Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - virgo75

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 33
1
The Double Theory / Re: Michael Jackson and Doppelganger
« on: April 07, 2010, 08:45:30 PM »
Quote from: "PinkTopaz"
Quote from: "*Mo*"
Quote from: "PinkTopaz"
I understand that. But aren't you saying that there are like, tons that were on the verge of taking over his life for him and that took his place during concerts and interviews, things that are supposed to show his TRUE nature? And if the Illuminati are all about messing with his brain to make him do what they want, why hassle with hiring fakes? I just feel that Michael's entire indentity, persona and real, is being destroyed, I feel like I'm never sure who I'm seeing, and if I'm never sure who I'm seeing, how do I know that story he's telling about how he wrote Billie Jean is true? How do I know if that food he's saying is his favorite is really his favorite? Most of all, how do I know he really cares as much about poor, suffering children any more than the next Joe, orthe poor, poor woman he's dating or married or his kids..? Do you see what I mean? This makes me feel like everything is some kind of big act- I'm  glad I haven't liked him all of my life now, I'd feel like I just wasted a lot of time.

I'm sorry, I just had to do what I did with your post.  I understand your feelings, but isn't it about time to put your feelings aside and try to look at all that has happened from HIS point of view..?
Like he's given us any kind of opportunity to do that.. Again, how am I supposed to know whose point of view is whose if there are so many fakes? I'm sure they don't care in the least- hell, they probably love it.. As for him.. I'm getting pretty confused as to when he really speaks his mind or not.. then again, I always suspected that all that kid-loving stuff was PR anyway..



I don't want to speak for you Pink Topaz, but I think I get what you're saying.

As much as it would be nice for us to try to see things from Michael's point of view, just how do we know what HIS point of view is?

All we really have is our imagination and speculation as to what went into everything and how all of this came about.
We can put together our own ideas of why and how Michael would do certain things that we think he did(even though we still don't have 100% proof on ANYTHING!), but none of us know him personally.

And with all of this doubles stuff, the variations on what  "his" point of view is, grows exponentially.

See, we don't know if "his" point of view was just part of a PR machine as suggested by Pink Topaz.
Part of "programming" if he was a victim of MK-Ultra.
If we're really seeing the different characters of Mike's doubles, or Mike's doubles if they were programmed, or Mike's doubles as instructed by a PR team, or Mike's doubles as instructed by Mike himself.
Heck, it could even be Michael pretending to be a double himself so that if/when stuff hits the fan, he can say, "that wasn't me, that was the other guy!"   :?

My head hurts.

2
Quote from: "~Souza~"
It doesn't matter, but we have been ridiculed, called names, even threatened due to the theory, and all of the sudden it's ok to discuss. I just don't get that.

I think there are multiple reasons why it's ok now.

1)After 9 months of going over other, more "reasonable" possibilities, people are becoming more open to alternate possibilities.
2)After hearing something suggested here and there over the course of months, eventually, what may have been ridiculous at first becomes easier to accept as a possibility.
3)When the doubles theories were being presented initially, besides the backlash against it, there was also backlash against the backlash.   :lol:   So now, the people who initially opposed it may be more open to it because of the first 2 reasons and because it's coming from someone new.

Just my 2 cents.

3
Quote from: "Serenitys_Dream"
Quote from: "the arabian nights"
looks exactly the same sunshades
Do you always disagree  with what everyone posts? :roll:
I sense so much negativity in your posts, I kind of want to skip over them actually...
Especially, because I do see a curve in the outside picture and straight line in the inside ones as Angiek74 pointed out.


Actually, I see the same thing.
The top line on the glasses goes straight across.
The bottom line curves over the bridge of the nose which can make it look straight across if you're looking directly, but if looking from a different angle you can see the curve like in the bottom pic.

4
The Double Theory / Re: Michael Jackson and Doppelganger
« on: April 07, 2010, 01:53:28 PM »
Quote from: "THE JACKSONOLOGIST"
WOOOOW..........that "real" MJ pic blew me away. What if that really is him?

That pic REALLY looks like him. Im speechless right now. It doesnt look PS to me...can anyone tell if it is or not? I need to know. I think we all do. This is messed up.

You mean the pic that looks like Alfonso Ribiero? lol
Yeah, it's shopped.

1)The eyes, nose, and mouth are too large for the face - in person he would look like an alien.   :lol:
2)There are clear lines of demarcation.  I don't know how to draw on pictures, but there is a line that runs down the right side of the face that looks like it starts at the hat and runs down right next to the eyebrow and may end at the goatee.  Then there is another line under the bottom lip but above the goatee that goes in a straight line across.  I can see the lines because Michael's skin is lighter than the face that his features were photoshopped onto.

5
Other Odd Things / Re: HEISMYPETERPAN AGAIN!
« on: April 07, 2010, 01:44:00 PM »
Someone(either on here or another forum) said that the webcam pics of Blanket are on Rebbie Jackson's Facebook page.
Which means the pics are probably Rebbie's pics.
And this person could be Rebbie's Facebook "friend."
Doesn't mean "friend" in real life.

6
Other Odd Things / Re: Hoax Recap?
« on: April 07, 2010, 07:33:18 AM »
Thank you everyone so much for your input!   :D

I really appreciate the links to info & videos as well as the embedded ones(the arabian nights, reasonables, scorpionchik, and loyalfan).

I also want to especially thank ladyandbird for listing some of the pros to the clues!
This is really what I was hoping for - other people to express what they see as pros and cons of clues with relation to the hoax.

Even though I will (work permitting  :oops: ) come through and post my own, I was hoping to get other people's input.
I wasn't just trying to make this whole thread about my own thoughts.
I would genuinely love and prefer input from others.   :D

7
Quote from: "*Mo*"
Quote from: "MJLover1990"
Quote from: "*Mo*"
I especially like this one, and the symbolism in it...



I agree with you, it's as he's free because all the armbands break lose while reaching for the hand and the hand symbolises God in my opinion. I mean not as if in going to heaven but returning back to God.

The broken straps symbolize breaking free, but in my opinion the hand that's reaching out to him is not god's.  It's the hand of the person who helped Mike breaking free, and who guided him through the whole process.

I felt that about the broken straps as well.
But I felt that him reaching up could be symbolizing how when he performed he broke free of earthly bonds and it was a gift from the Divine, especially since that's one of his stage outfits.

8
Quote from: "miss j"
Quote from: "ABeautifulMind"
Quote from: "miss j"
wait, was he out of the room making phone call and returned to find mj's not breathing or he was out of the room to go the toilet and returned to find mj's not breathing? so which one is true? if he went out to make a phone call, then, when did he go to the toilet? or am i losing my tracks here?


Maybe we should start a list.

1. He left the room to use the toilet
2. He was on the phone with his GF
3. He was sleeping (another one I've heard)
......

I'm sure there will be more

once his lawyer said he didn't leave michael's side at all. yeah, i heard that sleeping part too..


Don't foget the rumor that he was with a call girl or left to actually spend time with his girlfriend.
I don't know where that was originally reported, but I read it on here.

Murray's story has A LOT of inconsistancies....

9
Quote from: "nynyro"
There's a possibility he's dead and people need to acknowledge that. You may not agree, but it's no harm to acknowledge it. His legacy needs to be restored either way, dead or alive.


Thank you.
I agree 100%.

There's a lot of bashing on here as soon as someone says that Michael could be dead.
Which, he very well could be.
If we knew for a fact he was alive we wouldn't be on here or searching for signs that he's alive.

Granted, some people say it in a way that is harsh and that will not get a good reception.
But it doesn't make their opinion or the possibility any less valid.

10
Michael Jackson News / Re: Uri Geller did 'live' announcement on SBS6?
« on: April 06, 2010, 08:26:41 PM »
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
Uri Gellar is a egotistical con artist.  Michael saw through him in the end.  Michael no longer spoke to him after the Bashir incident.
Uri Gellar took money from Bashir for the introduction.

There is no way Michael would do this with Uri.  No way.

Im leaning towards Michael being gone at the moment, and have a broken heart.  But if this is a hoax, then Michael will return on his own terms.  Michael doesnt need to ride Uri Gellars coat strings on this one.


Agreed.

And every time I saw Michael with Uri, he always looked unhappy or zoned out - like he was hypnotized or on drugs.   :?

I believe the poster who said the Uri would say things pretending something big was gonna happen, even though I've never seen or heard his show.   :lol:

11
Other Odd Things / Re: Hoax Recap?
« on: April 06, 2010, 06:40:25 PM »
Thank you very much Harry and VeryLittleSusie(I like your name  :)  ).
I can't wait to check out both.  :D

12
Other Odd Things / Re: Mike's red pants
« on: April 06, 2010, 06:38:07 PM »
Sorry, I don't think they're the same.

The TII pants are longer and slimmer to match a slimmer Michael.
The Thriller pants are borderline high-waters. lol
You can see his socks clearly.
The TII pants scrunch up at the foot because they're almost too long for him.

13
Quote from: "voiceforthesilent"
How Much Propofol was Jackson Given:
I just saw an interview posted on CNN. It was with an anesthesiologist and he claims (no surprise) that the amount of propofol in the body's system would have had negative results within 10 seconds after being administered refuting the statements that Dr Murray stayed there right after giving the drug. He also said that it's not likely that Dr Murray gave the propofol by IV - if he gave him the amount he claims. Here's the link to CNN.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


As far as the amount of propofol given - that's debatable.

Yesterday on TMZ live (either during or after the court hearing) - Harvey was taking questions and one thing he said was that the prosecution DOES NOT believe Murray's account on how much propofol was given.

There have been other reports posted on here that the amount that was supposed to have been given would barely put a puppy to sleep.

14
The O2 Press Conference / Re: scary double
« on: April 06, 2010, 06:30:24 PM »
:shock:

Just, wow.

 :shock:

If I were them, I would have spent that money trying to visit Michael rather than trying to **BE** Michael.

But they do say that imitation is he sincerest form of flattery...

15
Other Odd Things / Re: More clothing connections....!!!
« on: April 06, 2010, 06:23:21 PM »
Quote from: "Hopeless"
I think  this outfit is one of her favorites..she likes it...she often wears blue clothes, light and darker blue and she looks great in this colour.
No matter how much money you have, if you have a favorite in which you are feeling good, you can wear it for many years.
And i am not sure if it is rearly absolutly the same...
And Joe is rearly often wearing this colours...i saw him in german television and the german media...always in this colours...not absolutly the same jackets, but always the red tie to a dark grey jacket.

Yes, probably.
Plus we have to remember that both Mr. and Mrs. Jackson are a bit older.

Most older people I know do NOT like to shop for new clothes.
They find suitable, COMFORTABLE(very important!), well made items and take care of them.
They usually have specific outfits suitable for certain occasions - Church clothes, visiting the grandkids clothes, bingo night clothes, court clothes, etc.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 33
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal