Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators

Latest News => Michael Jackson News => Topic started by: brendanjacskon on March 22, 2010, 05:14:59 AM

Title: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: brendanjacskon on March 22, 2010, 05:14:59 AM
FUNNY HEADING FOR THE REPORT ON THE LEAKED REPORT ON PEREZ HILTON'S WEBPAGE THIS MORNING!

http://perezhilton.com/2010-03-21-ambul ... ve#respond (http://perezhilton.com/2010-03-21-ambulance-report-leaked-could-michael-jackson-still-be-alive#respond)
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: Stranger In Chi-town on March 22, 2010, 07:22:31 AM
Whoa! I was just about to check Perezhilton this morning too.
Ruh-roh, lolllll :shock:  :lol:  :lol:  ;)  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: the arabian nights on March 22, 2010, 09:58:22 AM
yes the title and the content differ

maybe there were going to run with a different story

remember they thought it was a hoax
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: Lady J on March 22, 2010, 10:22:13 AM
Why the hell does no one from think he could be alive? I read their comments and they are all so sure he is dead  :cry: . But why would Perez take such a topic? He ain´t that stupid. Why would he do that? Is he making fun of us?  :twisted:
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: somekindofsign on March 22, 2010, 10:30:03 AM
One of the comments

Quote
queen_lara says

9Re: rosebud99 –
true. the hoaxers will think perez has inside information lol

 That easy! :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: MzInfo on March 22, 2010, 01:25:41 PM
Here's my issue with the whole ordeal: why is all this information just now coming out? How come this information wasn't released right after Michael supposedly died? All this doesn't make any sense. There's alot of inconsistences that proves that Michael is alive than him being no longer with us.

What about Janet lying about being in New York when she and Tyler Perry said that she was in Atlanta when she got the news about Michael?

What about Jermaine lying about Michael's face being disfigured when the doctor or whomever was administering CPR (which alot of us know that's a bunch of bull)?

And who gets buried at night?

I mean the list could go on and on and on and on. The reason for me posting this is because whenever there's a breakthrough in proving that Michael is alive something always comes up in the media. Why is that? :o  :o

Keep the faith people! Keep the faith.
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: the arabian nights on March 22, 2010, 01:32:51 PM
i think that it was but there were so many clues this just forgotten, plus pp think mikes alive

the cm trial is recent
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: alovesmichael on March 22, 2010, 01:40:11 PM
I think bringing these kind of things up earlier might have seemed disrespectful, considering that most people believe Michael has passed away. Perez did claim it was a media stunt before Michael's death was confirmed and was bashed for this. After almost 9 months the topic might not be considered as sensitive although I cry just by the thought of it. Really weird title of his post I must say but does not support that Michael is alive in any way and the post is even about how it could have been prevented. Depressing indeed  :(
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: the arabian nights on March 22, 2010, 01:42:19 PM
so why the headline does someone want to contact them?
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: BlessHisHeart on March 22, 2010, 02:30:11 PM
My thing is, why use that title if the article has NOTHING to do with it?????????? Is it to bring attention to the possibility for other people?
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: the arabian nights on March 22, 2010, 02:40:00 PM
to get some internet action from tmz :lol:
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: Raven on March 22, 2010, 02:41:20 PM
The title should have been "have been" instead of "be". Why it wasn't written like that is just weird for a native english speaker
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: Datroot on March 22, 2010, 02:43:28 PM
Quote from: "Raven"
The title should have been "have been" instead of "be". Why it wasn't written like that is just weird for a native english speaker

A play on words to make us sit up and take notice.
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: paula-c on March 22, 2010, 03:02:46 PM
Could the King of Pop have been saved by paramedics if they had known about the Propofol????




What I understand is that if the paramedics would have known that Murray gave propofol to Michael, maybe it would have saved. :mrgreen:
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: Jacksonology on March 24, 2010, 06:15:25 PM
Quote from: "paula-c"
Could the King of Pop have been saved by paramedics if they had known about the Propofol????




What I understand is that if the paramedics would have known that Murray gave propofol to Michael, maybe it would have saved. :mrgreen:
yeah, He meant it like if ''Dr'' Murray didn't withheld certain information ''Michael'' could of been treated accordingly, would He still be Alive??? That's what He meant.
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: whisper on March 25, 2010, 02:52:12 AM
Quote from: "paula-c"
Could the King of Pop have been saved by paramedics if they had known about the Propofol????




What I understand is that if the paramedics would have known that Murray gave propofol to Michael, maybe it would have saved. :mrgreen:

hmm. I don't see anything wrong with the title...This is my analysis from the title : COULD MICHAEL JACKSON  STILL BE ALIVE  IF Murray had told the paramedics about the propofol ?  ..And he probably intentionally used this title to drag more attention ..
Title: Re: COULD MICHAEL JACKSON STILL BE ALIVE ( PEREZHILTON )
Post by: Jacksonology on March 25, 2010, 12:12:32 PM
Quote from: "whisper"
Quote from: "paula-c"
Could the King of Pop have been saved by paramedics if they had known about the Propofol????




What I understand is that if the paramedics would have known that Murray gave propofol to Michael, maybe it would have saved. :mrgreen:

hmm. I don't see anything wrong with the title...This is my analysis from the title : COULD MICHAEL JACKSON  STILL BE ALIVE  IF Murray had told the paramedics about the propofol ?  ..And he probably intentionally used this title to drag more attention ..
Exactly. Damn you Perez! :lol:
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal