Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators

Latest News => TMZ.com => Michael Jackson News => TMZ Articles => Topic started by: SEHF on April 19, 2014, 02:12:03 PM

Title: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: SEHF on April 19, 2014, 02:12:03 PM
Tito Jackson
Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Would Be Nothing
Without Jackson 5
(http://www.tmz.com/2014/04/19/tito-jackson-michael-jackson-jermaine-jackson-5-debbie-rowe-guardianship/)

4/19/2014 1:02 AM PDT BY TMZ STAFF

EXCLUSIVE

(http://ll-media.tmz.com/2014/04/19/041914-tito-jackson-launch-3.jpg)
Watch da video here yo: http://www.tmz.com/2014/04/19/tito-jackson-michael-jackson-jermaine-jackson-5-debbie-rowe-guardianship

Tito Jackson calmly and coolly defended his brother Jermaine, who told TMZ earlier in the week, "If it wasn't for the Jackson 5, there would be no Michael Jackson."

Tito told our photog in Calabasas Friday ... Jermaine was misunderstood, and he explains why.

Tito also bristled at Debbie Rowe's comment to us ... the Jackson 4 are all bad influences on Michael's kids.

TMZ broke the story ... Debbie intends to seek guardianship of Paris and Prince -- her biological kids -- and would also like to bring Blanket along for the ride, because she believes the current guardianship is damaging all 3 children.

Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: suspicious mind on April 19, 2014, 10:10:53 PM
perhaps what he meant was it should have been me.  :Pulling_hair:
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: blankie on April 20, 2014, 02:33:39 PM
Everyone knows perfectly well that it is the exact opposite...  :icon_razz:  maybe the Jackson really want to anger Michael and provoke his  reaction....   :michael-jackson: :icon_rr:
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: Starchild on April 20, 2014, 06:59:08 PM
I tend to agree with what Tito says in the video above (http://www.tmz.com/2014/04/19/tito-jackson-michael-jackson-jermaine-jackson-5-debbie-rowe-guardianship (http://www.tmz.com/2014/04/19/tito-jackson-michael-jackson-jermaine-jackson-5-debbie-rowe-guardianship)), that “it’s gettin’ to be a little twisted :icon_twisted: from his [Jermaine’s] meaning.”                           

Also notice in the video above what Tito—i.e., not just “a source” this time but Tito himself—said about Debbie Rowe allegedly seeking guardianship: “you know, that whole thing, I’m not familiar with it at all. . . . I don’t know anything about it.” That said, as mentioned last week in a thread now long forgotten (
http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,24499.msg450362.html#msg450362 (http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,24499.msg450362.html#msg450362) ), the following is again noteworthy:

Quote
In the article above, “Jackson Brothers - Debbie Rowe Already Abandoned Her Kids Once,” it states “Tito, Randy, Jermaine, and Jackie tell us, '[The children] are well loved and well taken care of. We are quite taken back [sic] that Ms. Rowe has decided now to enter their lives, after she abandoned her children many years ago for money.'" All of them spoke to TMZ about this? If memory serves me, this and other statements in the article may have been general statements made by one or two of the brothers years ago, in the months following 6/25/09 (when Debbie was first connecting with the children) (?), not statements recently given to TMZ regarding current stories.

All the recent stories TMZ has posted about the Jacksons and/or the Jacksons versus Debbie Rowe seem “twisted” upon closer inspection. TMZ is doing a good job: :ghsdf:
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: sweetsunsetwithMJ on April 22, 2014, 12:44:57 PM
All these TMZ articles about Jackson family are just baloney, MJ uses them to refill the time he needs for whatever behind the scenes.
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: Do on April 22, 2014, 05:11:36 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
All these TMZ articles about Jackson family are just baloney, MJ uses them to refill the time he needs for whatever behind the scenes.

Sweet, I have to ask you this again: how do you know for sure Michael is still alive and that all this 'balony' is used by him to prolong the hoax because of whatever is happening behind the scenes?? Is it because of frontback on twitter or something you experienced during your visit in the USA? I would hate to see you get hurt again...
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: marumjj on April 22, 2014, 06:19:44 PM
I'm not so sure, I do not think an attitude of MJ. Using the family to "fill"?. Regarding the comment of Jermaine, I think Michael "glow" from the beginning. In fact the only one that took his career to the top, was Michael.
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: MJonmind on April 23, 2014, 12:43:51 AM
Yes, and the other brothers just came along for the exciting ride!
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: Starchild on April 23, 2014, 02:49:55 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
All these TMZ articles about Jackson family are just baloney, MJ uses them to refill the time he needs for whatever behind the scenes.

Sweet, I have to ask you this again: how do you know for sure Michael is still alive and that all this 'balony' is used by him to prolong the hoax because of whatever is happening behind the scenes?? Is it because of frontback on twitter or something you experienced during your visit in the USA? I would hate to see you get hurt again...

Good question. If there is a hoax, it seems likely that TMZ is in on it, which of course has been discussed in-depth on the forum (e.g., the way TMZ reported the “death” on 6/25/09 hours before any official announcement was made and before any major media outlet, and plus there are the things Harvey Levine [head of TMZ, for those unfamiliar] has said on-camera in the past years [e.g., the “if Michael were dead” comment, and so on]). However, outside of possibly being part of or in on a MJ hoax, TMZ is basically a tabloid, in the business of fabricating celebrity news for the purpose of $elling sensational gossip and potential slander to interested readers. Recent stories about the Jacksons and/or Debbie Rowe versus the Jacksons seem more like tabloid news as opposed to hoax news.Thoughts?
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: suspicious mind on April 23, 2014, 01:52:28 PM
i'm a man that stays on this side of calabasas  :icon_e_confused:huh?
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: applehead250609 on April 23, 2014, 03:44:40 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
perhaps what he meant was it should have been me.  :Pulling_hair:

My choice ( in a Kennedy way, ofcourse  :icon_e_wink: :icon_e_biggrin: ) would be this:

Quote
“I thought it would be me.”
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: sweetsunsetwithMJ on April 23, 2014, 05:19:09 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I'm not so sure, I do not think an attitude of MJ. Using the family to "fill"?. Regarding the comment of Jermaine, I think Michael "glow" from the beginning. In fact the only one that took his career to the top, was Michael.

Marum did you forget to put on the "MICHAEL WOULD NEVER" t-shirt?  :icon_rolleyes:
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: sweetsunsetwithMJ on April 23, 2014, 05:22:31 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
All these TMZ articles about Jackson family are just baloney, MJ uses them to refill the time he needs for whatever behind the scenes.

Sweet, I have to ask you this again: how do you know for sure Michael is still alive and that all this 'balony' is used by him to prolong the hoax because of whatever is happening behind the scenes?? Is it because of frontback on twitter or something you experienced during your visit in the USA? I would hate to see you get hurt again...

Don't worry about me I won't be hurt cause there is nothing to be hurt about, I just KNOW
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: scorpionchik on April 27, 2014, 11:40:58 PM
I don't think we misunderstood Jermaine because had made similar comments not once in the past. He had been jealous of Michael always. He is one in general. He also was jealous of his little brother marrying his ex wife.
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: sweetsunsetwithMJ on April 28, 2014, 08:30:44 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't think we misunderstood Jermaine because had made similar comments not once in the past. He had been jealous of Michael always. He is one in general. He also was jealous of his little brother marrying his ex wife.

There are no problems among Jackson family, Michael likes controversy and his family follow his instructions, in return they are earning a lot of money cause they are under the spotlight.
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: suspicious mind on April 28, 2014, 10:41:08 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't think we misunderstood Jermaine because had made similar comments not once in the past. He had been jealous of Michael always. He is one in general. He also was jealous of his little brother marrying his ex wife.

There are no problems among Jackson family, Michael likes controversy and his family follow his instructions, in return they are earning a lot of money cause they are under the spotlight.

guess there is always the possibility you are correct. i wonder though if that wouldn't make them either remarkably good or remarkably evil. just sayin"
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: Starchild on April 28, 2014, 12:33:17 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't think we misunderstood Jermaine because had made similar comments not once in the past. He had been jealous of Michael always. He is one in general. He also was jealous of his little brother marrying his ex wife.

