Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators
Hoax Investigation => General Hoax Investigation => Other Odd Things => Topic started by: reasonables+luvs+MJ on April 03, 2010, 05:15:05 PM
-
have you ever wondered why investigaters never used a lie detection test on anyone :?:
if they do, everyone would fail, esp. Jermaine! :lol: :lol:
-
have you ever wondered why investigaters never used a lie detection test on anyone :?:
if they do, everyone would fail, esp. Jermaine! :lol: :lol:
GOOD POINT!! they shud use a lie detecter test! and it wud be very useful even if he did die(which i RLY HOPE not ) cos we could get an actual story and what REALLY happened..u knw cos everybody has different versions and contradictions
-
I've always wondered that! :D It might be easier to get the truth out if they were hooked up to lie detectors. Especially La Toya, that would be funny. :lol:
-
Question: Mr. Jermaine Jackson, is your brother dead?
Jermaine: Yes.
Beeeeep beeeep beeeep beeeep :lol: :lol: :lol:
-
Question: Mr. Jermaine Jackson, is your brother dead?
Jermaine: Yes.
Beeeeep beeeep beeeep beeeep :lol: :lol: :lol:
lol :lol: :lol:
-
I think they should give them all a shot of truth syrum. That would definitely bring out the truth.
-
I dont think the family should be submitted to these tests, they have done nothing wrong. But I'm surprised they haven't used it on Murray, though. Does anyone know which are the standards or regulations to submit a suspect to a polygraph test? Good question, reasonables....
-
I dont think the family should be submitted to these tests, they have done nothing wrong. But I'm surprised they haven't used it on Murray, though. Does anyone know which are the standards or regulations to submit a suspect to a polygraph test? Good question, reasonables....
After watching the news for many months (and I still am), I never heard the words "lie detector" in the Michael Jackson case, but after listening to the Casey Case, they always talked about one, and that really ticked me off, big time! :evil:
-
as far as i know, a lie detector is used if accuser/defendant ask for it but the result cant be used in court in many countries as it is not 100% reliable. But i think it can be in some states in USA if both parties agreed to do the test (b4 knowing the result of course) ...(watching to many soaps...:)
i dont know how it s in California tho..somebody knows better?
as for the family, why should they pass a test? U were kidding right...well i guess so
-
as far as i know, a lie detector is used if accuser/defendant ask for it but the result cant be used in court in many countries as it is not 100% reliable. But i think it can be in some states in USA if both parties agreed to do the test (b4 knowing the result of course) ...(watching to many soaps...:)
i dont know how it s in California tho..somebody knows better?
as for the family, why should they pass a test? U were kidding right...well i guess so
No, PrettyYoung...Teletubby :lol: ,
I'm not kidding, because this has been going on for a long time, and none of the family members or the media are telling us the truth!...Janet :!: :roll: :!:
-
I think they should give them all a shot of truth syrum. That would definitely bring out the truth.
yeah :D
-
have you ever wondered why investigaters never used a lie detection test on anyone :?:
if they do, everyone would fail, esp. Jermaine! :lol: :lol:
They dont stand up in courts of law... i know they are not used in UK as are not reliable. Pretty sure this is the case for most parts of USA too.
-
Putting them on a lie detector would make for a great reality show. Much better and more entertaining than the present one.
-
have you ever wondered why investigaters never used a lie detection test on anyone :?:
if they do, everyone would fail, esp. Jermaine! :lol: :lol:
They dont stand up in courts of law... i know they are not used in UK as are not reliable. Pretty sure this is the case for most parts of USA too.
the Casey Antony case... :roll:
-
Those tests are not admitted in a court of law but when a person is screaming up and down, left and right till there blue in the face that they are innocent, as our famous CM is, often that person will ask for one just to prove their innocence. Even though they are not conclusive evidence they still influence prosecutors and investigators. So yeah it would be great if CM took one, but it dont mean we'd actually get the totally true version of the results, dont forget media chooses what they write and talk about and that is how they print their stories as well, they put their own personnal spin on things! :roll:
-
Those tests are not admitted in a court of law but when a person is screaming up and down, left and right till there blue in the face that they are innocent, as our famous CM is, often that person will ask for one just to prove their innocence. Even though they are not conclusive evidence they still influence prosecutors and investigators. So yeah it would be great if CM took one, but it dont mean we'd actually get the totally true version of the results, dont forget media chooses what they write and talk about and that is how they print their stories as well, they put their own personnal spin on things! :roll:
1, that was a lot of big words (I hate big words, sometimes) and 2, the media needs to read my post, use a lie detector test on anyone who is in on this hoax, and get the answer ASAP :roll:
-
Whether or not the results of a polygraph test are admissible in a court of law varies from state to state. In California, they are not admissible. They are known to be unreliable and they don't conclusively detect lies: they detect changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and respiration, all of which can be affected by many things. Yes, it is common that when a person lies those body functions are affected. But this can also be caused by simple nervousness that a lie might be detected even when one is telling the truth--and the nervousness alone makes them appear to be lying; this can also be caused by colds, headaches, other physical ailments, and neurological and muscular problems.
The polygraph can only detect changes in the heart rate, BP and respiration; it can't detect exactly what is causing those changes. It also happens that many people can pass a polygraph when they are indeed lying, so that's another reason why they are frequently inadmissible in a court of law.
-
Whether or not the results of a polygraph test are admissible in a court of law varies from state to state. In California, they are not admissible. They are known to be unreliable and they don't conclusively detect lies: they detect changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and respiration, all of which can be affected by many things. Yes, it is common that when a person lies those body functions are affected. But this can also be caused by simple nervousness that a lie might be detected even when one is telling the truth--and the nervousness alone makes them appear to be lying; this can also be caused by colds, headaches, other physical ailments, and neurological and muscular problems.
The polygraph can only detect changes in the heart rate, BP and respiration; it can't detect exactly what is causing those changes. It also happens that many people can pass a polygraph when they are indeed lying, so that's another reason why they are frequently inadmissible in a court of law.
Thank you for all this info on lie detector tests, very interesting stuff to know.