Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators
Latest News => TMZ.com => Michael Jackson News => TMZ Articles => Topic started by: brunob12 on November 07, 2010, 05:14:51 PM
-
Michael Jackson's 'Breaking News' -- The Real Deal
11/7/2010 3:07 PM PST by Harvey Levin
Hey, it's Harvey. We usually don't write first person on TMZ, but I gotta tell you what I just heard.
(http://ll-media.tmz.com/2010/11/07/1107-michael-jackson-ex.jpg)
Someone has played me the song "Breaking News." I'm not a music expert, but I am a Michael Jackson music fan ... and it's definitely Michael Jackson. The song -- which is awesome -- is a pretty harsh look through Michael's eyes at the media. In essence, he is saying ... You've treated me shabbily and you've hope for my demise, but I'm back!
One of the lyrics:
"They want to see that I fall,
cause I'm Michael Jackson.
You write the words to destroy
like it's a weapon."
In another part of the song, Jackson sings:
"Everybody wanting a piece of Michael Jackson.
Reporters stalking the moves of Michael Jackson.
Just when you thought he was done,
he comes to give it again."
The song is vintage Jackson. The initial beat will remind you of "Billie Jean" and there are all sorts of MJ trademarks throughout.
When you hear it, you will not be able to suppress the image of Jackson dancing to the song.
The song was recorded at the home of music producer Eddie Cascio, when Michael Jackson was living there for four months in 2007.
As good as the song is ... it's not the first single that will be released. We're told we might be able to post a copy of "Breaking News" on TMZ as soon as late tonight.
-
You've treated me shabbily and you've hope for my demise, but I'm back!
I absolutely LOVE that part!
Plus, Harvey in person posted it...
-
Surprise! Harvey gets first listen! lol
-
Shut the fuck up.
-
I really like this sentence:
he is saying ... You've treated me shabbily and you've hope for my demise, but I'm back!
Talk about TMZ getting the Breaking News!
It is just amazing!
With L.O.V.E
-
WOW! This is incredible! I can't wait to hear the whole song!!
-
I wonder if Harvey will write the BAM article in first person. And who is the someone who played it for Harvey? I bet he knows for a fact it's Michael singing because Michael played it for him! :D And all the talk of Michael in present tense...
-
Ha! Hi Harve, now give us the song! I have to go to work in the morning, have merci!
-
Shut the fuck up.
SOMEONE WOKE UP ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE BED!,WHO ARE YOU TALKING TO?
-
I haven't seen this in my whole GODDAMN life. I swear I go and take distonocalm.....
An article from Harvey dirrectly saying that? THOSE lyrics? I swear I can't believe what my eyes hear....
-
''they'' are gonna hate this song, this whole album! :lol:
-
Shut the fuck up.
SOMEONE WOKE UP ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE BED!,WHO ARE YOU TALKING TO?
It's a saying. Like get out of town. Or no way. Or you don't say. Or wow I can't believe my ears.
You know?
-
What's wrong with this sentence?:
As good as the song is ... it's not the first single that will be released. We're told we might be able to post a copy of "Breaking News" on TMZ as soon as late tonight.
It IS the first single, right> Or am I misunderstanding something?
-
Shut the fuck up.
SOMEONE WOKE UP ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE BED!,WHO ARE YOU TALKING TO?
It's a saying. Like get out of town. Or no way. Or you don't say. Or wow I can't believe my ears.
You know?
oh yes i know now, it was because you said it with no expression but only those words!
I am glad your not going angerily!.lol
-
Shut the fuck up.
SOMEONE WOKE UP ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE BED!,WHO ARE YOU TALKING TO?
It's a saying. Like get out of town. Or no way. Or you don't say. Or wow I can't believe my ears.
You know?
Yeah, that's my bec! She can swear like a marine!
-
Shut the fuck up.
SOMEONE WOKE UP ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE BED!,WHO ARE YOU TALKING TO?
It's a saying. Like get out of town. Or no way. Or you don't say. Or wow I can't believe my ears.
You know?
Yeah, that's my bec! She can swear like a marine!
She is your bec...lol!
BY THE WAY HOW DO YOU ALL CHANGE YOUR NAME COLOR?
-
What's wrong with this sentence?:
As good as the song is ... it's not the first single that will be released. We're told we might be able to post a copy of "Breaking News" on TMZ as soon as late tonight.
It IS the first single, right> Or am I misunderstanding something?
Maybe we will get TWO songs today?
-
get out of the city! I just can't believe what I'm seeing... I just, it's like impossible! He never wrote an article as that and how he resumed the message of the son : In essence, he is saying ... You've treated me shabbily and you've hope for my demise, but I'm back!
I just have to go out and take a breath of fresh air. Harvey... Wait here, 'cause I'll be back when I will be able to put my thought on paper. I can't believe what my ears see and what my eyes hear
-
So excited to hear this song even before what Harvey just said!! Now there's no way I'm going to sleep tonight! :D I hope every song on the album details each injustice no way the media can ignore it now every song is such big news all over the world.
-
OMG :shock:
-
Wow... Can't wait to hear it!
-
Is it only me who thinks this is straight on our face? I mean when did Harvey EVER write an article dirrectly? and about Michael.
The whole message is simply straight in your face, I can't believe my eyes
-
(http://www.clicksmilies.com/s1106/spezial/Fool/appl.gif)
-
Shut the fuck up.
Why steal my lines?
hahahaha
Excellent news,totally cheered me up in my sick state.
I know someone who is gonna be pissed they missed this...OH DEJAVUUUUUUUUUU......
..and whoever just said about the BAM article, he will mostly likely have to change his name to Harvey BAM Levin for the rest of his life ;P
GO ARMY <3
-
Also, if the Jackson family are saying it's not Michael singing, Harvey cannot just state it's the real deal as in fact just by listening to it -unless of course he has confirmation from the man himself. :D
-
I don't know how to express better my face when I opened this TMZ article.
This is exactly
(http://i1045.photobucket.com/albums/b453/Anna-Jackson/12424.gif)
-
What's wrong with this sentence?:
As good as the song is ... it's not the first single that will be released. We're told we might be able to post a copy of "Breaking News" on TMZ as soon as late tonight.
It IS the first single, right> Or am I misunderstanding something?
Strangely, rumor has it the song isn't even going to be included on the album. Is it NOT a single and I weirdly keep getting the impression they are insinuating that it isn't even a song...
-
I don't know how to express better my face when I opened this TMZ article.
This is exactly
(http://i1045.photobucket.com/albums/b453/Anna-Jackson/12424.gif)
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
-
:shock: :shock: :shock:
Oh My Gooooooooooooooooooooooooooood
[youtube:2tw3f7mj]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3kQk-lgFRI[/youtube:2tw3f7mj]
-
(http://www.gifsoup.com/view/270794/omg-cat-2-o.gif)
-
Maybe it's a not a single or on the album or even a song because it's reality, it's what's happening, it's apart of the return? ;)
-
wowwwww I love to read "I'm back" and "he comes to give it again".
Talking about the first single, hours ago I read on MJJNews's twitter that "Hold my hand" feat.Akon will be the first one...
(http://img607.imageshack.us/img607/6996/immaginebmp.jpg)
-
bec you could be so right about it not even being a song. We didn't hear him sing in the snippet and the Opus track wasn't really sung in the regular way either. I am counting the minutes till they release this I hope we're not waiting for hours on end. They like to tease though huh? ;)
-
wowwwww I love to read "I'm back" and "he comes to give it again".
Talking about the first single, hours ago I read on MJJNews's twitter that "Hold my hand" feat.Akon will be the first one...
(http://img607.imageshack.us/img607/6996/immaginebmp.jpg)
With Akon the believer? lol
-
Thanks Harvey ~ you now have my undivided attention...and I was going to call it an early night :lol:
The title -- THE REAL DEAL makes me think of movie reels... Time to sit back ~ relax ~ unbutton our jackets ;) and ENJOY the GREATEST show on EARTH...
Best of luck to you Michael ~ Don't Stop 'til You Get Enough! LONG LIVE THE KING................MICHAEL JACKSON!
-
wowwwww I love to read "I'm back" and "he comes to give it again".
Talking about the first single, hours ago I read on MJJNews's twitter that "Hold my hand" feat.Akon will be the first one...
(http://img607.imageshack.us/img607/6996/immaginebmp.jpg)
With Akon the believer? lol
yeahhh!! the believer lol :lol: :lol: :lol:
-
CAN YOU FEEL IT, CAN YOU FEEL IT, CAN YOU FEEL IT??? OMG I'm sooooooooooooo excited! I feel like overloaded, hyper energetic! Let me do the Happy Dance with this dude pls :lol:
[youtube:1wh5jkb9]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0W3ZXQqJWH8[/youtube:1wh5jkb9]
WoW! The beLIEvers are so fast to make the videos lol :D
[youtube:1wh5jkb9]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1kjgEeCAxc&feature=recentu[/youtube:1wh5jkb9]
-
Shut the fuck up.
SOMEONE WOKE UP ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE BED!,WHO ARE YOU TALKING TO?
It's a saying. Like get out of town. Or no way. Or you don't say. Or wow I can't believe my ears.
You know?
THATS OK TUMIC CAUSE I THOUGHT THE SAME THING lol. IM GLAD SHE EXPLAINED HERSELF. LOL. THANK YOU BEC FOR THE DEFINITION OF STFU lol. THAT WAS FUNNY. MJ HIMSELF WOULD HAVE LAUGHED AT THAT ONE lol.
-
Wow after reading that line im nearly after having heart failure.. When in TMZ history has HARVEY personally come on to the website to write its usually TMZ staff and on a sunday in LA when he is off usually on weekends, he stated that before on TMZ live.. This is really turning into something big i'd love the video to show breaking news and MJ pops up saying Im back... Could MJ really be preparing for his return.. Sony wouldnt have given TMZ that track first, im guessing its someone else... aaaaaaaaaahhhh im so excited
-
"Breaking News" – Along with the press release for the album, the Michael Jackson website confirmed the song "Breaking News", a track Michael recorded in 2007 will feature on the album. The song will be streamed on the Michael Jackson website for one week, starting on November 8, 2010.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_(album (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_(album))
TIAI 10/30:
October 1938: War of the Worlds
On Oct. 30, 1938, up-and-coming actor and director Orson Welles stages a radio adapation of H.G. Welles' novel War of the Worlds set in modern-day New Jersey. Presented as a series of news bulletins and without commercial breaks, the intense broadcast convinces many that the Martian invasion may be real, sparking panic in communities throughout the country.
http://www.life.com/timeline/232#index/7 (http://www.life.com/timeline/232#index/7)
Breaking news for a week?
-
The song -- which is awesome -- is a pretty harsh look through Michael's eyes at the media. In essence, he is saying ... You've treated me shabbily and you've hope for my demise, but I'm back!
That part I highlighted is BAM in your face media. 8-)
The mainstream media, bloggers, and web only media copies and pastes everything TMZ does. LOL copy that then media....
Also the "Breaking News" title of the song and the fact that it is supposed to or was supposed to be heard on Nov. 8th the same day as the Jackson family interview with O.
Hmm got me to thinking that it makes sense to release the song "Breaking News" on that day.
As the plot thickens...to destroy Michael Jackson.
As the drama unfolds there is alot more to say about Michael Jackson.
Harvey confirmed for us the song is the real deal and gave us the lyrics and what the meaning is behind the song. Love it. Thanks Harvey.
Peace
-
Anyone who will ever look for Michael's "Breaking News" song on YouTube will also get the news of his "death": http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=michael+jackson+breaking+news&aq=0
The same will happen on the Internet, when people will type in "Michael Jackson, Breaking News": http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&source=hp&q=michael+jackson%2C+breaking+news&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&fp=7d1628ff6e47c97c
If Michael were dead, this would be so sad... especially since he wouldn't be able to see this album coming out. But I think he's alive! In any case, this album and the 6/25/2009 news will always be linked. The album title, MICHAEL, actually ensures that this will happen. If the album were titled, say, CIRCUS, people could make searches with "Circus, Breaking News"... But because the title is Michael, we have no choice but to always get the 6/25/2009 news thrown in our faces! This in effect ties MJ's 6/25/2009 "death" to the media - FOREVER. Now I wonder who chose the album title... ;)
I'm assuming here that this will be a song on the "Michael" album, but the same will actually happen if the song is released as a single.
I so hope this album is "vendetta"!
-
Anyone who will ever look for Michael's "Breaking News" song on YouTube will also get the news of his "death": http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=michael+jackson+breaking+news&aq=0
The same will happen on the Internet, when people will type in "Michael Jackson, Breaking News": http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&source=hp&q=michael+jackson%2C+breaking+news&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&fp=7d1628ff6e47c97c
If Michael were dead, this would be so sad... especially since he wouldn't be able to see this album coming out. But I think he's alive! In any case, this album and the 6/25/2009 news will always be linked. The album title, MICHAEL, actually ensures that this will happen. If the album were titled, say, CIRCUS, people could make searches with "Circus, Breaking News"... But because the title is Michael, we have no choice but to always get the 6/25/2009 news thrown in our faces! This in effect ties MJ's 6/25/2009 "death" to the media - FOREVER. Now I wonder who chose the album title... ;)
I'm assuming here that this will be a song on the "Michael" album, but the same will actually happen if the song is released as a single.
I so hope this album is "vendetta"!
Good point truthprevails...
-
I like your thinking truthprevails. Those of us in Europe are going to need a lot of coffee tonight it's almost 2am here and who knows how much longer we have to wait for the Breaking News? Harvey does but I bet he won't tell! :D
-
OMG! This is exciting!!!!! :o :o :o :o :shock:
-
... You've treated me shabbily and you've hope for my demise, but I'm back!
Mass media prepared for themselves, " the that has ears that it hears ", the truth was expecting for me this way from this song.
That good that tomorrow I have the day off.. I am going to wait :D
-
Sorry, i can still imagine Harvey's face, in his office
(http://smileys.sur-la-toile.com/repository/Manga/japonais003.gif)
Me ! Me ! Let me write it myself ! Let me write it myself !
-
November is going to be sooo interesting. Thanks Harvey, for the article!! You couldnt have made it more 'IN YOUR FACE!'
-
http://twitter.com/Taryll (http://twitter.com/Taryll)
On Monday 8th November 2010, @Taryll said:
I am shocked that things have gotten this far. This is ridiculous. I was at the studio when these questionable files were delivered. I heard these "so-called" Michael Jackson songs raw and without the distraction of the well produced music by Teddy Riley. How they constructed these songs is very sneaky and sly. many people who have worked on this project either have strong doubts and questions while others KNOW the truth yet decided to turn and look the other way with their hands out for $$$. I will NEVER look the other way. Right is Right, Truth is Truth, Facts are Facts and it will all come out!!! I tried so hard to prevent this craziness, but they wouldn't listen. I KNOW my Uncle's voice and something's seriously wrong when you have immediate FAMILY saying it's not him. Don't you have to wonder why? I have strong, undeniable points. They can't give me answers, yet continue to move forward with lies and deception. Sounding like Michael Jackson and BEING Michael Jackson are two different things.
"If you know it's a lie then you will swear it, If you give it with guilt then you will bear it, If it's taking a chance then you will dare it… you would do anything for money"
-
Sure Taryll, if you heard it that long ago and this album has been in the talks for some time now, why have you kept your mouth shut til... oh.. right now?
Not to mention the rest of the family. This is such garbage.
-
http://twitter.com/tjjackson (http://twitter.com/tjjackson)
On Monday 8th November 2010, @tjjackson said:
There's many MJ vocal impersonators. Some better than others. But there is only ONE Michael Jackson. Deceptively merging shady vocals with MJ samples (from prior MJ records) will never fool me. Why they would ignore the obvious, look the other way and rush a suspicious track that was NEVER on my Uncle's radar is beyond me. I'm disgusted, disappointed and saddened. And before the media starts to smear our name, just remember we are COMMITTED (as our Uncle Michael always knew) to protect his name and his amazing legacy he worked his whole life for. We have nothing to gain and we know they will try to drag our name through the mud. But we know how much he valued his legacy and his fans. And cheating either is unacceptable. "Lies run sprints, but the truth runs marathons"
-
This is bigger than the TMZ dry erase board my friends!
-
"Just when you thought he was done,
he comes to give it again."
WWOOWW :shock: :D
-
"You've treated me shabbily and you've hope for my demise, but I'm back!"
And we have been patiently waiting for it. The best part is when the dream comes true. It feels delicious, it feels Michael Jackson. Viva MJ!
-
You've treated me shabbily and you've hope for my demise, but I'm back!
I absolutely LOVE that part!
Plus, Harvey in person posted it...
me too :)
-
@souza Single basically means you pay for the song, so this is not a single, as it is free. A single will actually rake in the moolah.
Now why would Sony, who are always financially inclined, give this new single free. This is obviously a message more important than just monetary gain. And thanks to the family that is SCREAMING that it is fake, the whole world is going to listen to it. Either because they are fans of the music, or the media outlets to hear what was said about the, or the MJ bashers who will try to prove its him failing to make an impression and then blaming family that they are covering up for MJ just because the song sucked. Everyone is going to listen to it and there will be many posts about this song. Enough to let Michael's message be heard - and we know it is from Michael. Sony themselves would never release an anti-media message, remember how they refused to promote Invincible.
-
Sooooo, now we all trust Sony, Harvey and TMZ?
Just trying to be objective here... lest we forget that they apparently have a deal to regularly plug the new SONY Internet tv almost every friggin' day on their tv show.
Can you say "conflict of interest?"
I still think Sony and TMZ are just laughing at fans... all the way to the bank.
:?
-
Well, come to think of it they are laughing in our faces it's actually counterproductive because people read their website suspicion about MJs death creeps in and guess what we got visitors and people wake up to the fact that Michael is alive. You don't go through all this trouble just to play seriously I don't view it that way. Uncle Harvey come on took the time to write it's a right in your face message. They keep MJ in the news because everyone is supposed to be keep MJ fresh when have you seen a "dead" guy stay so long on the headlines never! MJ is in the news because something big is going to happen shocking BAM! MJ has to be in a sense in the news so when he takes over people don't get like oh my he is what? alive?!!! He is creating the suspicion am I alive? maybe maybe not? So, when he bams it's like duh you'll have a bunch of non believers saying duh I knew it he was alive yeah right!!! :lol:
-
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
-
@souza Single basically means you pay for the song, so this is not a single, as it is free. A single will actually rake in the moolah.
Now why would Sony, who are always financially inclined, give this new single free. This is obviously a message more important than just monetary gain. And thanks to the family that is SCREAMING that it is fake, the whole world is going to listen to it.
Yes this.
If Sony were laughing all the way to the bank Breaking News wouldn't be free.
-
NEXT THING WON'T SURPRISE ME THEY GOT THE WHOLE ALBUM TO LISTEN FOR FREE UNCLE HARVEY YOU READING PUT THAT WHOLE CD ON THE SITE SURPRISES US. LOL! IMAGINE A SONG PER DAY UNTIL THE WHOLE ALBUM IS POSTED. :lol:
-
Rats, I'm late to this party!
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Now that is a reaction! LOL!
Oh. Lord. Hi, Harvey! Thanks so much for making my eyes almost pop out of my head, here! Whoever said this may as well be a confirmation from the man himself, they are most likely right!
NEXT THING WON'T SURPRISE ME THEY GOT THE WHOLE ALBUM TO LISTEN FOR FREE UNCLE HARVEY YOU READING PUT THAT WHOLE CD ON THE SITE SURPRISES US. LOL! IMAGINE A SONG PER DAY UNTIL THE WHOLE ALBUM IS POSTED. :lol:
Oh, yeah- Ple-ase, Harvey? *nudge nudge*
-
I remember people getting just as excited back in June when we were told that the truth would be known... everyone waited for hours with great anticipation, and it turned out to be an announcement of a video game.
Sony can afford to post one song for free, they're counting on this to go viral create a lot of hype.
And the media keeps MJ in the news b/c it generates hits on their web sites which = more ad $ for them, not b/c they believe he's coming back. They act in their own interests, just like other corporations do.
As a fan who purchased his works and admired him from a distance, I'm just tired of feeling f*cked with.
-
WE ASK THEY RESPOND HOW ABOUT A FREE DOWNLOAD EXCLUSIVE TMZ MJ ALBUM THE FIRST 777 THAT CLICK ON SO AND SO LINK GET TO GET THE DOWNLOAD THE ALBUM FOR FREE. NUDGE NUDGE!!! YEP IT'S POSSIBLE THE MORE I LIVE THE MORE I SEE THIS IS A LEARNING, WEIRD, EXPERIENCE MICHAEL U HAVE TAUGHT US SO MUCH LIFE HAS NEVER BEEN THE SAME AGAIN NOR WILL IT BE AFTER U BAM. :lol:
-
Someone on the other board just mentioned that Sony edited this album art (remove Prince symbol) just like they edited the Invincible album art. History repeating itself?
So MJ adds the Prince LOVE symbol to the cover KNOWING its a copyright violation and will get yanked by Sony as soon as it's discovered. He makes it super small knowing that the hoaxers will find it within minutes of it's release on the web, tearing apart the picture searching for clues. We find it, TMZ picks up on it, alerts Prince's camp, who say no authorization! Causing Sony to freak and edit it.
Viola, what looks like a coincidence was completely orchestrated by MJ to cause History to repeat itself.
Now if there are lyrics on one of these songs that the press will flip over and cause Sony to censor them well... lol.
-
WE ASK THEY RESPOND HOW ABOUT A FREE DOWNLOAD EXCLUSIVE TMZ MJ ALBUM THE FIRST 777 THAT CLICK ON SO AND SO LINK GET TO GET THE DOWNLOAD THE ALBUM FOR FREE. NUDGE NUDGE!!! YEP IT'S POSSIBLE THE MORE I LIVE THE MORE I SEE THIS IS A LEARNING, WEIRD, EXPERIENCE MICHAEL U HAVE TAUGHT US SO MUCH LIFE HAS NEVER BEEN THE SAME AGAIN NOR WILL IT BE AFTER U BAM. :lol:
They could also have a discount if we enter the correct phrase like "MJ alive" remember the mother's book?
-
Just had a thought, is it possible THIS (history repeating itself with Sony edited album art) is the reason for Breaking News to be a free release??
Plenty of time for people to get offended and clamor for lyric censoring before the final version is sold on the album?
-
Just had a thought, is it possible THIS ^^ is the reason for Breaking News to be a free release??
Plenty of time for people to get offended and clamor for lyric censoring before the final version is sold on the album?
I believe so, I mean, we are being watched, right?!?!?
-
WE ASK THEY RESPOND HOW ABOUT A FREE DOWNLOAD EXCLUSIVE TMZ MJ ALBUM THE FIRST 777 THAT CLICK ON SO AND SO LINK GET TO GET THE DOWNLOAD THE ALBUM FOR FREE. NUDGE NUDGE!!! YEP IT'S POSSIBLE THE MORE I LIVE THE MORE I SEE THIS IS A LEARNING, WEIRD, EXPERIENCE MICHAEL U HAVE TAUGHT US SO MUCH LIFE HAS NEVER BEEN THE SAME AGAIN NOR WILL IT BE AFTER U BAM. :lol:
They could also have a discount if we enter the correct phrase like "MJ alive" remember the mother's book?
@simalves it's increible how creative we're getting perhaps they will use some of our ideas one just never knows. Yes, I remember Mrs. Katherine's MJ alive come on that was a big one.
-
the song is up on http://breakingnews.michaeljackson.com/ROW - it's a little after midnight here on the east coast - listening to the song NOW... LLTK <3 MJ
-
the song is up on michaeljackson.com - it's after midnight here on the east coast - listening NOW - ENJOY!!!
IT IS UP AND RUNNING!
-
THAT IS NOT MICHAEL JACKSON SINGING "BREAKING NEWS"
-
Listening now!!!!!! 8-)
-
OH MY GOD ITS BRILLIANT BUT DONT SOUND LIKE MICHAEL... (Heartbroken :(..)
-
I LIKE IT. :D
-
Wow. The family is right.
Holy crap.
That's not MJ.
Omg I have to go find my head it just fell off.
-
Doesn't sound like Michael to me for most of it, only a bit of it sounds like Michael in a small part. I've only listened to it once so far. Vocally, doesn't really come close to Michael. Hot mix though. Great beat. I need to analyze the words. Is he saying, "why does it seem strange that I would fall in love?"
Wow. This is quite an amazing situation.
-
GAVE IT ANOTHER LISTEN I LIKE IT IT'S TIGHT BUT THE VOICE IT'S LOWER THAN MJs, MICHAEL'S VOICE IS HIGHER THERE'S MORE PUNCH IN MJs VOICE THIS IS TOO GENTLE. YOU HEAR THE ANGER IF IT WERE THE REAL MJ SINGING HE'D BE SINGING THE SONG LIKE IN PRIVACY. WE KNOW THERE ARE EFFECTS IN THAT SONG BUT YET U CAN TELL HE IS SINGING THAT SONG WITH ANGER LIKE MAN I NEED MY PRIVACY.
-
TMZ has a poll: http://www.tmz.com/2010/11/07/michael-j ... full-song/ (http://www.tmz.com/2010/11/07/michael-jackson-breaking-news-full-song/)
Is it Michael's voice: Yes or No
-
Breaking News + MJ's voice + the beat + head phones + max volume = Oooh baby! :D :oops: :D :oops: :D
(http://www.hiphopgossips.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/meg-ryan-orgasm.jpg)
p.s. threw in a waft of Black Orchid for a total sensory experience!
-
So far, 64% say yes it is Michael. I voted no.
In terms of the music. 100% beautiful. Love that lead-in with the crescendo of strings. Gorgeous.
-
So far, 64% say yes it is Michael. I voted no.
The voting is fake as well!
TMZ owns it, they will do anything to prove the Jacksons wrong!
I mean don't you think all hoax believers will go voting and most of the believers would say no!
-
YOU HEAR THE ANGER IF IT WERE THE REAL MJ SINGING HE'D BE SINGING THE SONG LIKE IN PRIVACY. WE KNOW THERE ARE EFFECTS IN THAT SONG BUT YET U CAN TELL HE IS SINGING THAT SONG WITH ANGER LIKE MAN I NEED MY PRIVACY.
Good point, there is no emotion in MJs voice, the part that is him, as if he is singing to a completely different set of lyrics. There might be parts of MJs voice in this song but MJ didn't SING it. You know?
Is Sony being exposed? I mean someone released Opis None as an example of REAL MJ vocals, KJ or not KJ. Someone KNEW the Sony stuff was bogus and someone has the real deal and someone leaked it, all 9+ minutes of it, for free, on V for Vendetta day... So if that's mjsecretvault then this needs to be looked into more closely.
He took what we expected and turned us on our heads. Nice one MJ.
-
MIGHT BE HIM BUT I THINK THE TRACK HAS BEEN MANIPULATED THAT I DO THINK. SOME WAY IT'S BEEN MESSED WITH
-
So far, 64% say yes it is Michael. I voted no.
The voting is fake as well!
TMZ owns it, they will do anything to prove the Jacksons wrong!
I mean don't you think all hoax believers will go voting and most of the believers would say no!
hmmm, so can we crash it? i think we've done it before :)
-
Has twitter crashed over this????
-
now it's 46% say no, it's not Michael. only 54% yes. margin is closing.
-
So far, 64% say yes it is Michael. I voted no.
The voting is fake as well!
TMZ owns it, they will do anything to prove the Jacksons wrong!
I mean don't you think all hoax believers will go voting and most of the believers would say no!
hmmm, so can we crash it? i think we've done it before :)
About 900 voted less than five minutes, so go for it.LOL
-
I'm still trying to get all the words right.
You can vote more than once.
Looks like Sony's got some explaining to do. :lol: :lol: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :lol:
-
OMG! :evil: I totally want the last few hours back that I waited around for this song. NO WAY ITS MJ!!! NO WAY...NO HOW. I'm with the family on this one. I voted NO!
-
YOU HEAR THE ANGER IF IT WERE THE REAL MJ SINGING HE'D BE SINGING THE SONG LIKE IN PRIVACY. WE KNOW THERE ARE EFFECTS IN THAT SONG BUT YET U CAN TELL HE IS SINGING THAT SONG WITH ANGER LIKE MAN I NEED MY PRIVACY.
Good point, there is no emotion in MJs voice, the part that is him, as if he is singing to a completely different set of lyrics. There might be parts of MJs voice in this song but MJ didn't SING it. You know?
Is Sony being exposed? I mean someone released Opis None as an example of REAL MJ vocals, KJ or not KJ. Someone KNEW the Sony stuff was bogus and someone has the real deal and someone leaked it, all 9+ minutes of it, for free, on V for Vendetta day... So if that's mjsecretvault then this needs to be looked into more closely.
Yes, let's say you are singing about ppl saying crap about you, you're gonna be yeah breaking news in like man I just want to kill you, he sound so calm it's like breaking news and what? Doesn't make me want to get worked up like I get all into Privacy to the point I feel like yeah Mike needs his privacy yes leave him alone. This track didn't make me feel that it was like calm. Michael he gets crazy we know that. He is exposing stuff this is no coincidence showing us that things are manipulated against his will he is being oppressed as an artist. His music, artwork on album is messed with regardless of what he wants this is wow.
He took what we expected and turned us on our heads. Nice one MJ.
-
YOU HEAR THE ANGER IF IT WERE THE REAL MJ SINGING HE'D BE SINGING THE SONG LIKE IN PRIVACY. WE KNOW THERE ARE EFFECTS IN THAT SONG BUT YET U CAN TELL HE IS SINGING THAT SONG WITH ANGER LIKE MAN I NEED MY PRIVACY.
Good point, there is no emotion in MJs voice, the part that is him, as if he is singing to a completely different set of lyrics. There might be parts of MJs voice in this song but MJ didn't SING it. You know?
Is Sony being exposed? I mean someone released Opis None as an example of REAL MJ vocals, KJ or not KJ. Someone KNEW the Sony stuff was bogus and someone has the real deal and someone leaked it, all 9+ minutes of it, for free, on V for Vendetta day... So if that's mjsecretvault then this needs to be looked into more closely.
Yes, let's say you are singing about ppl saying crap about you, you're gonna be yeah breaking news in like man I just want to kill you, he sound so calm it's like breaking news and what? Doesn't make me want to get worked up like I get all into Privacy to the point I feel like yeah Mike needs his privacy yes leave him alone. This track didn't make me feel that it was like calm. Michael he gets crazy we know that. He is exposing stuff this is no coincidence showing us that things are manipulated against his will he is being oppressed as an artist. His music, artwork on album is messed with regardless of what he wants this is wow.
He took what we expected and turned us on our heads. Nice one MJ.
GOOD JOB GUYS!
THIS IS VERY TRUE, HE TENDS TO SING SONGS TOWARDS THE MEDIA WITH MUCH ANGER AND PASSION!
-
OMG! :evil: I totally want the last few hours back that I waited around for this song. NO WAY ITS MJ!!! NO WAY...NO HOW. I'm with the family on this one. I voted NO!
Well, I do believe Michael WROTE the song. It's a great song even if he's not singing it.
Anybody catching all of the words?
-
OMG! :evil: I totally want the last few hours back that I waited around for this song. NO WAY ITS MJ!!! NO WAY...NO HOW. I'm with the family on this one. I voted NO!
Well, I do believe Michael WROTE the song. It's a great song even if he's not singing it.
Anybody catching all of the words?[/quote][/quote]
I DONT THINK THE LYRICS WERE WRITTEN BY MICHAEL, BECAUSE MICHAEL IS NOT CONCEITED TO MENTION HIS NAME THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE SONG, AND ALSO HIS WORDS TEND TO BE STRONGER VERY STRONGER, AND DO NOT REPEAT THEMSELVES AS MUCH AS THIS NEW SONG DID!
-
YOU HEAR THE ANGER IF IT WERE THE REAL MJ SINGING HE'D BE SINGING THE SONG LIKE IN PRIVACY. WE KNOW THERE ARE EFFECTS IN THAT SONG BUT YET U CAN TELL HE IS SINGING THAT SONG WITH ANGER LIKE MAN I NEED MY PRIVACY.
Good point, there is no emotion in MJs voice, the part that is him, as if he is singing to a completely different set of lyrics. There might be parts of MJs voice in this song but MJ didn't SING it. You know?
Is Sony being exposed? I mean someone released Opis None as an example of REAL MJ vocals, KJ or not KJ. Someone KNEW the Sony stuff was bogus and someone has the real deal and someone leaked it, all 9+ minutes of it, for free, on V for Vendetta day... So if that's mjsecretvault then this needs to be looked into more closely.
Yes, let's say you are singing about ppl saying crap about you, you're gonna be yeah breaking news in like man I just want to kill you, he sound so calm it's like breaking news and what? Doesn't make me want to get worked up like I get all into Privacy to the point I feel like yeah Mike needs his privacy yes leave him alone. This track didn't make me feel that it was like calm. Michael he gets crazy we know that. He is exposing stuff this is no coincidence showing us that things are manipulated against his will he is being oppressed as an artist. His music, artwork on album is messed with regardless of what he wants this is wow.
He took what we expected and turned us on our heads. Nice one MJ.
GOOD JOB GUYS!
THIS IS VERY TRUE, HE TENDS TO SING SONGS TOWARDS THE MEDIA WITH MUCH ANGER AND PASSION!
YEY SEE NOTHING GOES PAST US MIKE WE KNOW WE'RE AWARE YOU HAVE HELP US ENHANCE OUR OBSERVATIONAL POWERS. :) I VOTED NO THIS POLL STILL WINNING WITH YES LET'S MAKE IT GO NO COME ON!!!
-
There's no way MJ would sing his own name in a song. Or write a song with his own name in it.
This is nuts. This has got to be exposing Sony. How could it not be.
-
@Bec yes another point there man we're good the man isn't like that saying his name so many times on a song. Dissecting this track really no matter what observations share them we were given this to unravel.
-
OMG! :evil: I totally want the last few hours back that I waited around for this song. NO WAY ITS MJ!!! NO WAY...NO HOW. I'm with the family on this one. I voted NO!
Well, I do believe Michael WROTE the song. It's a great song even if he's not singing it.
Anybody catching all of the words?
[/quote]
I DONT THINK THE LYRICS WERE WRITTEN BY MICHAEL, BECAUSE MICHAEL IS NOT CONCEITED TO MENTION HIS NAME THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE SONG, AND ALSO HIS WORDS TEND TO BE STRONGER VERY STRONGER, AND DO NOT REPEAT THEMSELVES AS MUCH AS THIS NEW SONG DID![/quote]
The words are: "They want to see that I fall, cause I'm Michael Jackson. You write the words to destroy like it's a weapon."
I'd still like to analyze all the lyrics though. There's a line about writing his obituary. I need to hear that more clearly.
-
There's no way MJ would sing his own name in a song. Or write a song with his own name in it.
This is nuts. This has got to be exposing Sony. How could it not be.
even though i dont think its mike, he does have a song called Dear Michael where he says his own name...
-
He says "Michael Jackson" in a song lyric?
-
He says "Michael Jackson" in a song lyric?
no, just dear michael, itz an old song, here is a link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kk3N4RFuV4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kk3N4RFuV4)
-
Ok so that's my point. Does anyone find it incredibly ironic that Sony is trying to perpetuate fraud on the fans yet they have gone off half cocked in a rampage to shut down the website that gave us REAL MJ music?
-
Ok so that's my point. Does anyone find it incredibly ironic that Sony is trying to perpetuate fraud on the fans yet they have gone off half cocked in a rampage to shut down the website that gave us REAL MJ music?
i wonder can the estate sue?
-
It could be a collab - the chorus sounds like him.
It could be a demo and so emotionless.
It could be that he thinks of Michael Jackson as a product that he is now retiring and hence able to speak of it in the third person.
Why do I hear about "thinking about a bogeyman" over and over again in the chorus?
One thing that is missing is Michael mixing his words when singing, shamone, etc were his singing quirks.
-
JASON MALACHI
[youtube:4pteazf9]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-uOMgVyXOU[/youtube:4pteazf9]
Listen and compare
-
@Bec....
Omg I have to go find my head it just fell off.[/quote]
I just read and laughed...threw my nose, to which has a new piercing thank u very much....that really hurt...but very much needed....u r right, no way in shit is that MJ...sounds more like that Jason Malic guy
-
Also most importantly.
IF YOU BELIEVE TS YOU MUST BELIEVE HARVEY, that it is the real deal.
-
well, shit.
here's my problem.
i listened to it, and like a lot of you, i thought that doesn't sound like michael at all. however, a little thought popped into my head....what if it was? i mean, just because michael sang a lot of the time in the higher register, that's what we're used to. what if the voice is actually him, just singing a lot lower? i don't know.
-
@Bec....
Omg I have to go find my head it just fell off.
I just read and laughed...threw my nose, to which has a new piercing thank u very much....that really hurt...but very much needed....u r right, no way in shit is that MJ...sounds more like that Jason Malic guy[/quote]
lol happy to oblige,
no way in shit. That's right. No way in shit.
-
Also most importantly.
IF YOU BELIEVE TS YOU MUST BELIEVE HARVEY, that it is the real deal.
I don't believe Harvey. But I believe there is more to the story.
-
well, shit.
here's my problem.
i listened to it, and like a lot of you, i thought that doesn't sound like michael at all. however, a little thought popped into my head....what if it was? i mean, just because michael sang a lot of the time in the higher register, that's what we're used to. what if the voice is actually him, just singing a lot lower? i don't know.
IMO based on my musical training and listening to MJ's voice for the last 40 years now -- and since 6/25/09 almost daily -- Michael did sing a lot of the time in a higher register but he also sang in a lower one. This wouldn't be the first time we heard a deeper tone from him. A few comments ago, I posted the youtube video of Jason to compare. Jason doesn't have the inflections and tone that Michael does. He really doesn't have the range. If you listen to Will You Be There or Keep The Faith, you hear Michael in a lower register but he has more colors and richness to his tone. And definitely more spirit and passion. Listen to Jason, he sings in a flat, soul-less way and he doesn't have that gutteral kind of rageful emphasis that MJ can carry in a song like this. Jason has a nice voice but it's flat, lacking affect. That's never been Michael. Never Flat. I think Michael's vocals may "appear" on this record, just not too often.
-
YOU DON'T BELIEVE UNCLE HARVEY COME ON HE'S ABOUT TO BECOME MIKE'S EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH HIS PIC WILL BE FRAMED ON TMZ' STUDIO WALL :) OK, WELL YOU KNOW IT IS DIFFICULT WHAT IF IT'S A MIX OF MICHAEL AND A BIT OF JASON MALACHI. IT'S POSSIBLE FOR SURE IT'S BEEN MANIPULATED WHATEVER THAT IS NOT MJ BY HIMSELF NO WAY. I JUST WENT TO MY ROOM PLAYED PRIVACY, THREATENED, UNBREAKABLE AND YES I CAN TELL A DIFFERENCE.
-
Once again, people are playing with our minds....again. Is it or isn't it??
This is the song that sounds alot like MJ.....Remember that Malachi means messenger.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSKIjcuo ... re=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSKIjcuownw&feature=related)
[youtube:3sug02qm]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSKIjcuownw&feature=related[/youtube:3sug02qm]
-
Announcing the world premiere of "Breaking News," a new song from Michael Jackson's MICHAEL.
Okay so this song is on Michael, but it may NOT be the album version. Maybe that has more pop to it, which is why they say wait it out for a few days.
This could be a remixed demo version. And if the kids heard him singing they may have the original vocals.
Lets take the message from the song meanwhile.
-
well, shit.
here's my problem.
i listened to it, and like a lot of you, i thought that doesn't sound like michael at all. however, a little thought popped into my head....what if it was? i mean, just because michael sang a lot of the time in the higher register, that's what we're used to. what if the voice is actually him, just singing a lot lower? i don't know.
IMO based on my musical training and listening to MJ's voice for the last 40 years now -- and since 6/25/09 almost daily -- Michael did sing a lot of the time in a higher register but he also sang in a lower one. This wouldn't be the first time we heard a deeper tone from him. A few comments ago, I posted the youtube video of Jason to compare. Jason doesn't have the inflections and tone that Michael does. He really doesn't have the range. If you listen to Will You Be There or Keep The Faith, you hear Michael in a lower register but he has more colors and richness to his tone. And definitely more spirit and passion. Listen to Jason, he sings in a flat, soul-less way and he doesn't have that gutteral kind of rageful emphasis that MJ can carry in a song like this. Jason has a nice voice but it's flat, lacking affect. That's never been Michael. Never Flat. I think Michael's vocals may "appear" on this record, just not too often.
Good point. Just think about 2000 Watts. I really had to get my ears used to this 'new' tone :lol: :lol: when I heard it the first time. But still, what would be Michaels' motiv to make controversy wether it's him or not? It would go with the hoax - but in what sense? :oops: :?: I voted NO. I kept missing the angry part that he usually puts on in such songs during the last third of such songs.
-
Maybe this deeper voice, was a hint ???????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiDNMhET ... re=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiDNMhETTeU&feature=related)
[youtube:94n22lwo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiDNMhETTeU&feature=related[/youtube:94n22lwo]
-
"Happiness isn't always material things,"
like an album you have to pay for that probably isn't even real.
"This world is full of much confusion,"
like a free song that's like a Liberian Girl/Destiny remix released under great controversy on a shady spin off MJ site on V for Vendetta day.
-
wait a minute.... how on earth did Harvey listen to the song if it was released after he wrote the article?
-
wait a minute.... how on earth did Harvey listen to the song if it was released after he wrote the article?
Did you check the time frame? Are you sure he didnt listen to it on michaeljackson.com and THEN they posted the link on their site?
-
wait a minute.... how on earth did Harvey listen to the song if it was released after he wrote the article?
Did you check the time frame? Are you sure he didnt listen to it on michaeljackson.com and THEN they posted the link on their site?
I'm sure that's the case because I was waiting on the computer refreshing the pages. Harvey posted that before it was up on MichaelJackson.com
But I thought somehow Harvey heard it through someone before it was released and that he'd said that..
I'm tired though, who knows
-
That's what I noticed. I didn't check Michael's site in that particular moment but no one said anything about listening to the song yet, we were here talking and we are put in front of a TMZ article, saying Harvey listened to it. It gives me the impression he posted the article before it was posted on Michael's site. I try to find a way to see when exactly was the song released on michaeljackson.com but don't know how
-
wait a minute.... how on earth did Harvey listen to the song if it was released after he wrote the article?
Did you check the time frame? Are you sure he didnt listen to it on michaeljackson.com and THEN they posted the link on their site?
No, actually Harvey said that he listened to the song and that probably it will be available in full version for all the world this night. So yes, he listened to it beforehand.
-
That's what I noticed. I didn't check Michael's site in that particular moment but no one said anything about listening to the song yet, we were here talking and we are put in front of a TMZ article, saying Harvey listened to it. It gives me the impression he posted the article before it was posted on Michael's site. I try to find a way to see when exactly was the song released on michaeljackson.com but don't know how
In that case...that's an extremely interesting piece of info! This is worth looking into...
-
Michael is a genius.. I think its him, but he changed his voice a little bit to confuse us for some reason. we are supposed to talk en discuss about this song!
-
You've treated me shabbily and you've hope for my demise, but I'm back!
I absolutely LOVE that part!
Plus, Harvey in person posted it...
Thats great if Mj is really back!
But the song, to me, sounds more like Jason MAlachi with MJ on backup-vocals.... than MJ all the way.... :(
-
So, I calculated and it seems that Michael's staff posted the song on november 7th at 1:00 am (twitter announcement, NY time) and Harvey's article was posted on november 7th at 3:07 pm (L.A time).
L.A is GMT- 8
NY is GMT -5
In NY it was around 1:00 am while in L.A was also around 1:00 am ( because 3:07 pm L.A time means 5.07 am GMT time. NY is GMT -5 ==> so 5:07 - 5 hours would be around 1:07 am too)
God, I don't know if I did it right. My head spinns around. So it means that Harvey was on michaeljackson.com waiting and keep refreshing the page until he saw it first hand and then went and posted the article?
Also Harvey said "Someone has played me the song "Breaking News."
He didn't say "I just listened the song on michaeljackson.com." So this really means that "someone" has played him the song before it was officially released. So Harvey has a special treatment again? harvey again knows things beforehand? We know it's not the first time
-
I just want to say this is huge. But you already know it :lol:
Love you Michael
-
I just managed to listen to it for the first time ( been at work :( ) but i think it does sound like Michael..... :?
But i agree, that maybe it's more about understanding the lyrics rather than the sound.
What happened with the Oprah interviews today?
-
To me sounds like Michael.
The family say that is not him because "it does not sound lie him". Well, what if Michael has lost some of his voice qualities? He is not infalible. Many singers after many years of singing sound a bit different. The throath and the vocal chords also are subordinated to the process of aging.
-
Well well well....
I take a nap and look what happens.
Just going to point out a few things here in regards to what's already been said..
Remember who owns TMZ.Firstly.Kingdom Entertainment.Who partly owns KE?MJ.
Also remember how 'reliable' TMZ have been in the past.One article one day,total 360 flip on the story the next day.
The time thing doesn't make sense.It will never be 1am in the east AND west.So whoever is on to that one.....good going
This is clearly about bringing SONY down to it's knees
They are messing about with the greatest performer of the millenium.
After the amount of scandal and suspicion surrounding Breaking News,Opis none,the album delay,the is it him isn't it him and split of opinion through the MJ fans can only be hurting them.Who is going to buy an album which doesn't even sound like Michael but which they have totally taken the piss with by calling it...MICHAEL.
I mean the painting on the front doesn't even look like him IMO.
and for the record,not a fan of opis none.Sounds backmastered and would never be a MJ hit.In a million years.That put with this Breaking news is not giving out a very good impression of how the album is going to sound.
Anyone regretting that pre order yet?
To me sounds like Michael.
The family say that is not him because "it does not sound lie him". Well, what if Michael has lost some of his voice qualities? He is not infalible. Many singers after many years of singing sound a bit different. The throath and the vocal chords also are subordinated to the process of aging.
I Agree he is not infalible,he is human and has the same effects of age as any other person-the ones you can't pay to have altered I mean-voice etc.
This was recorded supposedly in 2007 and it doesn't sound like him so how on earth does anyone still believe that in any part of the TII movie MJ was performing... that came AFTER this.His voice didn't just change and then go back.
Check the vocals against TII.
As for the JM comparison that is supposed to be MJ releasing tracks under some 20yr olds image right?I think that is the general concensus.I think it was a MJ project to see if he could get away with it.It isn't Jason singing, think about it...if he really was signing and it wasn't MJ...why isn't he signed?ANYONE who sounds like MJ would have $$$ poured into their career.2albums on '7 and critical' and still no big deal?
Pretty sure he has never done a live show-or he has and someone caught the footage of it being badly mimed,never toured,never really tried to do anything with his 'talent'...maybe because it isn't his?
I actually have more friends on myspace than Jason M LOL.
So they have either altered MJ's vox the way they did for 'Jason's' tracks and or someone at Sony gave one of those Vegas impersonators a call and said
"Listen,we have a job for you,with what we'll pay you,you can buy the entire history tour costume collection,you in?"
Ok maybe not but I can hear it in my head and it sounds about right for a record label doing shifty deals.
IF YOU BELIEVE TS YOU MUST BELIEVE HARVEY, that it is the real deal.
Why?...
As for the 02 thing,not to get into it...but that wasn't Michael so his voice has no relevance to this at all.It's an actor with a St Tropez tan...and quite a bad one.
What a mess.
-
Sinderella I love your ability to be straight-to-the-point and yet funny at the same time. ;) The Jason Malachi project has been discussed a lot for sure and maybe the intention was to have us thinking it was him so we'd all go research him even further and try and determine if he even exists or is just a persona MJ created. I remember the live footage of him was said to sound nothing like he does in the actual video for Mammacita etc. I don't know whether a record company would have picked him up just because he sounds very like MJ, there are a lot of people who would be against a "clone" of another artist, especially the legend that is Michael. He could have got work as a tribute artist if he so wished though! :D Now a lot of fans are talking about him it'll be interesting to see if he comes out with a statement denying any involvement. I agree with whoever said he sounds more "flat" than MJ and doesn't have the same range but that could just be Michael trying not to make it too obvious that it's actually him. Anything's possible.
-
I am thinking about this since I've listened to it. I really try to see all possibilities and not let myself influenced by what the family said.
If we take for a fact what the family said (not Michael's voice) I do not understand and it's absolutelly illogical - why they don't go and sue SONY for providing a false song? Why all they do is to badmouth on twitter and when it come sto really do something they absolutelly don't move a finger? If indeed, in their opinion, SONY promoted an imposter, why not to sue it? They would gain billions from this and also SONY's name will be really dragged through dirt. A HUGE as SONY...
If SONY promotes a fake voice, do you really think they are so highly idiots as to risk their entire company for some songs released which are actually false? Do you think they would gain from this album,with a fake voice, more than from continuing being a huge as they are? If they are sued with this and they are found to be doing such thing they will loose volumes in the music industry. Do you think they would be so stupid in doing this, just thinking that maybe the Jacksons wouldn't sue them? I personally really think they wouldn't risk such thing, it would be absolutelly ignorant and stupid.
I also have to say that on this song I do hear Michael's voice, in a lower register on some parts, also analyzing it I notice that it has many effects on it, that the backing vocals are a bit too loud over his voice and on some parts you can't her clearily his voice, almost giving you the impression it's another voice. I know he sounds different, I know him since I was 5 and nothing can buy me (as the double theory from TII for example, or any other aberation regarding his voice/body) but I almost have the impression it's all done on purpose to confuse us.
Also, I'd like to point out another thing: The song was released by http://www.michaeljackson.com (http://www.michaeljackson.com) and the family declared they say it's not his voice on the song way before it was up on the site. Does this mean that mj.com gave the Jacksons the song before it was released?(and if so, why? wouldn't they actually have it as well?) Or this is another inconsistence, meaning the song really was known by the jacksons and also a song sang by Michael, bearing a lot of voice effects on purpose and they declared it's not his voice just to see how many people would actually buy this news again. To see how big the media influence STILL IS to the masses? To see what point we reached in all this? To see how much we learned and how much we believe media at this point and to see how much Michael has to still work with us, to show us TABLOIDS, MEDIA, NEWSAPERS are nothing but pure lies delivers.?
-
OK I finally listened to it and in my opinion it is not Michael singing, except for small parts that sound like him (kind of....).
Yet I'm thinking if this is not another mask..... because I know Michael can change his voice the way he wants :D