Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Tenderoni

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: [1]
1
They are most likely leaving the screening of the new Bob Marley movie, which is why Paris has that bracelet--it looks like those they give to people at screenings.  I don't think E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G is a clue.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

2
Other Odd Things / Re: Michaels funeral was so fake,having watched witneys
« on: February 19, 2012, 05:04:03 AM »
Whitney's coffin was platinum, not gold.

3
Hoax Videos / Re: Dr. Murray is truly a very sick man!
« on: February 12, 2012, 09:35:40 PM »
BTW, artists do not make money "every time their song is played on the radio".  There are plenty of VERY BROKE artists who gets lots of airplay.

4
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
OK, since when can i convict ask to be released so he can be a member of society because he poses no threat?? Is this for real? He's "suppose" to be in prison. How many other inmates on a daily basis ask if they can be released because they are not a threat to society? Hhhhmmm...suppose to have killed King of Pop, but hey he asked "nicely" if he could be released....pretty please.....that ought to mean something right? Why would a story even be made public for such a stupid request? Only in the "death" of Michael Jackson does this silly stuff happen..

Yes, it does happen in other cases, but rarely granted.  Just FYI, he's not in "prison"; he's in jail.  There is a difference. 

But I HIGHLY doubt he is "chained to the table" when his lawyers are present.  Sorry, I don't buy that.

5
I just wish people would do some research before posting here about what WOULD and would NOT happen if you're not in the U.S.

No, Murray would NOT be "forced to sell his assets".  He can have assets and the family can go after them IF they win a CIVIL judgment.

YES, criminal courts deal with restitution every day....but it's based on what income the person has--not ASSETS.  They pay fines and restitution in cash.

Please, everyone, not EVERYTHING is part of a hoax.  Some things make perfect sense in all this IF it were a real criminal case.

6
TMZ Articles / Re: CONRAD MURRAY Appeals Manslaughter Conviction
« on: December 03, 2011, 12:48:39 AM »
Also want to mention that there can't be appeal if it's not a REAL case  penguin/

Anyone who believes that the case was all just a movie or show being scripted can't now go with the theory that he's going to have a REAL appeal and provide a live person as his proof  beerchug

7
TMZ Articles / Re: CONRAD MURRAY Appeals Manslaughter Conviction
« on: December 03, 2011, 12:44:10 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The ending to this journey will come with the appeal trial. Murray will be vindicated after serving his sentence by showing via the surveillance tape, that he did not hurt Michael. The world will see that even though the prosecution put on a much better case than the crappy defense team, that an innocent man went to jail even though he looked guilty. The discussions and changes that will ensue after that will be big, and hopefully wake people up to stop believing everything they hear from the media about a person, and hopefully it will halt the media on trying individuals in the court of public opinion.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBDnaf_9mYc[/youtube]

There is no 'appeal trial' forthcoming.  And, Murray wouldn't be able to "prove" he is innocent by producing a live body.  The appeals court deals ONLY with rulings of law during the trial, and not whether the evidence was credible or valid.  And in MOST cases is there is NO oral argument. In fact, sometimes the higher court dismisses the appeal without even explaining in detail (it's called "per curiam" or "per curiam affirmed" in some cases). The parties file what are called "briefs" with case law cites that claim that the JUDGE was wrong in allowing or disallowing certain testimony or evidence--not whether it was valid or not.  IF the Court decides that the Judge made legal mistakes then there could be a whole new trial or a partial trial back in the lower court--but NO NEW EVIDENCE WOULD BE ALLOWED.

All this appeal shows me--as a lawyer and having been involved with law for over 25 years--is that it's keeping the story alive in the media.  This is probably more important than proving MJ is alive through the courts :)

8
Michael Jackson News / Re: FORREST LAWN INTERMENT LOCATOR- NO MJ !!!
« on: February 26, 2010, 11:29:59 PM »
Just to clarify, they do NOT have to provide this information.  They are not legally bound.  Forest Lawn has always had a policy of not providing information on publicly  known people unless the next of kin allows it.  They do have to keep it for their own records, but they never have to tell anyone in the public.

Also, anyone is allowed near the OUTSIDE of the building.  That's where Murray's pictures were taken.  Not inside.  This is why I don't believe any of Karen's posts or pictures--she doesn't have authority to get inside (not a 1-2-or 3rd generation family member, which is the policy, and doesn't have a family member with her when she supposedly visits).

9
Michael Jackson News / Re: Smoking gun
« on: February 08, 2010, 11:00:23 PM »
Why would it be over for you?  They ID'd his body using a driver's license!  And, notice that the officer who collected hair samples says in the affidavit that everything was covered except the hands and the top of the head.  So, how does anyone know WHO was in that casket?

There is still nothing specifically identifiable--it could have been ANYONE in that autopsy!  Especially because the report says he was 5'9".  MJ is taller than that!

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Hoax not over for me....and I notice that there isn't much coverage about this today.

10
Michael Jackson News / Re: Facebook post: "staging the return"
« on: January 24, 2010, 12:19:47 AM »
Thanks for the welcome back!

Yes, I know it was supposed to be a comeback tour (although staying in one city isn't really a tour), but the movie isn't....and that's what they are referring to...and why call it that now?

And (in my opinion) anyone who saw the movie can CLEARLY see there is NO WAY that was going to be a stage production!  It was meant to be a movie all along  8-)

11
Michael Jackson News / Facebook post: "staging the return"
« on: January 23, 2010, 01:08:17 PM »
I have been gone since before the board dropped off the internet and Mo and Souza brought it back so I have a LOT to catch up on.  

PLEASE forgive me if this is a re-post!

But did anyone notice the NAME of this video that the THIS IS IT Facebook page posted?

Staging The Return: The Adventure Begins - "Something to Think About"

Whaaaaaaaaaaat?

Pages: [1]
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal