1
Other Odd Things / Re: WHY ARE YOU DECIDING FOR US???
« on: January 13, 2010, 07:44:05 PM »
Same here, ha ha. You can't get rid of me THAT easily by banning me. People...
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1
Other Odd Things / Re: WHY ARE YOU DECIDING FOR US???« on: January 13, 2010, 07:44:05 PM »
Same here, ha ha. You can't get rid of me THAT easily by banning me. People...
2
Other Odd Things / Re: WHY ARE YOU DECIDING FOR US???« on: January 13, 2010, 04:36:22 PM »Quote from: "MJhunny" still waiting for decent explanation... LOL. I doubt what they define as "decent" is what they've already posted. I wouldn't put your hopes up. And no Souza, I really don't trust you. Not anymore. How are we spitting on it?? We deserve at least a DECENT explanation, except all we get is that it is your decision and that it is "for the best", etc. What's with all this shit? How can we trust you if you go around deleting topics that could be seriously helpful to our investigation?? There's no I in TEAM. THOSE ARE MY TRUE COLOURS. :lol: 3
Other Odd Things / Re: WHY ARE YOU DECIDING FOR US???« on: January 13, 2010, 04:28:07 PM »
I've lost a lot of respect for you Mo... But thanks for creating a forum where I've met a lot of fantastic people. Apart from that, your reputation is pretty much sinking...
4
Other Odd Things / Re: WHY ARE YOU DECIDING FOR US???« on: January 13, 2010, 04:16:43 PM »Quote from: "MJhunny" BOW topics keep getting deleted ...Because as our admins explained "it's clearly a lying troll and we, the members need protection from such people" Okay, erm ... YOU GO GIRL!!!!! :lol: Seriously, this is waaayyy too controlling. Stop making our bloody decisions for us Mo!! I understand perfectly well this is your forum, but your reasons for deleting any BoW-related topics are completely ridiculous. SOME of us actually want to hear this girl out, and how are we going to find out anything if you keep slamming down everything YOU think is inappropriate when it could lead to a potential clue of some sort?? Damn!!! We're not little kids and this is a forum = a team. TEAM WORK. Get real hun. 5
Joe Jackson / Re: LETTER FROM JOE JACKSON« on: January 13, 2010, 12:59:37 PM »
Hmm, as long as it's non-profit I'm not really at all that worried.
6
Other Odd Things / Re: OMG HIGH PROBABILITY OF MJ “RETURN” THIS MONTH!« on: January 13, 2010, 09:53:54 AM »
As much as I am happy with the idea that people may be slowly catching onto the hoax, it's kind of doing me head in having to use the refresh button a million times!
7
Questions about the forum and/or website / Re: Having a hard time getting in on the site since this morning« on: January 13, 2010, 12:23:14 AM »
It's working well for me now. But yesterday was so frustrating!
Lol, just as I was about to post that that bloody error page came up again... :roll: 8
Questions about the forum and/or website / Re: Having a hard time getting in on the site since this morning« on: January 12, 2010, 09:07:00 PM »
Yep, I've been having problems with the whole forum all day!! :| So annoying having to refresh at least five times each page...
9
Other Odd Things / Re: OMG HIGH PROBABILITY OF MJ “RETURN” THIS MONTH!« on: January 12, 2010, 09:04:13 PM »
Could you PM me too? Thanks!!
10
Other Odd Things / Re: Why i BeLIEve he will perform again....« on: January 04, 2010, 06:04:04 PM »
Heh, he's welcome in the UK anytime. It'd be awesome if he decided to live over here!
11
Others / Re: Can this be true.. Nanny Grace. Please read.. its upset me!« on: January 02, 2010, 08:24:54 PM »
"Now the youngest has been saying,'Why Daddy? God should have taken me not him.' "
I thought Blanket had been told that Michael was "on holiday"? This is bullshit. 12
Michael Jackson News / Re: STAND UP !!! TAKE ACTION!!! FOR MICHAEL Please read...« on: January 02, 2010, 07:30:24 AM »
Sorry, I just spent a few minutes writing an e-mail out to that foul woman. I used to kind of like her, but now I can see her true colours. If she was an actual proper reporter, she would've done research before publishing such accusations for crying out loud. Yep, she received a right earful from me!
13
Hoax Pictures / Re: Camera details« on: January 01, 2010, 04:34:34 PM »
I don't post very much here now as my attentions are based on another forum, but I thought I'd give a helping hand on this case.
Sometimes on the odd occasion I like to post on Yahoo! Answers, so I took the opportunity to open up this question on the site. I've gotten a few answers (mainly people telling me to try it out myself :lol: ), but the best so far comes from a user called fhotoace. If the camera is in auto exposure, it will choose the correct exposure settings when you take the shot. For it to auto-focus through the blinded window it may focus on the blind instead of the subject. I don't understand why this situation is effecting you so much. Do you actually have such an image, shot in that way? If you do, it is easy enough to look at the EXIF data on the file and see what the settings actually were a the time the photo was taken Free program that will read the EXIF data You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login I hope I helped a tiny bit. 14
Other Odd Things / Re: Ben The Photographer« on: December 30, 2009, 12:00:51 PM »
Hmm, maybe. But it doesn't explain why he stumbled over his words and looked uncomfortable.
15
Michael Jackson News / Re: Bonnie Vent has "contact" with MJ!!!« on: December 29, 2009, 11:19:48 AM »
Yeah, yeah ... Ha, and I have a pet pig that can fly.
|