Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators
Persons Of Interest => The Jackson Family & Kids => Prince, Paris & Blanket => Topic started by: Miss.Peppers on December 12, 2009, 03:08:34 PM
-
I have heard someone mention on another site that "prince michael", "Paris" and "Prince Michael II" are pseudonyms and are actually false names... that Michael Jackson used these names to the media in order to keep their privacy and their real names secret.
This, therefore, would make the Will invalid.
I cannot find a source for this, and have searched the net to try and find a link to no avail.
Has anyone else heard this or got a link i can view?
;)
-
:o I have never belonged....
:?: maybe somebody knows what about that :roll:
-
Wow, really? :shock: I never knew this! Can someone confirm this? :P :P :P
-
could be...i don't think the birth certificates on the web are real...i always thought why paris' name would be paris michael?? isn't michael a name for a boy? :roll:
-
It is my idea that a lot of false things have been leaked out to the press etc. It would not surprise me at all if the childrens names are false, Michael suffered greatly throughout his long career withthe media/tabloids etc so is only natural he would want to protect them. How can we find the truth? I don't know. We may never.
-
I cannot say that I wouldn't do the same thing, if this is indeed the case. It is only natural that Michael would want to protect his children. So I think this is quite possible, if not highly likely.
-
It would be absolutely understandable
Maybe to do even a good idea this, in his position not at all badly,MJs Status it is surely difficult to handle with it.
-
That is exactly what Souza and I think.
Souza and I also think that they kids we have seen are not Mike's real kids, but just doubles. Why would he expose his kids to the eyes of the entire world..?
Greetz, Mo
-
It would not surprise me and as another member stated, it would be totally understandable, he’s prioritizing their safety.
-
I don't think so.
-
hello Mo Yes, this is also my opinion
Why MJ should act in view of the children aufeinmal in such a way,
And, nevertheless, is, it acts to me suffer to me, I cannot understand, the behavior of the children in all
They were all years in affectionate care of her father and, however to hold guarded and the general general public.
Michael was it are protected is always important to protect the children, around her identity.
Why he resolved to change this ... sometime must the children in the face, sometime he must go reveals itself, nevertheless, why in this expiry? Very mysteriously!
The behavior of the children after "deadly" of her father.... I finds the children treat very contently with the wide general public! If one thinks like these children normally must go would be surely intimidated and would be got tangled, I would will have to expect quite different behavior of the children.... This confuses me very much, leave.... Prince seemed to me rather dull (memorial service ...) Paris likewise unexpectedly .... of the small cover is still very young, one cannot do this judgement hard...
I hope to understand everything me also properly, however, this is very bewildering and questionable...
I have these photos and Homevideos I know this, but the same children are I do not understand.
And now where we faces of the children know Nanny Grace them again veiled? Why?
-
I believe the will is valid, regardless of Prince, Paris, and Blanket's actual legal names ... at least until they find the one that Michael allegedly updated a few years later. The children's birth certificates online are valid, too.
i always thought why paris' name would be paris michael?? isn't michael a name for a boy? :roll:
Yep, generally speaking, Michael is a boy's name. But there ARE women named Michael, such as the lovely former model and current actress Michael Michele (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005230/). She's named after her mother's best friend, another woman also named Michael. I actually think it's a cool name for a girl.
-
I definitely believe that the beautiful children Michael has shown us are his and his only. I think the false image of Michael being a bizarre figure is a plausible factor for some people to believe that he is likely of doing anything evens the most peculiar. Only because he is Michael Jackson.
I think believing this about Michael only supports the image of him being a strange and bizarre person. I think Michael would be sad reading these kinds of theory, but this is my opinion. I don’t care if you don’t agree with me. ;)
-
Everything is easy Too unreally ....... one simply does not understand these actions :roll:
-
The name could be pseudonym, yes it is a possibilty. The fact he might have used double for his kids for all their lives ... no, it's not even a chance. How could he? How could have he used three doubles since they were born? This is too much, this is tabloid trash IMO
-
That is exactly what Souza and I think.
Souza and I also think that they kids we have seen are not Mike's real kids, but just doubles. Why would he expose his kids to the eyes of the entire world..?
Greetz, Mo
i think they r his real children they look like the same little ones he put blankets and disguses on cause you could see their faces thru the material most of the time...also the home videos of when they were little they look like the same kids just older..but idk :?
-
That is exactly what Souza and I think.
Souza and I also think that they kids we have seen are not Mike's real kids, but just doubles. Why would he expose his kids to the eyes of the entire world..?
Greetz, Mo
i think they r his real children they look like the same little ones he put blankets and disguses on cause you could see their faces thru the material most of the time...also the home videos of when they were little they look like the same kids just older..but idk :?