There are no problems among Jackson family, Michael likes controversy and his family follow his instructions, in return they are earning a lot of money cause they are under the spotlight.

guess there is always the possibility you are correct. i wonder though if that wouldn't make them either remarkably good or remarkably evil. just sayin"

Interesting perspective: "remarkably good [actors?] or remarkably evil [do you mean for the love of money?]"
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: whatyourheartsays on April 28, 2014, 03:38:40 PM
40 years ago, my grandma knitted a blanket that looks exactly like Tito's jacket. That's quite disturbing.

*don't have much interesting things to say about this topic. Is there anything stupid that was said by someone else than Jermaine, anyway ? Slippy-Lips opens it all the time and we just need to figure out if it's for the best or not.*

Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: suspicious mind on April 28, 2014, 11:09:49 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't think we misunderstood Jermaine because had made similar comments not once in the past. He had been jealous of Michael always. He is one in general. He also was jealous of his little brother marrying his ex wife.

There are no problems among Jackson family, Michael likes controversy and his family follow his instructions, in return they are earning a lot of money cause they are under the spotlight.

guess there is always the possibility you are correct. i wonder though if that wouldn't make them either remarkably good or remarkably evil. just sayin"

Interesting perspective: "remarkably good [actors?] or remarkably evil [do you mean for the love of money?]"

i guess by the remarkably good it just goes against human nature for there to be NO problems within the family. and the remarkably evil goes into thinking that this would all be planned deception if they are all working with michael to carry out what ever this is especially  if it has been goin on for a while. and if it would be just for money that would be worse , at least for me. i don't know if i have explained myself well.
by the way sweet . what you have said about the family making money because he had put them in the spotlight, it seems i read something on the other forum that was posted and it mentioned something like this.
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: curls on April 29, 2014, 01:59:33 AM
I would be very surprised if members of a family that large hadn't had their fair share of 'problems' over the years, that's just life and human nature, but airing them to TMZ ... that's just stupid (if they are just casual unplanned comments) or pathetic (if planned, to keep in the news). Or, if it's all part of MJ's 'script' ... well, has he lost the plot? I certainly have!  Since when was trashing the family's reputation part of the hoax? Have you read how hated they are on other forums?  If it's all a big joke, 'let's see how much BS they'll believe about us', then I'm sorry, but I find that rather disturbing.
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: suspicious mind on April 29, 2014, 08:01:32 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't think we misunderstood Jermaine because had made similar comments not once in the past. He had been jealous of Michael always. He is one in general. He also was jealous of his little brother marrying his ex wife.

There are no problems among Jackson family, Michael likes controversy and his family follow his instructions, in return they are earning a lot of money cause they are under the spotlight.

guess there is always the possibility you are correct. i wonder though if that wouldn't make them either remarkably good or remarkably evil. just sayin"

Interesting perspective: "remarkably good [actors?] or remarkably evil [do you mean for the love of money?]"

i guess by the remarkably good it just goes against human nature for there to be NO problems within the family. and the remarkably evil goes into thinking that this would all be planned deception if they are all working with michael to carry out what ever this is especially  if it has been goin on for a while. and if it would be just for money that would be worse , at least for me. i don't know if i have explained myself well.
by the way sweet . what you have said about the family making money because he had put them in the spotlight, it seems i read something on the other forum that was posted and it mentioned something like this.
http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxdeath.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=73&t=19893
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: sweetsunsetwithMJ on April 29, 2014, 08:15:04 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't think we misunderstood Jermaine because had made similar comments not once in the past. He had been jealous of Michael always. He is one in general. He also was jealous of his little brother marrying his ex wife.

