when TJ first petitioned for guardianship, the judge said that Debbie must be notified
I thought she stepped down from her custody and assigned the right for sole custody to Michael?
Why then:Quotewhen TJ first petitioned for guardianship, the judge said that Debbie must be notified
Does anyone know?
There may be no biological connection at all. MJ said she was the surrogate mother. Usually a surrogate just carries the baby for the biological mother for whatever reason they have. The eggs from the biological mother are used. In the article it says "gave birth" so this could be a surrogate. The biological mother may not want to be known. But, I guess it's none of our business so I'll leave it at that. It's up to them if they want to say.^ These are exactly my thoughts!! :icon_e_wink:
Debbie Rowe -- the woman who gave birth to two of Michael Jackson's children -- has filed legal papers saying she SUPPORTS the new joint guardianship arrangement ...
[...]Rowe claims her concern is for the health, safety and well-being of HER children; and says she will continue to ensure their needs are met.[...]Did you see that ^^ ?? TMZ clearly stressed on "HER children" ! :icon_e_wink:
There may be no biological connection at all. MJ said she was the surrogate mother. Usually a surrogate just carries the baby for the biological mother for whatever reason they have. The eggs from the biological mother are used. In the article it says "gave birth" so this could be a surrogate. The biological mother may not want to be known. But, I guess it's none of our business so I'll leave it at that. It's up to them if they want to say.
[...]But in the docs, Debbie warns ... "Should the arrangement sought by TJ Jackson and Katherine Jackson become untenable, unstable, unsafe, or in any way contrary to the best interests of the children, Ms. Rowe will seek court intervention."[...]Just as I doubt that the Jackson family Feud is for real, I doubt everything that is written in this TMZ article :icon_albino: and I also doubt that Debbie is in the position of issuing WARNINGS on a legal basis! especially taking into account the information quoted below (unless anybody knows anything else about the current status of Debbie's legal rights over the 2 children!)
[...]Divorce
After Paris' birth, Rowe couldn't bear Jackson any more children. The couple's relationship became strained, and Rowe filed for divorce six months later. In 1999, she accepted a settlement of more than $6 million as well as ownership of the couples' Beverly Hills mansion. In return, Rowe gave up her custodial rights to the children, and agreed to one visit every 45 days. Two years later, she applied to the court to terminate her parental rights completely, claiming it was in the childrens' best interest. During this time, Rowe studied at an online university to earn degrees in criminal law and psychology.
In 2005, when Jackson was accused of molesting a young boy, Rowe told the court he was a loving and caring father. During the case she revealed that she had not seen Jackson or her children for several years, which discredited her testimony. Jackson was later acquitted on all counts.
Attempt to Restore Parental Rights
In 2006, Rowe took Jackson back to court in order to have her parental rights restored. During the case she also complained that Jackson had stopped paying her. The case was settled out of court. Rowe sold the house shortly after and moved to Palmdale, California, to raise and breed horses. She stayed out of the public eye until June 25, 2009, when her ex-husband died of mysterious causes. In Jackson's will, he named his mother, Katherine, as guardian of his and Rowe's two eldest children. Media reports say that Rowe may contest the decision, although she currently remains silent on the issue.
SOURCE: http://www.biography.com/people/debbie-rowe-467216
Speaking of Blanket....
I really don´t want to start a new topic for this.....
:LolLolLolLol:
http://rumorfix.com/2012/08/exclusive-another-jackson-tries-to-get-custody-of-blanket/ (http://rumorfix.com/2012/08/exclusive-another-jackson-tries-to-get-custody-of-blanket/)
Speaking of Blanket....
I really don´t want to start a new topic for this.....
:LolLolLolLol:
http://rumorfix.com/2012/08/exclusive-another-jackson-tries-to-get-custody-of-blanket/ (http://rumorfix.com/2012/08/exclusive-another-jackson-tries-to-get-custody-of-blanket/)
Paris looks like her mother, Debbie. Nothing else to find out.
Speaking of Blanket....
I really don´t want to start a new topic for this.....
:LolLolLolLol:
http://rumorfix.com/2012/08/exclusive-another-jackson-tries-to-get-custody-of-blanket/ (http://rumorfix.com/2012/08/exclusive-another-jackson-tries-to-get-custody-of-blanket/)
Here we go again...another crazy lawsuit against those poor kids...
Billie Jean.....the kid is not your son !!!!
with all the unknowns in this whole affair , she and michael may have even made their own arrangements to deal with the aspect of his not being around.
There may be no biological connection at all. MJ said she was the surrogate mother. Usually a surrogate just carries the baby for the biological mother for whatever reason they have. The eggs from the biological mother are used. In the article it says "gave birth" so this could be a surrogate. The biological mother may not want to be known. But, I guess it's none of our business so I'll leave it at that. It's up to them if they want to say.
There may be no biological connection at all. MJ said she was the surrogate mother. Usually a surrogate just carries the baby for the biological mother for whatever reason they have. The eggs from the biological mother are used. In the article it says "gave birth" so this could be a surrogate. The biological mother may not want to be known. But, I guess it's none of our business so I'll leave it at that. It's up to them if they want to say.When did he say that? I don't recall him ever saying that. I was always under the impression that Debbie was their biological mother despite whatever other claims the media made, especially since Paris looks just like her.
yes could you show us please. :icon_e_biggrin: seems like he said that about blanket , not the other two.There may be no biological connection at all. MJ said she was the surrogate mother. Usually a surrogate just carries the baby for the biological mother for whatever reason they have. The eggs from the biological mother are used. In the article it says "gave birth" so this could be a surrogate. The biological mother may not want to be known. But, I guess it's none of our business so I'll leave it at that. It's up to them if they want to say.When did he say that? I don't recall him ever saying that. I was always under the impression that Debbie was their biological mother despite whatever other claims the media made, especially since Paris looks just like her.
Speaking of Blanket....
I really don´t want to start a new topic for this.....
:LolLolLolLol:
http://rumorfix.com/2012/08/exclusive-another-jackson-tries-to-get-custody-of-blanket/ (http://rumorfix.com/2012/08/exclusive-another-jackson-tries-to-get-custody-of-blanket/)
Here we go again...another crazy lawsuit against those poor kids...
Billie Jean.....the kid is not your son !!!!
But, I guess it's none of our business so I'll leave it at that. It's up to them if they want to say.
DontwalkawayQuoteBut, I guess it's none of our business so I'll leave it at that. It's up to them if they want to say.Very well said.
End of story!