]
A lot of people commented on how sexy it is but I personally felt kinda disturbed. Especially with all the reading I've done lately.
Lizzie, that's a very clear video and very disturbing. Also look at the lyrics, it has been covered by lots of artists:
Sweet dreams are made of this
Who am I to disagree?
Travel the world and the seven seas
Everybody's looking for something
Some of them want to use you
Some of them want to get used by you
Some of them want to abuse you
Some of them want to be abused
Sweet dreams are made of this
Who am I to disagree?
Travel the world and the seven seas
Everybody's looking for something
Some of them want to use you
Some of them want to get used by you
Some of them want to abuse you
Some of them want to be abused
I wanna use you and abuse you
I wanna know what's inside you
(Whispering) Hold your head up, movin' on
Keep your head up, movin' on
Hold your head up, movin' on
Keep your head up, movin' on
Hold your head up, movin' on
Keep your head up, movin' on
Movin' on!
Sweet dreams are made of this
Who am I to disagree?
Travel the world and the seven seas
Everybody's looking for something
Some of them want to use you
Some of them want to get used by you
Some of them want to abuse you
Some of them want to be abused
I'm gonna use you and abuse you
I'm gonna know what's inside
Gonna use you and abuse you
I'm gonna know what's inside you
Well. Mo,I was referring to this (Souza`s quote).
However, this isn`t a "who`s right - who`s wrong" -game. is it? Just different perceptions (of reality ...).
Am I wrong? I try not to be apodictic - and you. too?
That's because all Souza did was copied and pasted without further investigation. She'll deny it, but she can't defend it.
10
« on: February 08, 2010, 04:02:51 PM »
I'm glad you know how to copy and paste Mo.
Really, that skill will take you far.
Aintnosunshine, You make allot of sense in what you post.
11
« on: February 07, 2010, 07:42:46 PM »
Just the lyrics Diana Jean? Are you sure you read the whole article I posted? I don't think you did.
BTW, the lyrics DID come from her:
"Sweet Dreams" is a song by American R&B singer Beyoncé Knowles from her third studio album, I Am… Sasha Fierce (2008). Written and produced by Knowles, James Scheffer, Wayne Wilkins, and Rico Love, the track was released as the album's sixth single. (Wikipedia)
Maybe you can check the co-writers yourself, I have done enough. I am not here to convince you, if you are interested you can do your own research, I'm not your dog. If you are not interested, I am seriously wondering what you are still doing in this thread. There are lots and lots of threads about other subjects. I am done.
Your dear ROFL said
she can't write her songs (however she claims to do LOL big copycat anyways... and your dead Misha86 just said
firstly as pointed out beyonce does not write her own songs, they add her name to songs to make her seem like a well rounded artist Maybe you guys should stop defending her, Your only makeing your side of the argument look less valid by the second.
Not just the lyrics, you also spoke about the video which was based of off Gareth Pugh Autom/Winter 2009 video. Which you forgot to mention aswell.
Maybe I should check the cowriters? That's not my job. If you're too lazy to follow up your OP (which you didn't even write, just copied and pasted) then why did you even post it in the first place? You have yet to prove the writers of the song are being controled.
Then you tell me
Like I said, I can defend it but I won't post certain stuff here Which AKA translation "I can't defend it"
Don't dish out what you can't defend.
Won't work Diana, you are underestimating me.
This right here is proof that you can't defend what you post. A charecteristic of a good investigator is to question everything, and that's all I did. How can you ever get anything done if you're not willing to hear both sides of the arguement? Believe what you must, but Souza just proved to me that she can't defend what she posts. (by post I mean copied and pasted without further investigation) I don't know why everybody is getting mad at me, it's not my fault the OP isn't what it seems. I didn't write it. INVESTIGATE FOR YOURSELVES. Case closed, have a nice day.
12
« on: February 07, 2010, 04:37:39 PM »
Just the lyrics Diana Jean? Are you sure you read the whole article I posted? I don't think you did.
BTW, the lyrics DID come from her:
"Sweet Dreams" is a song by American R&B singer Beyoncé Knowles from her third studio album, I Am… Sasha Fierce (2008). Written and produced by Knowles, James Scheffer, Wayne Wilkins, and Rico Love, the track was released as the album's sixth single. (Wikipedia)
Maybe you can check the co-writers yourself, I have done enough. I am not here to convince you, if you are interested you can do your own research, I'm not your dog. If you are not interested, I am seriously wondering what you are still doing in this thread. There are lots and lots of threads about other subjects. I am done. Your dear ROFL said she can't write her songs (however she claims to do LOL big copycat anyways... and your dear Misha86 just said firstly as pointed out beyonce does not write her own songs, they add her name to songs to make her seem like a well rounded artist Maybe you guys should stop defending her, Your only makeing your side of the argument look less valid by the second. Not just the lyrics, you also spoke about the video which was based of off Gareth Pugh Autom/Winter 2009 video. Which you forgot to mention aswell. Maybe I should check the cowriters? That's not my job. If you're too lazy to follow up your OP (which you didn't even write, just copied and pasted) then why did you even post it in the first place? You have yet to prove the writers of the song are being controled. Then you tell me Like I said, I can defend it but I won't post certain stuff here Which AKA translation "I can't defend it" Don't dish out what you can't defend.