There are no problems among Jackson family, Michael likes controversy and his family follow his instructions, in return they are earning a lot of money cause they are under the spotlight.

guess there is always the possibility you are correct. i wonder though if that wouldn't make them either remarkably good or remarkably evil. just sayin"

Remarkably good because the most important for them is that person with their same blood.....the opinion of the rest of the world is a lesser evil if the Grand plan is gonna be successful.....people will understand in the end and will forgive if there is something to forgive.
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: sweetsunsetwithMJ on April 29, 2014, 08:23:13 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't think we misunderstood Jermaine because had made similar comments not once in the past. He had been jealous of Michael always. He is one in general. He also was jealous of his little brother marrying his ex wife.

There are no problems among Jackson family, Michael likes controversy and his family follow his instructions, in return they are earning a lot of money cause they are under the spotlight.

guess there is always the possibility you are correct. i wonder though if that wouldn't make them either remarkably good or remarkably evil. just sayin"

Interesting perspective: "remarkably good [actors?] or remarkably evil [do you mean for the love of money?]"

i guess by the remarkably good it just goes against human nature for there to be NO problems within the family. and the remarkably evil goes into thinking that this would all be planned deception if they are all working with michael to carry out what ever this is especially  if it has been goin on for a while. and if it would be just for money that would be worse , at least for me. i don't know if i have explained myself well.
by the way sweet . what you have said about the family making money because he had put them in the spotlight, it seems i read something on the other forum that was posted and it mentioned something like this.

Jackson family is helping Michael to pull this hoax off, if they are making money meanwhile what's wrong in that?
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: Do on April 29, 2014, 09:05:19 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't think we misunderstood Jermaine because had made similar comments not once in the past. He had been jealous of Michael always. He is one in general. He also was jealous of his little brother marrying his ex wife.

There are no problems among Jackson family, Michael likes controversy and his family follow his instructions, in return they are earning a lot of money cause they are under the spotlight.

guess there is always the possibility you are correct. i wonder though if that wouldn't make them either remarkably good or remarkably evil. just sayin"

Interesting perspective: "remarkably good [actors?] or remarkably evil [do you mean for the love of money?]"

i guess by the remarkably good it just goes against human nature for there to be NO problems within the family. and the remarkably evil goes into thinking that this would all be planned deception if they are all working with michael to carry out what ever this is especially  if it has been goin on for a while. and if it would be just for money that would be worse , at least for me. i don't know if i have explained myself well.
by the way sweet . what you have said about the family making money because he had put them in the spotlight, it seems i read something on the other forum that was posted and it mentioned something like this.

Jackson family is helping Michael to pull this hoax off, if they are making money meanwhile what's wrong in that?

I've said this before, to me that's fraud.
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: suspicious mind on April 29, 2014, 09:23:27 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't think we misunderstood Jermaine because had made similar comments not once in the past. He had been jealous of Michael always. He is one in general. He also was jealous of his little brother marrying his ex wife.

There are no problems among Jackson family, Michael likes controversy and his family follow his instructions, in return they are earning a lot of money cause they are under the spotlight.

guess there is always the possibility you are correct. i wonder though if that wouldn't make them either remarkably good or remarkably evil. just sayin"

Remarkably good because the most important for them is that person with their same blood.....the opinion of the rest of the world is a lesser evil if the Grand plan is gonna be successful.....people will understand in the end and will forgive if there is something to forgive.
controversy for a cause or controversy for the sake of controversy?  i can see stirring a bit of sh** to make people think and talk and perhaps make changes but be it for sport to my way of thinking that would make you as reba would say a little "tetched in the head"  :Pulling_hair:


that said there is one thought that has occurred to me of late. you could get it right in 4 years and still have a 5 year plan and "see you in july"  :icon_e_wink: :icon_lol:
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: sweetsunsetwithMJ on April 29, 2014, 03:03:48 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't think we misunderstood Jermaine because had made similar comments not once in the past. He had been jealous of Michael always. He is one in general. He also was jealous of his little brother marrying his ex wife.

There are no problems among Jackson family, Michael likes controversy and his family follow his instructions, in return they are earning a lot of money cause they are under the spotlight.

guess there is always the possibility you are correct. i wonder though if that wouldn't make them either remarkably good or remarkably evil. just sayin"

Interesting perspective: "remarkably good [actors?] or remarkably evil [do you mean for the love of money?]"

i guess by the remarkably good it just goes against human nature for there to be NO problems within the family. and the remarkably evil goes into thinking that this would all be planned deception if they are all working with michael to carry out what ever this is especially  if it has been goin on for a while. and if it would be just for money that would be worse , at least for me. i don't know if i have explained myself well.
by the way sweet . what you have said about the family making money because he had put them in the spotlight, it seems i read something on the other forum that was posted and it mentioned something like this.

Jackson family is helping Michael to pull this hoax off, if they are making money meanwhile what's wrong in that?

I've said this before, to me that's fraud.

Are you kidding me? Sanctification of the Popes are a fraud to me spending buckets of money while children are starving in Africa, let Jackson family play media, the more money they earn the less children will die.
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: sweetsunsetwithMJ on April 29, 2014, 03:11:27 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't think we misunderstood Jermaine because had made similar comments not once in the past. He had been jealous of Michael always. He is one in general. He also was jealous of his little brother marrying his ex wife.

There are no problems among Jackson family, Michael likes controversy and his family follow his instructions, in return they are earning a lot of money cause they are under the spotlight.

guess there is always the possibility you are correct. i wonder though if that wouldn't make them either remarkably good or remarkably evil. just sayin"

Remarkably good because the most important for them is that person with their same blood.....the opinion of the rest of the world is a lesser evil if the Grand plan is gonna be successful.....people will understand in the end and will forgive if there is something to forgive.
controversy for a cause or controversy for the sake of controversy?  i can see stirring a bit of sh** to make people think and talk and perhaps make changes but be it for sport to my way of thinking that would make you as reba would say a little "tetched in the head"  :Pulling_hair:


that said there is one thought that has occurred to me of late. you could get it right in 4 years and still have a 5 year plan and "see you in july"  :icon_e_wink: :icon_lol:

The former.
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: curls on April 29, 2014, 04:24:41 PM
Controversy for a cause eh?  I wonder what that cause can be.  Teaching a lesson?  Proving a point?  IDK.
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: suspicious mind on April 29, 2014, 09:18:08 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't think we misunderstood Jermaine because had made similar comments not once in the past. He had been jealous of Michael always. He is one in general. He also was jealous of his little brother marrying his ex wife.

There are no problems among Jackson family, Michael likes controversy and his family follow his instructions, in return they are earning a lot of money cause they are under the spotlight.

guess there is always the possibility you are correct. i wonder though if that wouldn't make them either remarkably good or remarkably evil. just sayin"

Interesting perspective: "remarkably good [actors?] or remarkably evil [do you mean for the love of money?]"

i guess by the remarkably good it just goes against human nature for there to be NO problems within the family. and the remarkably evil goes into thinking that this would all be planned deception if they are all working with michael to carry out what ever this is especially  if it has been goin on for a while. and if it would be just for money that would be worse , at least for me. i don't know if i have explained myself well.
by the way sweet . what you have said about the family making money because he had put them in the spotlight, it seems i read something on the other forum that was posted and it mentioned something like this.

Jackson family is helping Michael to pull this hoax off, if they are making money meanwhile what's wrong in that?

I've said this before, to me that's fraud.

Are you kidding me? Sanctification of the Popes are a fraud to me spending buckets of money while children are starving in Africa, let Jackson family play media, the more money they earn the less children will die.
huh?  :icon_e_confused:
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: whatyourheartsays on May 07, 2014, 05:30:33 PM
I don't wish to rain on the party, but i truly think that grown up adults in a family that has so many issues and argues and trials and contracts and God knows whatelse including money, DO HAVE words about each others. I believe Jermaine could say so about MJ, and i believe MJ could say so about his family. I don't say i'm right or wrong, i just see what this people "do", the way the act, and sometime, i don't see any LOVE. So how could this be part of the Hoax... I don't mean they hate each other. I just say everything is not black or white (lol)

We don't know who may be in the know, and in what way. Anyway, being in the know surely may not change what people think deep inside. Maybe Jermaine knows MJ is alive, yet he thinks MJ would have been nothing without the J5. He may be part of the hoax as a character, under a contract signed with MJ.

