Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators
Hoax Theories => References & Similarities => Topic started by: bec on November 29, 2009, 01:31:13 PM
-
To protect them.
Common sense and logic, it will lead you to the truth.
Under California law, DNA is irrelevant when it comes to questioning parentage IF the child was born into a marraige AND the parents names are entered on the birth certificate AND the parentage is not challenged for 3 years.
So, many rumors are flying that Prince and Paris are not bio-kids to MJ, right? Blanket on the other hand, most believe is MJs bio-kid.
Here, i'll break it down slowly.
Rumors are flying following MJs "death". These rumors would be easily foreseen following the death of MJ, as he is MJ, and his life was shrouded in one big rumor and ugly press, it only stands to reason that the gossip would intensify following his passing. The kids and their parentage are an obvious topic of debate, considering their complexion and the secrecy surrounding them. It's a no-brainer that they would be the subject of speculation and rumor, right? The very reason MJ protected them their whole lives by concealing their identities.
So, a couple weeks before 6/25, Paris and Prince are seen in public for the very first time unmasked.
WHY???
Well, if you follow logic and common sense and look at state law, the reason is obvious.
Because Paris and Prince were unmasked shortly before 6/25 we KNOW they are the MJ kids, under the definition of California law. They were born to Debbie Rowe while she was married to MJ, his name is on the BC, and they are obviously living with MJ as his children, thanks to the pic we have from early June, no one would (or has) contested these facts.
If anyone comes forward now and claims parentage by DNA, and it MATCHES.... well too bad, under CA law, the time for contesting parentage has run out years ago and it cannot be challenged in court. It is too late by 8 years or so. They were born to a married couple, MJ is on the BC, and the kids have lived with MJ as their father from birth. CA law prevents anyone, even a bio-parent, not listed on the BC, from coming forward and gaining custody.
IF, however, we had not seen these kids unmasked in early June, one or both of their bio fathers could come forward and try to take them away claiming DNA match AND making some crazy claim that the kid(s) never lived with MJ at all and the claim that MJ acted as parent all these years to this particular kid (Paris or Prince or both) is a lie.
In other words, if MJ wasn't seen with them recently, it could be argued in court that Paris and Prince are not the same little kids seen in old home movies or family photos, and with a DNA match, someone could make a legal argument for taking them away, totally within CA law.
But those unmasked pics from early June make this imposible, within the stipulation of the state law, regardless of DNA.
Got all that? Hopefully. Because it shows extreme forethought and the great painS Michael went through to ensure all this was done within legal guidelines ahead of time. All the i's were dotted, all the t's crossed, perfection, right down to the legal framework of the plan.
Brilliant, and logical. Common sense, it will lead us to the truth.
(Originally posted 8-11-09, copied from MJKit because I think it is an important bit of information that centers us back to common sense, logic, and legality.... all things we MUST remain focused on in order to not get distracted by fluff and the obscure. The further we stray from Real Life, the more we risk letting the TRUTH slip between our fingers.)
-
thanks for that info,and maybe now people will realise that mj has not broken any laws during this fake death
-
I remember reading this topic by you months ago and yes it is very plausible common sense gets you far. Very good post! :D
-
All very well planned isn't it?
-
He is a genius in every sence of the word and I will always support him in all he shows us King of Pop doesnt begin to cover his accomplishments in this world I am proud to share oxygen with this man!!
-
Thanks for posting
-
Thanks for posting, that is a very good point
-
Thank you for that information. It makes a lot of sense.
-
Whoever copied and posted this onto another forum today did so without my permission and Admin has been contacted and steps will be taken to correct this theft. You STOLE my work. I don't find it funny or flattering. I did not compose and post this or any other piece of work for it to be STOLEN from me by people who don't bother to do any research or partake in any thought process beyond click and drag.
I'm serious and I ain't playing. Delete it from that other forum now before Admin has to do it for you.
-
This is really good, did you write it? Can I post it too my blog so people who arent members of this site can read it? I will give you FULL credit of corse. I would never take your work like the person who youre talking about in the above post did.
-
Thanks to a consciencous mod on the other forum where my work was posted without my permission, the situation has been corrected. Thank you to username "klhayes".
Diana Jean, you can add this to your blog if you include the link to this thread and credit me. Thanks for asking.
Yes, I wrote the piece. It is original work from 8-11-09 posted on MJkit forum.
-
Thanks to a consciencous mod on the other forum where my work was posted without my permission, the situation has been corrected. Thank you to username "klhayes".
Diana Jean, you can add this to your blog if you include the link to this thread and credit me. Thanks for asking.
Yes, I wrote the piece. It is original work from 8-11-09 posted on MJkit forum.
Of corse, and if there is a link too a blog of yours or maybe your twitter you would like me to include just send me the link.
-
My baby is a genius and I love him so much 8-)
-
Makes sense, thanks!
-
You definitely have a point there! :)
-
sometimes also the best protection :!: for someone is to be
IN PLAIN SIGHT :!:
-
So based on your research could Blanket's parentage be challenged?
-
I really don't like discussing paternity but I'll say I believe Blanket to be safe from any potential paternity challenges.
-
He is a genius in every sence of the word and I will always support him in all he shows us King of Pop doesnt begin to cover his accomplishments in this world I am proud to share oxygen with this man!!
Well said! Thats exactely what i wanted to say, he is a genius and Im so proud to breath the same air with him! and be part of this story!
Michael is the best from the best!
Love forever!
K.
-
Thanks for this info! Great job bec! :)
-
Even if the public hadn't seen a lot of his kids recently wouldn't his family and friends have? And his staff? If there ever was a question of parentage wouldn't the courts just have to bring in everyone who has been involved with him to confirm they are indeed his children? He may not have been seen in public with them but , in private, he was seen every day with them their whole lives. And he videotaped and photographed extensively so I would imagine there is tons of footage of them growing up in his care.
-
You would think that more care would have gone into everything else - there have been so many mistakes in this hoax so far - why be meticulous in one aspect of the hoax and not others? This bothers me a bit and I believe 100% he's alive.
-
You would think that more care would have gone into everything else - there have been so many mistakes in this hoax so far - why be meticulous in one aspect of the hoax and not others? This bothers me a bit and I believe 100% he's alive.
I would hesitate before assuming anything is other then precisely planned.
But... I think we can safely assume that the children's safety and welfare were of utmost priority.
-
You know the old saying.....'Never Assume'..........
:lol:
-
You know the old saying.....'Never Assume'..........
:lol:
You assumed.
-
You know the old saying.....'Never Assume'..........
:lol:
You assumed.
Isn't that what everyone else is doing, including yourself? No-one knows for sure what really happened and that is why we are all here, sharing our thoughts - if you want to be pedantic - so be it. For what its worth, I'll carry on assuming so there.