That is true. I do believe they are Michael's children. However, it does make sense, if that would not be their real names. Were the same names released when they were born or were none released not at all? I personally am not sure because I was young myself. But there was also a thread posted a little while ago, that, that was the reason why we started seeing their faces a little before June 25th.
-
The name could be pseudonym, yes it is a possibilty. The fact he might have used double for his kids for all their lives ... no, it's not even a chance. How could he? How could have he used three doubles since they were born? This is too much, this is tabloid trash IMO
easy, if he knew there parents..we only seen the kids with mike a couple of times a year if that and we really never seen there faces that often..all we seen were random pictures of them with stuff on there face and the couple of movies that are on youtube..if mike has been planning this for at least 2year that would make sense
That is exactly what Souza and I think.
Souza and I also think that they kids we have seen are not Mike's real kids, but just doubles. Why would he expose his kids to the eyes of the entire world..?
Greetz, Mo
exactly..plus how is blankets name prince micheal joseph jackson II??? who is prince michael jackson the first?
-
Good Evening all,
I was reading this thread and you made me think of something from when Prince was born and the photos of Michael holding him were printed in People magazine at that time. It is possible that Michael has chosen to not reveal the identity of his children to the public since the time of their birth after all that has happen to him. Who could blame him.
Maybe he has chosen to hide their real identities.
It does seem odd that he chose this particular time to reveal them.
-
Mmm I don't think so. How do you explain Michael calling the kids Paris and Prince in those cute home movies when they were babies? I don't think this is true...
-
Good Evening all,
I was reading this thread and you made me think of something from when Prince was born and the photos of Michael holding him were printed in People magazine at that time. It is possible that Michael has chosen to not reveal the identity of his children to the public since the time of their birth after all that has happen to him. Who could blame him.
Maybe he has chosen to hide their real identities.
It does seem odd that he chose this particular time to reveal them.
in in his interview with barbara walters he told her that when he gave them those photos that he was "giving the people what they wanted" which was pictures of him and his son..but who is to say that that was his real son? he gave them what they wanted..and he still did what he wanted..keep his kids lives private
Mmm I don't think so. How do you explain Michael calling the kids Paris and Prince in those cute home movies when they were babies? I don't think this is true...
easy...you tell them thats your playing a game...just like in one of the videos prince says " dad when i am i going to star in ghost part 2" i dont think its a concident that in that video he faked his death and came back and prince says that to him but we only see the video after mike faked his death...
-
You can see a little bit of him in ALL of those children, especially Blanket. Those are his real kids.
-
Mmm I don't think so. How do you explain Michael calling the kids Paris and Prince in those cute home movies when they were babies? I don't think this is true...
Exactly...I don't think it's true either. And I remember Debbie saying that Michael wanted to name Paris, "Princess", and Debbie said no way. :lol: Michael had two deer named Prince and Princess when he was younger...I'm sure he just always liked those names.
-
I'm sorry, but I think things got mixed up here.
There's a HUGE difference between pseudonyms and doubles, and the kids not being Mikes kids...
For sure I never said the kids aren't his, I said:
"Souza and I also think that they kids we have seen are not Mike's real kids, but just doubles."
-
Sorry where does one hire double kids?
-
Nothing is impossible. I can only imagine the nutjobs who would be just itching to get a hold of MJ's kids. Some obsessive female fan might use them to lure her "soul mate" MJ so that they can live as a family. Another greedy fan might use them to extort money and make headlines.
That is exactly what Souza and I think.
Souza and I also think that they kids we have seen are not Mike's real kids, but just doubles. Why would he expose his kids to the eyes of the entire world..?
Greetz, Mo
-
Sorry where does one hire double kids?
Just my thought ... :D
It's to grazy to even think about.
Doubles here, doubles there ... :lol:
Here a picture from a few years ago with the whole family,
same childeren!
(http://i50.tinypic.com/121c0oh.jpg)
(http://i46.tinypic.com/2ebaamu.jpg)
-
(http://i50.tinypic.com/121c0oh.jpg)
who is circled in the picture?
-
Some people think that is "hatman" ... :roll:
(http://i46.tinypic.com/2ebaamu.jpg)
-
Loes,
I have read this already with the old MJHD ... of this Hatman and Blondie??? Chaos purely :roll:
-
Oh .. :lol:
I can't place the article here with all the names of the familymembers because it's to big. I made it smaller but then it's impossible to read the names.
(I have to go now, dinertime in Holland)
(http://i46.tinypic.com/2ebaamu.jpg)
-
Oh .. :lol:
I can't place the article here with all the names of the familymembers because it's to big. I made it smaller but then it's impossible to read the names.
(I have to go now, dinertime in Holland)
(http://i46.tinypic.com/2ebaamu.jpg)
we wouldn't be able to pck out every name anyway..
-
Some people think that is "hatman" ... :roll:
(http://i46.tinypic.com/2ebaamu.jpg)
whats his name??