Such deal wouldn't include the lines "Jermaine must kiss my *** in every words he says about me"

Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: sweetsunsetwithMJ on May 08, 2014, 09:16:36 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't wish to rain on the party, but i truly think that grown up adults in a family that has so many issues and argues and trials and contracts and God knows whatelse including money, DO HAVE words about each others. I believe Jermaine could say so about MJ, and i believe MJ could say so about his family. I don't say i'm right or wrong, i just see what this people "do", the way the act, and sometime, i don't see any LOVE. So how could this be part of the Hoax... I don't mean they hate each other. I just say everything is not black or white (lol)

We don't know who may be in the know, and in what way. Anyway, being in the know surely may not change what people think deep inside. Maybe Jermaine knows MJ is alive, yet he thinks MJ would have been nothing without the J5. He may be part of the hoax as a character, under a contract signed with MJ.

Such deal wouldn't include the lines "Jermaine must kiss my *** in every words he says about me"

Jackson family love and support each other, Michael is playing with the media, don't believe anything they say, Jackson family are playing a role in Michael's hoax, they like controversy to be under the spotlight, all Jackson family members know MJ is alive, time will tell.
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: suspicious mind on May 08, 2014, 11:36:08 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't wish to rain on the party, but i truly think that grown up adults in a family that has so many issues and argues and trials and contracts and God knows whatelse including money, DO HAVE words about each others. I believe Jermaine could say so about MJ, and i believe MJ could say so about his family. I don't say i'm right or wrong, i just see what this people "do", the way the act, and sometime, i don't see any LOVE. So how could this be part of the Hoax... I don't mean they hate each other. I just say everything is not black or white (lol)

We don't know who may be in the know, and in what way. Anyway, being in the know surely may not change what people think deep inside. Maybe Jermaine knows MJ is alive, yet he thinks MJ would have been nothing without the J5. He may be part of the hoax as a character, under a contract signed with MJ.

Such deal wouldn't include the lines "Jermaine must kiss my *** in every words he says about me"

Jackson family love and support each other, Michael is playing with the media, don't believe anything they say, Jackson family are playing a role in Michael's hoax, they like controversy to be under the spotlight, all Jackson family members know MJ is alive, time will tell.


for the most part i feel like you are dreaming. but there is one exception that i can not get past . that is the video of the rock and roll hall of fame induction. well maybe even more, seems anytime they are performing together, but then again they are performing , so i just don't know.   :penguin:
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: Andrea on May 08, 2014, 12:46:06 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't wish to rain on the party, but i truly think that grown up adults in a family that has so many issues and argues and trials and contracts and God knows whatelse including money, DO HAVE words about each others. I believe Jermaine could say so about MJ, and i believe MJ could say so about his family. I don't say i'm right or wrong, i just see what this people "do", the way the act, and sometime, i don't see any LOVE. So how could this be part of the Hoax... I don't mean they hate each other. I just say everything is not black or white (lol)

We don't know who may be in the know, and in what way. Anyway, being in the know surely may not change what people think deep inside. Maybe Jermaine knows MJ is alive, yet he thinks MJ would have been nothing without the J5. He may be part of the hoax as a character, under a contract signed with MJ.

Such deal wouldn't include the lines "Jermaine must kiss my *** in every words he says about me"

Jackson family love and support each other, Michael is playing with the media, don't believe anything they say, Jackson family are playing a role in Michael's hoax, they like controversy to be under the spotlight, all Jackson family members know MJ is alive, time will tell.


I agree.  My thoughts on this are that as long as the world believes the Jackson family is divided and fighting, then the world will underestimate them and therefore indirectly underestimate MJ.  Makes the hoax work for as long as it has because if everyone thought they had a big secret, I imagine it wouldn't take very long to figure out what that big secret is. The Jackson family being seen as weak works to their advantage, to MJ's advantage.
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: applehead250609 on May 11, 2014, 01:19:35 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't wish to rain on the party, but i truly think that grown up adults in a family that has so many issues and argues and trials and contracts and God knows whatelse including money, DO HAVE words about each others. I believe Jermaine could say so about MJ, and i believe MJ could say so about his family. I don't say i'm right or wrong, i just see what this people "do", the way the act, and sometime, i don't see any LOVE. So how could this be part of the Hoax... I don't mean they hate each other. I just say everything is not black or white (lol)

We don't know who may be in the know, and in what way. Anyway, being in the know surely may not change what people think deep inside. Maybe Jermaine knows MJ is alive, yet he thinks MJ would have been nothing without the J5. He may be part of the hoax as a character, under a contract signed with MJ.

