Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators

Latest News => Michael Jackson News => Topic started by: paula-c on March 14, 2010, 02:09:34 PM

Title: Alleged Murray interview
Post by: paula-c on March 14, 2010, 02:09:34 PM
Make the title "claimed" that the journalist who published it said that was almost 2 hours with Murray, and what it publishes is a narrative, I would say it has nothing to do with an actual interview. If I were a journalist and I have the opportunity to interview Murray, rest assured it would not publish a thing. 8-)
                                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                     
This is the link:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and- ... pegoat-me/ (http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-08-19/jacksons-last-man-standing-dr-conrad-murray-dont-scapegoat-me/)
Title: Re: Alleged Murray interview
Post by: DancingTheDream on March 14, 2010, 03:03:31 PM
Dr Murray insists he isnt "money orientated".. pffff  :roll:
Title: Re: Alleged Murray interview
Post by: deepu priyanka on March 14, 2010, 04:32:16 PM
MURRAY IS A SCAPEGOAT N THERE IS NO DOUBT IT..... INSTEAD OF PROVING HIS INNOCENCE N GOING TROUGH ROUGH  TIMES CANT HE SAY THAT THIS IS A HOAX  N MJ IS ALIVE.
Title: Re: Alleged Murray interview
Post by: PrettyYoungTeletubby on March 14, 2010, 05:33:58 PM
Quote from: "paula-c"
Make the title "claimed" that the journalist who published it said that was almost 2 hours with Murray, and what it publishes is a narrative, I would say it has nothing to do with an actual interview. If I were a journalist and I have the opportunity to interview Murray, rest assured it would not publish a thing                                                        


well it is an interview, only not presented on the question-answer form. Writing it that way gives him opportunity to describe the person, the place and add personal comments. Maybe he chose that narrative form also cause the answers of murray werent that interesting...

But it s dated from 19th august...anyway thx for sharing, didnt see it b4
Title: Re: Alleged Murray interview
Post by: DancingTheDream on March 14, 2010, 05:39:14 PM
Quote from: "paula-c"
Make the title "claimed" that the journalist who published it said that was almost 2 hours with Murray, and what it publishes is a narrative, I would say it has nothing to do with an actual interview. If I were a journalist and I have the opportunity to interview Murray, rest assured it would not publish a thing. 8-)
                                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                     
This is the link:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and- ... pegoat-me/ (http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-08-19/jacksons-last-man-standing-dr-conrad-murray-dont-scapegoat-me/)

If you were a journalist and had an opportunity to interview Murray and then you chose not to publish it.. you wouldnt be a very good journalist.   :lol:
Title: Re: Alleged Murray interview
Post by: paula-c on March 14, 2010, 06:34:38 PM
DancingTheDream No, I mean that in 2 hours they said the journalist who was with Murray, I instead published an interview with many questions and answers. ;)
Title: Re: Alleged Murray interview
Post by: mjssoulmate on March 14, 2010, 06:41:23 PM
Horrible attempt at making Murray look "human".  Why on earth would his attorney allow any interview at all?  Only interesting quote:  "The press is mostly interested in bad news and gossip".
Title: Re: Alleged Murray interview
Post by: DancingTheDream on March 14, 2010, 06:54:11 PM
Quote from: "paula-c"
DancingTheDream No, I mean that in 2 hours they said the journalist who was with Murray, I instead published an interview with many questions and answers. ;)

Ah ok.. i understand now   ((hugs))
Title: Re: Alleged Murray interview
Post by: QuirkyDiana on March 14, 2010, 07:09:10 PM
I saw this interview ages ago and used a comment from the bottom of the article that an anaesthetist wrote. All i have to say is that everyone knows Murray has lied already! It doesn't matter if his account to police turns out to be true (although we know he is confused about the timeline of events), he lied to paramedics and medical staff - that is a red flag. Here he is trying to lie again. Amazing.
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal