This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - rayvyn
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10
121
« on: January 04, 2010, 02:34:43 AM »
Hey guys. I've saved the picture and zoomed in on everything, and it's fake. She could have placed the ONLY tribute of MJ there herself, and notice how it's right at the front.
LOOK CLOSELY AT THE PICTURES PLACED ON THE GROUND NEAR THE TOMB. TWO OF THE PICTURES ARE OF AN OLDER MAN, AND ONLY ONE RESEMBLES AN AFRICAN YOUNG BOY at the back. ALL THE FLOWERS HAVE A WHITE CARD, WITH NOTHING WRITTEN ON THEM. LOOKS LIKE THEY HAVE BEEN TURNED AROUND TO THE BLANK SIDE ON PURPOSE. ALSO, WHAT I FIND EVEN MORE BIZZARE, IS THE MOULD ON THE RIGHT TOMBSTONE. IT IS OF A MAN WITH BREASTS, AND A YOUNG CHILD VERY CLOSE TO HIS OR HER PRIVATE PARTS. THIS ABSOLUTELY WOULD NOT BE WHAT THE FAMILY WOULD HAVE CHOSEN, CONSIDERING WHAT MJ WENT THROUGH WITH THE TRIAL AND ALL. WHY NOT PICK AN ENBLEM OF A MAN SURROUNDED WITH MANY CHILDREN, LIKE PETER PAN. THIS IS A BIT FREAKY AND DISTASTEFUL. THERE'S A PICTURE OF AN OLD MAN AT THE BACK (COULD BE HIS DAD'S PHOTO) BUT THINK ABOUT IT. WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY PUT A PHOTO OF JOE JACKSON WITH MJ? ??No way. This cries out so fake. Whoever took the photo was obviously at another grave site of another family, and have just placed the MJ wreath with some sort of stuffed toy in a box,to fool us........
That's, what I first saw, too... See how "bad" our minds work!
Looking very close, it looks to me like an Angel with folded wings, holding a child's hand. And the "breasts" could be part of an armour.
But all those blurry images drive me mad!
If this is his grave, it's so weird not to engrave his name!
Here's another shoot of the tomb , where both reliefs are visible.
![]()
When zoomed in, the picture on the left, although blurry, looks like Michael.
122
« on: January 03, 2010, 11:31:18 PM »
I love this song, just wish it was longer.
123
« on: December 30, 2009, 08:35:31 AM »
Michael Jackson collapsed from a morphine overdose nearly six years ago after working himself into a ‘frenzy of anxiety’ over a TV interview.
A doctor found the star unconscious after being secretly summoned to his rented Beverly Hills home in the middle of the night. Hours earlier, more than 27million viewers in the US had watched
Jackson nervously defend himself against child sex charges.The incident has never been made public until today. The doctor who treated him has come forward because he believes the apparently accidental overdose has a bearing on the circumstances surrounding Jackson’s death.
It is claimed that shortly before the singer died, he was injected with Demerol, a powerful painkiller similar to morphine. As with the first overdose, Jackson was said to be suffering from acute stress at the time.
In an interview with The Mail on Sunday, the doctor recalled the events of the early hours of December 29, 2003 – and how he also warned Jackson’s family that the star should seek help for his ‘obvious addiction’.
Referring to handwritten notes he made at the time, the doctor, who asked not to be named, said: ‘I’d been treating Michael’s brother Randy for several months when I was awakened by a phone call from him at 1.51am. I was told someone wasn’t well and that they couldn’t call 911 [the US emergency services number] for security reasons.
just found this whilst looking for morphine lyrics What's the date on when the article was written?
124
« on: December 23, 2009, 06:17:34 PM »
Also, I'm immature enough to be glad I get the last word! :lol:
Too funny!
125
« on: December 23, 2009, 05:45:01 PM »
I'd whisper this in his ear: I don't care about your fame or your money-- I just want to know you. Put on one of your disguises (probably the one with the jacked-up teeth and afro wig), and let's go out like normal people. And to prove I just want to know you, I'll pay for everything. If you don't mind TGI Fridays, once you put on your disguise, we can be on our way. I won't even let you kiss me on the first date... okay... that's a lie, but all the rest of it is true. 
126
« on: December 20, 2009, 01:16:41 AM »
Why are you so defensive? I was reluctant to respond because people become so defensive if others, in this case me, don't see things the same way. I never said you were asking me to do anything-- I was making a statement about what I try to avoid, and that is blindly accepting-- it wasn't a personal attack on you.
The "that" I was referring to was Paris's choice of words. I'm trying to understand. I didn't see how it was odd, and if you had any additional insight that might help me see it better, I was asking.
I did think it was weird Paris was fidgeting with her purse and ear. I wondered if she had some sort of wireless device. Thank you for pointing it out-- I hadn't noticed it before.
127
« on: December 19, 2009, 11:39:54 PM »
I don't understand how that is a clue. My child and I often repeat certain phrases to one another, and when I speak about her to others, those phrases might come up. I'm not a naysayer; I just don't want to blindly accept something that I don't see. Maybe someone can be more detailed in the significance of what Paris said. Thanks.
128
« on: December 14, 2009, 02:05:53 PM »
When I first saw the dance around Jennifer Hudson, there was something oddly familiar about it. Then I remembered-- it reminded me of this miniature statue of the Circle of Friends terracotta. In the center is a place for a candle. Maybe that's why Jennifer wore white. I don't know... just a thought... Here's a link for a picture of the terracotta: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginThe circle represent an ancient pre-Columbian ceremonial dance symbolizing the unbroken circle of friendship.
129
« on: December 13, 2009, 10:20:08 PM »
It seemed to me as though Jermaine wants the limelight-- being the headliner, my songs, not showing up for the photo shoot. He comes off as though he wants to be seen as separate. The Jacksons, to me, is just another singing group without Michael. Michael was the essence of that group. Michael was the group. That was proven when he went solo. He didn't need them to be a success, but they needed Michael to be a success. That hasn't changed.
And Jermaine's shirt did say Royalty. I don't know what that was all about. Jermaine does not come off good on this show. When I saw his wife putting his shoe on his foot, I said, "Whaaaaaat?! I can't believe this." It was bad enough him ordering her around, and not wanting lipstick and wiping it off, but the shoe thing was just too much. Again, Jermaine is not coming off well at all.
I'm sure it must have been hard for Jermaine when he was the lead singer in the Jackson 5, and then his dad changed things. Michael... he was... Michael. He cannot be reproduced.
130
« on: December 13, 2009, 01:46:42 PM »
Apart from other things this guys nose is not like Michaels at all. The only way you could pass him off as Michael is if it was at great distance away and your sight was not 100%. :lol:
131
« on: December 09, 2009, 01:08:46 PM »
I read the following in an article today: His brother Jackie Jackson added: 'For 40 years, we've had great, great support from our fans around the world. And we should give them a great tour around the world.
Tito Jackson said there were not yet concrete plans but made it clear talks had started.
'There's been some talk about some things. There's a lot of work that goes into putting the show - the type of show that we want to put on.'
Read more: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or LoginI think the support was for Michael. Hello?
132
« on: December 08, 2009, 06:46:19 PM »
Okay... I found it. It was on this forum. I've posted it below: * Report this post * Reply with quote Re: HOAX discussed on Official MJ site New postby Xsy » Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:16 am I found some interestings posts of them that we could discuss too: - Why would they hire impersonators for something that is supposed to just be footage of a 'rehearsal'? (I would be interested what the the family thinks about using stand ins for this is it REHEARSALS. They mentioned in the beginning that there are impersonators used in the movie, but they are not wondering about it when it was just LUCK and coincidence that they filmed the rehearsals and thought "oh right we could make a movie of it" like kenny said???) - And something more. Yesterday I saw on television that Michael's children, who were going somewhere with their grandmother, had a car accident while trying to avoid some paparazzi. But...judging from the pictures from the burial and not only, they had no problem with being photographed. Catherine let photographers take pictures of them. Question: why then were they trying to avoid the paparazzi a few days ago? What were they trying to hide? Or they may didn't want others to see their destination. So WHERE were they going to? - And I already one time had doubts about Paris' words at the memorial, as she did not address to her father. Would it not have been normal that she said ; I love you daddy, but instead she said : I love him so much. What a big difference !! Suppose your father died, what would you do. I m sure I would fix the casket allmost all the time, staring, with wet eyes. I did not see any of his children do that. She also said : daddy has been the best father..... Why did she not say : you have been... ?? Isn' that strange ?? - This is it movie on 25th november: Ok, I have returned from the movie. I sat there in total darkness until the very end. The Columbia Pictures sign came on, the screen showed nothing and then 3 seconds of what played last night came on. No pictures, only words. The Jacksons are in the recording studio and they are told that they sound like the Supremes. These are the words that were spoken tonight: you guys sound like the Supremes, you guys sound like the Supremes. And then nothing. ? Why was the rest cut out? If you have a movie, how can the movie be missing parts from each showing to showing? ? Especially in the same theater and the same frickin auditorium!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's bad enough that extra words are put in sometimes and a scene is inserted a few more times than others or if a scene isn't there at all, but why remove something at the end of the movie when the movie is over? ? And why did they leave those words in? I believe this scene was in the middle of the segment that I saw last night, so why the editing job? Is this a reference to Diana Ross? Are we now being given clues bit by bit at the end, the extreme end?
133
« on: December 08, 2009, 11:17:50 AM »
You sound like the Supremes...
1-You sound like women?
2-You sound like an old Motown act?
I cannot imagine where the line would have fit into TII. I'm in agreement. What balancing act? I am still stuck on watching the show because I am curious as to how long they will mourn as a lure to get people to watch. Face it, no one will really watch because of them. They don't draw people like that anymore. Fans of the hoax and those who believe Mj died will tune in to hear about references to MJ. I'm so not looking forward to watching them rehearse Jackson 5 songs without MJ. However, I will be glued to the tv searching for clues. Jermaine gave us a heads up about a surprise ending for the 6th and final segment. We shall see Jermaine, we shall see...lol.
A friend of mine on Youtube send me this link and i want to share it with you...
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
This will air Sunday December 13th 2009.
"The Jackson Family A Dynasty" This series will
chronicle the brothers' relationships with each other,
their parents and their children, while also balancing the
demands of their professional commitments and celebrity.
Enjoy
Call me cynical (I've been called worse), but when I watched Jackie say he missed Michael, I didn't see any tears. Everyone is different, but I just wasn't feelin' it. I backed it up and watched several times, and... well... I just didn't see any tears.
I read on a forum (I can't remember which one) that This Is It had a different ending on November 25th, that at the end someone said something like "You sound like the Supremes." I noticed on this clip that's what Tito says to his brothers who are in the booth. I don't know what it means that this would be at the end of This Is It. I wish I could remember which forum. It could have been MJHD or mkit... or maybe even this one.
It was supposedly, I guess, when the movie was thought to be over. I wish I could remember the forum.
134
« on: December 08, 2009, 02:23:55 AM »
A friend of mine on Youtube send me this link and i want to share it with you...
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or Login
This will air Sunday December 13th 2009.
"The Jackson Family A Dynasty" This series will
chronicle the brothers' relationships with each other,
their parents and their children, while also balancing the
demands of their professional commitments and celebrity.
Enjoy Call me cynical (I've been called worse), but when I watched Jackie say he missed Michael, I didn't see any tears. Everyone is different, but I just wasn't feelin' it. I backed it up and watched several times, and... well... I just didn't see any tears. I read on a forum (I can't remember which one) that This Is It had a different ending on November 25th, that at the end someone said something like "You sound like the Supremes." I noticed on this clip that's what Tito says to his brothers who are in the booth. I don't know what it means that this would be at the end of This Is It. I wish I could remember which forum. It could have been MJHD or mkit... or maybe even this one.
135
« on: December 07, 2009, 11:27:49 AM »
Hmm... to me, it doesn't sound like Michael.
|
Show Posts