Such deal wouldn't include the lines "Jermaine must kiss my *** in every words he says about me"

Jackson family love and support each other, Michael is playing with the media, don't believe anything they say, Jackson family are playing a role in Michael's hoax, they like controversy to be under the spotlight, all Jackson family members know MJ is alive, time will tell.


for the most part i feel like you are dreaming. but there is one exception that i can not get past . that is the video of the rock and roll hall of fame induction. well maybe even more, seems anytime they are performing together, but then again they are performing , so i just don't know.   :penguin:

.....yeah ,a really great "performance"......."performed" really great by this family "performers" lol   :icon_lol:  :icon_lol: :icon_e_wink: !!!!

(http://blog.cleveland.com/pdextra/2009/06/large_michael-jackson-berry-gordy-jackson-5.jpg)
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: scorpionchik on May 11, 2014, 05:59:04 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't think we misunderstood Jermaine because had made similar comments not once in the past. He had been jealous of Michael always. He is one in general. He also was jealous of his little brother marrying his ex wife.

There are no problems among Jackson family, Michael likes controversy and his family follow his instructions, in return they are earning a lot of money cause they are under the spotlight.

Is that right?
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: diggyon on May 12, 2014, 10:18:55 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't wish to rain on the party, but i truly think that grown up adults in a family that has so many issues and argues and trials and contracts and God knows whatelse including money, DO HAVE words about each others. I believe Jermaine could say so about MJ, and i believe MJ could say so about his family. I don't say i'm right or wrong, i just see what this people "do", the way the act, and sometime, i don't see any LOVE. So how could this be part of the Hoax... I don't mean they hate each other. I just say everything is not black or white (lol)

We don't know who may be in the know, and in what way. Anyway, being in the know surely may not change what people think deep inside. Maybe Jermaine knows MJ is alive, yet he thinks MJ would have been nothing without the J5. He may be part of the hoax as a character, under a contract signed with MJ.

Such deal wouldn't include the lines "Jermaine must kiss my *** in every words he says about me"

Jackson family love and support each other, Michael is playing with the media, don't believe anything they say, Jackson family are playing a role in Michael's hoax, they like controversy to be under the spotlight, all Jackson family members know MJ is alive, time will tell.

I totally agree with you sweetsunset. I still remember the fight Janet had with Paris. And of course that was not a real fight. Then we saw a picture of Janet holding a gun lool I think we should be used to this by now. None of what the Jacksons say about each other is true. They don't fight because hey hate each other or because they are jealous of their brother. They are playing their roles in the greatest show on earth lol. All we have to do is sit back, relax and order some pop corn because knowing that those fights are not real is fun in itself. Somehow I believe that they are paid for what they do. If MJ has hired some actors, he would have paid them too. But being paid for helping a family member is a little bit disturbing for me. But may be others would see nothing wrong about it... 
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: blankie on May 12, 2014, 02:39:42 PM



Michael wants that people keep talking about him....he will have his reasons.... :icon_e_wink: is a great adventure !!  :icon_razz:
Title: Re: Jermaine Didn't Mean Michael Jackson Would Be NOTHING Without Jackson 5
Post by: applehead250609 on May 14, 2014, 08:18:22 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


Michael wants that people keep talking about him....he will have his reasons.... :icon_e_wink: is a great adventure !!  :icon_razz:

In my country it's a proverb that sounds like this:
Talking alot ,leads to poverty........so I'm sorry but this about keep talking is annoying and pointless,already  :LolLolLolLol: :LolLolLolLol:  :Crash:  :icon_geek:  :smiley-vault-misc-150: .
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal