1
General Hoax Talk / Re: How likely is it that MJ will return this July?
« on: April 24, 2011, 10:19:15 AM »
Nah. I wish.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1
General Hoax Talk / Re: How likely is it that MJ will return this July?« on: April 24, 2011, 10:19:15 AM »
Nah. I wish.
2
Michael's Reasons to hoax his death / Re: New Jesus - mark my words« on: April 20, 2011, 11:21:26 AM »Quote from: "angranity"
I'm with you. 3
TMZ Articles / Re: Lindsay Lohan -- I Trust MJ's Bodyguard« on: April 10, 2011, 05:49:18 AM »
Working for a celebrity has benefits whether you get paid or not. Maybe he wants fame? IDK...
4
TMZ Articles / Re: Oprah Winfrey -- The Day My Show Will End FOREVER« on: April 06, 2011, 11:48:14 AM »Quote from: "alovesmichael" what kind of comeback would Elvis be doing at 76? would he just sit down with Oprah and say, hey I've pretended to be dead for more than 30 years but I just wanted to let you know I'm alive..? Agreed. :| 5
Michael Jackson News / Re: Sony Attacked by Anonymous Over Hacking Suit« on: April 06, 2011, 07:46:44 AM »
This popped to my mind for some reason:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login Jackson attacks music piracy bill Michael Jackson said piracy was wrong Pop superstar Michael Jackson has attacked a proposed bill in the US which would jail people who exchange pirated music online. Two Democrats, John Conyers and Howard Berman, have proposed legislation which would make file swapping of pirated music and software a crime. The Authors, Consumer and Computer Owners Protection and Security Act of 2003 - known as the Accops Act - carries penalties of up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine for uploading a copyrighted file to a peer-to-peer (P2P) network. "I am speechless about the idea of putting music fans in jail for downloading music," Jackson said in a statement. Fight "It is wrong to illegally download, but the answer cannot be jail," he added. Hundreds of individuals are being targeted for copyright violation The record industry, backed by the US government, is stepping up its fight against those who pirate music online. The Recording Industry Association of America is suing users who pirate music online, threatening them with heavy fines. The crackdown comes as a new legitimate online music site launches in the US on Tuesday, offering what it says is the cheapest per-song rates yet. The legitimate online music market is beginning to grow with a number of services offering music downloads. Full album But users are still often limited by the size of the music catalogue available and restriction on the use of the songs once they have been downloaded. BuyMusic.com will offer a catalogue of more than 300,000 songs from the big five major record labels at a cost of 70 cents per song or a full album for $7.95. But the service comes with restrictions and not all songs can be copied freely on to CDs, other computers or portable devices such as MP3 players. Apple launched a similar service for users of its computers in the US two months ago and has sold more than five million songs in that time. The computer firm charges 99 cents per song but users have more freedom over what they can do with their downloaded songs. The differences between Apple's iTunes service and BuyMusic.com are symptomatic of the online music situation. 'Visionary' Record labels are still grappling with the internet as a legitimate means of distribution and have not defined uniform licensing rights for all songs and artists. BuyMusic founder Scott Blum called Apple's chief executive Steve Jobs a "visionary". "But he's on the wrong platform," he added. Apple users make up about 3% of the computer market, while BuyMusic is targeting the 97% of people with PCs. The music industry is trying to compete with file sharing services such as Kazaa and which allow users to download pirated copies of songs. - 2003 6
Frank Dileo / Re: Frank DiLeo hospitalized« on: April 06, 2011, 07:26:28 AM »Quote from: "ignisaeternus" I'm not saying it was not a message- but: I have an iPhone and it has autocorrect. If I type Frank and forget to capitalize and in addition accidentally hit a neighboring key (which happens all the time with the virtual keyboard) - it is possible that Frank gets changed to freak. Texting, tweeting, etc all the time- I know those autocorrect errors are only too common. There's even a website about it. I didn't think of that, but that could also be possible. 7
Frank Dileo / Re: Frank DiLeo hospitalized« on: April 05, 2011, 12:17:06 PM »Quote from: "suspicious mind"
![]() 8
Court Case & Hearings; Discussion and Articles / Re: True Crime with Aphrodite Jones- The Conrad Murray Defen« on: April 05, 2011, 08:35:26 AM »
Hm. "Had sort of passed away" and "reason for it" caught my attention. It's like saying, a REASON to "die."
9
Frank Dileo / Re: Frank DiLeo hospitalized« on: April 05, 2011, 08:26:48 AM »
I find it a bit strange that there are only a few media sources that have reported it. We get all of our info from family member's twitters, but it seems there are controversies in their stories.
10
Frank Dileo / Re: Frank DiLeo hospitalized« on: April 05, 2011, 08:16:13 AM »
That's very thoughtless. However, there must be more behind it than we know. I'm very fascinated as to why such a remark.
12
Court Case & Hearings; Discussion and Articles / Re: LOST TAPES COULD CLEAR MICHAEL JACKSON'S DOCTOR« on: April 04, 2011, 07:06:18 AM »
Whether it was Murray or even MJ himself who administered the fatal dose, the doctor has done wrong. He left his patient alone under the influence of a dangerous drug that he wasn't even supposed to use in a home setting!
I still keep wondering what happened to those tapes. 14
Frank Dileo / Re: Frank DiLeo hospitalized« on: April 03, 2011, 05:02:31 AM »Quote from: "~Souza~"
OT: So you're saying Evan is alive? I don't think he killed himself because of Michael's death... That guy was mentally unstable, he was suffering from bipolar disorder. It has been claimed that Evan refused to take his meds. I think that the news reports of Jordan's confessions threw him over the edge. His own son had refused to play along after all these years and he'd been exposed. 15
MJ Tributes / Re: I went to see "Who's Bad" a Michael Jackson tribute band« on: April 03, 2011, 04:07:31 AM »Quote from: "hesouttamylife" I’m glad you enjoyed yourself. I have some apprehension about seeing MJ Impersonators that look and act too much like Michael :? I don’t know but it makes me feel like the Michael brand is being erased and replaced by pod people. :shock: I don’t like it. Not saying it’s a bad thing, and that anyone who enjoys this is wrong. Do your thing by all means. I am saying only that I have some misgivings about them. And this one scares me. He appears to be spot on and he also is following in visiting children. Hopefully that turns out to be positive. But just because one looks and imitates Michael’s art doesn’t necessarily mean that his heart is in the same place. I hope he’s being sincere. :? But I’m old school. I have a hard time changing my stripes. Ditto. |