-
Some people think that is "hatman" ... :roll:
(http://i46.tinypic.com/2ebaamu.jpg)
RIck Baker?
-
Please, discuss Hatman in the Hatman section...
-
I ALSO THINK THAT THESE CHILDREN ARE DOUBLES BECAUSE THEY LOOK NOT SAD AT ALL WHEN THEY GO OUT WITH THEIR COUSINS THE REAL CHILDREN ARE WITH THEIR DADDY MICHAEL I HOPE. IT SOUNDS MAYBE STRANGE BUT IT CAN BE TRUE....PSEUDONYMS FOR THEIR NAMES THAT IS ALSO A POSSIBILITY ...ITS SO CONFUSING. NOTHING IS STRANGE ANYMORE IF YOU ASK ME.....ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE IN THIS CASE....I LIKE TO KNOW THE TRUTH BEFORE I REALLY GO INSANE ... :?
-
I am surprised at this quick one change with childrens...
-
(http://i50.tinypic.com/121c0oh.jpg)
who is circled in the picture?
is it just me or do this picture look hella fake :|
-
Pssst... kind of like if I took a picture of my family reunion and photo shopped some Jackson family members into it. Uh huh... :lol:
I have seen this pic before and even then it looked odd.
BTW - the larger version that I have seen shows that it is Omer standing next to MJ and holding the baby. What's that about?
(http://i50.tinypic.com/121c0oh.jpg)
who is circled in the picture?
is it just me or do this picture look hella fake :|
-
Where were all these members of the family with the Staples (commemorative celebration) and burial?
-
Sorry where does one hire double kids?
:lol: that was what i was gonna ask ,if you had a child how would you hire it out as a double i cant quite understand how it works,and as for the names i heard that he was gonna name all his kids the same prince michael ,but i think the media made this up :lol:
-
RIck Baker?
No, Lawrence Jackson (Joe's brother).
It's not hatman IMO ... ;)
(http://i46.tinypic.com/2ebaamu.jpg)
-
Just wanted to say that Prince is the name of MJ's grandfather and having your father's name as a middle name is not odd. My daughter as well as my son's, all have their fathers name as their middle name.
-
could be...i don't think the birth certificates on the web are real...i always thought why paris' name would be paris michael?? isn't michael a name for a boy? :roll:
I went to high school with a girl named Michael... N
-
I prefer not to comment too much on the children topic because before june 25th how many vids of them has every one seen? I hadn't seen any however I must say I hadn't searched for any either. But it still makes me suspicious that there all coming out now. Who went in Michael's personal library of home movies to post them on the net? I'd be surprised if anyone close enough to Michael to gain access to such vids would have went against Michael's wishes and exposed them.
The other reason I hate to discuss them is because they are only children and I rather leave them out of this. But that could be just me, I am not judging anybody I am only stating my personal opinion on this topic.
-
I thought Prince was named after MJ's grandfather
-
Here is the link to the article where the idea that the names of the children that the public know them by are not their real names:
http://www.michaeljackson.com/us/node/461509 (http://www.michaeljackson.com/us/node/461509)
Ive copied and pasted the relevant bit:
WRONG NAMES ON BIRTH CERTIFICATES?: It has been alleged that there is an apparent naming inconsistency of Michael Jackson's children in the in what is reportedly—yet controversially—his "Will." How does this translate into a functional reality? This amounts to nothing more than a minor technicality—so I’m told—in that the children of Michael Jackson—whatever their true and accurate names may be—are entitled to certain rights. It is not uncommon for persons to have one name on their birth certificates but go by a completely different name throughout their lifetimes.
-
I'm sorry, but I think things got mixed up here.
There's a HUGE difference between pseudonyms and doubles, and the kids not being Mikes kids...
For sure I never said the kids aren't his, I said:
"Souza and I also think that they kids we have seen are not Mike's real kids, but just doubles."
I have thought that all along why cover them up and protect them then a few weeks before show them to the world knowing what the world can do too them in the future Michael knows only too well what can happen to them it is far to dangerous for them so strange as it sounds I dont think we have seen Michaels children It does not make sense to show them
-
I have had the very same thoughts about Michael's children, i bet there are some other people who are thinking the same as well.
I have thought that the children we are seeing were doubles, for the real childrens safety?? it seems strange thet all this time they have been hidden, then suddenly before Michael "died" we get to see what they look like?? this clearly doesn't make any sense to me, i don't know how anyone else feels about this...
It could all be a ploy to detract the Press from the real children so Michael can be with "his" children...
Just my thoughts..
At the moment any thing is possible i have learnt to expect the unexpected now!
-
Blanket: Yes !
If it's right, I think it's a great idea !
But it's not very "effective"
-
:-X
maybe this is the reason why people around michael's children says that the will is invalid...maybe he really faked the name of his children to keep their privacy...