13
« on: February 07, 2010, 02:42:27 PM »
You still have yet to show me evidence that the people who wrote this song are being controled.
If Beyonce doesn't write her own songs, then you can't look into the songs she sings for signs of her being controled. Let's be smart now.
for anyone who is reading this, INVESTIGATE FOR YOURSELF.
We are not saying EVERYONE in the music industry is controlled, but most of the very big ones are.
And I think you should read up on it before you judge, you obviously have no knowledge of this at all.
The purpose of your OP was to show people that Beyonce is being controled because lyrics of a song she sings shows signs of being controled.
She didn't write that song, which means the lyrics did not come from her.
She only sings it, you don't have to be under control to sing a song like that.
The lyrics of the song came from the people who actually wrote it, which you still fail to show evidence of them being controled. When I ask for it you say "not everyone in music is being controled"
Which means that you have no evidence what so ever, and you can't defend your OP.
I rest my case.
OMG -_- , what is so hard to understand ? Not everyone is under mind control , we say they wrote this song for her because she is a mind controled artist and they are/or works with the illuminati , i don't understand what is so hard to understand ? Seriously ?
Eum, actually Diana Jean makes a lot of sense. You say "and they are/or works with the illuminati", can anyone prove that? Can anyone provide any evidence that the people who actually wrote the song, and therefor decided on the lyrics, are in any way involved with the illuminati or mindcontrol?
THANK YOU ilmftbomh! That's exactly what I'm trying to ask.
To ROFL and Souza,
There's something you're not understanding.
Once second you're telling me "they wrote the song for her because they are/or works with the illuminati"
I ask for proof of that, and you tell me "Not everyone is involved with the illuminati"
One second you tell me their involved with the Illuminati, and the next you tell me their not.
It's clear to me that you can't defend what you're saying.
What do you want Diana Jean? You want proof? Videos of kids that go through horrific tortures? Want me to tell you what they do to those kids? Are you really sure you want the same headache I have had for weeks now? Want to cry your eyes out? Give me your e-mail and I will mail you the 748 pages of the book. Go read it first and then come back ridiculing this. I am not a victim so by ridiculing this you won't hurt me, but you might hurt those who are with your biased comments.
I posted this for your information. If you think it's crap, and you hate this forum that much like you told our nice conspiracy blogger, then just leave. This is not the only forum.
I don't post everything I read about this stuff, because it breaks your heart and makes you run to the toilet to vomit. If you think it's BS, fine by me, but don't ask for proof, because I can't give it to you.
Read up about this before you ridicule, otherwise just skip the topic. Do a search on YouTube for Cathy O'Brien and listen to her heart breaking story. Read the book and see the obvious signs some artists have in their videos, listen to their lyrics again after reading it. But believe me, you won't like what you read. Why? Because when you have read it you will know it's not BS.
It would have been allot easier if you would have just said
"I can't defend the OP"
'cause that's basicly what you're telling me.
Like I said, I can defend it but I won't post certain stuff here. I can send you the book if you want so you can read about it yourself. No interest in the book? Not willing to read up on it? Then I rest my case.
*sigh* Souza, the purpose of your OP was to show people Beyonce is being controled because of song lyrics she sings. That would have been great, but Beyonce didn't write the song, it was written by FIVE different people. The lyrics where given to Beyonce, they didn't come from her mind. You can tell me the people who wrote the song for her are under the control of the illuminati, but you haven't given me the evidence to believe so. When I ask for it you tell me "Not everyone is under control of the illuminati" Do a search on YouTube for Cathy O'Brien and listen to her heart breaking story. Read the book and see the obvious signs some artists have in their videos, listen to their lyrics again after reading it. I'm not talking about Cathy O'Brein. I'm not doubting she's being controled because I know nothing about her. I'm talking about your OP. You say Beyonce is being controled, and your argument is song lyrics. Lyrics which you conveniently forgot to mention DID NOT COME FROM HER. How in the world can you use lyrics that didn't come from her as proof she's being controled? Don't tell me "The song was written for her", because then I'll ask for proof that the people who wrote the song for her are undercontrol of the illuminati. I already know your answer to that one: "Not everyone is under control of the illuminati, but most of them are" Which doesn't defend your OP. Which is ALL I'm talking about.
