This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - NightOwl
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
« on: January 29, 2012, 01:01:14 PM »
Richard Hall & Neil Sanders - Mind Control Overview.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1mMWEE6v5E[/youtube]
MJ is brielfy discussed from about 2h 8minutes (nothing new though). But it's worth to listen/watch through. An interesting, yet long clip but you can have it on radio-like. I had it on and made dinner, did the dishes and folded the laundry.
2
« on: January 12, 2012, 02:36:03 PM »
It's worse [as bad as] than anti-USSR propaganda during Cold War.
Is it for real? Hard to believe they still step so low. Maybe it's a bad joke, no?
I wish it was a joke. Even a terribly bad taste joke. But no, it's real - it's for sale in Amazon for example. I found some sample pages. The text on the same page with the picture of the soldier shooting Osama made me just gasp for breath: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginKids who are in "coloring book age" in 2011, weren't even born 2001. So - what's for them to forget? To have closure? Truth is, the kids who will be exposed to this book, will likely grow to be the future soldiers, emotionless killing machines. The certain hate, fear and ultra-patriotism will be passed on the the next generation. And they will not question the true motives of a war they're fighting. Referring to the text on that page, that often seen American FREEDOM mantra is so annoying. Mind control.
3
« on: January 09, 2012, 01:38:08 PM »
It's been a while since I've had this much trouble getting my jaw pulled up from the floor. And I've seen a lot since early 2009 when I "woke up". "(WXYZ) - On the brink of the 10th anniversary of September 11th a new children’s ‘graphic coloring novel’ has emerged. We want to know; is it appropriate for kids? According to the publisher, the book entitled ‘We Shall Never Forget 9/11 – The Kids’ Book of Freedom’ is “designed to be a tool that parents can use to help teach children about the facts surrounding 9/11.” The book opens on September 11, 2011 with a picture of Osama Bin Laden as he plots the US attacks. It ends nearly 10 years later with the raid of Bin Laden’s Abbottabad compound and his death. Several pages show both American military and Muslims with guns. The final page of the story shows a bullet flying toward Bin Laden before his death. Publishers say the book ‘demonstrates honesty, reverence, integrity and good character,’ with ‘a historic and educational perspective.’ 7 Action News showed the coloring book to the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic relations. He calls the book disgusting because it portrays all Muslims as radicals when indeed American Muslims had nothing to do with 9-11 and they were victims as well as first responders that day. “This publisher is doing a disservice to innocent young minds by showing this type of nonsense. In every single reference to Muslims has to do with radical, extremists, and depictions of people being terrorists,” said Dawud Walid. Spokesperson for the publisher, Wayne Bell, released a statement to Action News about the use of Osama Bin Laden and said: “Because they see the man, Osama Bin Laden, get shot in black and white, that provides closure for them.” Parents, we want to know what you think. Is this coloring book appropriate for children? Let us know in the comment section. You can watch a statement by ColoringBook.com publisher Wayne Bell in the video player below. (You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login)"
A picture from the book:
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
Wow. I'm shocked.
It came out for the 10th anniversary, so it's a few months old news. Maybe news to someone else too. Gotta spread the word how strange the world is these days.
4
« on: December 07, 2011, 11:10:54 AM »
You are sitting in a wrong place. Leave your model friend deal with those kinda guys.
And hey, she won't be 1,78 and 58kg when she's over 35.
LOL I don't have a choise, we are together at work.
She's over 35 and she eats almost nothing.
I blurres her face but look crash/ crash/ at her body:
I wrote that because I used to be her size when below 30 y. Then I bought a car. I'm now much older, and 15 kg heavier than she is, but I don't envy her. I'm lean and in good shape, more muscular than she is. Our difference is that I like to eat well. A male collegue joked (in a loving manner) when having lunch together that I eat mens portions. LOL! So you're 1,58 tall, but you have more choice of men than us tall women: a lot of men don't like women taller than they are (and vice versa, I must add). But why would you bother whether other men admire you or find you interesting, you have a husband.
5
« on: December 07, 2011, 10:25:54 AM »
The fashion industry is a multi BILLION $$$$ dollar industry.
<snip>
.....a few weeks ago my 8 year old niece came to me and asked me if she was fat (she was being teased at school for having a little tummy bump)...it broke my heart into a million pieces, I just wanted to scream!
