Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators
Hoax Investigation => The Death Certificate, The Autopsy Report & The Will => After June 25, 2009 => The Coroner and Autopsy Report => Topic started by: the arabian nights on April 18, 2010, 02:38:40 PM
-
{i admit i have not read the autopsy}
with all the talk of doubles and mike being alive
we are going to hear a lot during the trial - toxicology records, drug history {official] etc
but was it mike's brain tissue if not then who
what did the brain tissue establish?
-
its strange that we have no clues on this one
i welcome your thoughts
-
but did that even happen?? the brain thing? i dont see in the autopsy report where its even addressed...that has to be documented and the results discussed right?? so where is the info???
-
but did that even happen?? the brain thing? i dont see in the autopsy report where its even addressed...that has to be documented and the results discussed right?? so where is the info???
i thought they said that they had taken his brain out to do test samples?
-
Aparently, they made a macroscopical examination (visual description) of the Nervous Central System, included the Brain.
Then, the brain was sent to Neuropathology, were they selected areas to take the samples for the histological examination. Neuropathology states:
.Mild cerebral vascular congestion;
.Mild diffuse brain swelling without herniation syndrom;
.Mild basal ganglia calcification.
After that, the "Residual brain" was released to the mortuary on 07-08-09.
Brain tissue is not in the list of samples sent to Toxicology.
-
Aparently, they made a macroscopical examination (visual description) of the Nervous Central System, included the Brain.
Then, the brain was sent to Neuropathology, were they selected areas to take the samples for the histological examination. Neuropathology states:
.Mild cerebral vascular congestion;
.Mild diffuse brain swelling without herniation syndrom;
.Mild basal ganglia calcification.
After that, the "Residual brain" was released to the mortuary on 07-08-09.
Brain tissue is not in the list of samples sent to Toxicology.
so what does this mean??
-
mirandacnc, I think we should add to the list of things "rare."
At one time it said and now it appears in the report 8-)
-
Aparently, they made a macroscopical examination (visual description) of the Nervous Central System, included the Brain.
Then, the brain was sent to Neuropathology, were they selected areas to take the samples for the histological examination. Neuropathology states:
.Mild cerebral vascular congestion;
.Mild diffuse brain swelling without herniation syndrom;
.Mild basal ganglia calcification.
After that, the "Residual brain" was released to the mortuary on 07-08-09.
Brain tissue is not in the list of samples sent to Toxicology.
so what does this mean??
Sorry, I don't know what to say... I guess nothing by itself... I'm not sure why the OP requested info about brain tissue in particular. I just wanted to help him/her out, since not everyone wanted to read the report.
I did read the whole report and to be honest, I don't find it weird in its content nor the procedure, but it's just my opinion. I did search for my local Autopsy Protocols, and of course it's very similar.
I'm not able to state an opinion regarding its legal aspects, since they are very individual from place to place.
-
There is only one association to me:
who's brain has been taken out (and dissected) must 100% for sure have lost his mind.
(translates among others into: is not functional thus not dangerous anymore, became crazy, is out of way)
Oh and didn't we dissect his mind, intention, purpose, thoughts, potential implications, reasons why?
We did. We always asked for answers. We always got them so far, didn't we?
The coroner's report says: minor calcification.
It does not say: complete Parkinson symptoms.
To me the result translates into:
he does exactly know what he is doing and full master of his actions.
Nothing more nothing less.
-
they worked on someone?
-
the report was not a real true one.
if they worked on someone it may have been whoever.
maybe a donation body from UCLA.
maybe the double.
but the report was not a true one.