14
« on: February 07, 2010, 02:24:23 PM »
You still have yet to show me evidence that the people who wrote this song are being controled.
If Beyonce doesn't write her own songs, then you can't look into the songs she sings for signs of her being controled. Let's be smart now.
for anyone who is reading this, INVESTIGATE FOR YOURSELF.
We are not saying EVERYONE in the music industry is controlled, but most of the very big ones are.
And I think you should read up on it before you judge, you obviously have no knowledge of this at all.
The purpose of your OP was to show people that Beyonce is being controled because lyrics of a song she sings shows signs of being controled.
She didn't write that song, which means the lyrics did not come from her.
She only sings it, you don't have to be under control to sing a song like that.
The lyrics of the song came from the people who actually wrote it, which you still fail to show evidence of them being controled. When I ask for it you say "not everyone in music is being controled"
Which means that you have no evidence what so ever, and you can't defend your OP.
I rest my case.
OMG -_- , what is so hard to understand ? Not everyone is under mind control , we say they wrote this song for her because she is a mind controled artist and they are/or works with the illuminati , i don't understand what is so hard to understand ? Seriously ?
Eum, actually Diana Jean makes a lot of sense. You say "and they are/or works with the illuminati", can anyone prove that? Can anyone provide any evidence that the people who actually wrote the song, and therefor decided on the lyrics, are in any way involved with the illuminati or mindcontrol?
THANK YOU ilmftbomh! That's exactly what I'm trying to ask.
To ROFL and Souza,
There's something you're not understanding.
Once second you're telling me "they wrote the song for her because they are/or works with the illuminati"
I ask for proof of that, and you tell me "Not everyone is involved with the illuminati"
One second you tell me their involved with the Illuminati, and the next you tell me their not.
It's clear to me that you can't defend what you're saying.
What do you want Diana Jean? You want proof? Videos of kids that go through horrific tortures? Want me to tell you what they do to those kids? Are you really sure you want the same headache I have had for weeks now? Want to cry your eyes out? Give me your e-mail and I will mail you the 748 pages of the book. Go read it first and then come back ridiculing this. I am not a victim so by ridiculing this you won't hurt me, but you might hurt those who are with your biased comments.
I posted this for your information. If you think it's crap, and you hate this forum that much like you told our nice conspiracy blogger, then just leave. This is not the only forum.
I don't post everything I read about this stuff, because it breaks your heart and makes you run to the toilet to vomit. If you think it's BS, fine by me, but don't ask for proof, because I can't give it to you.
Read up about this before you ridicule, otherwise just skip the topic. Do a search on YouTube for Cathy O'Brien and listen to her heart breaking story. Read the book and see the obvious signs some artists have in their videos, listen to their lyrics again after reading it. But believe me, you won't like what you read. Why? Because when you have read it you will know it's not BS.
It would have been allot easier if you would have just said "I can't defend the OP" 'cause that's basicly what you're telling me.
15
« on: February 07, 2010, 02:09:13 PM »
You still have yet to show me evidence that the people who wrote this song are being controled.
If Beyonce doesn't write her own songs, then you can't look into the songs she sings for signs of her being controled. Let's be smart now.
for anyone who is reading this, INVESTIGATE FOR YOURSELF.
We are not saying EVERYONE in the music industry is controlled, but most of the very big ones are.
And I think you should read up on it before you judge, you obviously have no knowledge of this at all.
The purpose of your OP was to show people that Beyonce is being controled because lyrics of a song she sings shows signs of being controled.
She didn't write that song, which means the lyrics did not come from her.
She only sings it, you don't have to be under control to sing a song like that.
The lyrics of the song came from the people who actually wrote it, which you still fail to show evidence of them being controled. When I ask for it you say "not everyone in music is being controled"
Which means that you have no evidence what so ever, and you can't defend your OP.
I rest my case.
OMG -_- , what is so hard to understand ? Not everyone is under mind control , we say they wrote this song for her because she is a mind controled artist and they are/or works with the illuminati , i don't understand what is so hard to understand ? Seriously ?
Eum, actually Diana Jean makes a lot of sense. You say "and they are/or works with the illuminati", can anyone prove that? Can anyone provide any evidence that the people who actually wrote the song, and therefor decided on the lyrics, are in any way involved with the illuminati or mindcontrol?
THANK YOU ilmftbomh! That's exactly what I'm trying to ask. To ROFL and Souza, There's something you're not understanding. Once second you're telling me "they wrote the song for her because they are/or works with the illuminati" I ask for proof of that, and you tell me "Not everyone is involved with the illuminati" One second you tell me their involved with the Illuminati, and the next you tell me their not. It's clear to me that you can't defend what you're saying.
|
Show Posts