/scream/ 
My cousin told me a year ago her toddler keeps on repeating "Hellllooo kitty!". It's sick. Here's a documentary of it: Consuming Kids: The Commercialization of Childhood [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uUU7cjfcdM[/youtube] Kids are a huge target group for advertizers. Once you get the kids want something, they can nag, throw tantrums and all the rest of it and the parent often ends up buying the product. They do the presuasion work instead of advertizers. I'm glad the Consumer Agency here forbids degrading ads like those in "Killing us softly" and has some strict rules to what is tolerated in advertizing towards children.
6
« on: December 06, 2011, 03:51:55 PM »
The funny thing is what's most important actually IS how we look crash/.
TV and all the crap it shows can be blamed for that pretty far. And that's exactly what should be done to TV - smash it.
I find it hard to believe that such a thing would be so important, but sadly for some it true. Such people are SO lost and unhappy deep inside.
I have a friend...she's 1,78 (meter) and she has 58 kilos, thin as a model. Indeed she almost doesn't have breasts but the push-up bra helps her "build" some LOL. And most of the men I know admire her. I don't even want to sit next to her with my 1,58 height.....I feel so small and uninteresting LOL....
The fact is men won't be "charmed" by our witty conversation or our intelligence and unfortunately it's not entirely because of the TV commercial...it's just because they are how they are, let's face it.
You are sitting in a wrong place. Leave your model friend deal with those kinda guys. And hey, she won't be 1,78 and 58kg when she's over 35.
7
« on: December 06, 2011, 03:30:34 PM »
The funny thing is what's most important actually IS how we look crash/.
TV and all the crap it shows can be blamed for that pretty far. And that's exactly what should be done to TV - smash it. I find it hard to believe that such a thing would be so important, but sadly for some it true. Such people are SO lost and unhappy deep inside.
8
« on: December 06, 2011, 02:42:29 PM »
Sorry, double
9
« on: December 06, 2011, 02:40:59 PM »
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKwHfFcsqK4&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]
That's disgusting. Killing animals for elitism and human vanity. So sad. Sad are the YTers' comments below this vid as well - those few who mention the furs got replies comparing furs to food. Sure, how animals that are killed for food is a big issue itself, but fur is for VANITY. Doesn't compare. Just earlier today watched a video today called "Killing us softly" - nothing to do with furs. It's a lecture by Jean Kilbourne about the image of women in advertising -> sexism etc. There were examples of how black women are often wearing leopard clothes, tiger make up - "as if they were exotic animals". Gotta say that Janet+fur+Black cat blasting in the video... it is another example of advertisers portraying this image. I posted the link to the video elsewhere: topic=21627.msg377685#msg377685 .
10
« on: December 06, 2011, 02:37:48 PM »
A lecture with many examples: [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ujySz-_NFQ[/youtube] All the fellow women, let's be proud of our wrinkles, gray hairs, moles, lumps. The older we get, the more the gravity will pull... 
11
« on: November 20, 2011, 05:01:11 AM »
An excellent film: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
12
« on: October 11, 2011, 03:06:05 PM »
How can I have faith?? Although his body is not cut (like they usually do during autopsy) it is absolutely deprived of any dignity! Would Michael allow for this? He, who was being photographed in the police after the allegations? This was too painful for him! Would he show himself naked to the whole world??
This is something that can turn a hard-core believer into non-believer! I am utterly shocked and disgusted!
Oh technically he may well have been cut and the image photoshopped before showing to court. Would explain the missing bellybutton, too. Quite a shocker.
13
« on: July 02, 2011, 11:58:26 PM »
No need to feel ashamed about failing the bear test anymore.
Look how they failed noticing the switch of person they're in the midst of helping:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-NtmLm-VW4[/youtube]
:shock: :lol:
14
« on: July 02, 2011, 05:11:03 AM »
Watched the first 30 minutes, but decided to save it for the evening. About US Federal Bank, monetary system etc.
Worth watching so far. Also presents new names and faces whose material to explore.
Frankenfed Monster Amongst Us by Anthony J Hilder (Complete).
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yD-5LMaPiQM[/youtube]
15
« on: July 02, 2011, 05:02:20 AM »
To be honest I'm a bit tired of seeing all these "sons of Michael" surface. I really find it hard to believe that, of all people, Michael Jackson was that irresponsible. To compare, Gene Simmons of Kiss has slept with some 4000 women (even if he exaggerated that a little, we may still say thousands) and he's been responsible, he has one son and one daughter both with his long time partner.
I don't believe either Omer or this lad are MJ's sons. Not much resemblance to me. Wouldn't anyone be flattered to look alike or sound like their idol, or be a suspected girlfriend? And then build a mystery around it to keep the glow? People think they are hiding something. The buzz goes on and on and so does the mental mas***bation of these "sons".
|
Show Posts